“From 2012 to 2023, I worked in Naval Intelligence, focusing on advanced underwater detection systems as part of an unidentified submerged phenomena program.
I'd like to start by saying that the ‘drones’ we've been seeing aren't US experiments, Chinese tech or extraterrestrial.”
Another 4chan UFO larp, this one seems pretty interesting ngl
On Jake Barber
On the Cybertruck bomber and the manifesto released on the Shawn Ryan Show
Who he was: A 27‑year‑old voter‑expansion data director for the Democratic National Committee (DNC), working in Washington, D.C.
Known for: His role at the DNC, and post‑humously, the conspiracy theories surrounding his death and a supposed connection to WikiLeaks.
Cause of death: He was shot (twice in the back) in July 2016 in the Bloomingdale neighborhood of Washington, D.C. Police concluded it was likely an attempted robbery; perpetrators were never apprehended.
2. Amy Eskridge
Who she was: A brilliant materials scientist and entrepreneur; co‑founder, Chairwoman, and President of the Institute of Exotic Science in Huntsville, Alabama.
Known for: Her work in advanced technology and futurism, particularly exotic science and potentially anti‑gravity or highly speculative research.
Cause of death: She passed away on June 11, 2022, at age 34. Public records and obituaries describe it as her going "to her eternal rest in the Lord." There are rumors and discussions around potential foul play or controversy, but no official evidence suggests otherwise.
Paying Homeless Fugitives to spread narratives online
UFO Shane was a homeless fugitive when he was found by someone affiliated with a paranormal ranch in Utah and paid 800 a month to promote the ranch online.
How did they find a homeless fugitive? Was this the only homeless fugitive to have this deal?
UFO Shane has since served his time and paid his debt to society but still how did this arrangement happen?
Ask WHY Lue Elizondo would visit Jeremy Corbell's personal home multiple times over many many weekends, in order to "train" Jeremy. Train him for what, exactly? If this is going to be refuted by Jeremy then I will leak images of when Jeremy secretly took pictures of Lue being at his house for days on end. This is very concerning.
More importantly however, ask WHY Jay Stratton prevented multiple engineers from getting their own laboratories. Did Jay not want various engineers who focused on rotating capacitors to succeed in tapping zero point energy? Who was Jay working for? And If Jay denies this then I will continue to post things that these spooks do not realize that I have.
There are so many liars in this field it isn't even funny.
Hello everyone. I am sorry for not sticking around last time. I got too nervous. However, since someone other than me leaked the full 141 page BAASS Tic-Tac Report, I am back to attempt to convey a message to the community. The 141 page Tic Tac Report that just recently leaked IS real, but I did not leak it. I firmly believe the reason for this leak is to attempt to DISTRACT and divert attention way from the actual point of what I was trying to convey in my post a few weeks ago.
There are so many liars in this field it isn't even funny.
Other than that, please see the attached screenshots in which various individuals within BAASS were focused on
"voice to skull" technology, amongst various other things.
What was the purpose of focusing on voice to skull technology when the focus was allegedly on UAP crash retrievals? I will let you all think on that.
Reasoning: Grusch, a former U.S. Air Force officer and intelligence official, has made bold claims about a secret U.S. government program involving UAP crash retrievals and "non-human biologics." His testimony before Congress in July 2023 was under oath, which adds a layer of legal accountability. He leverages his high-level positions at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), as well as his role with the UAP Task Force, to bolster credibility. His claims are secondhand—he says he was briefed by credible sources—but he’s been consistent and avoids sensationalism. Corroboration from figures like Lue Elizondo (who called him a "hero") and some lawmakers’ interest lend weight, but the lack of public hard evidence caps his reliability. Past personal struggles (e.g., a 2018 psychiatric detention) raise questions, though he attributes them to PTSD, which doesn’t necessarily discredit his claims.
Strengths: Professional background, congressional testimony, consistency.
Weaknesses: No firsthand evidence, reliance on hearsay, personal history scrutiny.
2. Lue Elizondo - 70%
Reasoning: Elizondo, former head of the Pentagon’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), has a solid intelligence background and was key in releasing UAP videos in 2017. His claims focus on government secrecy and UAP encounters causing physical harm (e.g., "directed-energy exposure"), detailed in his book Imminent. He’s consistent and ties his narrative to verifiable events (e.g., Pentagon videos), but his lack of physical evidence and occasional vague statements (e.g., about remote viewing) lower his score slightly. Allegations of a Pentagon disinformation campaign against him suggest pushback, which could imply he’s onto something—or that he’s a target for other reasons. His reliability is strong but tempered by unproven assertions.
Strengths: Direct Pentagon experience, released videos, detailed accounts.
Weaknesses: No hard evidence, some esoteric claims, counterintelligence ties.