Tanmay Kadam recalls the period of the 🇻🇳Vietnam War when 🇺🇸 American B-52 bombers, known for unleashing devastation, were perished by 🇷🇺Soviet-made air defense missiles👇🧵
1⃣ Operation Linebacker II was one of the most intense bombing campaigns in modern history. Over 200 B-52 bombers dropped 20,000+ tons of bombs in just 11 days. The goal? To force North Vietnam back to peace talks.
But Hanoi was ready.
2⃣ North Vietnam had one of the densest air defense networks in history, built with Soviet-supplied SA-2 surface-to-air missiles (SAMs).
The B-52 Stratofortress, America’s most powerful bomber, was expected to dominate. But in December 1972, it faced its greatest test.
3⃣ December 18, 1972 – 87 B-52s flew toward Hanoi, escorted by F-4 Phantoms. As they neared their targets, North Vietnamese radar operators tracked them with deadly precision.
Over 200 missiles were launched. The sky lit up with explosions.
4⃣ The first night saw five B-52s hit, three destroyed. Crews ejected, some captured. It was a wake-up call for US commanders.
But December 20 was even worse. North Vietnam had adapted, correctly predicting US flight paths. The results were devastating.
5⃣ As American bombers flew in, another barrage of SAMs was unleashed. In a single night, six B-52s were shot down—the worst loss in B-52 history.
"It felt like flying into hell… we were sitting ducks," one surviving pilot recalled.
6⃣ Nixon was furious. Changes were made—randomized flight paths, increased electronic jamming, and decoys were deployed.
These tactics reduced losses, but by the end of Linebacker II, 15 B-52s had been lost, along with 33 American airmen.
7⃣ Despite the cost, Nixon declared victory. On January 27, 1973, the Paris Peace Accords were signed, leading to the withdrawal of US forces from Vietnam.
But two years later, in 1975, Saigon fell. Did the bombings really achieve their goal?
8⃣ The campaign proved one thing: Strategic bombing alone cannot win wars.
It also showed that even the most advanced bombers are vulnerable to a well-coordinated air defense. The lessons from Linebacker II still shape air warfare today.
9⃣ The effectiveness of Soviet SAMs in Vietnam reshaped modern aerial combat. Today, conflicts like Ukraine highlight how advanced SAMs and drones continue to challenge air superiority.
As 🇮🇳 India beats 🇵🇰 Pakistan in 🏆Champions Trophy, Eurasian Times recalls when Eagles kept Falcons at bay: How IAF’s MiG-29s triumphed over PAF’s F-16s during Kargil War 👇🧵
1️⃣ During the 1999 Kargil War, the Indian Air Force (IAF) launched Operation Safed Sagar to neutralize enemy positions in the treacherous Himalayan heights. While several aircraft played key roles, the MiG-29s emerged as the silent guardians of Indian airspace. ✈️🇮🇳
2️⃣ The MiG-29, codenamed Baaz (Eagle), was the backbone of IAF’s air superiority efforts. Armed with R-27 beyond-visual-range (BVR) air-to-air missiles, these jets locked onto PAF’s F-16s, forcing them to retreat and ensuring the safety of IAF strike missions. 🦅🔥
Turkey’s KAAN fighter made its maiden flight in Feb 2024, marking a major milestone in its aerospace ambitions. Meanwhile, India’s AMCA is still in the prototype stage. How did Turkey move ahead so quickly, and what does this mean for the future of both programs? Let’s break it down. 🧵👇
1️⃣ Turkey’s Aerospace Growth 🇹🇷
Turkey’s journey into 5th-gen fighter development started in 2010 when it decided to create an indigenous alternative to Western fighters. Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI) spearheaded the program, leveraging its experience producing F-16s under license and developing combat UAVs like the Bayraktar TB2. Over the years, Turkey built a strong foundation in aerospace manufacturing, allowing for rapid progress on the KAAN fighter.
2️⃣ A Defense Powerhouse 💰
Turkey has aggressively expanded its defense industry, with a market size reaching $15.27 billion in 2024. Turkish firms like Aselsan, Baykar, TAI, and Roketsan are now globally recognized, with four companies listed in SIPRI’s Top 100 defense firms. Notably, Baykar’s revenue soared by 94%, driven by the massive export success of the TB2 drones. This robust industrial ecosystem enabled Turkey to fund and execute advanced projects like KAAN efficiently.
🛩️ 🇺🇸 F-35 vs. 🇷🇺 Su-57: Which 5th-Gen Fighter is Right for the IAF?
🧵 Veteran IAF pilot and military expert VK Thakur provides a comprehensive comparison between the 🇺🇸 Lockheed Martin F-35 and the 🇷🇺 Sukhoi Su-57 to determine which aircraft is better suited for the 🇮🇳 Indian Air Force. Let's dive in! ⬇️
1️⃣ Different Design Philosophies:
The F-35 and Su-57 were developed for different roles:
🔹 The F-35 is an offensive platform, designed to penetrate contested airspace.
🔹 The Su-57 is primarily defensive, optimized for air superiority & interception.
2️⃣ Geopolitical Constraints
Defense procurement isn’t just about technology—it’s heavily influenced by geopolitics.
🔸 The U.S. could impose CAATSA sanctions if India opts for Su-57.
🔸 The F-35 comes with operational restrictions and no transfer of technology (ToT), while Su-57 offers co-production opportunities.
🇵🇰 JF-17 Block-III Trains Alongside Rafale & Typhoon Jets During Saudi Wargames 🇸🇦
Covered by Ritu Sharma, this highlights how 🇵🇰 Pakistan’s JF-17 Block-III is participating in high-profile international air exercises while 🇮🇳 India still awaits the delivery of the LCA Mk1A.
A detailed breakdown 🧵👇
1️⃣ JF-17 Block-III Joins ‘Spears of Victory’
The latest Block-III variant of the China-Pakistan-built JF-17 participated in the "Spears of Victory 2025" wargames in Saudi Arabia. The exercise included:
🔹🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia: F-15, EF-2000, Tornado
🔹 🇫🇷 France: Rafale
🔹 🇬🇧 UK: EF-2000
🔹 🇺🇸 USA: F-16
🔹 🇵🇰 Pakistan: JF-17 Block-III
🔹 🇶🇦 Qatar: EF-2000
🔹 🇧🇭 Bahrain: F-16
🔹 🇦🇪 UAE: Mirage 2000-5
2️⃣ PAF Demonstrates Long-Range Deployment
Pakistan Air Force (PAF) executed a non-stop flight from Pakistan to Saudi Arabia and back, utilizing in-flight refueling. This showcased the JF-17’s long-range operational capabilities, as per PAF’s ISPR.