Trump's otherwise-inexplicable comments regarding Zelensky's popularity make sense in this context. It is a lie so easily disproved as to be laughable.
Zelensky is actually substantially more popular than Trump, who has never had an approval rating higher than 50%.
According to my theory, the reason why Trump is talking about Zelensky's approval rating doesn't have a whole lot to do with the actual situation as far as elections, either.
It is especially jarring considering the Napoleonic rhetoric Trump uses himself.
I think the strategy behind why Trump is talking about Zelensky's approval rating and delayed (wartime) elections is this:
Zelensky is the only leader right now who could conceivably unite Europe against Russia, especially now that the U.S. is sabotaging itself because of Trump.
The "Army of Europe" idea has been raised before and shot down before several times, I don't have any illusions about that.
I'll tell you what though: The last times people raised the idea, the largest land war in Europe since WWII wasn't happening, so...
The NIH funding freeze is an interesting anti-disinfo problem
The question is "how do you explain the impact of (here we go) reduced NIH indirect-cost reimbursement for research" and make it more approachable than disinfo
I think the way to explain it is about patriotism
(🧵)
So, this is about reduced funding at the end of the day so examples of NIH research that saved lives might be apropos
This is a fairly obvious answer though I don't think anyone is gonna win a Macarthur Genius Award for realizing that
At a more academic level it strikes me that this goes to the heart of American competitiveness and the way that we subsidize science & medical research in this country
Howard Zinn discusses this a bit; that goes back to a relative of President Bush(es) named Vannevar Bush
In 1956, a United Airlines DC-7 was involved in a midair collision with a Lockheed L-1049 Super Constellation over the Grand Canyon, killing all 128 souls aboard. This is cited as a driving impetus behind the nationalization of American air traffic control.
🧵
I was completely ignorant of all this, this morning, I just looked this up; but when you read about it, you can kind of see why this led to a nationalized air traffic control service.
It starts from just asking 'why' - the 'five whys' exercise, really.
Why did the planes collide?
Because they weren't being tracked in realtime.
Why weren't they being tracked in realtime?
Because they were 'off-airways', which meant, in 1956, in uncontrolled airspace.
Why was there uncontrolled airspace through which PASSENGER PLANES flew?
The odds that we go to some kind of incredibly stupid war with a NATO ally and partner, Denmark, over Greenland, increases from "negligible" to "non-negligible" because our country just made an abusive, vapid, Deus-Vult-tattoo-having vetbro talkshow host into our SecDef
🧵
The odds of nuclear weapons use within the next four years goes up, because consultation with SecDef is supposed to be a check on the President's authorization of nuclear launch, and it is laughable to think Hegseth will serve as any kind of check to Trump
At this point, if Trump had a senior moment and said "let's nuke Mexico!" it is difficult to envision a 25th-Amendment Cabinet majority, or any kind of internal check in the Defense command chain, that would actually stop him from doing that.
So here's the deal with Facebook's new fact check & hate speech rules.
Let me explain who I am: from January to July of 2021, starting with the insurrection - actually, because of it - I co-led a team that deplatformed extremists for Facebook. These are our numbers.
🧵
Our data is the subject of an SEC whistleblower complaint filed with the help of @wbaidlaw. This is why I can talk about it.
There are multiple levels of content monitoring on Facebook by multiple departments, and while I can't speak to its 'in-line' fact-checking in detail or its larger-scale policy -