John Sailer Profile picture
Jan 26 9 tweets 3 min read Read on X
NEW: Louis Galarowicz (@nasorg) and I have acquired a trove of records from University of Colorado, Boulder, that show how the entire university coordinated to advance a system of brazen race-based hiring.

The receipts are pretty astonishing... 🧵 Image
@NASorg We acquired the approved/successful proposals for the university's large-scale diversity hiring program. Here are a few examples:

The College of Engineering & Applied Sciences said its cluster hire had “the goal of doubling our underrepresented faculty in the college.” Image
@NASorg Another example:

The Renewable And Sustainable Energy Institute proposed a specific candidate—who it noted was “an outstanding BIPOC scholar” who would increase the program’s “domestic Faculty of Color...” Image
@NASorg Another example:

The Department of Journalism told the admin in its proposal that “Our commitment, should we be successful with this application, is to hire someone from the BIPOC community…” Image
@NASorg Another example:

“We have an urgent and qualified need for BIPOC femme/women of color faculty,” the Department of Ethnic Studies stated, adding that the scholar should contribute to a “thematic cluster hire in racism and racial inequality.” Image
@NASorg These are just a few examples, the list goes on and on.

The College of Media, Communications, and Information’s cluster hire, meanwhile, emphasized "hiring Black, Indigenous, Asian American, Latinx, and Pacific Islander faculty…”

But also note the disciplinary focus... Image
@NASorg As we argue in the @WSJopinion, racial preferences went hand-in-hand with ideological preferences.

Notice that this proposal to hire a German studies scholar touts how she's both a woman of color and has an expertise in “anti-racist pedagogy” and “decolonizing German Studies.” Image
@NASorg @WSJopinion One of the most remarkable troves of public records I've ever received, the implications here are far-reaching, both for the university and for federal policy.

Read our full analysis, with full context, in the Wall Street Journal. Image
@NASorg @WSJopinion Full link here. Please read and share:

wsj.com/opinion/how-de…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Sailer

John Sailer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnDSailer

Apr 18
As huge NIH funding cuts become a real possibility at places like Harvard, it's worth putting the agency's role in perspective.

Put simply, the NIH is biomedical science in the US. Private money will not be able to pick up its tab.

🧵🧵🧵
2/ This year the NIH requested a fiscal year budget of $50 billion, and in years past its been close to that amount.

The top ten medical schools by NIH funding all get more than half a billion dollars annually.

Let’s put that in perspective… Image
Image
3/ The top philanthropic funder of the medical sciences, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, happens to also be the second largest charity in the country behind the Gates Foundation.

It’s endowment is $27 billion, just a little more than half the NIH’s total budget. Image
Read 5 tweets
Apr 9
Princeton President Chris Eisgruber argues: Trump’s demands violate academic freedom, the admin is using science funding to influence policies that have nothing to do with science (e.g. admissions policies).

It's hard to take this completely seriously. Here's why: (🧵) Image
The federal government constantly uses its funding “clout” to elicit university policies. Most recently, this has come in the form of heavy handed diversity requirements, which of course involves admissions policies.

As far as I know, Eisgruber has never raised the issue. 2/
To give just one example: at the NIH, large scale training grants (T32s) have long required applicants to submit special plans on enhancing diversity, which have to meet a certain scoring threshold for the project to be funded. Image
Read 7 tweets
Apr 3
Trump is hurling earth-shaking threats at America’s universities. The response from elite opinion leaders has been fascinating, if you read between the lines.

The pattern is: denounce Trump’s actions, but also, in a way, vindicate them. The New York Times is a good example.

🧵
The NYT editorial board declares: now is the time for universities to defend themselves.

But also, universities have valued ideology over truth-seeking (i.e. their basic mission). They've silenced debate. They've ostracized political outsiders. Image
Image
David Leonhardt says: Trump is borrowing from the Modi/Putin/Erdogan playbook.

But also, universities (even community colleges!) have acted in a way that’s “inconsistent with their mission." Editor Patrick Healy adds a story about required campus orthodoxies. Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Apr 2
LaVelle Ridley, a professor at Ohio State, uses research to push an "anti-capitalist, prison abolitionist agenda."

Ridley’s career is worth examining. It illustrates how much cash goes toward scholar-activism—especially cash from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

🧵🧵🧵 Image
As an undergrad, Ridley was a Schomburg-Mellon Humanities Fellow, a diversity-focused research and mentoring program with a decent stipend.

Run through the New York Public Library. Funded by the Mellon Foundation. Image
As a PhD student, Ridley received the University of Michigan’s Rackham Merit Fellowship, a diversity-focused tuition and stipend program. Image
Image
Read 16 tweets
Apr 2
NEW: A scholar pushing a "prison abolitionist agenda." A "neuroqueercrip" student studying decolonization. A working group on "tribal critical race theory."

Each is funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation—a driving force behind the scholar-activist pipeline.

🧵🧵🧵 Image
Image
Image
Image
2/ Andrew Mellon made his mark on American politics a century ago as Treasury secretary.

In my latest, I describe how today his foundation injects identity politics into our universities and—most notably—bankrolls the career development of activist scholars. Image
3/ Throughout this series, I’ve shown how fellow-to-faculty hiring schemes are especially clever because they help administrators bypass normal hiring procedures.

As dozens of documents show, this is a favored tool of the Mellon Foundation. Image
Read 8 tweets
Apr 1
For a few years I’ve reported on how universities use DEI statements to screen faculty hires—a huge issue for academic freedom.

It’s safe to say: we won the debate. In two years, opinion has shifted dramatically. This month, the UC System nixed the practice.

🧵🧵🧵 Image
For me, covering the policy underscored what you can accomplish through solid reporting.

Again and again, when I managed to show what the policy looked like in practice—what happened behind the scenes—it moved the needle.

I'm putting some key examples in this 🧵of 🧵s. Image
Image
Image
Image
Texas Tech. Texas Tech’s biology department decided to require and heavily weigh diversity statements in all of its faculty hires.

I acquired its evaluations. Predictably, they penalized scientists for failing to repeat progressive shibboleths.

Image
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(