Brandon Warmke Profile picture
Mar 4 6 tweets 3 min read Read on X
1/ Philosopher Joseph Heath on the five dogmas of DEI

1. Race Is A Social Construct
2. Stereotypes Are False
3. Racism Is Not Innate, But Learned
4. Majority Privilege Is Unjust
5. Racial Disparities Are Unjust (Per Se) Image
2/ "In every canonical use of the term, race is determined by ancestry, and ancestry is a straightforward biological concept." Image
3/ "the way that many anti-racism educators have tried to encourage this caution is by telling students that these beliefs about groups are stereotypes, and that stereotypes are simply false, not just as universal generalizations, but even as claims about averages, probabilities, or frequencies."Image
4/ "The desire to believe in the innocence of children is powerful, but it should not be allowed to influence the study of human nature." Image
5/ "the advantages that stem from majority privilege are not necessarily unjust (should everyone be able to attend a school at which the majority of teachers are of their own race?). In many cases, the benefits are just a consequence of having mainstream tastes and preferences." Image
6/ "disparityism jumps directly to the conclusion that the outcome, being unequal, must be unjust. (This is most prominent in the work of Ibram X. Kendi, who defines racism as the existence of racial disparity in outcome.)

The problem with this view is that practically every disparity is the product of multiple causes, some of which are innocent, others of which are not."Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brandon Warmke

Brandon Warmke Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BrandonWarmke

May 30
“Over the past few decades, Americans have redefined “harm,” “abuse,” “neglect” and “trauma”…

This cultural shift has contributed to a new, nearly impossible standard for parenting…

We’ve held our own parents to unreachable standards, standards that deep down, maybe, we know we ourselves would struggle to meet.”Image
“Today, parents still have obligations to their children. But it seems the children’s duties have become optional.” Image
“One video, with close to a million likes, cites introversion as a symptom that can be explained by flawed parenting: “Growing up is realizing that ‘strict parents’ are just abusive parents who robbed us of our childhood and turned us into introverts.”” Image
Read 4 tweets
May 13
“Here are my dozen suggestions for how Democrats might persuade my hand (and the hands of similarly-minded Americans) to gravitate toward the “D” on the 2028 ballot.”

“If your message only works when shouted, you won’t persuade me.” 1/ Image
“If you reflexively ignore or reject what I say, you won’t persuade me.” 2/ Image
“If you use the F-word and the N-word to describe your adversaries, you won’t persuade me.” 3/ Image
Read 13 tweets
Mar 31
1/ A college president recently wrote an op ed arguing that colleges need to be more honest with themselves.

The problem is the op ed isn't being honest, either: Image
2/ We get data showing that many faculty are willing to discriminate against conservatives and an admission that professors needlessly politicize their classes:

"Taken together, those survey results suggest that some of the most intense pressure to conform to political orthodoxy comes from within the academy."

This is true. The solution?Image
Image
3/ "The solution is neither more regulation nor more denial. It is sitting in front of us: Colleges and universities should retreat from politics and renew our core mission of teaching, learning and discovery."

Great, who will be in charge of this renewal? Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 29
There are relatively few defenses of immigration restrictions in the philosophy literature. Which is weird because every nation has them.

So most philosophers have little idea what the arguments could even be. And when they do finally encounter push back on open borders, their total self-confidence in a view that's never really been challenged and in a policy that's never been tried takes over. The usual response is just immediate dismissal or name-calling.
One thing I like about this debate about immigration in this volume is that it shows how poorly the open borders positions holds up under scrutiny.

By the end, the defender of the "open borders" position has conceded that welfare would have to be restricted or limited for immigrants, they wouldn't be able to vote, and no men aged 18-34 would be allowed to migrate freely. Remarkable concessions for lovers of freedom.

global.oup.com/academic/produ…
There are some views that philosophers hold very confidently that I can at least work myself up into seeing what justifies the confidence even though I strongly disagree.

But open borders? I've never understood how someone could be so confident in a massive change to the global social and political order--one that's never been tried and no one has really any idea how it would happen.

I take it that this was in part Tristan's point here. Naturally, defenders of open borders are unwilling to even admit they don't really know how things would turn out.

x.com/TristanJRogers…
Read 4 tweets
Jan 4
One symptom of what’s wrong with American higher education is how bad *people with PhDs* are at thinking and talking about the political Right.

They might have a PhD, but they haven’t learned much about the political ideas they don’t like.

Three thoughts:
1. Many academics will simply admit they have no idea what conservatism is. “What even is conservatism? You mean Rush Limbaugh/Donald Trump? Why would students need to learn that?”

Imagine a crowd of PhDs asking “What even is liberalism, you mean like Rachel Maddow? Who needs to learn that?”
2. Many just think of everyone on the “right” as just one big undifferentiated blob: Burke, Oakeshott, Maistre, and Scruton (if these names are known at all) are all of a piece with Ayn Rand, Nozick, Hayek, Margaret Thatcher, Donald Trump, Joseph McCarthy, Franco, and Fox News. It’s one bad team, connected via one shadowy network.

Understanding politics on Left requires careful distinctions and nuance: it’s important to distinguish the 8 varieties of Marxism and 13 shades of democratic socialism. The Right? Just a blob.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 1
"I attempt to explain why cultural preservation is important and, in particular, why it is important enough to justify immigration restrictions. As will become clear, this is an argument that is rarely made in philosophy." Image
"Name anything of considerable value—beauty, courtesy, freedom, friendship, justice, knowledge, prosperity, security, “belonging”—and either it will be part of some culture or there will be cultural mechanisms such as institutions, dispositions, customs, and norms to protect and promote it."Image
"Presumably, there is a moral presumption in favor of everything that is of considerable value: liberty and human rights, for example, but also the continued existence of certain cultures. In fact, the two are arguably bound up with one another. Liberty at the level of society requires that certain institutions and norms are in place. Hence, to have a presumption in favor of liberty is ipso facto to prefer a certain kind of culture."Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(