It will have you forget the Holocaust in Gaza and try to convince you that US American fascism arrived, fully-formed, with orange foundation and a blond sweep.
It will have you forget that, many decades ago, the US inspired Hitler.
While Europe colonized and exterminated Indigenous peoples from India to the Congo, the US expanded West.
State governments offered bounties for "red skins sent to Purgatory." By 1900, the Indigenous population in what is now the US collapsed from up to 15 million to 237,000.
“I don’t go so far as to think that the only good Indians are the dead Indians, but I believe nine out of every ten are,” Theodore Roosevelt said in 1886. He justified the US genocide against the Native American people as the "pioneer work of civilization in barbarous lands".
Among many acts of settler-colonial barbarism, US colonizers exterminated much of the native bison population — devastating Indigenous communities who depended on them. As we see with the Zionist destruction of native Palestinian olive trees, the eradication of the conditions for indigenous life is central to the settler-colonial playbook.
The US doctrine of "manifest destiny" — the idea that the US had a divine right to expand West, and, by implication, exterminate those who stood in its way — was indistinguishable from the later German doctrine of "lebensraum", which sought to replicate that model in the East.
It is no surprise that Germany's killing fields in the "Wild East" resembled those of the US in the "Wild West". Hitler admired, he said, how the US had “gunned down the millions of Redskins to a few hundred thousand, and now keep[s] the modest remnant under observation in a cage.”
But the comparisons run deeper. As James Q. Whiteman documented extensively in Hitler's American Model, German jurists and lawmakers spent considerable time studying US race laws. Jim Crow became foundational for the Nuremberg Race Laws adoped by Germany in the 1930s.
Colonialism was long recognized as the rotten seed from which fascism sprouted.
After Mussolini’s invasion of Ethiopia in 1935, which exterminated nearly 300,000 people, George Padmore wrote that “the Colonies are the breeding ground for the type of fascist mentality which is being let loose in Europe today”.
That analysis would echo in the later writings of thinkers like Frantz Fanon and Aimé Césaire, who wrote that Hitler’s real crime in the eyes of “civilised” Europe was “that he applied to Europe colonialist procedures which until then had been reserved exclusively for the Arabs of Algeria, the ‘coolies’ of India, and the ‘n*****'s’ of Africa”.
Colonialism was not simply a project of sadistic violence. It followed the logic of primitive accumulation — the capture of land and the plunder of its resources required the expulsion, demobilization and often extermination of those who might defend it.
In this way, fascism is symbiotically linked with capitalism. It emerges, as V.I. Lenin argued, from capitalism's decay — as a desperate attempt by the ruling class to overcome the contradictions of capitalism through extreme violence.
For that reason, fascism also represents the convergence of corporations with the state — the reduction of the capitalist state to its primary class function, the defence of private property. This is why Mussolini though "corporatism" would be a more appropriate term than "fascism". In the US, that convergence runs deep.
With the consolidation of Western imperialism after WWII, the crisis of capitalism became global — and the instruments of reaction did, too.
As European fascism was formally defeated, the US and Western Europe moved quickly to salvage the pieces. Institutions like NATO, the CIA, NED, USAID, and others emerged over time as instruments that nurtured and cultivated reactionary forces around the world to prevent the emergence of progressive and emancipatory political projects.
From 1949, for example, the US led a covert project to support reactionaries and Nazi-collaborators in Ukraine, Belarus, Poland and the Baltics. It hoped to form a violent insurgency against the Soviet Union within these territories, while building a reactionary bloc among their emigres living in the US, Canada and Western Europe.
We see these policies play out to this day — in the Canadian Parliament, in the "Victims of Communism" foundations, in the attempts to equate Communism and Nazism, in the memorials to Nazi collaborators that dot the West, or in the streets of Riga or Lviv.
Another example: From 1948, the CIA funneled tens of millions of dollars to extremist right-wing groups in Italy.
These groups were responsible for scores of deadly terrorist attacks that massacred hundreds, many of which were blamed on the left. These included attacks like the bombing of the Bologna Centrale railway station on 2 August 1980, which killed 85 people and wounded over 200.
According to a 2000 Parliamentary Commission in Italy, these attacks were part of a “Strategy of Tension” that terrorized people into abandoning their support for the popular Communist and socialist movements, intended in particular to "stop the [Italian Communist Party], and to a certain degree also the [Italian Socialist Party], from reaching executive power in the country”.
Outside Europe, the US waged a ceaseless counterinsurgent war — directly and through proxies — to undermine the emergence of sovereign political regimes across the Global South. Three to four million were massacred in Korea. Up to three million in Vietnam. Over a million in Indonesia. Hundreds of thousands across Latin America. And now, hundreds of thousands in Gaza. Each time, opposition to the violence was viciously suppressed back home.
US American fascism is no abberation. It is innate to the US political project. Its fundamental impulses have been there from the very beginning. It existed in the institution of slavery. It existed in the lynchings of the Ku Klux Klan. It exists today, in the prison camps that hold a quarter of the world's prison population — often worked without compensation.
And because it is intrinsically tied to the ceaseless violence inflicted by the US on peoples outside its borders, US fascism cannot be countered with liberal sloganeering — or the social-imperialist posturing of those who would privilege the lives of US workers over those in Bangladesh, the Congo or Bolivia. The only anti-fascist position is an anti-imperialist one.
If you would like to read more about fascism, study thinkers like R. Palme Dutt, George Padmore, Sylvia Pankhurst, Amílcar Cabral, George Jackson, Aimé Césaire, Frantz Fanon, Domenico Losurdo, and Michael Parenti. They connected the question of fascism with the question of imperialism and colonialism, showing that the only antidote to fascism is a serious commitment to socialist internationalism.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵: We are witnessing tectonic changes in the international system on a scale unseen in generations — and much of the West remains wilfully blind to this epochal process or what it means for the future of humanity.
To understand this moment, we need to turn back to World War I, a vicious inter-imperial conflict fought for the spoils of colonial loot.
That war, which slaughtered over sixty million working people, both gave the impetus to the October Revolution in Russia and revealed the unspeakable brutality of an international order dominated by colonial and imperial rule.
In 1919, the Manifesto of the Communist International to the Workers of the World put forward a clear analysis of what that war, often remembered as the "Great War" in the West, really meant to the world's colonized and working people:
"The colonial populations were drawn into the European war on an unprecedented scale. Indians, Blacks, Arabs and Malagasy fought on the territories of Europe—for the sake of what? For the right to remain the slaves of Britain and France. Never before has the infamy of capitalist rule in the colonies been delineated so clearly; never before has the problem of colonial slavery been posed so sharply as it is today."
When British imperial policy starved some four million Bengalis to death, Churchill said it was “their own fault for breeding like rabbits”. It is clear as day that Churchill and Hitler were part of the same rotten European colonial tradition.
For years, Churchill backed fascism as a bulwark against communism. “If I had been an Italian," he said in 1927, "I am sure I should have been wholeheartedly with you from the start to finish in your triumphant struggle against the bestial appetites and passions of Leninism.”
In 1935, he praised “the courage, the perseverance, and the vital force which enabled [Adolf Hitler] to... overcome all the... resistances which barred his path.” It was Germany's threat to Britain's own fascist colonial ambitions that alarmed Churchill most.
My uncle once lived on Patrice Lumumba Street in Gdańsk. When our socialist project fell, Lumumba’s name made way for that of the Jagiellon dynasty, a royal family from a time when history measured the exchange of thrones, not the heartbeats of people. 🧵
Together with Lumumba’s memory went a rich legacy of socialist internationalism.
The Polish people had been in Accra, Baghdad, Lagos, Hanoi and beyond. They left behind schools, roads, hospitals, universities, and social housing.
In turn, youth and students from around the world came to Poland — acquiring the skills, lessons and friendships that would support them in their own projects of struggle, decolonization, and state building.
NATO was founded on this day in 1949. Its mission, as its first Secretary General said, was "to keep the Soviets out, the Americans in, and the Germans down."
Like the fascist project that it absorbed, NATO's anti-communism was directed not just at the USSR, but at the aspirations of the European people—and the anticolonial movements springing up around the globe.
In Europe, NATO was quick to rehabilitate fascists. António Salazar's brutal regime in Portugal was a founding member of NATO. Adolf Heusinger, a senior Nazi officer wanted by the Soviet Union for war crimes, would become Chairman of its Military Committee.
Today, Germany celebrates “Unity Day”: ideological cover for the 1990 annexation of the German Democratic Republic by west Germany.
The process was accompanied by perhaps the largest expropriation of public wealth by private capital in European history, estimated at $2 trillion.
The annexation was marked by the severe curtailment of political and economic rights for the residents of east Germany.
With no democratic mandate, west German monopolists seized factories, farms, mills, and other GDR property, which they asset-stripped and wound down.
Industrial output collapsed by 50% and unemployment ballooned to double the rate in west Germany. Housing costs climbed from five percent of income to up to two-thirds. A country with no homelessness soon found itself with tens of thousands of people living in the streets.
Gorbachev died. His legacy? Russia's GDP dropped by 40%. Real wages halved. Poverty ballooned from 2.2 million in 1987-88 to 66 million in 1993-95. Millions died under the brutal regime of privatization and shock therapy. Half a million women were trafficked into sexual slavery.
Does Gorbachev hold sole responsibility? Of course not. He was just the feeble culmination of a revisionist current in Soviet governance that made increasing accommodation to capitalist interests. But he presided over the final capitulation, and that is his weight to bear.
Does Gorbachev bear the primary responsibility? No. Since the 1950s, the USSR faced a vicious adversary whose policy was to “enormously increase the strains” on Soviet governance to “promote tendencies which must eventually find their outlet in... the breakup... of Soviet power.”