Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Andy Grewal Profile picture
@ProfGrewal
Feb 17 • 2 tweets • 1 min read • Read on X
Devastating point made by the Solicitor General in the Special Counsel (Dellinger) case:

"No one [ever] imagined that the President might need to obtain the advice and consent of a federal district court." reason.com/wp-content/upl…Image
"A court has barred the elected President from controlling an entire department of the Executive Branch and has turned over that department to a person who answers to no one and for whom no one voted." 🔥🔥🔥 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Andy Grewal

Andy Grewal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfGrewal

Andy Grewal Profile picture
Jul 1, 2024
SCOTUS notes the parties' agreement that there were at least *some* indicted acts that may face prosecution. supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf…
Image
Core official acts get absolute immunity, while non-core official acts might or might not get absolute immunity.

(Maybe my article hasn't become obsolete after all! I argue absolute immunity for all official acts, though I may have defined those acts differently from SCOTUS.) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…Image
Many twitter experts said that criminal prosecution was LESS dangerous than civil liability. So, they said, civil immunity could not imply criminal immunity.

I'm glad to see SCOTUS recognize the obvious -- being thrown in jail is more dangerous than being asked to pay damages.Image
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(