All the world’s value will be tokenized. This idea is what drove our investment in Uniswap, a token exchange, 5 years ago—and it’s the same idea behind our pre-seed investment in @whetstonersch, who are building Doppler, a protocol live on @Unichain that reimagines token issuance—improving the mechanisms used to launch assets, bootstrap liquidity, and build community.
Whetstone is founded by @AustinAdams10. We got to know Austin as a protocol researcher at Uniswap—and later, as a mech design advisor to Variant and our portfolio. He’s built a killer team to boot.
Token launches have grown from 20K/week to 400K/week in the last year, yet there is tons of low hanging fruit to improve how issuance works:
Doppler addresses three key problems:
1/ Value leakage – Bots & insiders snipe supply at launch, crowding out real users & leading to “pump & dumps.”
2/ Poor composability – Existing token issuance platforms limit integrations & force reliance on 3rd-party oracles.
3/ Lack of trust – No standardization for vesting, misaligning incentives between founders & communities.
Doppler introduces better mechanics:
1/ Anti-sniper pricing curves to limit bot dominance
2/ Open-source, composable design for seamless integrations
3/ Built-in, auditable vesting to align long-term incentives
Why does this matter? Issuance is the foundation of every asset’s lifecycle. Fixing it means better price discovery and value capture for creators/issuers, stronger communities, & more sustainable token economies.
The first Doppler integration is already live pure.st and if you’re building any product where tokens will be launched, you need to yap with @AustinAdams10
+ DAO 2.0 launcher: platform enables launching new community/governance tokens tied to an agent, agent responds to tokenholder votes, reads discussion forums and generates proposals (where agent will execute with a time delay and tokenholders hold a heckler’s veto), etc.
+ Quality assessment for token distribution: an agent assesses quality of contributions to determine payment/token allocations for DAOs/airdrops/etc.
+ Price as governance: an agent that uses a token’s price as input to decision making (but not the sole input)
2/ Prediction Markets
+ Market creation agent: Agent spots a hot Twitter viral debate/news, quickly launches a more ephemeral prediction market based on it.
+ Prediction market trading agent: Agent acts as market maker, ingests information on current events and trades in a dedicated prediction market.
+ Prediction zkTLS agent: Agent that can generate zkTLS proofs to resolve prediction markets (e.g., Polymarket resolved by zkTLS instead of a DAO).
3/ Social
+ Autonomous memecoin launcher: Agent tracks news/social media to come up with the next hot memecoin and launches it; uses previous data to assess potential virality.
+ Reputation/social agent trading: agent tracks token shills from various accounts on Twitter and builds reputation score on their performance; aggregates scores to make trading decisions.
+ Content production DAO agent ("Botto for X"): Agent generates content where human signaling through DAO token holders is used as RLHF/refining taste of the agent (for music, film, TV, social content, etc.).
+ Agent as connector/AI service marketplace: Agents running on existing social platforms (e.g., Farcaster, LinkedIn), to reach out on behalf of users who want to be connected with other users for a specific talent, information, or freelancing opportunity.
+ Ongoing puzzle agent with bounties: Agent continues to generate unique puzzles for people to solve with a bounty/reward pot.
+ Agent game character NFTs: NFTs that have memories, ingest social data, can evolve over time, work with their trainers to do tasks in the game, battle each other, etc. (e.g., Digimon, Pokemon).
My tl;dr (paraphrase) on why @Hyperlane's AVS (via @eigenlayer) is interesting
1/ Hyperlane is focused on enabling the modular expansion of rollups. Rollups can use Hyperlane to permissionlessly connect to other rollups and VMs with fast/cheap bridging. With the addition of the Hyperlane AVS, any rollup, from any framework (e.g. OPStack, Arb, AggLayer, etc) can connect with any other—without needing to source liquidity or validator sets to secure that connection.
Why Hyperlane AVS for this? More below:
Canonical rollup bridges claim to be super secure (secured by Ethereum L1), but require a 7 day wait.
3rd party bridges improve on speed, but often sacrifice on security and connectivity to other rollups.
Hyperlane’s modular security architecture allows anyone to deploy a bridge and create a custom validator set (e.g. for example, using a rollup's native token for stake)
Those validators can observe and validate messages on any origin chain/rollup, enabling permissionless connectivity between chains validators observe.
If a validator signs a message not found in the chain’s block history (e.g. in an attempt to steal funds), it is committing fraud, and the message serves as evidence.
Headless Marketplace: a market leveraging global (onchain) identity, money, and data while distributing locally, wherever a users wallet already is (e.g. inside a Telegram group chat or Farcaster feed)
Most marketplaces are destinations: users have to travel to a website or open an app, signup for an account, put in a credit card.
With headless marketplaces, the destination is wherever the users attention already is—and increasingly, thats where their $ will be too...
Thats because apps where users spend time are increasingly integrating crypto wallets (e.g. Telegram, Reddit, Warpcast)
That means users identity, money, data, will travel with them, and the friction to transacting will become much, much lower as a result.
Will Web3 end up like traditional open source, where (application) protocols end up as open source commodities, and products capture all the value on top?
🧵
Last year I argued protocols that capture fees should buck against that future, and offered a strategy on how to do it:
- Engineering: How does it operate?
- Design: How does the user navigate and experience it?
- Go-to-market: How should it be distributed?
Executing on these questions should be grounded in an understanding of user needs.
If great products optimize for excellent user experience (UX) in addressing these needs, great tokens should optimize for a great ownership experience (OX).
But as noted in the original proposal, it was always meant as an MVP for something bigger.
If approved, that something could be UF.
The UF would serve a number of functions, including expanding the grants program, and providing deeper, hands on support for a decentralized ecosystem of developers, researchers, and governance participants