JChoe Profile picture
Feb 25 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
"Trump-Russia", by which people mean a variety of different ideas and explanatory theories ranging from "omg Agent Krasnov!" to "senior citizen being steamrolled by Putin", has never been about any kind of secret or non-public information.

It's because of what he's done. (🧵) Image
In 2016, the only substantive change that the Trump campaign wanted made to the Republican Party platform was support for lethal aid to Ukraine.

npr.org/2017/12/04/568…
In 2017, once elected, Trump met Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Ambassador Sergey Kislyak alone in the Oval Office a day after firing James Comey because he wouldn't offer Trump public assurances that he wasn't involved with Russia.
npr.org/sections/thetw…
In 2019, Trump tried to condition aid to Ukraine on the provision of fabricated Hunter Biden dirt, which later resulted in his first impeachment.

npr.org/2019/09/25/764…
In 2024, as a disgraced out-of-office twice-impeached felon Trump was responsible for Republicans blocking a bipartisan border-security-for-Ukraine-aid compromise.
U.S. intelligence agencies and major news outlets also broke news this year of Russian interference in the American election, always attacking Biden or Harris and supporting Trump.
In 2025, Trump told Ukraine that the aid we've sent them was actually a loan and tried to bully them into a neo-colonialist deal where they surrender their mineral rights to the U.S. as well as conceding territory to Russia.
And, now we're voting alongside Russia, and Belarus, and literally against the rest of the civilized world that we're supposed to lead, on a U.N. vote regarding Ukraine.

These are simply facts.
You don't need a background in intelligence, or a security clearance, or really even very good research skills to know all these facts, because they are all large, public, officially attested-to or -documented events. All I'm doing is putting them in a row, figuratively speaking.
The specific causation here, I don't care - pee tape, 1980s compromise, 1990s capital flight & laundering, Melania, Felix Sater, Trump Tower, whatever. They are irrelevant to the big, obvious, amply-documented, public facts that we can all agree to, and to the practical upshot.
Before November 2024, the primary practical importance to all of us was, let's not vote that guy into the damn Presidency.

Now, I think, it's a lot more like "realize the stakes and educate other people on them before it's too late".
And for people outside the country, like...

Whatever you think he's going to do next on Ukraine, which, I'll admit myself having read news about this asshole for the past 8 years, is unpredictable

Do you think it's going to be good or bad?

Yeah.

That's what's predictable.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with JChoe

JChoe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JoohnChoe

Feb 19
The best outcome that I can see here is some kind of European unified military command with Zelensky in its leadership.

We'll be at odds with them on several issues like Africa, China, maybe even Russia.

But the alternatives are either capitulation now or another war later.

🧵
Trump's otherwise-inexplicable comments regarding Zelensky's popularity make sense in this context. It is a lie so easily disproved as to be laughable.

Zelensky is actually substantially more popular than Trump, who has never had an approval rating higher than 50%. Image
Image
According to my theory, the reason why Trump is talking about Zelensky's approval rating doesn't have a whole lot to do with the actual situation as far as elections, either.

It is especially jarring considering the Napoleonic rhetoric Trump uses himself.
Image
Read 6 tweets
Feb 15
let me get this straight

We just elected a President who put a foreign intelligence 'asset' in charge of intelligence and an abusive alcoholic in charge of defense

And they screwed up just ONE security conference - their first! - so badly that Europe is about to unite and rearm
Not as in "oh *waves hand lazily* Europe is screwed" the way that people say "the West"

As in

Team Trump screwed up Munich so bad that Zelensky got up there like nuclear Charles Martel

And all those countries you hear applauding *agreed*
Volodymyr the Hammer

A fitting epithet if this all comes to fruition

For those unaware, Charles Martel is the reason why there is a Europe today and not, like, an Eastern Caliphate

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_M…
Read 4 tweets
Feb 14
OK, so people overseas (Ukrainians especially) might not get this

Vice President Vance is out there today, talking about recovering American "optionality" in negotiations with Russia by saber-rattling

because SecDef Hegseth screwed up so very, very badly a few days ago

1/3 Image
Image
You should not evaluate this as "oh wait Vance is on our side now!" or "Vance is one of the good guys!"

Look at statements Vance has made on Ukraine, Politico has a helpful summary from July of last year

There's no shortage of them and they're all bad

politico.eu/article/jd-van…
I hate to say it but look what we're doing with the Eric Adams/DoJ matter, or for that matter where Canada and Mexico are with us

The U.S. is not in a position right now to be dictating the terms of very much

As a U.S. ally right now I'd start looking at plans for worst cases
Read 4 tweets
Feb 9
The NIH funding freeze is an interesting anti-disinfo problem

The question is "how do you explain the impact of (here we go) reduced NIH indirect-cost reimbursement for research" and make it more approachable than disinfo

I think the way to explain it is about patriotism

(🧵) Image
So, this is about reduced funding at the end of the day so examples of NIH research that saved lives might be apropos

This is a fairly obvious answer though I don't think anyone is gonna win a Macarthur Genius Award for realizing that Image
At a more academic level it strikes me that this goes to the heart of American competitiveness and the way that we subsidize science & medical research in this country

Howard Zinn discusses this a bit; that goes back to a relative of President Bush(es) named Vannevar Bush Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 30
In 1956, a United Airlines DC-7 was involved in a midair collision with a Lockheed L-1049 Super Constellation over the Grand Canyon, killing all 128 souls aboard. This is cited as a driving impetus behind the nationalization of American air traffic control.

🧵 Image
I was completely ignorant of all this, this morning, I just looked this up; but when you read about it, you can kind of see why this led to a nationalized air traffic control service.

It starts from just asking 'why' - the 'five whys' exercise, really.
Why did the planes collide?

Because they weren't being tracked in realtime.

Why weren't they being tracked in realtime?

Because they were 'off-airways', which meant, in 1956, in uncontrolled airspace.

Why was there uncontrolled airspace through which PASSENGER PLANES flew?
Read 12 tweets
Jan 25
The odds that we go to some kind of incredibly stupid war with a NATO ally and partner, Denmark, over Greenland, increases from "negligible" to "non-negligible" because our country just made an abusive, vapid, Deus-Vult-tattoo-having vetbro talkshow host into our SecDef

🧵 Image
The odds of nuclear weapons use within the next four years goes up, because consultation with SecDef is supposed to be a check on the President's authorization of nuclear launch, and it is laughable to think Hegseth will serve as any kind of check to Trump
At this point, if Trump had a senior moment and said "let's nuke Mexico!" it is difficult to envision a 25th-Amendment Cabinet majority, or any kind of internal check in the Defense command chain, that would actually stop him from doing that.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(