Mike Lee Profile picture
Feb 24, 2025 9 tweets 4 min read Read on X
17. Republicans in Congress therefore need to take a stand—holding hostage something Democrats care about by attaching the REINS Act to that thing Image
18. To that end, Republicans should attach the REINS Act to any bill to increase the debt ceiling, forcing true compromise in an area where it’s badly needed—here, restoring separation of powers through the REINS Act Image
19. The REINS Act would force a restoration of the separation of powers mandated by the Constitution, by returning the lawmaking power to the legislative branch Image
20. But this thread is about federalism—the Constitution’s mandate that the powers of the federal government remain “few and defined,” as James Madison described them in Federalist 45 (while referring to the powers reserved to the states as “numerous and indefinite”)

So what does the REINS Act have to do with restoring federalism?

EverythingImage
21. Remember: our drift from separation of powers (in which Congress began shifting the task of lawmaking to unelected bureaucrats in the executive branch) didn’t begin until the Supreme Court dramatically expanded Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause, contrary to the Constitution’s text, structure, and original understandingImage
22. It follows logically that, if Congress can begin to restore separation of powers (as it would do by enacting the REINS Act) there would soon be far less new federal law being created each year, as elected lawmakers would be more reluctant to impose new burdens on the American people—far more reluctant than federal bureaucrats who never have to stand for electionImage
23. In other words, if every expansion of federal law had to be enacted by Congress—whose members must stand for election at regular intervals—there would be less federal law being created each year Image
24. As surely as the sun will rise in the east tomorrow (and every day thereafter), members of Congress will rediscover federalism—as it will be in their interest to do so—once the REINS Act has become law Image
25. Follow if you’d like to read more posts like this one, and like and share if you’d agree that Congress should attach the REINS Act to any bill raising or suspending the debt ceiling Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mike Lee

Mike Lee Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BasedMikeLee

Jan 27
🚨🧵 1. It’s wrong that all spending bills go through just one committee in the Senate—the Committee on Appropriations

The House of Representatives does the same thing

This thread attempts to explain why this is a problem and what can be done about it
2. It’s unwise and even reckless to run all spending bills through a single committee for at least three independent reasons

First, it makes no sense from a workload-distribution standpoint
3. The staggering size, cost, and complexity of the federal government are such that no sane person would assign all of the workload associated with all spending bills to one committee

Responsibility for spending bills should be distributed broadly among all who have been elected to either chamber of Congress—not just to a select few who happen to serve on one committee
Read 19 tweets
Jan 7
🧵1. Congress should be *passing* the SAVE Act to stop noncitizens from voting—not paying leftists to lobby against it

The Labor/HHS spending bill advanced by the Senate Appropriations Committee contains an earmark giving $500,000 to leftists falsely claiming the SAVE Act would “disenfranchise millions of Americans”
2. This earmark must go!

Also, earmarks as a whole are problematic, given their tendency to promote excessive spending and bad policy decisions

They coerce lawmakers in both parties to vote for bloated spending bills in a way that favors the left and other fans of big government
3. We need Congress to *pass* the SAVE Act and thereby protect election integrity—not use your money to pay far-left activists to undermine it
Read 8 tweets
Dec 31, 2025
🧵 1. The massive fraud schemes in Minnesota—billions in stolen federal funds from child nutrition, autism services, housing stabilization & childcare programs—aren’t just a failure of oversight

These areas (welfare, education aid, health services) lie far outside Congress’s enumerated powers under the Constitution

And they likely represent just the tip of a much larger iceberg—with other schemes going on in many other states
2. Strictly speaking, the federal government has no sound constitutional authority—rooted in the plain text and original understanding of that document—to run or fund state-level social welfare programs like these
3. When Congress acts where it’s not authorized, that’s an overreach

As the Tenth Amendment makes clear, functions not deemed federal by the Constitution are reserved to the states or to the people

Nothing in the Constitution authorizes Congress to fund Somali daycare centers
Read 5 tweets
Dec 12, 2025
🧵Return of the Walking Earmarks: A Deadly Epidemic🧵

1/ After a decade-long moratorium, Congress has reverted to “congressionally directed spending”—the polite, new name for pork-barrel projects subtly slipped into must-pass bills with almost no review or opportunity for debate Image
2/ Earmarks are sold as “only 1% of spending,” but that 1% creates a corrupting process that helps perpetuate $2 trillion annual deficits

Let’s talk about why they’re so toxic ok Image
3/ Legalized Vote “Purchasing”

Members trade votes on massive spending bills for pet projects back home

“You vote for my bridge to nowhere, I’ll vote for your turtle tunnel”

It’s not about good policy

It’s about buying votes with taxpayer money—all to make politicians look goodImage
Read 13 tweets
Oct 30, 2025
🚨🧵🚨 1/10 Government shutdowns aren’t a bug—they’re a feature of a system that’s grown too big and too expensive

They illustrate why James Madison insisted the federal government’s powers must be “few and defined”

Let’s break it down Image
2/10 In Federalist 45, Madison wrote:

“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.”

He wasn’t being poetic

He was drawing a line in the sand
3/10 “Few and defined” includes:

• National defense
• Foreign affairs
• Interstate & foreign commerce
• Coining money
• Post offices & roads

There are a few others, but that’s most of it

Everything else?

Left to the states—“or to the people”

But today?

The feds touch everything—including education, healthcare, light bulbs, toilets, and your kids’ lunch at school
Read 11 tweets
Oct 20, 2025
At the “No Kings” rallies, we saw countless, open calls for violence against President Trump and other Republicans

When pressed, some Democrats will shrug and insist that “both sides have bad apples who sometimes say bad things, but that doesn’t mean they reflect the views of their party as a whole”

That sounds like a good argument—and in the past it might have been

But open calls for violence among Democrats have recently become so common, widely accepted, and even celebrated—as they certainly were at the “No Kings” rallies—that this argument rings hollow

Those engaging in such behavior over the weekend appear to have done so with full, unbridled approval of their fellow protesters

And this happened in so many times—and in so many different locations—that it’s impossible to dismiss them as one-off exceptions

Please share this post if you agree, commenting on any examples you found especially troublingImage
Image

Image
This guy’s promoting the killing of federal law enforcement personnel—with the apparent approval of the crowd
Dick proudly announces that he wants to “kill the president”
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(