🚨Hidden BEE Premiums: How Preferential Procurement Drains Billions 🚨

South Africa’s government pays a premium on almost everything it buys — far more than private businesses.

Why? It's a system that prioritizes race over value-for-money spending, wasting billions.

BEE isn’t fighting poverty — it’s pro-poverty policy.

Let’s break it down. 🧵👇
1️⃣ A R40M School That Should Cost R15M?

In 2009, Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan exposed the shocking reality:

❌ The state paid R40M for a school that should have cost R15M.
❌A R26 loaf of bread instead of R7.

That’s anti-ownership economics in action — where taxpayers pay more and get less.
2️⃣ The Price of Politics

By 2010, Gordhan warned again: The government was being routinely charged inflated prices. But nothing changed.

💰 A R14M tender to organize a conference — double the losing bid of R7M — because the winner was a 100% black-owned firm.

This is crony socialism, where government-knows-best policies force taxpayers to subsidize inefficiency.
3️⃣ @MYANC Admits the Problem

Even Gwede Mantashe criticized BEE procurement in 2012:

⚠️ "BEE companies must stop using the state as their cash cow."
⚠️ "It is unacceptable to charge taxpayers R20M for a public school that should cost R5M–R10M."

And who suffers the most? The poor.
4️⃣ R140M for a Website?!

In 2013, Free State officials paid R140M to a BEE contractor for a website redesign—using a R400 template.

After public outcry, they "corrected" the number:
➡️ "We actually paid only R40M."
➡️ Still 100,000x the real cost!
5⃣ That R40M could have:

🏠 Built 400 RDP houses
👩‍🏫 Paid for 1,000 new teachers
🍼 Funded 80,000 child support grants

Instead, it lined the pockets of politically connected elites. BEE isn’t about growth—it’s wealth destruction.
5️⃣ The Smart Meter Scandal

Johannesburg’s @CityPowerJhb handed a lucrative contract to Edison Power, a company linked to Jacob Zuma, despite its higher price:

❌ Double the bid of another BEE firm
❌ Higher than multiple competitors
❌ Imported meters from the US, while a local firm planned to manufacture them in SA
6⃣ This is choking small businesses while driving up costs for everyone.

❌ More taxpayer money wasted
❌ Fewer jobs for South Africans
❌ Higher electricity prices for struggling families
7⃣ Transnet’s R15.5bn "BEE Premium"

In 2013, Transnet awarded a R15.5bn fuel contract to 9 BEE firms. Their own CFO admitted:

⚠️ Fuel would cost more because the new firms lacked experience.
⚠️ The extra cost was justified because "BEE comes at a premium."

Translation? A direct transfer of wealth from taxpayers to connected insiders.
8⃣ And who pays?

➡️ Poor households struggling with high food & transport costs.
➡️ Small businesses suffocating under anti-innovation policies.
➡️ Job-seekers locked out of the aspiration economy.
9⃣ 💡 The Bottom Line

BEE was supposed to create economic inclusion. Instead, it’s an opportunity-crushing policy that punishes merit-based success while making poor South Africans even poorer.
🚨 Cutting BEE premiums saves R100bn — enough to CUT VAT from 15% to 11.5%! NO NEED FOR HIGHER TAXES.

🔹 Lower VAT means:
✔️ Cheaper food & transport.
✔️ More take-home pay.
✔️ A real shot at economic mobility.

📢 Like & share if you agree!

📖 Read the IRR’s "Cut VAT & BEE" report here: irr.org.za/reports/the-ir…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with South African Institute of Race Relations

South African Institute of Race Relations Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IRR_SouthAfrica

Feb 24
💥🚨 South Africa’s biggest scam? Forcing you to bankroll Blatant Elite Enrichment.

SA is #1 in the world for ripping off taxpayers — taking BILLIONS and delivering nothing.

Roads? Hospitals? Schools? Forget it.

Your taxes subsidize cadres, cronies & crooks to live large.

Let's unpack it 🧵👇
1⃣ SA has officially hit rock bottom.

We rank WORST in the world for how fast our government takes more tax while delivering less.

More money stolen. Less value for YOU.

How bad is it? Let’s dive in 👇
2⃣ Between 1996 and 2023, SA moved in the Tax-Increase-Effectiveness-Decrease (TIED) direction.

That means we pay more tax while getting WORSE government services.

In fact, we’ve lost 51% of government effectiveness while tax as a % of GDP shot up. 📉📈
Read 9 tweets
Feb 19
🚨 THREAD: NO NEED FOR A VAT HIKE—CUT BEE PREMIUMS INSTEAD! 🚨

📢 The ANC wants to hike VAT to 17%, making life more expensive for EVERYONE. But here’s the truth:

💡 If BEE premiums are cut, VAT doesn’t need to rise at all! In fact, VAT could even go DOWN.

👇 Let’s break it down 🧵
1️⃣ The budget delay is a BIG DEAL.

For the first time in decades, there’s time to rethink how government spends YOUR money. 💰

Instead of squeezing South Africans with a 17% VAT hike, why not cut wasteful spending first?
2️⃣ IRR has a better plan: Instead of taxing people more, let’s CUT the billions wasted on BEE preference premiums!

📩 We’ve sent Parliament a #BlueprintforGrowth demanding:
✅ Transparency on BEE costs
✅ Cutting BEE premiums
✅ Dropping VAT to 11.5%—without more debt!
Read 11 tweets
Feb 14
🧵 The State Land Audit: Misused & Misleading

The 2017 State Land Audit is often cited to justify EWC. But both the EFF and ANC misuse its data, distorting South Africa’s land ownership picture. Let’s break it down. 👇
1⃣ The EFF claimed black people own:

📌 Less than 2% of rural land
📌 7% of urban land

The @MYANC echoed this, with President @CyrilRamaphosa stating whites own 72% of all individually owned farms.
2⃣ The problem? These stats omit key details, leading to misleading conclusions:

⚠️ The Audit has numerical errors
⚠️ It only measures individually owned land
⚠️ It ignores land already transferred since 1994
Read 12 tweets
Feb 12
🧵 South Africa’s land debate: EWC & the future of property rights.

In 2018, President @CyrilRamaphosa declared: “We are going to take land, and when we take land, we are going to take it without compensation.”

This policy has major implications. Here’s what you need to know. 👇
1⃣ EWC is a major policy shift.

The government frames it as land reform, but it also threatens property rights, investment, and economic stability. ⚠️
2⃣ The big question: Will EWC fix land inequality? Or will it undermine property rights, drive away investors, and weaken economic growth? 💰🏚️
Read 11 tweets
Feb 10
🚨 THREAD: Why does the ANC keep pushing Expropriation Without Compensation (EWC)?

Because it’s part of a bigger plan—the National Democratic Revolution (NDR).

The problem? It’s making South Africa poorer, not better.

Let’s break it down. 🧵👇
1⃣ The ANC has been committed to the NDR for decades.

At every national conference, it reaffirms this goal: transforming SA through wealth redistribution—not by growing the economy, but by shifting existing assets.
2⃣ This thinking comes from an old Marxist-Leninist idea that says SA is a “colony of a special type”.

Basically, it argues that white South Africans only became wealthy by exploiting black South Africans—and that the solution is state-driven redistribution.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 8
EWC FAQs – What You Need to Know 🧵🚨

The Expropriation Act is now law. What does this mean for your property rights?

❌ It allows expropriation without compensation
❌ It applies to ALL property – not just land
❌ It opens the door for government abuse

Here’s how it works & why you should be concerned. 🧵👇
1️⃣ What Can Be Expropriated?

⚠️ Not just land! The Act applies to ALL property in South Africa.

🔹 Homes, businesses, pensions
🔹 Cars, gold, trademarks, shares
🔹 Even intellectual property (like patents & copyrights!)

📜 Section 25(4)(b) of the Constitution confirms “property is not limited to land.”
2️⃣ Can Government Take Your Property Without Paying?

🚨 YES – and here’s how:

🔹 The Act explicitly allows nil compensation for land (S12(3)).
🔹 Unclear if buildings are included – legal grey area.
🔹 Other property types must be compensated, but less than market value is likely.

📢 Bottom line: Your property can be taken, and you may get little to nothing in return.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(