Boom! We cracked it! Today we are introducing Boomless Cruise—supersonic flights up to 50% faster with no audible sonic boom.
We quietly (har har) demo'd this on XB-1's first supersonic flight—three times actually. 🧵👇
How did that work? It's actually well-known physics called Mach cutoff.
When an aircraft breaks the sound barrier at a sufficiently high altitude, the boom refracts in the atmosphere and curls upward without reaching the
ground. It makes a U-turn before anyone can hear it.
Mach cutoff physics is a theoretical capability on some military supersonic aircraft; now XB-1 has proven it with airliner-ready technology.
Just as a light ray bends as it goes through a glass of water, sound rays bend as they go through media with varying speeds of sound. Speed of sound varies with temperature... and temperature varies with altitude. With colder temperatures aloft, sonic booms bend upward.
This means that sonic booms can make a U-turn in the atmosphere without ever touching the ground. The height of the U varies—with the aircraft speed, with atmospheric temperature gradient, and with winds. So
making this work requires tech not available in Concorde's era...
Boomless Cruise requires engines powerful enough to break the sound barrier at an altitude high enough that the boom has enough altitude to U- turn. And realtime weather and powerful algorithms to predict the
boom propagation precisely.
Boomless Cruise on Overture would not be possible without Symphony engines—which we're designing with enhanced transonic performance, allowing Overture to break the sound barrier at a high enough altitude for Boomless Cruise.
Overture's autopilot will have a "boomless" mode that automatically selects the fastest quiet speed while advising pilots on the fastest on most efficient altitude, based on predictions informed by realtime weather.
Top speed for Boomless Cruise varies with weather and can be as high as Mach 1.3—but will usually be between Mach 1.1 and Mach 1.2. At higher speeds, the geometry doesn't work and a boom will still reach the ground.
Boomless Cruise is not the same thing as "low boom" attempts to dampen sonic boom. Boomless Cruise results in no audible boom; at Mach 1.7, Overture will still make a boom.
So... in honor of Boomless Cruise, we are renaming the company 🤫Shhh Supersonic. OK, just kidding. But Boomless Cruise is no joke.
In addition to the 600+ routes that will benefit from Overture's existing Mach 0.94/Mach 1.7 hybrid speed, Boomless Cruise adds many other practical routes—including U.S. coast to coast flights up to 90 min faster.
Current regulations in the US prohibit supersonic flight over land, even if no audible sonic boom is produced. We look forward to working with regulators to update these regulations to unlock Boomless supersonic flight over land.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What's the connection between XB-1 and Overture? 🧵👇
How it's starting How it'll go
Early in @boomaero history, we sketched out the design for Overture. It was originally a ~32 passenger trijet.
But we knew we didn't know what we didn't know, and we wanted the opportunity to learn and iterate before building a full-scale supersonic passenger airliner.
So we shrank the design down to 1/3 scale—so we could design, build, test, learn, and iterate. XB-1 was born as "Baby Boom."
1/ When I lived in California, I was in a neighborhood with particularly unreliable electricity. There were often outages affecting the whole street.
2/ When the power went out, everyone would go out on their front porch, look left and right and see if it was just them or the whole street.
3/ Once they saw it was everyone, they’d go back inside and get their flashlight and candles and go about their business. “If the power’s out for the whole neighborhood, the power company must surely already know.”
1/ Heard about a Bell Labs researcher who went around asking his colleagues two questions: 1) What is the most important problem in your field? 2) Are you working on it?
These are good questions, and too often the answer to the second is “no.”
2/ hypothesis: there’s a bystander effect in how people choose their work: People ignore the most obvious approaches to the biggest problems—because they assume that someone else must already be taking care of them
3/ the crazy result of this is that massively important issues have no one (or almost no one) working on them in the highest-leverage way.
1/ At tonight’s employee rollout celebration I asked @boomaero employees what they thought our odds of success were on the day they joined
2/ the answers ranged from 5% to 100%.
For me... I thought we had well under one chance in ten. At founding, I feared I’d never manage to assemble a team. Then I feared we’d never raise the money to accomplish anything.
3/ the first 18 months were almost a game for me. How far could we get? I thought we had such a low chance of success that any progress at all was amazing. I expected failure so much I wasn’t afraid of it.
1/ RIP, Steve. I’ve watched your interviews and keynotes so many times you feel like the mentor I never met. I hope you passed knowing you’d continue to inspire for years to come.
2/ Preparing for XB-1 rollout this week, I’ve thought often of the grandmaster of product introductions
3/ Steve had a way, not just of introducing *great* products, but bringing his audience along with the logic of his creation.