5 graphs that everyone should know about, based on tonight's Spotlight webinar with @PearceMrs.
A quick thread that gives a whistle stop tour on recent research about when to retrieve, how students under-value spacing and interleaving, as well as how to get students to cheat less...🧵
1. When you retrieve matters.
Retrieval induced forgetting is real. If retrieve soon after encoding (i.e. after 2 minutes), there is a cost as you will forget other things #tradeoff
2. Retrieval is beneficial for all students.
Good news. If students have either high or prior learning, it still looks like retrieval practice is beneficial. #memory
A thread on cold-calling, and why research suggests it might be one of the most inclusive means of participation, as well as one of the best for learning 🧵
What is cold-calling? It sits at the other end of the spectrum from self-selection, which is where students select themselves to answer a question, typically by putting up their hand. The agreed understanding is that if students don’t put up their hands, they won’t be called on
What’s the problem with self-selection? Unfortunately, it tends to be dominated by the loudest, quickest or most confident. Research suggests that those who get drowned out in this environment learn less, this is an issue worth considering link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Very excited and proud to announce we at InnerDrive are partnering with Routledge to edit a book series called ‘The Teacher CPD Academy’ that we really hope will help make a positive dent in the education landscape.
The Teacher CPD Academy series is built on:
📚 Research from cognitive science + teaching & learning
🧠 On topics that matter
📝 Authors from a range of backgrounds: teachers, researchers, senior leaders, psychologists & trainers
📝 Several 1st time authors & established ones
Each book will be accompanied by a module on our Teacher CPD Academy site ()
The 1st set of books is going to explore how cog sci can inform:
Cognitive Load Theory and Classroom Displays. A 🧵 on some interesting studies…
First off a quick note on distractions. They are potentially everywhere.
According to recent research, students get distracted “more than 2,000 times per year and that these disruptions result in the loss of between 10-20 days of instructional time”.
This study found that after 2 weeks, students who were taught in highly decorated classrooms (e.g. with lots of colour, posters, art) spent more time off task than students in minimally decorated classrooms journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
Who wants a twitter thread on about feedback? Some really interesting studies out there that covers what/when/how. So here is a thread 🧵 on 10 of my favourite studies...
Feedback is a double edged sword 🗡. This seminal study found that feedback is one of the best bets for accelerating learning. However, over a third of feedback interventions hindered progress. That is to say, students would have done better if left alone psycnet.apa.org/record/1999-10…
Timing ⏰ (part 1). Should feedback be immediate or delayed? It depends. This study found that in studies in a laboratory, delayed feedback was more helpful; however, in a real world setting, especially in classrooms, immediate feedback was more beneficial journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.310…