It will have you forget the Holocaust in Gaza and try to convince you that US American fascism arrived, fully-formed, with orange foundation and a blond sweep.
It will have you forget that, many decades ago, the US inspired Hitler.
While Europe colonized and exterminated Indigenous peoples from India to the Congo, the US expanded West.
State governments offered bounties for "red skins sent to Purgatory." By 1900, the Indigenous population in what is now the US collapsed from up to 15 million to 237,000.
“I don’t go so far as to think that the only good Indians are the dead Indians, but I believe nine out of every ten are,” Theodore Roosevelt said in 1886. He justified the US genocide against the Native American people as the "pioneer work of civilization in barbarous lands".
Among many acts of settler-colonial barbarism, US colonizers exterminated much of the native bison population — devastating Indigenous communities who depended on them. As we see with the Zionist destruction of native Palestinian olive trees, the eradication of the conditions for indigenous life is central to the settler-colonial playbook.
The US doctrine of "manifest destiny" — the idea that the US had a divine right to expand West, and, by implication, exterminate those who stood in its way — was indistinguishable from the later German doctrine of "lebensraum", which sought to replicate that model in the East.
It is no surprise that Germany's killing fields in the "Wild East" resembled those of the US in the "Wild West". Hitler admired, he said, how the US had “gunned down the millions of Redskins to a few hundred thousand, and now keep[s] the modest remnant under observation in a cage.”
But the comparisons run deeper. As James Q. Whiteman documented extensively in Hitler's American Model, German jurists and lawmakers spent considerable time studying US race laws. Jim Crow became foundational for the Nuremberg Race Laws adoped by Germany in the 1930s.
Colonialism was long recognized as the rotten seed from which fascism sprouted.
After Mussolini’s invasion of Ethiopia in 1935, which exterminated nearly 300,000 people, George Padmore wrote that “the Colonies are the breeding ground for the type of fascist mentality which is being let loose in Europe today”.
That analysis would echo in the later writings of thinkers like Frantz Fanon and Aimé Césaire, who wrote that Hitler’s real crime in the eyes of “civilised” Europe was “that he applied to Europe colonialist procedures which until then had been reserved exclusively for the Arabs of Algeria, the ‘coolies’ of India, and the ‘n*****'s’ of Africa”.
Colonialism was not simply a project of sadistic violence. It followed the logic of primitive accumulation — the capture of land and the plunder of its resources required the expulsion, demobilization and often extermination of those who might defend it.
In this way, fascism is symbiotically linked with capitalism. It emerges, as V.I. Lenin argued, from capitalism's decay — as a desperate attempt by the ruling class to overcome the contradictions of capitalism through extreme violence.
For that reason, fascism also represents the convergence of corporations with the state — the reduction of the capitalist state to its primary class function, the defence of private property. This is why Mussolini though "corporatism" would be a more appropriate term than "fascism". In the US, that convergence runs deep.
With the consolidation of Western imperialism after WWII, the crisis of capitalism became global — and the instruments of reaction did, too.
As European fascism was formally defeated, the US and Western Europe moved quickly to salvage the pieces. Institutions like NATO, the CIA, NED, USAID, and others emerged over time as instruments that nurtured and cultivated reactionary forces around the world to prevent the emergence of progressive and emancipatory political projects.
From 1949, for example, the US led a covert project to support reactionaries and Nazi-collaborators in Ukraine, Belarus, Poland and the Baltics. It hoped to form a violent insurgency against the Soviet Union within these territories, while building a reactionary bloc among their emigres living in the US, Canada and Western Europe.
We see these policies play out to this day — in the Canadian Parliament, in the "Victims of Communism" foundations, in the attempts to equate Communism and Nazism, in the memorials to Nazi collaborators that dot the West, or in the streets of Riga or Lviv.
Another example: From 1948, the CIA funneled tens of millions of dollars to extremist right-wing groups in Italy.
These groups were responsible for scores of deadly terrorist attacks that massacred hundreds, many of which were blamed on the left. These included attacks like the bombing of the Bologna Centrale railway station on 2 August 1980, which killed 85 people and wounded over 200.
According to a 2000 Parliamentary Commission in Italy, these attacks were part of a “Strategy of Tension” that terrorized people into abandoning their support for the popular Communist and socialist movements, intended in particular to "stop the [Italian Communist Party], and to a certain degree also the [Italian Socialist Party], from reaching executive power in the country”.
Outside Europe, the US waged a ceaseless counterinsurgent war — directly and through proxies — to undermine the emergence of sovereign political regimes across the Global South. Three to four million were massacred in Korea. Up to three million in Vietnam. Over a million in Indonesia. Hundreds of thousands across Latin America. And now, hundreds of thousands in Gaza. Each time, opposition to the violence was viciously suppressed back home.
US American fascism is no abberation. It is innate to the US political project. Its fundamental impulses have been there from the very beginning. It existed in the institution of slavery. It existed in the lynchings of the Ku Klux Klan. It exists today, in the prison camps that hold a quarter of the world's prison population — often worked without compensation.
And because it is intrinsically tied to the ceaseless violence inflicted by the US on peoples outside its borders, US fascism cannot be countered with liberal sloganeering — or the social-imperialist posturing of those who would privilege the lives of US workers over those in Bangladesh, the Congo or Bolivia. The only anti-fascist position is an anti-imperialist one.
If you would like to read more about fascism, study thinkers like R. Palme Dutt, George Padmore, Sylvia Pankhurst, Amílcar Cabral, George Jackson, Aimé Césaire, Frantz Fanon, Domenico Losurdo, and Michael Parenti. They connected the question of fascism with the question of imperialism and colonialism, showing that the only antidote to fascism is a serious commitment to socialist internationalism.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We often hear about "victims of communism", but rarely about the colossal and continuous death toll imposed by capitalism.
The historic mortality crisis that capitalist restoration caused in Eastern Europe — unprecedented in peace time — tells a very different story.🧵
After the fall of socialism, states across the Eastern Bloc experienced the largest mortality crisis outside of war or famine in human history.
Previous figures published in @TheLancet put the number at roughly seven million. But more recent research carried out by @jasonhickel and his colleagues identified 16.9 million excess deaths between 1991 and 2019.
The figures fundamentally reorient our understanding of 20th century political economy.
Rather than "rescuing" the people of Eastern Europe, capitalism systematically killed them. It caused more than twice as many deaths as the 1930s famine that swept Soviet Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan — a period often summoned in attempts to discredit the socialist horizon as a whole.
And it claimed almost as many casualties as the total WWII civilian death toll in Russia.
What does it mean, concretely, for the Communist Party of China to seek to build a “modern socialist society” by 2049?
Today, I saw one example of that vision in Dongyue, a small village in Henan Province — a model in the processes of poverty reduction and common prosperity.
In 1992, when the village was first electrified, there was only sufficient energy to power household lightbulbs. Even by 2014, the power grid could not support a single air-conditioning unit in the village, and when CPC officials visited in 2016, the roads were all unpaved.
Today, the village has levels of development that you would be hard-pressed to find in rural areas in the wealthiest countries of Western Europe.
We rightly celebrate the breathtaking images of technological progress emerging out of China.
But the Chinese revolution was primarily an agrarian one — and it is in the countryside where the advancement of Chinese socialism can be observed most clearly. 🧵
Today I visited the village of Zhangzhuang in the northern part of Lankao Country in the Yudong Plain on the last bend of the Yellow River. The village has 1,017 households and just over 3,000 residents.
In the heart of Zhangzhuang, there is a canteen that provides free daily lunches to the elderly.
Next to the canteen there is a free massage room and health clinic, which provides periodic health checks to the village’s elders, alongside other diagnostic services. The village residents can be referred to a nearby hospital for specialist treatment.
Dr. Ni has served the village for over 30 years, choosing to work here over higher remuneration offered by work in the cities. “I am proud to serve my people,” he said.
🧵Over the course of its revolutionary history, Cuba has dispatched some 605,000 health professionals and technicians to 165 countries, bringing health to as many nations as the US has sanctioned.
Now, the US State Department is expanding its sanctions to target the program.
"Our country does not drop bombs on other people, nor does it send thousands of planes to bomb cities," Fidel Castro once said. "Instead our country sends doctors to those most lost corners of the world."
One of Cuba's earliest missions supported Algerian revolutionaries as they fought against French occuapation in the 1960s.
“It was like a beggar offering help, although we knew that the Algerian people needed it even more than we did,” Cuba's Health Minister Dr José Ramón Machado Ventura said at the time.
Some initial thoughts on the Trump administration's policies on Ukraine.
1. The "aid for minerals" ploy simply makes explicit what has implicitly been US policy since 2014, using Ukrainian land and lives to line the pockets of the US oligarchy and military-industrial complex.
2. On NATO membership, Trump's "maybe it will, maybe it won't" approach hardly differs from the ambiguity that was always implicit in the offer.
NATO membership has been dangled in front of Ukraine—and, for nearly a decade before it, Georgia—as a ploy to drive both countries into increasingly-aggressive postures against Russia.
I doubt anyone seriously considered NATO membership realistic behind closed doors: these countries were meant to be NATO's instruments, not its members. They both know this. Indeed, Georgia's government has now said it explicitly.
3. The panic in Europe's capitals feels especially contrived given that the current situation is the very obvious outcome of (a) playing second fiddle in the US-led imperialist bloc and (b) making yourself entirely dependent on the US by helping it undermine economic relations with your more immediate neighbors.
Trump has simply pulled the curtain on the theatre of multilateralism that concealed how little say the Europeans really had within the parameters of the "unipolar", imperialist system.
🧵: We are witnessing tectonic changes in the international system on a scale unseen in generations — and much of the West remains wilfully blind to this epochal process or what it means for the future of humanity.
To understand this moment, we need to turn back to World War I, a vicious inter-imperial conflict fought for the spoils of colonial loot.
That war, which slaughtered over sixty million working people, both gave the impetus to the October Revolution in Russia and revealed the unspeakable brutality of an international order dominated by colonial and imperial rule.
In 1919, the Manifesto of the Communist International to the Workers of the World put forward a clear analysis of what that war, often remembered as the "Great War" in the West, really meant to the world's colonized and working people:
"The colonial populations were drawn into the European war on an unprecedented scale. Indians, Blacks, Arabs and Malagasy fought on the territories of Europe—for the sake of what? For the right to remain the slaves of Britain and France. Never before has the infamy of capitalist rule in the colonies been delineated so clearly; never before has the problem of colonial slavery been posed so sharply as it is today."