In a paper that analyses US spending habits, they found that for every 1$ spent on gambling, 0.99$ less was spent on long term investments, with outsized effects among poor households
imo this is happening with memecoins, it's not that entertainment money is being redirected to gambling, but rather the money that would go towards long term investments such as a university fund for kids, retirement fuds, buying a house... is being redirected to gambling and lost
Since most of that money ends up lost, this reduction in net investments ends up becoming a serious net negative for society
Furthermore, households with recent bank overdrafts spend 2x as much on gambling relative to their income, that is, families that are in the hole gamble twice as much, pulling them further into the hole
This worries me because I believe crypto is path dependent, and if a large part of society ends up seeing crypto as net bad because of memecoin's effects or if negative policy against all of crypto is created because of that, we could end up in a situation where the negative effects of memecoins spill over and prevent other ideas such as self-sovereign money or trust minimization from flourishing
We just launched the Full Version of LlamaFeed, a major upgrade to our free dashboard!
It includes:
- Expanded data
- Content filters
- New sections
- AI news recaps
- Revamped mobile
Available to Pro & Llama+ subscribers
All features 👇
AI-generated, personalised news recaps
Get a concise snapshot of the most important recent developments. Summaries refresh on demand every 10 minutes. If you’ve set filters in the News section, summaries reflect only your selected sources.
New Content Filters
You can now select which data to include in each section, like choosing specific RSS feeds for news, tokens for price tracking, or projects for governance, allowing you to tailor LlamaFeed to your specific interests.
.@foundation's NFT contracts have an exploit that allows foundation's team to destroy almost all NFTs minted on their platform.
Here's a thread explaining the exploit👇
Foundation's collection contracts make use of a forwarder proxy pattern to save gas on deployments, which means that all collections call a single contract to use it's code
Normally this shouldn't be a problem, however in foundation's case this contract can be selfdestructed
This is because foundation's collections have a feature that allows the creator to destroy them in case they have 0 NFTs
This is meant for collections but it also applies to the implementation contract, meaning that it's creator can destroy it if it has no NFTs
The person who controls both defillama’s twitter and domain has decided to launch a token despite everybody in the team not wanting it.
That is why we (the DefiLlama team who have built the site you all know and love for the past three years) have decided to fork Defillama and start fresh on llama.fi and @llamadotfi
DO NOT TRUST ANY COMMUNICATION OR TOKEN FROM @Defillama or Defillama .com
The contract uses chainlink price feeds, but if those fail due to society's collapse caused by hiperinflation, or if there's a bug in the code, both participants can pull their funds 10 days after the 90d deadline
Contract is immutable
@balajis to take the other side of the bet you have to:
We've released LlamaZip, a UniswapV3 router specially optimized for Optimism, achieving huge gas reductions vs every other aggregator (in screenshot, 7.8x cheaper than 1inch).
DEX aggregators deploy the same contracts across all chains, and these contracts are optimized against the gas costs of ethereum, bsc, avax, polygon... where storage is expensive and calldata cheap
But on Optimism, costs change: calldata is expensive but computation is cheap
So when aggregators deploy their Ethereum contracts on Optimism, these are optimized targeting Ethereum's gas, not Optimism's.
That's why we built LlamaZip, a router that compresses calldata as much as possible, optimizing it specifically for Optimism.
84.4% of all supply is on Ethereum where it's directly issued by Circle, rest is mainly bridged to bsc (0.88bn), polygon (0.847bn) and arbitrum (0.762bn)
USDC on tron (1.12bn) and solana (0.92bn) is directly issued by Circle