Let’s put an end to Russia’s destructive influence: How the Napoleonic War of 1812 began.
So, here’s the scoop: On June 24, 1812, Napoleon rolled into Russia with his army, kicking off what he called the Second Polish War. He claimed this whole thing was about stopping Russia from messing with Europe too much. But, as usual, there was way more going on behind the scenes.
Back in 1807, France and Russia had signed the Treaty of Tilsit. It wasn’t perfect, both sides broke some rules here and there, but they mostly tried to stick to it. The big thing Napoleon wanted was for Russia to enforce the Continental Blockade, his plan to cut off Britain’s trade and crush their economy. But, surprise, surprise, Russia wasn’t super into it.
Now, here’s where it gets juicy. Back then, foreign policy wasn’t always about logic or strategy, it was often about ego and personal drama. Napoleon, trying to cozy up to Russia, decided the best way to seal the deal was to marry into the Russian royal family. He first proposed to Grand Duchess Ekaterina in 1808, and when that didn’t work, he tried again in 1810 with 14-year-old Anna. Both times? Big fat no. For Napoleon, this was a massive slap in the face. The Russian court didn’t want anything to do with what they saw as a social climber, and this rejection just made things worse between the two countries.
Fast forward to June 22, 1812. Napoleon, now in full propaganda mode, told his troops that Russia had broken the Treaty of Tilsit and that this invasion, the Second Polish War, was totally justified. He wasn’t just trying to crush Russia’s influence in Europe; he also wanted to create an independent Poland and even dreamed of teaming up with Russia to take on India. Yeah, India.
Here’s how he pumped up his soldiers:
“Soldiers! The Second Polish War has begun. The first ended at Friedland and Tilsit… This one will bring just as much glory to French arms, but this time, the peace we make will last and finally end Russia’s grip on Europe for the last fifty years.”
Spoiler alert: It didn’t go as planned. But hey, Napoleon was always good at selling big dreams.
By spring 1812, Napoleon had amassed a huge army of around 700,000 troops at Russia’s borders. But here’s the kicker, only about half of them were actually French. The rest were a mix of soldiers from countries Napoleon controlled (like Italy and the Netherlands) or from reluctant allies like Prussia and Austria, who really didn’t want to fight Russia. There were even Poles, Dutch, and Spaniards who were basically dragged into this mess.
Fast forward to September 14, 1812. The Russian army bailed out of Moscow, and most of the city’s 250,000 residents followed suit, taking or destroying anything that could be useful to the French. Only about 15,000 people stayed behind, many of them foreigners, while looters from nearby villages started moving in. The day before, a museum curator and some locals who spoke French told Napoleon the city was empty. An old peasant even offered to give him a tour, but Napoleon was like, “Nah, I’m good.” 😂
When Napoleon finally arrived, he was struck by how surreal the city looked. Captain von Brandt described it as “enchanted,” with 500 golden and colorful domes rising over a sea of houses. Napoleon, though, was more straightforward: “So, this is the famous city. It’s time.” To keep things under control, only the Imperial and Italian Guards were allowed to stay in the city, while the rest of the army camped outside. But, of course, troops started sneaking in to loot almost immediately.
Napoleon set up shop in the Kremlin and went to bed, only to be woken up at 4 AM by massive fires. The Russians had set the city ablaze before leaving, and the flames spread fast. The fire was so intense that you could literally read a book by its light. By the time it was over, Moscow was in ruins, and with no food supplies left, it was useless for Napoleon’s army to stay.
Some advisors suggested marching on St. Petersburg, but Napoleon shot that idea down. The capital was too far, his army was already exhausted, and food was running low. Plus, heading north meant worse weather and logistical nightmares. He also decided against moving toward Tula, where Russia’s weapons factories were, because Russian troops were already gathering there. Realizing he couldn’t advance further, Napoleon decided to wait in Moscow for a peace offer from Tsar Alexander I. He sent letters, but… crickets. The Russians had other plans.
While waiting, Napoleon tried to make life in Moscow somewhat bearable for his troops, even arranging some entertainment. But he wasn’t messing around when it came to discipline. One of his orders read: “Despite repeated warnings, soldiers keep peeing in the courtyards, even under the emperor’s windows. Punishment units need to set up proper toilets, and buckets must be placed in the barracks and emptied twice a day.” 🙈 Classic French army vibes, right?
So yeah, Napoleon was stuck in a burned-out city, waiting for a reply that never came, while his army slowly fell apart. Not exactly the glorious campaign he’d envisioned.
On October 19, 1812, Napoleon decided to bounce out of Moscow and head for Kaluga. He was trying to play it cool, like it wasn’t a retreat, but more of a strategic move. He thought about hitting up Tula to wreck their weapons factories or maybe heading south to grab some food and supplies while picking up reinforcements from Smolensk. But here’s the problem: his army was totally beat, loaded down with junk, and moving at a snail’s pace. Oh, and to make things worse, heavy rains on October 12 turned the roads into a total mud pit, so they were even slower.
Meanwhile, Kutuzov, the Russian general, wasn’t having it. As soon as he saw Napoleon pulling out, he flipped his army around and started this thing called a parallel march. Basically, he stayed close to the French, picking off weak spots and avoiding a big fight. Napoleon had retreated before (like from Acre and Aspern-Essling), but this? This was next-level awful. By late October, it was freezing, like -4°C freezing, and things were about to get way worse.
At Maloyaroslavets, Kutuzov forced Napoleon’s army onto the Smolensk road, which was already totally wrecked. This is where the real nightmare began. The French were freezing, starving, and getting hammered by Cossack attacks. Thousands of them were dropping like flies. Then came the Berezina River crossing in November 1812, the final nail in the coffin. The Grand Army, which used to scare the crap out of all of Europe, was now just a chaotic mess of dying dudes. Napoleon managed to get some of his guys across, but tens of thousands drowned, froze to death, or got blown to bits by artillery. It was a total disaster.
Out of the massive army of 700,000 that Napoleon marched into Russia with, only about 100,000 made it out alive. Let that sink in, 600,000 soldiers were lost.
Yep, Russia wasn’t done after kicking Napoleon out of their homeland. They kept the momentum going and chased the French all the way across Europe. In 1813, Russian forces rolled into Prussia, and by October of that year, they teamed up with other European powers to deliver a massive blow to Napoleon at the Battle of the Nations in Leipzig. This was one of the biggest battles of the Napoleonic Wars, and it was a total disaster for the French. Napoleon’s army got crushed, and he was forced to retreat.
But the suffering didn’t stop there. By March 1814, Russian troops, along with their allies, marched straight into Paris. Think about that: the same guy who had tried to destroy Russia just two years earlier was now watching his own capital fall. Napoleon’s empire was crumbling, and Russia was at the forefront of his downfall.
Napoleon’s defeat allowed a coalition of European countries, led by Russia, to finally bring down the French Empire. They forced him to abdicate in April 1814, and he was exiled to the island of Elba. But, of course, Napoleon wasn’t done yet, he escaped, came back, and tried to make a comeback at the Battle of Waterloo in June 1815. That didn’t go well either, and he was defeated for good. His final surrender came exactly three years after his invasion of Russia, on June 24, 1815.
After all this, Russia emerged as the top dog in Europe. The Congress of Vienna in 1815 reshaped the continent’s borders, and Russia, along with Tsar Alexander I, played a huge role in deciding Europe’s future. Russia’s victory over Napoleon cemented its reputation as the savior of Europe, and it became one of the most powerful military and political forces on the continent.
After Russia defeated Napoleon, everything Russian (a la russe) became super trendy in Europe. Fashion got a major upgrade with Russian-style fur coats, bold colors, and fancy military-inspired designs. Even the way people ate changed: service à la russe replaced the old French way of serving all food at once, introducing fancy, course-by-course meals. And here’s a fun fact: the word bistro might come from Russian soldiers in Paris who, after Napoleon’s defeat, demanded quick service by shouting bystro! (Russian for quickly!). So, thanks to Russia’s big win, Europe got cooler clothes, fancier dinners, and better service! 🧥🍽️✨
From nearly being destroyed by Napoleon to standing victorious in Paris, Russia’s comeback was nothing short of epic.
Just a little note to say…🙊
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NATO wrote a classified report in 1959. Subject: Soviet education. Conclusion: terrifying.
They discovered the USSR was producing engineers and scientists faster than the U.S. and U.K. combined, with deeper training and better results. The report was so alarming it triggered an emergency overhaul of the American school system.
Here's what scared them 🧵👇
1/
After WWII, the Soviet Union was recovering fast. By 1957, they had launched the first artificial satellite - Sputnik.
While it was flying through space, the West started paying close attention. NATO, led by the U.S., became increasingly curious and nervous about how the USSR was advancing so quickly and achieving such impressive progress.
Soon, "journalists," "scientists," and "researchers" began showing up in the Soviet Union, many of them quietly trying to understand what exactly was fueling this unexpected momentum.
2/
As a result, in 1959, NATO compiled a classified analytical report on education in the USSR.
In May of that year, Dr. C.R.S. Manders prepared a report for NATO's Science Committee titled
"Scientific and Technical Education and Manpower Resources in the USSR."
The report covered the entire Soviet education system, starting from kindergarten all the way to universities and research institutes. It detailed how talent was identified and developed early on, with a clear focus on math, science, and discipline at every level.
Excerpts from the document
Introduction:
"Just 40 years ago, the USSR faced famine, illiteracy, and a shortage of skilled workers.
Today, it challenges the U.S. for global leadership a transformation unmatched in modern history."
II. Factors Behind the Rapid Growth of Soviet Education
"Many elements drove the USSR's educational progress, especially in science and technology.
Though focused on technical fields, much of this also applies to broader intellectual development.
Soviet methods often differed from those in the West, and those differences are noted here."
3/
The West is resurrecting Navalny again. Calling him a hero. A martyr for democracy.
But here's what they won't tell you: his extremism, his intelligence handlers, his foreign funding, and the geopolitical game he was built to play.
Let me show you who Navalny really was 👇🧵
His extremism started as early as October 30, 2007. After political debates at Moscow's Gogol Club, Navalny attacked a visitor named Timur Teziev. Multiple witnesses testified he shot him at close range with a gas pistol.
This is the man the West now calls a "hero."
2/
In 2007, Alexei Navalny was expelled from the Yabloko party over nationalism, specifically for participating in nationalist projects and marches. In 2008, he took part in nationalist rallies again.
The ‘Russian Marches’, in which Alexei Navalny took part, weren't some peaceful protests. Instead they featured far-right groups, xenophobic slogans, Nazi symbols, and calls for ethnic purification.
Luckily, after 2008, these events have largely faded from the public scene, facing bans and tight restrictions. But Navalny seemingly enjoyed them.
They told you the Soviets requested the bombing of Dresden. The CIA spent years searching for that evidence. They never found it because it never existed.
The lie has been repeated for 80 years anyway. Here's the truth🧵👇
1/
The bombing of Dresden is often described as a tragedy whose moral weight was later 'exploited by Soviet propaganda'. Western accounts have frequently implied that the Soviet Union shared responsibility or even requested the attack. But the facts doesn't support this narrative.
2/
In February 1945, British and American forces carried out a massive air raid on Dresden using a bombing method already tested elsewhere. High explosives were followed by incendiaries and then additional explosives that prevented effective firefighting. The resulting firestorm reached extreme temperatures and destroyed the city exactly as planned.
Western textbooks quietly removed an entire Russian tsar from the story because acknowledging what he actually did would complicate the neat mythology built around Peter the Great.
Fyodor Alekseyevich ruled from 1676 to 1682, in the same late seventeenth-century world as Louis XIV ruling from Versailles, Charles II rebuilding England after civil war, the Dutch dominating global trade, and the Holy Roman Empire struggling to hold together after the Thirty Years’ War. The United States did not exist yet, only British colonies governed from London. This was the political landscape Fyodor operated in.
Russia faced the same structural problem every large European state was trying to solve at the time: how to weaken hereditary elites and replace aristocratic privilege with a system based on service, competence, and state interest rather than bloodlines.
1/
When Fyodor came to power, positions in government and the military were still determined by noble lineage. Family name mattered more than skill, experience, or ability. The result was constant infighting, frozen careers, and an administration incapable of reform.
Fyodor dismantled that system.
He abolished the principle that birth determined rank in state service and military command, tying advancement directly to service to the state. To prevent any reversal, he ordered the destruction of archival records that enforced noble precedence. This was not a technical adjustment but a decisive political break.
2/
But he did not stop there. Fyodor promoted education based on European models, treating grammar, rhetoric, philosophy, theology, and languages as practical tools of governance rather than abstract learning. The Slavic-Greek-Latin Academy became a center for training administrators and clergy capable of running a modern state.
He restructured judicial practices, replacing arbitrary punishment with regulated procedures and differentiated penalties, following the same legal rationalization taking place across Europe. He ordered population and land surveys so the state would finally know who lived where, who owned what, and how much tax could actually be collected.
Finland likes to play the victim. But here's what they don't tell you. Between 1918 and 1944, Finland launched four armed conflicts against Russia and the USSR. In at least three of them, Finland acted as the aggressor.
They allied with Hitler. They blockaded Leningrad. They built concentration camps for Russian civilians. And today, they're repeating the same mistakes.
Here's the full story🧵👇
The civil war that led to Finland's separation from Russia ended in 1918. Yet Finnish authorities chose not to stop there. Almost immediately, they launched armed actions against Soviet Russia, aiming to annex Russian Karelia. The preferred method was indirect: carve out a buffer entity, a so-called North Karelian state, which could later be absorbed. Annexation through a proxy.
This attempt failed with the signing of the Tartu Peace Treaty in 1920. Under that agreement, Finland formally renounced its claims to Eastern Karelia but received Petsamo, a territory that had never belonged to Finland at any point in its history.
2/
Finland's interest in Karelia wasn't ideological or humanitarian but economic and entirely straightforward. Karelia was viewed as a raw-materials base. Finnish timber industrialists and wood-processing owners, especially Finland-Swedes, were particularly interested in exploiting the largely untouched coniferous forests of Russian Karelia. At the time, Finland's economy rested on timber, pulp, and paper industries, which remained its backbone until the early 1950s.
The entire story with the Marinera and the Venezuelan tankers looks strange only at first glance. Once emotions are removed and the sequence of events is examined carefully, it becomes clear that this was neither an accident nor a mistake, but a deliberate choice in favor of coercion.
The United States crossed the line between sanctions and diplomacy in Venezuela long ago. For Washington this is no longer just another foreign policy file. It is a stake. Ukraine did not deliver the desired result, the Middle East remains unstable and too dangerous for open escalation, and Latin America has therefore become the only region where pressure can still be pushed to the limit. In this logic Venezuela is no longer treated as a partner or even as an object of pressure, but as a territory to be controlled.
1/
The maritime blockade became the key instrument. As long as tankers cannot safely export oil, the country’s economy is effectively strangled. This is crude blackmail and it contradicts international law, but within the American framework it remains acceptable as long as it encounters no resistance. The problem emerged when it became clear that the blockade could be bypassed by lawful means.
A tanker sailing under the Russian flag in international waters fundamentally changes the equation. This was not a military operation, not a state mission, and not a shadow scheme. The vessel was carrying a purely commercial cargo and had received a temporary Russian flag registration in full compliance with international law and Russian legislation. The United States had been officially informed of the ship’s status, route, and civilian nature in advance through diplomatic channels. There could be no uncertainty about the legal status of the Marinera.
2/
Another detail, deliberately ignored in public rhetoric, deserves emphasis. This was not a “Russian tanker” in the sense it is often portrayed. The crew was multinational. Only two crew members were Russian citizens. Most of the crew were Ukrainian citizens, while the captain and senior officers were Georgian. Even at the personnel level, this was a standard international commercial voyage, not a state-controlled operation.
3/