USAID funneled $53 million to EcoHealth Alliance, which then used U.S. taxpayer funds to support gain-of-function research on coronaviruses at the Wuhan lab—research that likely led to the creation of COVID-19.
The CIA’s deception regarding COVID-19 origins becomes much clearer when considering USAID's long history of serving as a CIA front organization.
With an annual budget exceeding $50 billion and activities in over 100 countries, USAID has repeatedly been linked to intelligence activities. Former USAID Director John Gilligan once admitted the agency was “infiltrated from top to bottom with CIA people,” explaining that “the idea was to plant operatives in every kind of activity we had overseas: government, volunteer, religious, every kind.”
In 2013, a U.S. cable published by WikiLeaks outlined the U.S. strategy to undermine Venezuela’s government through USAID by "penetrating Chavez’s political base," "dividing Chavismo," and "isolating Chavez internationally."
In 2014, the Associated Press revealed that USAID funded the creation of a Twitter-like platform intended to incite a rebellion in Cuba.
USAID funding has been linked to coups in Haiti, Ukraine, Egypt, and other nations.
From 2009 to 2019, USAID partnered with EcoHealth Alliance on the PREDICT program, which identified 1,200 new viruses, trained 5,000 people globally in disease detection, and enhanced 60 research labs.
This partnership provided the CIA with a direct channel for embedding human assets within biological research facilities worldwide in exchange for funding and technology transfers.
In 2022, Dr. Andrew Huff, a former Vice President at EcoHealth Alliance, publicly revealed Dr. Peter Daszak’s alleged ties to the CIA.
The core issue?
The CIA lied to the American public about COVID-19’s origins because acknowledging the truth would expose its likely role in funneling taxpayer money through USAID to finance gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab.
Dr. Robert Redfield, the former CDC Director, says that U.S. taxpayer money from USAID, NIH, State Department, and DOD funded the creation of SARS-CoV-2:
"They wanted a single narrative, and I had a different point of view... Science has debate, and they squashed any debate... There's no doubt that NIH was funding gain of function research."
Is it likely that American tax dollars funded the gain-of-function research that created this virus?
"I think it did. Not only from NIH, but from the State Department, USAID, and from DOD."
.@RWMaloneMD: "There was a quid pro quo set up, and we transferred technology into Wuhan Institute of Virology to allow a limited number of human assets to have visibility of what was going on there...
There was technology transfer associated with Ralph Baric, and that whole program involved modern advanced recombinant virology, DNA technology, and known research specifically on coronaviruses.
If you go back in the literature, coronaviruses have been identified as one of the leading candidate agents for biowarfare for a very long time.
We knew that China was doing stuff. We didn't know what they were doing. We wanted to have eyes. And we engaged in a quid pro quo that involved both funding transfer and technology transfer, and Tony Fauci knew all about it...
There was technology transferred from EcoHealth Alliance and Ralph Baric having to do with this furin cleavage site. The specific mutations. The engineering of the virus. And potentially passaging in a humanized mouse strain that gave rise to a cluster of coronaviruses that were kept banked...
By the way, they have a massive bank of other coronaviruses that is there and untapped, and we don't even know what the contents are...
They came up with a portfolio of recombinant viruses, and they were testing those recombinant viruses, and somebody got infected."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨THREAD: @BretWeinstein tells @TuckerCarlson it's likely President Trump that is standing in the way of @RobertKennedyJr removing the COVID mRNA vaccine recommendations for children.
They highlight the case of Maddie de Garay, a 12-year-old girl who suffered severe injuries during Pfizer’s clinical trial.
@TuckerCarlson: "Where are we on the mRNA shots?"
@BretWeinstein: "I fear this question because everybody tells me there's no way forward by reaching President Trump. He can't hear it, and maybe I'll have to learn that myself."
"We are still recommending them for tiny children who don't stand to benefit at all... All mRNA shots induce a built-in vulnerability... The body will naturally attack the cells that are producing whatever protein you load into the mRNA platform..."
"The reason that the COVID shots produce such a wide range of pathologies is that they flow all around the body. There's no targeting mechanism in them. They invade tissues haphazardly, and then those tissues get targeted by the immune system, as of course they would, including the brain, including the heart."
"There's no justification scientifically, but injecting them into children for whom there was never a justification, because children didn't die from COVID, and they were injured by the shot. So why would you take a healthy child and give them something with a risk of a severe pathology when the disease it protects them from isn't a serious threat in the first place?"
"It's well beyond criminal negligence at this point. This is depraved indifference. This is the injection of these products into innocent people who are incapable of being informed and incapable of consenting in spite of the fact that you know that some substantial fraction of them will be profoundly injured. It is depraved indifference."
2/ @TuckerCarlson: "What's the process to stop recommending mRNA shots to children?"
@BretWeinstein: "I believe it could be done effectively, instantaneously, if the President were on board. The President has a certain amount of pride in Operation Warp Speed... That has caused him to dig his heels in."
"That is unnecessary. The President is in no way responsible for the appalling content of these shots. He's not a biologist. He listened to people who knew the material far better than he did, and they lied to him. That's entirely separate from the question of whether or not Operation Warp Speed was an accomplishment, whether he succeeded in bringing a shot to the public in record time, which he did."
"So, to my way of thinking, he can be proud of Operation Warp Speed, and he can be livid at the people who lied to him about the shot, and he can be horrified by all the damage that that shot has done, and I hope that he will see that. I'm wondering if maybe what might open his eyes to this is the plight of the vaccine-injured, which to me is one of the starkest horrors I've ever witnessed."
3/ @TuckerCarlson: "There are no Cabinet Secretaries that could act independently?"
@BretWeinstein: "You're surely talking about @RobertKennedyJr, who I believe absolutely would if he had the power. It must be a White House decision because Bobby knows the horror of these shots as well as or better than anyone."
"I think he must feel that he can't get there, or maybe he's working there overtime. But every month that we wait, more children are being injected with these things."
🚨THREAD: Paul Hyon Kim, 36, has been arrested for torching a row of Teslas with Molotov cocktails and spray-painting "RESIST" across the entrance of the Tesla service center in Las Vegas.
The legacy media radicalized this Democrat.
Here are his social media posts.👇
1/ On his IG, Kim links to his website (paulhyonkimdotcom) alongside a "Donations to Palestine" link.
His website identifies him as a cinematographer who relocated from the Pacific Northwest to Las Vegas.
On Vimeo, he lists his pronouns as he/him.
2/ His recent IG story labels @hasanthehun a "sellout" for gifting items to AOC and Bernie Sanders during a recent interview.
The post criticizes Hasan for not interviewing Jill Stein and for not challenging AOC and Bernie on "their support for Zionism and Iron Dome funding."
🚨THREAD: Russia's invasion of Ukraine was *PROVOKED* by NATO expansion and a U.S.-backed 2014 coup, according to three decades of leading U.S. military and foreign policy experts:
•Ambassador George Kennan
•Ambassador Jack Matlock
•Senator Joe Biden
•Senator Bill Bradley
•Senator Sam Nunn
•Senator Gary Hart
•Senator Gordon Humphrey
•Secretary of State Henry Kissinger
•Defense Secretary Robert McNamara
•Defense Secretary William Perry
•Defense Secretary Robert Gates
•CIA Director William Burns
•CIA Director Stansfield Turner
•Professor Edward Herman
•Professor Noam Chomsky
•Professor John Mearsheimer
•Prime Minister Paul Keating
•Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser
In this thread, I’ll dive into their warnings, showing how this reckless policy enriched the U.S. military-industrial complex, reignited the Cold War, and pushed the world closer to nuclear catastrophe than ever before.
Video: @ComicDaveSmith @joerogan
1⃣ 1997 Open Letter: NATO Expansion a "Policy Error of Historic Proportions"
In June 1997, 50 U.S. foreign policy experts—including former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara and ex-CIA Director Stansfield Turner—sent President Clinton an open letter, labeling NATO’s eastward expansion a “policy error of historic proportions.”
They predicted it would provoke Russia, fuel nationalism, and undermine nuclear disarmament efforts like START II, urging cooperation over confrontation.
2⃣ Senator Biden Predicts Hostile Russian Reaction (1997)
That same month, Senator Joe Biden warned that NATO expansion into the Baltic states would provoke a "vigorous and hostile" reaction from Russia.
All three Baltic states—Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania—became NATO members in 2004.