DD Geopolitics Profile picture
Feb 3 1 tweets 2 min read Read on X
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is has an annual budget of over $27 billion. Its stated mission is to "provide economic, development, and humanitarian assistance worldwide." However, in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet states, USAID’s activities go far beyond humanitarian aid, serving as a tool for advancing U.S. geopolitical interests, promoting regime change, and destabilizing governments perceived as adversarial to American influence.

This region has been a focal point for USAID due to its strategic importance in countering Russian influence and expanding Western political and economic interests . Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the U.S. sought to fill the power vacuum by installing pro-Western puppet regimes. USAID funded programs aimed at weakening Russian influence and integrating these nations into Western institutions like NATO and the European Union. .

USAID has been implicated in several regime change operations in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet states, often under the guise of promoting democracy.

Ukraine (2004 Orange Revolution and 2014 Euromaidan Revolution)
- Gave millions of dollars to Ukrainian NGOs, media outlets, and civil society groups that played a central role in mobilizing protests against pro-Russian governments.
- 2004, USAID-funded organizations like IRI and NDI supported opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko, who became president.
- 2014, USAID-backed groups were instrumental in the Euromaidan protest.

Georgia (2003 Rose Revolution)
- Provided significant funding to Georgian opposition groups and media outlets that supported the Rose Revolution, which overthrew President Eduard Shevardnadze.
- Brought Mikheil Saakashvili to power, a pro-Western leader who aligned Georgia closely with NATO and the EU.

Serbia (2000 Bulldozer Revolution)
- USAID funded opposition groups and independent media that played a key role in the ouster of Slobodan Milošević.

Propaganda and Soft Power
USAID’s funding often supports media outlets, educational programs, and NGOs that promote pro-Western narratives. For example:
- Ukraine, USAID funded media projects like Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), which broadcasts PRO-WEST content critical of Russia.
- Belarus, USAID supported opposition media and civil society groups that challenge the Lukashenko admin.

"NGOs are not needed in Belarus. They are a waste of money. They are a fifth column. They are a tool used by the West to destabilize our country." — LukashenkoImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with DD Geopolitics

DD Geopolitics Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DD_Geopolitics

Sep 5
🇮🇱💰🧵 Israel’s Government Media Office has approved over ₪167 million ($45M) in no-bid contracts to Google (DV360), YouTube, Twitter, and Outbrain/Teads for international propaganda campaigns.

Signed June 17, 2025, these contracts run through December and are part of Operation Rising Lion a full-scale emergency effort to influence foreign audiences via digital platforms.

Breakdown:
Google DV360: ₪90M (~$24M)
YouTube: ₪60M (~$16M)
Twitter: ₪10M (~$2.7M)
Outbrain/Teads: ₪7M (~$1.9M)

According to the document, the goal is wide “international exposure” for state narratives across defense, diaspora, and foreign affairs, especially after the launch of a major military operation.

The effort is coordinated by Israel’s Government Advertising Bureau (LAPAM), citing “urgent operational needs” and “broad messaging for government and security bodies.”

(Google Translation below)Image
Image
Operation Rising Lion and the Hasbara Contract

The Israeli Government Advertising Agency (Lapam) signed the contract with Google (YouTube + Display & Video 360) on June 17, 2025, right as Operation Rising Lion began.

The contract covers the period from June 17 to December 31, 2025, and identifies Google as a “key entity” for messaging during the military campaign and its aftermath.

Lapam’s own wording emphasizes this: “The request is for campaigns following Operation ‘Rising Lion’ as well as for ongoing activities.”

The campaign was part of a “full emergency format” deployed across all Israeli government ministries, including the:
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs
• Ministry of Defense
• Ministry of Diaspora
• National Publicity Division
• Home Front Command

The campaign sought to:
• Deny famine in Gaza (“There is food in Gaza. Any other claim is a lie”).
• Discredit the UN (e.g., accusing UNRWA of “sabotage”).
• Promote the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which is itself part of the U.S.–Israel occupation and aid-privatization scheme.
• Justify the Iran strikes via disinformation campaigns characterizing them as necessary for global security.Image
Google’s $24M Contract with Netanyahu Is More Than Propaganda, It’s Complicity.

On March 2, the same day Israel announced a total blockade of food, medicine, fuel, and humanitarian aid into Gaza, the Knesset did not debate ethics, law, or famine.

Instead, as shown in leaked transcripts, lawmakers discussed PR strategy, how to manage the optics of mass starvation. “Did you prepare for this thing this morning?” asked MK Moshe Tur-Paz, chair of the Foreign Affairs Subcommittee. The Israeli army’s Arabic spokesperson replied, “We could also decide to launch a digital campaign… to explain that there is no hunger and present the data.”

That “data” turned out to be Google ads.

On June 17, 2025, Israel’s Government Advertising Bureau (Lapam) signed a ₪90 million (~$24 million USD) contract with Google’s DV360 platform as part of Operation Rising Lion, a full-scale propaganda effort targeting international audiences. The contract identified Google as a “key entity” for messaging during and after the military campaign. Its explicit aim: deny the famine in Gaza, discredit the UN, and rehabilitate Israel’s image during a genocide.

The Google-run ads claimed “there is food in Gaza.” They accused UNRWA of sabotage. They promoted the U.S.-Israeli proxy NGO Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. They echoed debunked rape allegations. And they glorified the bombing of Iran which killed over 400 civilians.

In August, the UN formally declared a famine in Gaza City. Hundreds of children have already died of hunger. Israeli ministers like Bezalel Smotrich and Amichay Eliyahu have openly endorsed starvation as a strategy. “They can die of hunger or surrender,” said Smotrich. “They need to starve,” added Eliyahu.

Google is not a neutral platform. Its ad infrastructure is helping run cover for a man-made famine.

If you think this is just a moral crisis, think again, it’s a business model. And your data, your clicks, and your silence are part of it.Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 1
🇺🇸 PRESIDENT TRUMP: ISRAEL HAD THE STRONGEST LOBBY

In a new Oval Office interview with the Daily Caller, Trump made a stunning admission:

“Israel had the strongest lobby in Congress of anything… or of any company or corporation or state that I’ve ever seen. Israel was the strongest. Today, it doesn’t have that strong a lobby. It’s amazing.”

WHAT?!?

🧵👇Image
🇺🇸 TRUMP: AIPAC HAD TOTAL CONTROL OVER CONGRESS NOW THEY DON'T

In the same Daily Caller interview, Trump claims that Israel’s grip on U.S. politics has weakened and blames “AOC plus three” and unnamed “lunatics” for the shift.

“Israel was the strongest lobby I’ve ever seen. They had total control over Congress, and now they don’t. I’m a little surprised to see that.”

NOW they don't?!?!?

He adds: “People forgot about October 7th… It was a truly horrible day. I’ve seen the pictures.”Image
🇺🇸 TRUMP: OCTOBER 7 AND THE HOLOCAUST?

In the same Daily Caller interview, Trump compared October 7 to the Holocaust:

“You have people that deny it ever happened… They’re gonna have to get that war over with. It is hurting Israel… They may be winning the war, but they’re not winning public relations.”

Then again:

“Israel was the strongest lobby 15 years ago that there has ever been. And now it’s been hurt, especially in Congress.”

Let’s be clear:
🔹 Israel still receives billions in U.S. aid
🔹 The lobby dominates tech, arms, and media
🔹 Congress shields Israel from accountability
🔹 Dissent is still criminalized as “antisemitism”

So what is Trump doing?

He’s not wrong that support is slipping, especially among young Republicans. But he’s spinning it.Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 31
🇵🇸💸 Welcome to “The GREAT Trust” — Gaza’s future as imagined by U.S. planners, Israeli strategists, and Gulf investors. A corporate utopia, built on ruins and wrapped in Abraham Accords buzzwords. But under the branding lies a brutal truth: Gaza is to be recolonized, monetized, and erased.

This is not a reconstruction plan. This is a capitalist cleansing operation.

A leaked document titled “The GREAT Trust”—short for Gaza Reconstitution, Economic Acceleration, and Transformation—lays out the blueprint. It envisions Gaza as a “thriving trade hub” at the heart of the new Abrahamic regional order. But that vision only begins after Gaza is destroyed, Hamas is dismantled, and U.S. control is imposed through a “multilateral trusteeship.”

This is how they describe it:

“A U.S.-led custodianship… can start as a U.S.–Israel bilateral agreement taking control from Israel to the U.S. (once Hamas is disarmed), and evolve into a formal multilateral trusteeship.”

The real goal? Transfer Gaza from Israeli occupation to U.S.-Arab corporate control.

📉 Gaza’s value under Hamas is described as “$0.” The West Bank, they note approvingly, has “modest growth” under Israeli control. The conclusion? Hamas must be dismantled, Gaza must be opened to foreign capital, and “voluntary relocation” must begin.

📈 What follows is a $70–100B investment scheme to kickstart tokenized land ownership, 10 “mega construction” projects, a “top-tier security force,” and massive returns for U.S.-aligned investors:
$385B projected ROI over 10 years
$324B in asset value
$37B in tax revenue (for foreign countries)
$24B in direct revenue
Annual trust income exceeding $4.5B by Year 10

Gaza, they claim, will become a “$300B asset” up from “zero.” A digital-physical economic zone at the center of the IMEC corridor, exporting labor and goods through tokenized land and tightly controlled trade routes.

But this wealth will not belong to Palestinians.

The plan mentions “generous voluntary relocation packages” and “permanent housing,” but offers no political autonomy, no elections, no justice. Just corporate trusteeship, strategic mineral access, and a chance to erase Gaza’s revolutionary spirit forever.

🧵This is the vision. This is The GREAT Trust.
A capitalist dystopia over the bones of children.Image
2. The plan to “rebuild Gaza” is a corporate-military annexation wrapped in buzzwords like resilience, integration, and smart cities.

By 2035, Gaza is envisioned not as a Palestinian homeland but as:
• A bridge between India and Europe for the IMEC trade route
• A rare-earth processing hub feeding Gulf tech and Israeli defense
• A walled free-trade zone ruled by digital ID and AI systems

The U.S. and Israel would direct a 10-part mega-project campaign:
1. UXO/demolition clearing
2. “Abraham Gateway” logistics node in Rafah
3. UAE/KSA-funded railways, ports, and pipelines
4. An “Elon Musk Smart Manufacturing Zone” for EVs
5. U.S. datacenters governed by AI laws
6. A Trump-branded island resort
7. Smart ID-governed cities designed for surveillance
8. Israeli-border industry zones powered by Gaza’s own gas
9. A regional water hub (Sinai-based desalination)
10. A highway grid to link all of it to Israel, Jordan, Egypt, and the Gulf

Like Haussmann’s redesign of Paris to crush rebellion, Gaza’s new layout is engineered to prevent uprisings before they begin.

All economy, services, and movement would run through AI-managed ID systems. The cities are shaped like pie slices, surrounded by golf courses and tourist zones, with trams, highways, and surveillance nodes connecting every edge.

This is late-stage capitalism on meth and ketamine....Image
3. The core of the “GREAT Trust” plan is this: Gaza is not to be rebuilt for Palestinians but for investors.

At its heart is a $300B+ Land Trust, funded by turning Gaza’s land into digital tokens, tradable on a blockchain, managed like a corporate asset:
• Public land (~30%) leased for up to 99 years
• Private landowners offered “permanent housing” in exchange for digital tokens
• All transactions tracked via smart contracts
• Land aggregated, securitized, and sold — piece by piece

This is disaster capitalism on the bones of a genocide:
1. Tokenize the rubble.
2. Sell off the land.
3. Use the proceeds to fund a surveillance dystopia and call it “Palestinian Wealth.”

Governance? Not democratic, but custodial:
• Phase 1: Israeli-led “humanitarian zones” (no Hamas)
• Phase 2: A multilateral Trust governed by U.S. and “friendly” Arab states
• Phase 3: A deradicalized “Palestinian polity” takes over…but only if it signs the Abraham Accords.

Security? It begins with Western PMCs, transitions to Trust-trained Gazans, but always under permanent Israeli “oversight rights.”

This is worse than occupation, monetized, digitized, and whitewashed through humanitarian theater.

And in the end, it forces Palestine into a Zionist normalization pact as the price of survival.Image
Read 12 tweets
Jul 31
🇵🇸🚨 New from DD Geopolitics:

What do child trafficking, Gaza aid, private contractors, and Christian exorcists have in common?

In our latest investigation, we expose how a network of evangelical veterans, intelligence cutouts, and spiritual warriors turned Gaza into a battlefield, not just of bombs, but of ideology.

From biometric checkpoints to Bible-backed psyops, humanitarian aid is being weaponized in ways you’re not supposed to see.

Read the full exposé ⬇️Image
Read 5 tweets
Jul 11
🇺🇸 UNMASKING CANDACE OWENS: A THREAD 🧵

We have received a MAJOR SCOOP from a former Turning Point USA insider that Candace Owens was introduced to her husband George Farmer by Allie Hadley, wife of William Lee Hadley, who was a longtime friend of CIA Director Porter Goss!
In 2018, while working at Turning Point, Owens met Parler CEO and Turning Point UK Chairman George Farmer, the son of House of Lords life peer Michael Farmer, who proposed to her in a very strange way, over Facetime 17 days after being introduced to each other by Allie Hanley. Image
Image
Allie Hanley is the husband of William Lee Hanley, who was the chair of the State Department Propaganda outlet The Corporation for Public Broadcasting under Reagan. Hanley was very close friends with former CIA Director Porter Goss and donated to him during the Bush campaign. Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Apr 17
🇸🇻🧵 Erik Prince’s Offshoring Plan for U.S. Immigration Detention

Prince’s Proposal: A U.S.-Run “Mega-Prison” in El Salvador

Former Blackwater CEO Erik Prince has spearheaded a plan to privatize and offshore U.S. immigration detention by using El Salvador’s new mega-prison complex. The proposal obtained by POLITICO, calls for transporting up to 100,000 detainees from U.S. custody to El Salvador. Under the plan, Prince’s new entity (called “2USV”) would partner with El Salvador to round up “100,000 of the worst criminal offenders” currently in U.S. prisons, hold them initially at a 10,000-bed camp for processing, and then fly them to a Salvadoran prison for long-term incarceration. The targeted population is described as “criminal illegal aliens,” meaning non-citizens with criminal convictions, though Prince has also pitched involving U.S. citizens in some scenarios.

Under the proposal, private contractors would handle nearly every step of the operation. Prince’s team (comprised of military and defense contractors) seeks a lucrative government contract to locate, capture, detain, and deport these individuals on behalf of the U.S. To do this, 2USV asked for access to federal law enforcement and immigration databases to help identify deportable inmates across U.S. prisons. The contractors even want a role in immigration court proceedings: If a detainee lacks a final deportation order, 2USV would “facilitate a hearing before an immigration judge” to resolve any asylum claims. They also propose negotiating plea deals with U.S. prosecutors – offering prisoners reduced sentences if they agree not to fight deportation and accept removal orders. In effect, Prince’s group aims to replace or augment parts of ICE and immigration courts with a privately run enforcement arm, expediting removals outside the normal system.Image
2. Designating Salvadoran Soil as “U.S. Territory” – The Treaty of Cession

A centerpiece of the plan is a legal maneuver to circumvent U.S. legal constraints on deportation. Prince’s proposal includes sample language for a “Treaty of Cession” that would turn part of El Salvador’s prison complex into U.S. sovereign territory. In practical terms, El Salvador would cede a portion of the mega-prison to U.S. ownership, which the U.S. would then lease back to El Salvador to operate. Prince’s document argues that if this enclave is legally U.S. soil, then transferring prisoners there “would not be an extradition nor a deportation.” In other words, the inmates could be physically removed to El Salvador without legally classifying it as a removal to a foreign country. This attempt to exploit a jurisdictional loophole aims to avoid the legal hurdles that normally apply when deporting or extraditing individuals. By declaring the facility U.S. territory, Prince contends the transfer would be akin to moving a prisoner between domestic prisons – sidestepping requirements of extradition treaties or immigration removal proceedings.

Critically, the proposal urges the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to “suspend the ICE detention standards” for this facility. This indicates an intent to bypass U.S. regulations on the treatment of detainees once they are in El Salvador. If the enclave is U.S. territory but run by El Salvador, detainees might fall into a grey zone: U.S. custody in name, but without the usual oversight on conditions that ICE-run centers require. Indeed, the plan explicitly seeks to avoid “questions about detention standards” set by ICE and the Bureau of Prisons, presumably allowing far harsher conditions under the Salvadoran prison regime. Such an arrangement is unprecedented – effectively creating an offshore extraterritorial detention camp under U.S. jurisdiction but outsourced management.

Prince’s team and Salvadoran officials have already taken steps toward this plan. In August 2024, Prince toured El Salvador’s new Counter-Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) mega-prison and met with President Nayib Bukele. By March 2025, El Salvador’s Minister of Justice and Public Security, Gustavo Villatoro, signed a letter treating Prince’s group as an official “trade agent” for negotiating use of Salvadoran prisons to hold “foreign criminals.” . That letter touted the prison complex’s capacity to hold 40,000 prisoners immediately, with expansion up to 100,000 “criminal aliens” in the near future. In early 2025, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio (under a new Trump administration) visited El Salvador and confirmed Bukele’s “extraordinary gesture” – offering to accept deportees of any nationality, even violent U.S. citizens, into Salvadoran prisons. (The administration later insisted there is “no current plan” to deport U.S. citizens, which would plainly be illegal.) President Trump himself remarked he would “love” to send U.S. citizens to El Salvador’s prison if it saves money. These developments show significant political will – at least among certain U.S. officials – to use El Salvador’s prisons as an arm of U.S. immigration enforcement.Image
Bypassing Legal Constraints: Wartime Powers and “Not Deportation”

The driving motive behind the treaty-of-cession gambit is to exploit gaps in immigration and international law that normally protect detainees. Under standard practice, deporting someone from U.S. soil requires due process and a removal order. Extraditing a prisoner for punishment abroad requires a formal treaty and judicial process. Prince’s plan attempts to avoid both. By asserting the detainees haven’t technically left U.S. territory, officials could argue that court orders permitting removal from the U.S. aren’t needed at the point of transfer. In Prince’s own words, “transferring a prisoner to such a facility would not be an Extradition nor a Deportation” – it becomes a mere “relocation” of a U.S. held prisoner. This is meant to prevent detainees (and their lawyers) from invoking protections that would normally apply if the government tried to send them to a foreign country.

For example, the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that even under wartime powers (discussed below), noncitizens must be given “an opportunity to challenge their deportations before removing them from the country.” If detainees are whisked to El Salvador, the administration might argue they have not yet been “removed from the country,” because they remain on a legal patch of “U.S. soil.” This hair-splitting could be used to delay or complicate judicial oversight – effectively creating a legal black hole like past U.S. extraterritorial detention sites. Human rights observers have noted that the Venezuelan migrants already sent to CECOT are in “legal limbo” – the U.S. claims they are no longer in its custody, yet El Salvador hasn’t charged them with any crime, leaving them with no clear legal jurisdiction to appeal to. As Noah Bullock of the NGO Cristosal describes it, “they’re in a judicial black hole.” This is precisely the kind of outcome the plan is designed to achieve for a much larger population.

Prince’s proposal also invokes extraordinary executive powers to justify mass transfers. It explicitly references President Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, a centuries-old wartime law giving the president authority to detain or deport nationals of hostile countries during armed conflict. In late 2024 and early 2025, the Trump administration tried to repurpose this Act to rapidly expel groups of migrants (for instance, labeling hundreds of Venezuelans as members of a criminal gang aligned with a “foreign enemy”) . Prince’s team argued that the El Salvador scheme would help the administration “get around potential legal hurdles” with using the Alien Enemies Act in peacetime. Shipping detainees to CECOT was seen as a way to alleviate logistical and legal challenges that arose when trying to house them at Guantánamo Bay or remove them to countries that refused to accept them. Notably, Guantánamo was already being readied to hold up to 30,000 migrants under separate Trump plans, but a federal judge blocked at least one transfer of Venezuelan detainees to Guantánamo, forcing their deportation back to Venezuela instead. El Salvador’s prisons thus became Plan B for a transnational detention system. Prince’s document claims “this contract will solve the legal issues pertaining to removing criminal aliens” while enhancing the government’s capacity to locate and deport them.

Despite these maneuvers, serious legal challenges are expected. The proposal itself acknowledges it is “highly likely that this effort will be tested judicially. Constitutional and international law experts have already raised red flags. For instance, deporting U.S. citizens to a foreign prison would be flatly unlawful, effectively a form of banishment or exile, which is barred by the U.S. Constitution. Even President Trump and Secretary Rubio have conceded there are “legalities” and “We have a constitution” that prevent simply expelling Americans. The U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff urged the administration to reject Bukele’s offer outright, warning that “even entertaining this offer”abandons core legal principles. Furthermore, U.S. law (the First Step Act of 2018) requires federal inmates to be held in facilities “as close as practicable” to their home, generally within 500 miles. Sending U.S. prisoners to El Salvador, thousands of miles away, would violate this law meant to preserve inmates’ access to family and counsel. Finally, the Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment would almost certainly be invoked if Americans were forced to serve sentences in the notoriously harsh conditions of Salvadoran prisons. In short, while the plan tries to exploit jurisdictional loopholes, it faces a gauntlet of legal barriers, from constitutional rights to statutory mandates, that courts and advocates are already preparing to enforce.Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(