“You’re standing in a country where free speech was weaponized to commit a genocide.”
Utterly false. It’s called the “Weimar fallacy” and Margaret Brennan should know better than to engage in it.
Germany had plenty of hate speech codes. Indeed Hiltler was banned from speaking in parts of Germany for a number of years.
The censorship did nothing but make Hitler a martyr. Goebbels conducted a whole propaganda campaign on the back of it. “He alone of two billion people on Earth may not speak in Germany,” read the slogan.
Germany had no free speech and no rule of law — and millions died because of it.
Former ACLU President and @TheFIREorg Senior Fellow on the “Weimar fallacy.”
Nadine’s father was a Holocaust survivor.
@TheFIREorg “In this 1920s cartoon by Philipp Rupprecht, Hitler is depicted as having his mouth sealed with tape that reads ‘forbidden to speak.’ The text beneath this image reads, ‘He alone of two billion people on Earth may not speak in Germany.’”
In recent years, free speech advocates benefited from a marriage of convenience w/ conservatives justifiably concerned about censorship in higher ed & by Big Tech.
But now, some cons see “wokism” as a greater threat — & censorship an expedient tool to combat it.
In April, Florida politicians enacted the Stop WOKE Act, which bans debate and discussion of eight topics related to race and sex at the state’s colleges.
A federal judge recently struck those provisions down as a First Amendment violation, calling them “positively dystopian.”
Free speech culture is a set of norms that support free thought and our ability to share our opinions.
These are norms that see value in curiosity, dissent, devil’s advocacy, thought experimentation, and talking across lines of difference.
In a healthy free speech culture, our first instincts wouldn't be to find ways to censor speech we dislike — or cancel the speaker — but to meet it w/ more speech.
These are norms that can be advanced at all levels of society, from the average citizen 2 the largest corporation.