Of all the horror stories in Douglas Murray’s THE STRANGE DEATH OF EUROPE, this was the most horrifying:
A victim of sexual assault lied about the ethnicity of her attackers because she—get this—didn’t want citizens to view the men who attacked her “as the problem.”
🧵 1/
Imagine the poor self image of a woman who would lie to the police to protect the public image of three men who assaulted her.
But it gets worse. Much worse. 👇
2/
In a nightmarish manifestation of Stockholm Syndrome, the woman says in her open letter:
“You’re not the problem. You’re usually a wonderful human being”
Tip: wonderful human beings don’t force women to perform sex acts on them.
And there’s still more…
3/
They’re no better or worse—they’re only different
“They are alone and looking to banish their humiliation of flight with confirmation of their masculinity.”
The left has been force-feeding the world these lies for decades.
Don’t dare argue, lest they call you ‘racist.’
4/
Here’s a true thing:
Not all sexual assaults are committed by men of a certain ethnic group / nationality / religion.
Here’s another true thing:
When any crime is committed, the identify of the perpetrator should be reported.
INCLUDING ethnicity, religion, nationality.
5/
Our anti-racist friends (AKA We The Undersigned) are all for reporting the correct sex of a criminal, often citing the importance of accurate statistics.
Is there less of a need for accuracy with respect to other demographic data?
6/
If we don’t want crime statistics to make it appear that women commit more crimes of a certain nature than they actually do, wouldn’t we also be concerned about statistics that make it appear that a particular group doesn’t commit FEWER crimes of that nature?
7/
On top of the behaviour of victims who wish to protect their abusers in the name of ‘let’s all get along,’ we’re witnessing contradictory opinions with respect to accuracy in criminal records.
And…boom…the Washington Post has spoken out on HHS’ Pediatric Gender Medicine report with one of the most scathing articles thus far.
Let’s look at the claims, the rhetoric, the bias, and…the reader comments. 👇
🧵 1/
WaPo doesn’t waste a moment getting right to the ‘conversion therapy’ lie.
No questioning, no discussion, simply scarequoting ‘noninvasive’ and citing “pushback from LGBTQ+ advocates who said the proposal amounted to ‘conversion therapy’”
It must be true then. {sarcasm}
2/
Following in the footsteps of other media reports today, WaPo avoids naming the Cass Report — calling it ‘a similar, highly disputed, evidence review to enact a ban on puberty blockers’
Is “sex assigned at birth” REALLY a term “common in medicine”?
The Department of Health and Human Services report on Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria is a beautiful sight to see.
And a long time coming.
Let’s hope changes in the way we handle confused children aren’t far off.
A Quick Look at the Executive Summary 👇
🧵 1/
This is damning:
“Clinician-researchers developed the pediatric medical transition model in response to disappointing psychosocial outcomes in adults who underwent medical transition.”
2/
“Evidence for harms association with pediatric medical transition may reflect the relatively short period of time since the widespread adoption of the medical/surgical treatment model, failure of studies to track & report harms, and publication bias”
While we’re calling out Lia Thomas for cheating his way through a number of swim meets while at U Penn, let’s not forget the supporting cast members:
1. Head Coach Mike Schnur (the only coaching staff who feels it necessary to declare pronouns on his profile page)
🧵 1/
“Mike has been one of my biggest supporters and allies in this process since day one and I'm very grateful to have that support from him and from everybody on the team. I feel very supported. Just treated like any other member of the women's team” —Lia Thomas
2/
2. Associate VP for Equity & Title IX Officer Michele Rovinsky-Mayer
“Don’t feel safe”
“Afraid to travel”
“Trip was canceled”
“In passport purgatory”
🚨 Free advice 🚨
No matter how you dress or what you call yourself, you don’t get to mandate what official documents look like or what data they include.
🧵 1/
🛎️ There’s a common thread in all of the stories below. It’s one of persecution and ‘see what the government is doing to me?’
🛎️ But let’s look at it another way:
People who claim to be the opposite sex (or refuse to be saddled with the horrid binariness of sex) think that the world should adapt itself to suit them.
This is not how the world works. It isn’t how government documents work. Or how security clearances work.
Some things aren’t (and should not be) up to individuals to decide, hide from the public, lie about, alter, etc. Sex and age are two of those things.
No government-issued document should be changed on a whim, and unless we want to go down the rabbit hole of ‘how often and how soon and how many times can one request a new sex marker on a passport,’ allowing any such changes will be whimsical. If we do stipulate limits/restrictions there will always be someone who feels persecuted if the rules disallow a change.
🛎️ Who wins?
There are solid reasons (border security) for sticking with accuracy in passports.
Trans-identifying people claim there are solid reasons (personal security) for allowing passports to reflect their ‘chosen’ identity.
IF these are in conflict, then which comes out on top?
The safety of entire populations?
Or the feelings of a small number of people who have made life choices incompatible with reality? 🤷♀️
🍿 And now…on to stories of unbound cruelty…
2/
Transmasculine-nonbinary-identifying female (woman) applied for a passport update to show MALE sex in Jan. 2025. No details given, but State still has the passport.
“it’s basically like transgender folks have been put on an informal travel ban, unable to leave the country.”