Elon's right. Federal bureaucrats are undoubtedly working hard to sabotage this administration.
Fortunately, Trump's team learned many of their strategies during the first term.
Let's take a look at the deep state's playbook.
🧵🧵🧵
Fortunately, Trump's team learned many of their strategies during the first term.
Let's take a look at the deep state's playbook.
🧵🧵🧵
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1886629715693248907
Withholding information
Bureaucrats will regularly provide Trump officials with as little information as possible, causing them to waste valuable time looking elsewhere for the answers to their questions.
Keep in mind, the civil service is supposed to be politically neutral.
Bureaucrats will regularly provide Trump officials with as little information as possible, causing them to waste valuable time looking elsewhere for the answers to their questions.
Keep in mind, the civil service is supposed to be politically neutral.
Example: During Trump's first term, bureaucrats in the EPA Office of General Counsel intentionally "failed to keep political appointees informed about significant cases."
It got so bad that appointees were forced to check PACER (public) to keep up to date on these cases (!).
It got so bad that appointees were forced to check PACER (public) to keep up to date on these cases (!).
Misrepresenting facts
Federal bureaucrats are not just content to withhold information – they often provide inaccurate information to Trump officials, particularly when it comes to what agencies can and cannot do.
Federal bureaucrats are not just content to withhold information – they often provide inaccurate information to Trump officials, particularly when it comes to what agencies can and cannot do.
Example: A career employee at the Department of Labor told Trump appointees that they couldn't issue Direct Final Rules (DFR).
But on the first day of the Biden administration, that *very same* career employee did just that.
But on the first day of the Biden administration, that *very same* career employee did just that.
Refusing ideologically disagreeable work
The civil service, again, is supposed to be politically neutral. However, many federal bureaucrats believe that it is up to them to determine whether to do work with which they take political issue – that is, Trump's agenda.
The civil service, again, is supposed to be politically neutral. However, many federal bureaucrats believe that it is up to them to determine whether to do work with which they take political issue – that is, Trump's agenda.
Example: In 2016, Trump's DOJ opened an investigation into racial preferences in college.
Bureaucrats moved at a "snail's pace." Only in 2020 when a political appointee took over did the case proceed. Civil servants didn't want anti-white and anti-asian discrimination to end!
Bureaucrats moved at a "snail's pace." Only in 2020 when a political appointee took over did the case proceed. Civil servants didn't want anti-white and anti-asian discrimination to end!
Delays and slow-walking
Civil servants will regularly accept, but then delay or slow-walk work that they disagree with.
Civil servants will regularly accept, but then delay or slow-walk work that they disagree with.
Example: Career federal employees slow-walked Trump's DOJ investigation into the Cuomo nursing home scandal, in which bad policy led to the deaths of tens of thousands of elderly people.
Unacceptable work product
Federal bureaucrats will accept work from Trump officials, only to turn in an unacceptable product, ensuring that the objective is thwarted.
Federal bureaucrats will accept work from Trump officials, only to turn in an unacceptable product, ensuring that the objective is thwarted.
Example: During Trump's first term, political appointees at the DoEd were forced to write all sensitive regulations because career lawyers at the department kept turning in unusable drafts – on purpose, of course.
Leaking
We're all familiar with this one. When internal obstruction fails, civil servants are known to leak stuff to the press, often misrepresenting the policy or work in the process.
Such leaks can be incredibly damaging and time-consuming.
We're all familiar with this one. When internal obstruction fails, civil servants are known to leak stuff to the press, often misrepresenting the policy or work in the process.
Such leaks can be incredibly damaging and time-consuming.
Intransigence and insubordination
Sometimes federal bureaucrats will outright refuse to do work assigned to them by the Trump administration.
Sometimes federal bureaucrats will outright refuse to do work assigned to them by the Trump administration.
Example: After Trump took office in his first term, he issued a federal hiring freeze.
Later, admin officials at the HHS discovered that several HHS advisory committee employees were hired after the hiring freeze. HHS bureaucrats had crossed out the hiring dates with a pen.
Later, admin officials at the HHS discovered that several HHS advisory committee employees were hired after the hiring freeze. HHS bureaucrats had crossed out the hiring dates with a pen.
Hiring ideologues into career positions
The civil service, as we have discussed, is ostensibly politically neutral. While some federal employees certainly are, many are not. Both Dem political appointees and career employees will give other ideologues civil service jobs.
The civil service, as we have discussed, is ostensibly politically neutral. While some federal employees certainly are, many are not. Both Dem political appointees and career employees will give other ideologues civil service jobs.
Example: During Obama's first term, all but one employee hired into a section of the Civil Rights Division had previously worked for the Democratic Party or a left-wing activist organization. None were Republicans.
This partisan hiring even continued during the first Trump term.
This partisan hiring even continued during the first Trump term.
In summary, Trump and @elonmusk are absolutely justified in their quest to downsize the federal government, which entails both reduced funding and mass firings.
Drain the swamp!
Drain the swamp!
@elonmusk Credit to @A1Policy's James Sherk, who authored the report from which I took these screenshots. He's also the guy behind Schedule F. Trump recently gave him a job – good!
You can read the whole thing here: americafirstpolicy.com/issues/2022270…
You can read the whole thing here: americafirstpolicy.com/issues/2022270…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
