🧵After two world wars, liberal elites believed that “inherited culture” led to closed societies and conflicts between nations.
Their solution?
Creating open societies under “liberal democracy” by doing away with the old virtues that came with God, King, and Country. 1/8
Philosopher Karl Popper and monumental two-volume work, "The Open Society and Its Enemies," contended that humanity's proclivity for dwelling within tribal or "closed" societies contributed to both World Wars. 2/8
Popper believed that "the principle of the national state, that is to say, the political demand that the territory of every state should coincide with the territory inhabited by one nation," is a myth.
Nationalism was the enemy of his "open society." 3/8
Friedrich Hayek sought to combat the return of nationalism not through the critique of Western philosophy but through "free market" economics.
This free market philosophy was rooted in the belief that the unrestricted movement of people and goods was required for economic prosperity. 4/8
Although Hayek expressed concerns about unrestricted immigration, believing it would lead to a rise in nationalism, he stated that the "ultimate ideal is to a state of affairs in which national boundaries have ceased to be obstacles to the free movement of men." 5/8
Numerous academic elites, as well as “philanthropists” like George Soros, aligned with the ideology of an “open society,” believing that the West's destiny hinged on embracing "openness" in both cultural and economic realms.
This laid the groundwork for the West's destruction. 6/8
The rejection of nationalism and established Western norms and values through mass immigration has not produced the harmonious society envisaged by its liberal proponents.
In fact, it has had the opposite effect, as we see in the unrest burning throughout the West today. 7/8
If you learned something from this thread, consider sharing, following, and subscribing to my newsletter! 8/8 conquesttheory.com
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Food, music, art, clothing, literature, etc., are surface-level cultural representations.
Proponents of multiculturalism rarely discuss the depth of culture and deliberately ignore the far more pressing concerns of competing values that come from different cultures. 2/11
Given the scale of mass migration, in just a generation or two, these new foreign cultural attributes will change the entire fabric of a nation and destroy what “holds us together,” as Pat Buchanan points out. 3/11
At Columbia University, more than 55% of students are foreign nationals.
NYU's student body is 42% foreign.
Princeton's graduate program is over 42% international.
⬇️A clip from my discussion with @AuronMacintyre
Many of these international students taking spots at elite universities come to America not just for an education but also to engage in political activism.
No serious nation defends the rights of foreign nationals actively working to harm it under the banner of “free speech.”
While student visas are intended for academic study, today’s universities increasingly promote ideological activism over traditional education.
This shift is happening at the same time as the number of international students in the U.S. has grown to over 1.1 million annually.
Tyler Cherry was the associate communications director for the Biden administration.
His past tweets called for abolishing ICE, ending the “capitalistic police state motivated by explicit and implicit racial biases,” and likened police to “slave patrols and lynch mobs” 2/5
Sam Brinton was the deputy assistant secretary for spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste for Biden’s Department of Energy.
Before his stint at the DOE, Brinton developed policies for schools that stopped parents from finding out about their child's gender identity.
He was fired only because he got caught stealing airport luggage. 3/5
🧵After listening to the entire Trump/Netanyahu joint press event, I have some thoughts.
While Trump has always been unconventional, and his initial position is usually open to negotiation, I believe he is serious about Gaza.
A Palestinian State sounds all but over. 1/9
Trump continually made the point that Gaza would be something that the “entire Middle East can be proud of” and was asked if the U.S. would send troops to help fill the security vacuum.
“We will do what is necessary.” 2/9
Here’s a key part of U.S. involvement in Gaza:
Trump: “I do see a long-term ownership position. Everybody I’ve spoken to [in the Middle East] loves the idea of the United States owning that piece of land, developing and creating thousands of jobs.” 3/9