Contrary to popular belief, traditional VPNs (even “no-log” ones) can track you – they see both who you are and what you do, just like your ISP.
Your ISP is no better. Since 2017, they've been able to legally sell your sensitive data.
3/🧵
Obscura is different – we never see your decrypted internet packets in the first place.
It’s simply impossible for us to log your internet activity, even if we were compelled to, or if our servers were compromised.
4/🧵
We achieve this by using a fully-independent exit hop run by @mullvadvpn. Ensuring that our servers never see your traffic, and the exit hop never sees your identity.
In fact, you can check your connected server’s public key against those listed on Mullvad’s server page!
5/🧵
But that’s not all…
You may have had the frustrating experience of trying to use your VPN on a restrictive WiFi: in an airport, a hotel, or certain jurisdictions.
Other VPNs will often fail to connect, as their off-the-shelf protocol is easily detected and blocked.
6/🧵
With Obscura, we built our own custom stealth protocol that is much harder to block.
Our protocol blends in with regular internet traffic using the same technology that powers HTTP/3 – QUIC – making it much harder for censors or network filters to detect or block.
7/🧵
To celebrate our launch, Obscura is just $6/month.
Our team has put in the hours to make this all a seamless experience, and I hope you’ll take Obscura for a spin.
🔗
Thanks for reading, and I’ll see you on the free and open internet. 🏄 obscura.net
P.S. For those looking for an exploration of our technical choices, here's our blog post! obscura.net/blog/bootstrap…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Though useful in certain scenarios, using a traditional VPN is just handing all your data (linked to your personal information no less!) to that VPN provider instead of your ISP.
2/🧵
But your ISP is no better. Since the 2017 repeal of ISP privacy laws, they've been able to "sell Web browsing histories and other sensitive data directly to marketers, financial firms and other companies without consumers' consent"
There was a tweet by @glozow about libbitcoinkernel yesterday that lead to some interesting discussion threads in the replies.
Mainly people seem to be worried that efforts to build alternative Bitcoin implementations on libbitcoinkernel might be stifled on a cultural basis. /🧵
I think it’s somewhat pointless to speculate on what people will or won’t do, but there were a few pervading opinions that I think are worth talking about:
1. That “avoiding alternative implementations” is a part of Bitcoin culture 2. That this part of Bitcoin culture will stop people from building alternative Bitcoin implementations