In 2009, Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan exposed the shocking reality:
❌ The state paid R40M for a school that should have cost R15M.
❌A R26 loaf of bread instead of R7.
That’s anti-ownership economics in action — where taxpayers pay more and get less.
2️⃣ The Price of Politics
By 2010, Gordhan warned again: The government was being routinely charged inflated prices. But nothing changed.
💰 A R14M tender to organize a conference — double the losing bid of R7M — because the winner was a 100% black-owned firm.
This is crony socialism, where government-knows-best policies force taxpayers to subsidize inefficiency.
3️⃣ @MYANC Admits the Problem
Even Gwede Mantashe criticized BEE procurement in 2012:
⚠️ "BEE companies must stop using the state as their cash cow."
⚠️ "It is unacceptable to charge taxpayers R20M for a public school that should cost R5M–R10M."
And who suffers the most? The poor.
4️⃣ R140M for a Website?!
In 2013, Free State officials paid R140M to a BEE contractor for a website redesign—using a R400 template.
After public outcry, they "corrected" the number:
➡️ "We actually paid only R40M."
➡️ Still 100,000x the real cost!
5⃣ That R40M could have:
🏠 Built 400 RDP houses
👩🏫 Paid for 1,000 new teachers
🍼 Funded 80,000 child support grants
Instead, it lined the pockets of politically connected elites. BEE isn’t about growth—it’s wealth destruction.
5️⃣ The Smart Meter Scandal
Johannesburg’s @CityPowerJhb handed a lucrative contract to Edison Power, a company linked to Jacob Zuma, despite its higher price:
❌ Double the bid of another BEE firm
❌ Higher than multiple competitors
❌ Imported meters from the US, while a local firm planned to manufacture them in SA
6⃣ This is choking small businesses while driving up costs for everyone.
❌ More taxpayer money wasted
❌ Fewer jobs for South Africans
❌ Higher electricity prices for struggling families
7⃣ Transnet’s R15.5bn "BEE Premium"
In 2013, Transnet awarded a R15.5bn fuel contract to 9 BEE firms. Their own CFO admitted:
⚠️ Fuel would cost more because the new firms lacked experience.
⚠️ The extra cost was justified because "BEE comes at a premium."
Translation? A direct transfer of wealth from taxpayers to connected insiders.
8⃣ And who pays?
➡️ Poor households struggling with high food & transport costs.
➡️ Small businesses suffocating under anti-innovation policies.
➡️ Job-seekers locked out of the aspiration economy.
9⃣ 💡 The Bottom Line
BEE was supposed to create economic inclusion. Instead, it’s an opportunity-crushing policy that punishes merit-based success while making poor South Africans even poorer.
🚨 Cutting BEE premiums saves R100bn — enough to CUT VAT from 15% to 11.5%! NO NEED FOR HIGHER TAXES.
🔹 Lower VAT means:
✔️ Cheaper food & transport.
✔️ More take-home pay.
✔️ A real shot at economic mobility.
The 2017 State Land Audit is often cited to justify EWC. But both the EFF and ANC misuse its data, distorting South Africa’s land ownership picture. Let’s break it down. 👇
1⃣ The EFF claimed black people own:
📌 Less than 2% of rural land
📌 7% of urban land
The @MYANC echoed this, with President @CyrilRamaphosa stating whites own 72% of all individually owned farms.
2⃣ The problem? These stats omit key details, leading to misleading conclusions:
⚠️ The Audit has numerical errors
⚠️ It only measures individually owned land
⚠️ It ignores land already transferred since 1994
🚨 THREAD: Why does the ANC keep pushing Expropriation Without Compensation (EWC)?
Because it’s part of a bigger plan—the National Democratic Revolution (NDR).
The problem? It’s making South Africa poorer, not better.
Let’s break it down. 🧵👇
1⃣ The ANC has been committed to the NDR for decades.
At every national conference, it reaffirms this goal: transforming SA through wealth redistribution—not by growing the economy, but by shifting existing assets.
2⃣ This thinking comes from an old Marxist-Leninist idea that says SA is a “colony of a special type”.
Basically, it argues that white South Africans only became wealthy by exploiting black South Africans—and that the solution is state-driven redistribution.
📜 Section 25(4)(b) of the Constitution confirms “property is not limited to land.”
2️⃣ Can Government Take Your Property Without Paying?
🚨 YES – and here’s how:
🔹 The Act explicitly allows nil compensation for land (S12(3)).
🔹 Unclear if buildings are included – legal grey area.
🔹 Other property types must be compensated, but less than market value is likely.
📢 Bottom line: Your property can be taken, and you may get little to nothing in return.