Since some ppl are either pretending not to understand my tweet or actually not understanding it, I am ofc not saying that Elon made the numbers up out of thin air.
The absolute bullshit is the contention that these numbers, as presented, indicate fraud on a massive scale--possibly "the biggest fraud in history"
They indicate no such thing
it seems that this mystery was solved in 2023, in a SSA report.
Time to debate openly the "Black voter revolt" claim used to foist Harris as the only Biden alternative.
I'm w Tyler: I doubt it's importantly true; & it's certainly infantilizing to assume Black voters are incapable of seeing why an unpopular VP shouldn't run.
Note the practical question isn't "Will some Black voters resent Kamala getting passed over?"
The question is whether passing her & Biden over for a different (no doubt multiracial) ticket will cost Dems Black votes *in swing states* **on net**.
The answer isnt obvs at all.
2/
"I'm not voting against Trump because you passed Kamala over" is something that will be said. I'm sure it will be meant by a few. But I seriously doubt the loss wont be compensated for by gains from other voters with an unalterably negative image of Kamala.
3/
NYT reporting on Neely’s last few years paints a picture of social services in NYC more impressively staffed, organized, and responsive to individual cases than standard Left *or* Right discourse acknowledges.
There’s of course an inevitable trade off between liberty & safeguards for the mentally ill that our society has lately settled in favor of liberty.
Social services working under these constraints can be highly functional without guaranteeing a happy outcome in each case.
To be clear:
He was a felon *and* mentally ill. Both can be true
My point was that social services in NYC appear, per NYT, better resourced, etc than right & left discourse commonly assume.
Police and legislative failures are separate issues, w both arguably implicated here.