How Putin made Russia Great Again or why Russians love him so much
(very long 🧵)
After the collapse of the USSR, Russia became a colony of the West and lost its sovereignty. During the 1990s and under Yeltsin’s government, the country nearly fell apart. The military and industries across all sectors were destroyed, school textbooks were rewritten, and resources were sold off to Western corporations. It’s a serious question whether Russia would even exist today if things had continued that way. However, with Putin’s arrival, everything changed - he brought Russia back to itself.
Bio
Few in the West know about Putin’s mentor, Anatoly Sobchak, who introduced him to politics. Sobchak was a strong supporter of liberal-democratic ideas and one of the founders of the “Democratic Russia” party.
In the early 1990s, Vladimir Putin worked as an assistant to the rector of Leningrad State University for international affairs.
This position served as a cover, as he was an active KGB agent. When Sobchak noticed him at the University and invited him to join his team, Putin had to admit his work in intelligence. Realizing that combining KGB work with political activity was impossible, he resigned from the KGB.
In June 1991, Sobchak became the mayor of St. Petersburg. During the tense political environment of the time, from 1993 onward, Sobchak often entrusted Putin to act as mayor during his foreign trips, showing great trust in his professionalism. However, starting in 1995, a campaign to discredit Sobchak began, organized by his political opponents in Moscow who viewed him as a potential rival for the presidency. Using accusations of misconduct, law enforcement agencies like the Prosecutor’s Office, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and the FSB effectively ended his political career. His worsening health worked to his enemies’ advantage, reducing his ability to defend himself. At one point, they even tried to block him from traveling abroad for medical treatment.
At this critical moment, Putin showed complete loyalty to his mentor, Sobchak. He knew that helping Sobchak leave the country involved serious risks to his own career. First, he was going against powerful state agencies that were actively pursuing Sobchak. If the plan failed, Putin could have been accused of aiding or hiding him. Second, Sobchak was a political outsider at the time, and supporting him could have been seen as a strategic mistake, alienating influential allies in Moscow. Third, successfully getting Sobchak out of the country under the strict control of the FSB, prosecutors, and the Ministry of Internal Affairs required extreme caution. It could have been seen as breaking the law, threatening not just Putin’s career but also his personal freedom.
Despite these risks, Putin, using skills from his intelligence background, arranged for Sobchak to leave for France, where he underwent life-saving surgery. This act was a remarkable display of loyalty and courage. After the operation, Putin reported the outcome to Yeltsin, who, after a pause, approved his actions, saying, “You did the right thing.” This moment highlighted not only Putin’s loyalty to Sobchak but also his willingness to take risks for his principles and a sense of justice, which later became a defining feature of his political career.
The Turning Point: Russia’s New Year of Change
Since Christmas is a religious holiday in Russia, New Year’s Eve is celebrated similarly to how Christmas is in the West. A New Year’s tree is set up, and children receive gifts from Ded Moroz, the Russian Santa Claus, on the night of December 31st to January 1st. The celebration begins with a televised speech by the president, followed by the countdown to the chimes of the Kremlin clock, Russia’s main timepiece.
Back then, everyone anticipated Boris Yeltsin’s New Year address. By the 2000s, however, Yeltsin could barely speak. He was widely seen as a hopeless alcoholic, mocked by the Russian people and even by foreign leaders like Bill Clinton. Russians felt ashamed of their president, who had become a national embarrassment.
But instead of Yeltsin’s familiar face on TV, a young man appeared. Calm, polite, and well-spoken, he explained that Yeltsin had stepped down due to health reasons, and until the elections in the spring, he would take on presidential duties. He wished everyone a Happy New Year, and for the first time in a while, there was a sense of hope in the air.
When the elections came, people voted for this young man, Vladimir Putin, and he became president. Almost immediately, he introduced significant changes, particularly regarding the oligarchs who had gained immense political influence in the 1990s during the privatization of state enterprises under Yeltsin.
After the collapse of the USSR, several waves of privatization swept through Russia, leaving the nation’s wealth in the hands of a few. While ordinary Russians suffered from a sharp decline in living standards, barely scraping by, the business clans born in the chaos of perestroika solidified their control over the most valuable assets of what was once a great country.
The End of the Oligarch Era: Putin’s Economic Revolution
Putin made it clear that the era of oligarchs dictating terms to the state was over. He demanded they pay taxes and end tax evasion practices, including the widespread use of offshore schemes popular in the 1990s. One symbolic example of this crackdown was the case of Mikhail Khodorkovsky and his oil company, Yukos, which became a landmark in the fight against tax evasion. Following this, many companies began significantly increasing their tax contributions to the state budget.
Putin also expected major businesses to invest in infrastructure, social services, and regional development. For instance, after Putin took office, Roman Abramovich invested heavily in developing the Chukotka region, where he served as governor. Other businessmen were also required to fund the construction of schools, hospitals, roads, and other public facilities.
Oligarchs were instructed not only to avoid political involvement but to publicly support Kremlin policies, including major state initiatives and foreign policy. Funding opposition movements was strictly forbidden, and compliance was seen as essential for maintaining their businesses.
The state also involved oligarchs in national priorities, such as the 2014 Sochi Olympics and the 2018 FIFA World Cup. Companies owned by oligarchs often became contractors for these large-scale projects, investing significant resources.
Putin demanded the return of assets and capital taken abroad in the 1990s. This included repatriating funds from offshore accounts and relocating companies under Russian jurisdiction. Under pressure from the Kremlin, some oligarchs moved their assets to Russian banks or registered them in Russia.
Strategic industries like oil, gas, and metallurgy were brought under state control or placed in the hands of Kremlin-loyal structures. Oligarchs managing major resources were required to align their activities with state interests.
Not all oligarchs agreed with these new rules. Mikhail Khodorkovsky, head of Yukos, refused to pay taxes on his company’s profits. Under Khodorkovsky, the Rothschilds gained influence over Russian oil. Putin not only jailed him but also nationalized Yukos, redirecting its revenues to the Russian budget instead of foreign hands. After serving his sentence, Khodorkovsky moved to Britain, where he launched campaigns to discredit Putin and funded Russian newspapers critical of the government. Many of these outlets were labeled foreign agents in 2022. Btw, Khodorkovsky was invited and he also attended Trump’s inauguration 2 days ago.
Boris Berezovsky, another prominent oligarch, made billions through ventures like “Logovaz” (car sales) and co-ownership of “Sibneft” with Abramovich. His activities caused significant harm to the Russian economy. Understanding the power of media, he owned newspapers and held shares in the ORT television channel. Berezovsky was suspected of involvement in the murders of journalist Paul Klebnikov, who wrote the book “Godfather of the Kremlin”, and TV host Vladislav Listyev. His commercial ties allegedly extended to organized crime groups and Chechen militants, with claims that he profited from the release of hostages held in Chechnya.
When Berezovsky refused to accept the new rules in Russia, he fled to London, where he called for a “violent overthrow of power” in Russia.
Other oligarchs, including Vladimir Gusinsky, Evgeny Chichvarkin, Sergey Pugachev, Alexander Lebedev, Roman Abramovich, Leonard Blavatnik, Leonid Nevzlin, Mikhail Fridman, Pyotr Aven, and Alexander Smolensky, faced similar outcomes.
In the end, Putin returned control of strategic industries—oil, gas, and metallurgy—to the state. Many assets held by oligarchs were nationalized or transferred to companies that prioritized Russia’s interests. These changes redirected investments into the country’s development rather than draining wealth into offshore accounts, strengthening the nation’s economy.
Now, let’s look at the achievements of Putin’s presidency in numbers.
🔷 GDP (Gross Domestic Product) increased by 930%.
🔷 The national external debt was reduced by 75.2%.
🔷 In 2024, Russia ranked first in Europe and fourth in the world for GDP (PPP). According to the IMF, Russia’s share of global GDP (PPP) reached 3.55%, surpassing Japan’s 3.38%.
🔷 Between 1999 and 2024, Russia’s gold reserves experienced significant growth by approx 580%, reaching 2332 tonnes.
🔷 International reserves increased over 5,000%, reaching $609 billion.
🔷 Federal budget revenue increased 45 times to 36.72 trillion rubles.
🔷 Major international events were held: the Sochi Olympics (2014) and the FIFA World Cup (2018).
🔷 Increased funding for culture, cinema, and scientific research.
Education and Science
🔷 National education projects contributed to the modernization of schools and universities.
🔷 Only from 2019 to 2023, 900 new schools were built. Overall number for the last 25 years is much higher. Additionally, every year more than 1,000 schools undergo major renovations. By the end of the five-year period, more than 7,300 educational institutions, including those in rural and small towns, will have been updated.
🔷 Russia remains a leader in space exploration, continuing missions with Soyuz spacecraft and developing new technologies.
Industry and Economy
🔷 Industrial production grew by 60%.
🔷 Manufacturing increased by 70% by 2019; in 2024, it grew an additional 7.2%.
🔷 Agricultural product exports grew 19 times to $25 billion.
🔷 Grain exports grew 40 times, reaching 50 million tons.
🔷 Over the past 17 years, Russia has opened 200 to 500 new factories, workshops, and enterprises annually.
Social Progress
🔷 Real wages increased 3.5 times. This reflects real growth for the entire population, accounting for inflation and other factors, not just for select groups.
🔷 The average monthly pension increased by 30 times.
🔷 Unemployment decreased by 65%, dropping to 4.6%.
🔷 Average life expectancy rose to 73 years (for men, from 59 to 68.5 years; for women, from 72 to 78.4 years).
🔷 Free Healthcare and Education
Family support
🔷 Financial support to families upon the birth or adoption of their second and subsequent children
🔷 Employed parents can take up to 3 years of parental leave
🔷Housing Support: Special programs provide discounts on mortgage interest rates for families with children
🔷 Families with children are entitled to tax deductions, including reduced income tax for working parents
🔷 Families raising children with disabilities receive additional financial assistance, including monthly care payments
Military and Security
🔷 Russia’s military is considered one of the strongest globally, ranked either first (U.S. News & World Report) or second (Global Firepower Index).
🔷 Crime rates, including murders, assaults, and robberies, decreased by 53% during Putin’s presidency. The homicide rate dropped by 74%.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What if Hitler’s war machine was financed not by Berlin but by Wall Street? I bet you've never heard of the Dawes Plan (1924) and the Young Plan (1929). Let's unpack why it's important and why you never heard about it in school 🧵👇
A consortium of American investment banks, backed by the U.S. State Department, orchestrated Germany’s postwar “recovery.” The Dawes Plan (1924) was about control: It plugged Germany directly into the Anglo-American financial system, turning its economy into a satellite of Wall Street and the City of London.
Here’s how it worked:
🔸 Control through debt
The reparations crisis after World War I made Germany dependent on foreign credit. The Dawes Plan, drafted by American banker Charles G. Dawes and approved by U.S. diplomats, handed effective control of the German economy to an international board dominated by Wall Street financiers.
Every mark Germany paid as “reparations” came from American loans, meaning the Allies were repaid with their own money, filtered through German debt.
At the heart of this web were the Warburgs, a transatlantic banking dynasty linking New York, Hamburg, and London.
Paul Warburg, co-founder of the U.S. Federal Reserve, had already laid the foundation for America’s central banking power. His brother Max Warburg, head of M.M. Warburg & Co. in Hamburg (Germany) and a director of the Reichsbank, advised both Dawes and Hjalmar Schacht (later Hitler’s finance chief).
Through this dual network (Wall Street on one side, the Reichsbank on the other) the Warburgs acted as a bridge for American capital into German industry. The Dawes and later Young Plan (1929) weren’t “aid packages” but mechanisms through which German economic sovereignty was absorbed into the Anglo-American banking orbit.
Do you know that Hitler’s early backers were the Americans?🧵
1/7
In November 1922, U.S. Army Captain Truman Smith, then Assistant Military Attaché in Berlin, traveled to Munich and became the first American officer to meet the rising agitator Adolf Hitler. Smith filed a glowing report to Washington, describing Hitler as a “marvelous demagogue” with immense sway over crowds. He was impressed by Hitler’s oratory and predicted that he could become a major political figure.
2/7
In November 1922, U.S. Army Captain Truman Smith, then Assistant Military Attaché in Berlin, traveled to Munich and became the first American officer to meet the rising agitator Adolf Hitler. Smith filed a glowing report to Washington, describing Hitler as a “marvelous demagogue” with immense sway over crowds. He was impressed by Hitler’s oratory and predicted that he could become a major political figure.
3/7
“Crimea belongs to the Crimean Tatars”?
That’s a favorite Western talking point, but the Tatars weren’t even native to Crimea. They were brought there by the Mongols after their conquest of the region in the 1200s, when Mongol and Turkic groups settled on the peninsula and later formed the Crimean Khanate. 🧵
#1
By that time, Crimea had already been Greek, Roman, Byzantine, and part of the Rus world for centuries. Long before the Tatars or the Ottoman Empire, from around the 7th century BC to the early Middle Ages, Crimea and the northern Black Sea steppe were home to ancient peoples connected to the early Slavs and the Sarmatians. Ancient writers mentioned the Taurians, Scythians, and Sarmatians, who lived both in Crimea and across the steppe north of it, and later, Slavic tribes moved south along the Dnieper and Don, reaching these same lands.
#2
When Sarmatians Met the Slavs
The Sarmatians were nomadic horsemen, and their way of life left a real mark on the cultures that came after them. You can see traces of their warrior symbols, horse rituals, and jewelry styles showing up in early Slavic artifacts from the same regions.
The Sarmatians were closely related to the Scythians, both steppe peoples with similar languages, customs, and a shared warrior culture. The Sarmatians gradually replaced the older Scythians on the Pontic steppe, but in the eyes of the Greeks and later the Byzantines, they were almost the same, fierce riders from the Black Sea plains.
This ancient image of the “Scythians” lived on for centuries. Even when the early Rus appeared in chronicles, the Greeks and Byzantines often called them “Scythians” or “Tavroscythians,” keeping the old classical name for the peoples coming from the lands of Rus and the Black Sea region.
Modern DNA studies confirm deep genetic continuity between the ancient steppe populations and the Eastern Slavs, showing that the people of this region shared common roots and gradually merged over time. By the 6th to 8th centuries, Sarmatian and Slavic elements were blending across the steppe.
So no, the Sarmatians did not disappear. Many of them became part of the world that shaped the Eastern Slavs, preserving their culture and their bloodlines.
The Berlin Airlift: When Even The Guardian Starts Confessing 🙊:
“We in the West used to play dirty and we were good at it.”
— The Guardian, November 2025
Think of the Berlin Airlift as a big-budget movie sold as a true story.
Now one of its loudest fans finally admits it was staged.
👇🧵
1/4
For decades, the Berlin Airlift has been told as a fairy tale. Stalin blockaded the city: cruel and heartless, while heroic Western pilots fed starving Berliners with flour and chocolate from the sky.
The perfect moral script: light against darkness, liberty against tyranny, good vs evil. Exactly the same moral wiring that still fuels the superhero industry today, cultural programming as moral training.
The same Guardian now admits what Soviet and Eastern historians said all along: there was no full blockade. In Britain’s own National Archives, the Foreign Office wrote in 1948:
“The blockade of Berlin is NOT a siege… movement in and out of Germany is possible all the time.”
2/4
Do you want to know what really happened? Washington and London imposed a new currency in their occupation zones, breaking prior agreements with Moscow.
The Soviets responded with limited restrictions on Western transport: not starvation, not tanks, just a border dispute over sovereignty. But the West needed a story and it created one.
A three-billion-dollar media performance named The Berlin Airlift complete with cameras, pathos, and heroic speeches about “freedom.”
A Story Buried Under Decades of Propaganda:
How The West Fed Hitler Countries Hoping He'd Go Eat Russia
Alright, let's break down one of the biggest lies they teach you in history class about the Munich Agreement of 1938: that the Western democracies were just these naive, peaceful guys who got tricked by Hitler when they gave him Czechoslovakia. Bullshit. They weren't dumb. They were playing a game. And they thought they were geniuses.
1 of 6
They didn't just "give in" to Hitler over Czechoslovakia in 1938. They gifted it to him at the Munich Conference. Why do you think they did it? The plan was pretty simple: This Hitler guy was hungry for war. The West wanted to point him East and let him go fight the Soviet Union, so both can destroy each other, while the West could stay cozy and safe, free from competition in the global power game.
2 of 6
So guys like Chamberlain from Britain and Daladier from France handed over a whole, powerful country without even letting the Czechs into the room. They literally gave Hitler Czechoslovakia's factories, its army, its weapons, which basically meant: "Here's the key, now go attack Stalin."
But there's the part that will blow your mind. Czechoslovakia had an awesome army. And its secret weapon was its tanks.
After the takeover, the German army basically got a free, top-tier tank factory. And they used the hell out of it.