Thread by @Partisangirl

BREAKING🚨☢️ Israeli defence minister Gallant tacitly admits to using a tactical nuclear ☢️ bomb to kill Sayed Nasrallah .

He said he ordered to change the bomb from 40 tonnes to 80 tonnes . There is no such thing as a conventional 80 tonne bomb. Even 40 for that matter. The change could mean it’s dial a yield.

Inevitable someone is going to suggest multiple bombs were used in a mixed payload scenario. This is impossible for the following reasons, the most obvious of which is no aircraft can carry the weight required for 80 tonnes of conventional explosives.

Others may suggest multiple sorties with more than one jets. But
Video evidence only showed one bomb.

21st of September 2024, Israel’s first failed assassination attempt at Nasrallah. Similar to the one used in the day of his death, it was only one sortie, using only one bomb. Not multiple.

The hole left from the bunker buster bomb that killed Nasrallah. It was on bomb leaving one crater with one centroid.

The only 80 tonne bunker buster are nuclear EPWs (Earth penetrating weapons).

The way a bunker buster works is by burying under ground before detonating.

So it’s confirmed only one bunker buster bomb was used. And the only way its yield could be 80 tonnes is if it was nuclear.

CCTV footage just now released showing the moment Nasrallah was murdered, reveals: Only one bomb was used that detonated under the ground.

There is no single conventional bomb that can yield 80 tonnes. It’s impossible.

NOTE: This is not the centre of the explosion, this video is of the earth caving in at some distance. The bomb exploded underground.

At the time the media claimed that Israel must used 80 bombs , from estimating the yield of the explosion then back calculated how many bombs would have been necessary. They claimed it had to be a mysterious illegal 2000 pound bunker busters that were used. Where is a video of 80 bombs dropping? Doesn’t exist.

They messed up though because even though each of these bomb may weigh 2000 pounds, the yield is a fraction of this, no more than 500kg or 0.5 ton each. Had they done their homework they would had doubled their estimate.

An F16 can carry 4 mk84 JDAMs which are half a tonne of explosives each.

You would need 160 of these bombs and 40 F16s to drop them to make up 80 tones. They would have to drop them at the same exact point and orientation to keep digging into the ground like a tunnel. It’s impossible and ridiculous to suggest.

There was on bunker buster and it had a yield of 80 tonnes. Which means it had to be nuclear.☢️

Gallant’s admission means that Israel wants the world to know this

Someone questioned how the guy on the bike survived if the bomb was nuclear.

1. This was not the centre of the bomb, this was taken some distance away, and isn’t of the detonation but the earth being raised.

2. The bomb exploded under the ground .

A blow ground detonation is not going to kill you like an above ground one. Ever watch the film broken arrow?

To illustrate, the film broken arrow portrays a below ground nuclear detonation. Does it look familiar?

Now here are real videos of nuclear bombs going off underground .

Note that these are all in the countryside where it’s flat dirt, not roads buildings and asphalt. That’s why the ground is raised in a more regular fashion.

The cows lived just as the biker did.