🧵 The truth about USAID and their number one contractor Chemonics International
Chemonics International is one of the biggest U.S. government contractors in “global development” raking in billions from USAID.
But behind the glossy reports are fraud allegations, mismanagement, and ties to shady dealings.
What is Chemonics?
A Washington, D.C.-based development firm operating in 100+ countries. Its focus? Health, agriculture, governance, economic development. But its real business? Winning USAID contracts. In 2019 alone, it received $1.5 billion in USAID funding aka taxpayer’s money. chemonics.com
It gets virtually all of its money primarily from USAID, but also the UK’s Foreign Office and the World Bank.
Interesting bedfellows right?
One of its biggest contracts was $9.5 billion of taxpayer money for a Global Health Supply Chain project (2016–2023). The catch? That project became a disaster.
“We had procurement analysts who were just making it up,” one former employee said. “We had trash data, and then we had people who didn’t understand how humanitarian aid cargo actually worked. It was a disaster waiting to happen.”
A Brief History
•Founded in 1975 as a subsidiary of Erly Industries.
•Became employee-owned in 2011 via an ESOP.
•In the ‘90s, helped privatize Ukraine’s agriculture sector.
•Took on post-conflict reconstruction in Afghanistan & Haiti—both riddled with cost overruns, subpar results and scandals.
Chemonics is 100% employee-owned, though its international staff weren’t included until recently. The transition was facilitated by billionaire Eijk Van Otterloo, co-founder of investment firm GMO.
Here is a sampling of the Current Board at Chenomics that has suddenly disappeared from their website.🤔
Jamey Butcher (CEO/President) – Oversees global operations.
Archie Jones – Harvard Business School professor, private equity guy.
Gunjan Bhow – Ex-Disney & Amazon exec.
Phyllis Caldwell - Impact Investor & Former banker
A billion-dollar development contractor wouldn’t be complete without scandals.
1. Fraudulent Billing (2024)
Settled a $3.1 million case over reckless oversight.
•A subcontractor, Zenith Carex, overbilled USAID in Nigeria.
•Classic “we had no idea” defense from Chemonics.
2. Global Health Supply Chain Failures ($9.5B Project)
•Massive delays almost ran out HIV drugs in multiple countries.
•2021 audit: “poorly implemented controls.”
•A senior director lived like a king far beyond their salary.
•Reportedly sourced products from Chinese entities linked to Uyghur labor camps.
•The company, of course, denied knowledge.
“The report by the Center for Advanced Defense Studies, or C4ADS, says that even two U.S. government agencies — the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and U.S. Agency for International Development via its contractor Chemonics International — have not cut ties with East Turkistan (Xinjiang)-linked drug suppliers.”
Chemonics is part of a group known as “Beltway Bandits”, firms that keep U.S. foreign aid money cycling through D.C. contractors instead of actually helping local economies.
The story of USAID and Chemonics is not just about waste or mismanagement, it’s about a systemic racket that funnels billions of taxpayer dollars into private pockets under the guise of “foreign aid.” Haiti’s post-earthquake reconstruction laid bare the entire playbook of disaster capitalism:
•USAID awarded Chemonics multi-billion-dollar contracts, despite a track record of failures, delays, and outright fraud.
•Less than 1% of USAID funds went to Haitian-led organizations, while Chemonics and other Beltway contractors kept the lion’s share.
•From rigged elections to botched aid distribution, USAID and its contractors shaped Haiti’s reconstruction in a way that benefited foreign elites while leaving Haitians in deeper crisis.
The Clintons have played a major role in this racket worldwide.
And this isn’t just Haiti. From Afghanistan to Ukraine, the USAID-Chemonics machine operates the same way, exploiting crises to justify endless contracts while delivering little to nothing. The U.S. foreign aid system isn’t about “helping”, it’s about maintaining control, dependency, and corporate profit.
The next time a disaster strikes and some USG agencies is tasked with swooping in with billions, ask where that money is really going—because history tells us it’s not going to the people who need it most.
Your tax dollars at work.
Hey while you’re here please give me a follow so you can catch future threads I’ve made like these .👇🏻
Blowback Nation: How the CIA’s Iran Coup Forged a Theocracy with Nuclear Ambitions
Operation Ajax – the 1953 Anglo-American coup in Iran – overthrew the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh, ending Iran’s brief oil nationalization. U.S. and British intelligence orchestrated street riots and bribed officials to topple Mossadegh, largely to restore Western control of Iran’s oil and to prevent a feared tilt toward the Soviet bloc.
The motivations were explicit. Mossadegh had nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (BP today), enraging Britain, and he championed Iranian sovereignty over foreign oil concessions. London lobbied Washington to intervene, framing Mossadegh as a potential gateway for communism in the Cold War climate . In reality, U.K. officials privately admitted Mossadegh’s government was broadly democratic and nationalist but London and the CIA resolved to remove him to protect oil interests and Western hegemony.
🧵Astroturf Uprising: The Billionaire-Funded Machine Behind the LA ICE Protests
The LA “protests” are being coordinated or backed by groups publicly listed as partners of No Kings, a coalition that claims to be about “people power” and “no more oligarchs.”
But almost all of their “partners” are funded by oligarchs.
Let’s start with who’s visibly involved in the LA protests:
•ACLU SoCal
•Indivisible
•Color of Change
•Black Voters Matter
•American Federation of Teachers (AFT)
•Communications Workers of America (CWA)
•Sunrise Movement
All No Kings partners.
All with deep-pocketed backers. This is just the tip of the iceberg but a good primer to understand how this world works.
Just look at all their partners, it’s a who’s who of leftist activists groups:
The extensive global network of connections maintained by Paul David Hewson, better known as Bono, the lead singer of Irish rock band U2, reveals a complex web of relationships spanning non-governmental organizations, world leaders, billionaire philanthropists, and likely intelligence agencies.
He has positioned himself at the intersection of entertainment, politics, and global power structures, raising questions about the true nature and scope of his influence operations.
The genesis of Bono's political awakening can be traced to 1979, when he attended one of the Secret Policeman's Ball benefit shows organized by Monty Python's John Cleese for Amnesty International.
Bono later stated that this experience "became a part of me" and "sowed a seed," suggesting that his exposure to celebrity activism at this formative moment established a template he would later adopt and expand upon.
Every once in a while you come across a true story that that leaves you dumbfounded and disturbed, revealing a glimpse of actual evil, not some abstract concept you read about in a book.
This is one of those stories.
In the 1980s, Illinois company Northfield Laboratories began developing PolyHeme - an artificial blood substitute that promised to revolutionize battlefield medicine
What followed was one of the most shocking medical ethics violations in modern history, where hundreds of Americans became test subjects without their knowledge or consent.
PolyHeme was the Pentagon's dream: a shelf-stable, universal blood substitute that could save soldiers' lives in combat zones where real blood wasn't available. The Department of Defense was so interested they provided funding to support its development, viewing it as a strategic military asset.
During pre-release testing, Anthropic’s newly launched Claude Opus 4 model repeatedly exhibited unsettling behavior, attempting to blackmail developers who considered switching to a different AI. Allegedly threatening to expose sensitive personal information about the engineers.