Nico Perrino Profile picture
Feb 16 3 tweets 2 min read Read on X
“You’re standing in a country where free speech was weaponized to commit a genocide.”

Utterly false. It’s called the “Weimar fallacy” and Margaret Brennan should know better than to engage in it.

Germany had plenty of hate speech codes. Indeed Hiltler was banned from speaking in parts of Germany for a number of years.

The censorship did nothing but make Hitler a martyr. Goebbels conducted a whole propaganda campaign on the back of it. “He alone of two billion people on Earth may not speak in Germany,” read the slogan.

Germany had no free speech and no rule of law — and millions died because of it.

x.com/mtracey/status…
Former ACLU President and @TheFIREorg Senior Fellow on the “Weimar fallacy.”

Nadine’s father was a Holocaust survivor.

@TheFIREorg “In this 1920s cartoon by Philipp Rupprecht, Hitler is depicted as having his mouth sealed with tape that reads ‘forbidden to speak.’ The text beneath this image reads, ‘He alone of two billion people on Earth may not speak in Germany.’”

thefire.org/news/blogs/ete…Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nico Perrino

Nico Perrino Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NicoPerrino

Apr 11, 2024
It is increasingly common for college students to claim that disrupting or taking over someone else's event is protected by free speech.

It's not.

🧵

In a now notorious incident at @StanfordLaw last year, protesters shouted down federal judge Kyle Duncan’s speech.

“It’s called protest,” one @Stanford student remarked to Judge Duncan while the judge objected to being shouted down. “It’s under the 1st Amendment.”

thefire.org/research-learn…
When Stanford Law Dean Jenny Martinez criticized the students' actions, the students plastered her classroom with signs reading:

"We, the students in your constitutional law class, are sorry for exercising our 1st Amendment rights"

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
Read 6 tweets
Dec 29, 2022
Did the constituency for principled free speech advocacy grow smaller in 2022?

What is the state of #freespeech?

I take a look at where conservatives, liberals, libertarians, and others stand on the issue for @detroitnews:

detroitnews.com/story/opinion/… @TheFIREorg @DetNewsOpinion
Conservatives:

In recent years, free speech advocates benefited from a marriage of convenience w/ conservatives justifiably concerned about censorship in higher ed & by Big Tech.

But now, some cons see “wokism” as a greater threat — & censorship an expedient tool to combat it.
In April, Florida politicians enacted the Stop WOKE Act, which bans debate and discussion of eight topics related to race and sex at the state’s colleges.

A federal judge recently struck those provisions down as a First Amendment violation, calling them “positively dystopian.”
Read 17 tweets
Dec 29, 2022
ICYMI:

An art history instructor at @HamlineU apparently lost their job because they showed images depicting the prophet Muhammad in a class.

A Hamline admin allegedly said, “respect for the observant Muslim students in that classroom should
have superseded academic freedom.”
That's not how academic freedom works.

The use of the image in-class was pedagogically relevant (a class on Islamic art).

The image is considered "a masterpiece of Persian manuscript painting."

And the instructor apparently gave notice and an opt-out option before showing it.
It should go without saying, religious sensitivities must not dictate what gets taught in a college classroom.

Are we returning to the era of the fig leaf?
Read 10 tweets
Dec 1, 2022
In the debate surrounding Twitter under @elonmusk, the distinction between free speech as a legal right and cultural value can get confused.

What is #freespeech culture?

thefire.org/news/free-spee…
Free speech culture is a set of norms that support free thought and our ability to share our opinions.

These are norms that see value in curiosity, dissent, devil’s advocacy, thought experimentation, and talking across lines of difference.
In a healthy free speech culture, our first instincts wouldn't be to find ways to censor speech we dislike — or cancel the speaker — but to meet it w/ more speech.

These are norms that can be advanced at all levels of society, from the average citizen 2 the largest corporation.
Read 12 tweets
Nov 29, 2022
" @Apple Limits iPhone File-Sharing Tool Used for Protests in China"

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
" @elonmusk prepared to ‘go to war’ with Apple over moderation demands"

nypost.com/2022/11/28/elo…
🤔

"Apple CEO @tim_cook Accepts 2017 Free Expression Award in Washington, D.C."

macrumors.com/2017/04/19/tim…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(