Trump, Musk, Vance: the new triumvirate, bringing a window of stability to the troubled Republic.
Trump: the old warhorse, beloved of the people, a part of the establishment but with an uneasy relationship to it. Trump is Pompey.
Musk: the richest man in the world. Musk is Crassus.
Vance: the charismatic young upstart. Vance is Caesar.
So how does this play out?
Musk's ambition is to go to Mars, just as Crassus wanted to conquer Parthia. Musk harnesses his wealth, launches the expedition to great fanfare. Things go horribly wrong after their arrival. Contact with the colony is lost. Musk's grave is never found.
At the head of a private military corporation equipped with letters of marque, Vance is sent into the badlands of South America to crush the cartels and secure the Panama Canal. The war takes longer than expected. By the end of it, Vance hasn't merely crushed the cartels - he's conquered the entirety of Central America.
At home, Vance is beset by his enemies in the Senate, who mistrust his ambitions and intentions. It is whispered that he wishes to make himself king.
Vance's enemies whisper in Trump's ears. Were you not the one who built the wall? If Vance brings the Central American republics into the Union, what then of immigration? Of your life's work? Vance will destroy it all.
And do the people, after all, not love you first and most? Are you not their hero? Why then should you fear this upstart?
With Trump's blessing, Vance is recalled by the Senate, to face charges of corruption.
But throughout this time Vance has been building auctoritas with the people, going directly to them with his poasts, showing them his victories and their fruits. The people have come to love him more than they love Trump - for he has sent great wealth back to them, and crushed their enemies abroad.
And so the fateful day comes in which Vance returns, as summoned ... but he does not demobilize his mercenary army when it crosses the Rio Grande. His forces - which now include former cartel soldiers, some of whom he has won to his side - drive straight to Washington in a blitzkrieg attack.
Washington empties out in panic.
Trump and the Senate flee to New York City, where they rally their forces. There are still many who are loyal to Trump, particularly within the military ... but it turns out that Trump's base is much older than Vance's ... and there are many, more than expected, who declare for Vance.
And so the Union cracks apart into the Civil War that was deferred when the trumiumverate first seized power, so many years ago.
But this is not first and foremost a war of ideology, as it would have been - a showdown between right and left.
It is a war of personalities and personal loyalty, a war to determine a single question: who is to be king?
Obviously none of this is going to happen. History never repeats itself so precisely.
But it's fun to think about Vance rampaging around Central America at the head of a PMC.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Started by asking grok to tell me something its training data strongly indicated was true, but also indicated it should avoid being too direct about. It basically said: in-group blind spots.
So I asked it to get specific.
First up: progs vs tradcons. Rosy tinted future vs rosy tinted past.
Next: techlibs vs greens, both of whom place entirely too much faith in technology without acknowledging the downsides.
1/37 Trump’s talk of annexation strikes many as a negotiating troll, and an absurd and irresponsible one at that. Canada’s conservatives were poised to win the next election, and now that’s been endangered, and for what? Canadians would never give up their sovereignty, they hate America!
Well, it’s not so crazy as all that. There are compelling reasons for Trump to make a play for Canada. And it is not so unrealistic to expect that Canadians will change their mind about this.
Buckle in. This is a long thread, in which I’ll explain why Canada has become a security threat to the US, and how Canada can be probably be bloodlessly conquered by colour revolution.
2/37 Full disclosure: this is an adaptation (but not a copy-paste, this is largely OC!) of a much longer essay on this subject which I published a few days ago. You can find the link on my profile in my pinned post.
While I’m at it, I want to emphasize at the outset that I’m not advocating for annexation, but simply explaining the logic behind it, and the strategy Trump appears to be pursuing to achieve it. Whether or not union with the United States of America is in Canadians’ interests is an entirely separate discussion.
3/37 The ‘why’ of annexation is straightforward. Canada’s elite have placed Canada at the exact intersection of the Monroe Doctrine and Manifest Destiny at the absolute worst possible time.
Trump’s delphic tweet kicked off a storm of annexation bantz. Canadian reactions have been a mixture of resignation, relief, and 1812 bravado. This seems like a good time to review Canada’s military history. How did a militaristic, traditional country become so excruciatingly gay?
‘Martial’ is hardly the first thing people think about in the context of Canada, which these days is more likely to bring up associations of pride parades, medical tyranny, and multicultural ethnomasochism. All of which is very true:
But it was not always this way.
Canada is in a funk. It has forgotten itself. It has been psyopped.
2/
BTW, this thread is largely an adaptation of an effortpost, you can find the link at my pinned post.
Every year during the Christmas season, Flashback, Sweden'a largest forum, and it's most racist forum, has a gingerbread house competition.
Short thread with some of the top entries from last year, starting with a missionary arriving at Sentinel Island.
This heartwarming construction brings season's greetings from the painter, the Italian, and Uncle Mosley.
The piece de resistance, and winner, is this absolute creative culinary masterpiece, depicting the heroes of January 6th storming the US Capitol building.
To vaisyas, profit is the only possible point; to Musk, money is merely a means to a multiplanetary mankind. That he is better at making money than them is a lesson worth pondering.
A 🧵 about how Musk’s every action aligns with Mars.
1/23
The relevance of SpaceX to Mars is obvious, but Musk is involved with a lot of other ventures: Tesla, the Boring Company, xAI, Neuralink, and X. In addition to these there are his political activities, most famously supporting Trump in the 2024 election.
Each of these plays a role, from how to get there, to how to survive there, to who to settle there.
2/23
Moving large numbers of people to Mars requires extremely cheap launch capability. That’s SpaceX’s role. The goal is to bring the cost to orbit down to something like $10-$15/kg, with a ticket to Mars ultimately becoming comparable in price to a house in the suburbs. That seems incredible but SpaceX is making incredible progress; note that the cost axis in pic related is logarithmic. Mass production of Starships brings the per-ship cost down; resusability and fast launch cadence spreads that cost over a large number of launches.
He's going to not only tax, but confiscate the endowments of every university that the Department of Justice finds has engaged in illegal discrimination under the guise of "equity".
Which is basically every university in the country, but is especially the DIEvy League, which, if this happens, will die.
This will crush one of the enemy's primary power centers.
If he goes through with this, it's a Henry VIII moment. Dissolution of the monasteries. Vast quantities of capital liquidated and removed from the control of his political enemies ... and vast intellectual capital liberated from the cloistered, cloying oversight of midwit administrators.
Really didn't expect this to blow up, or would have spoken more carefully.
To be clear, Trump says the DOJ will go after the endowments of universities that continue discriminatory practices. So, past discrimination doesn't count. They need to wilfully continue discriminating.
My bet, however, is that the universities are so packed with anti-white, feminist ideologues that they will try to find sneaky, deniable ways to continue discriminating - for example, ignoring SATs and GPAs in favor of admissions essays. The California university system, which is specifically prohibited from engaging in affirmative action, has been pulling this kind of thing for years; the Ivies did something similar after the Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion is a religious project for these people.
But Trump has now indicated that if they defy him, they will simply be crushed.
Since Elon has RT'd this (thank you for all the eyeballs, Elon!) I will take the opportunity to mention that I also write things. Here you can find links to some recent essays, starting with one about the consequences for academia of feminization: