Alex Zoltan Profile picture
Mar 8 • 18 tweets • 7 min read • Read on X
Canada clearly has a money laundering problem.

A đź§µ

You can’t just walk into a bank and deposit cartel profits. Unless it's a Canadian bank, apparently. Image
1/ An unelected banker is going to become prime minister of Canada apparently without being forced to answer a single critical question.

Alas, there's no better time than now, I surmise, to start asking questions about Canadian money laundering on his behalf.
2/ Ever wondered how some people at the roulette wheel have bottomless pockets?

Or why are there so many empty condo buildings amidst a generational housing crisis?

The answer to both of your questions is probably "money laundering" and "money laundering." Image
3/ Money laundering is the art of making dirty cash look clean. It's considered one of the funner parts of crime, largely because those who help launder money aren’t scary cartel hitmen with face tattoos.

They’re bankers, real estate developers, and politicians playing cards. Image
4/ The best part of money laundering—aside from the gambling and speculative investing (read: also gambling)—is banks get fined, but no one gets arrested.

Meanwhile, anti-Trudeau protestors and the guy on the street selling a few grams get years in prison. Funny how that works. Image
5/ Except in this case, someone was arrested. Actually, a bunch of people were arrested.

And they all worked for a Canadian bank called “TD.”

Everything you ever needed to know about money laundering, can be gleaned from this one sensational and extraordinary cautionary tale. Image
6/ This is the story of when Toronto-Dominion met “David." Image
7/ This is “David.”

Take a close look at this picture.

Not at David, whose face is obscured by grainy camera footage and a K-95 mask, but at what David is depositing:

It's a mountain of cash—over $300K in cash bundled in $20 bills (the preferred denomination for launderers). Image
8/ It's an almost difficult picture to believe until you realize money laundering wasn't illegal in Canada until 1989.

And if that wasn't shocking enough, it wasn't illegal in the U.S. until 1986.

Point being: this isn't a crime either country has taken seriously for very long. Image
9/ That brings us back to David and TD.

Six years before his arrest, David embarked on the incredibly stupid venture of laundering mountains of cash generated from the sale of deadly fentanyl—"helping" to kill tens of thousands of Americans, Canadians, and countless others. Image
10/ David (real name: Da Ying Sze) was a Chinese national living in Queens, NY who helped orchestrate a five-year $653 million laundering scheme from the Tri State region, laundering narcotics proceeds with help from U.S. bank staff. Yes, you read that correctly: U.S. bank staff. Image
11/ indeed Sze leveraged not Canadian, but American, frontline employees at financial institutions including, but not limited to, TD Bank for over five years—processing $474 million in illicit cash, often from fentanyl sales, through branches in multiple states (not provinces). Image
12/ And how much did it cost David to bribe these U.S. born front-line bankers to facilitate laundering nearly $1 billion in death merchant fentanyl proceeds?

Just $57,000 in "gift cards" apparently. Image
13/ So where does Canada come into play here? Well, it does and doesn't it, really. Yes, TD is a Canadian bank, and now reputed for poor laundering oversight.

However, there's no direct evidence "David" Da Yeng Sze had any interactions with Canada or Canadian bankers whatsoever. Image
14/ There is simply no direct evidence in the available public records or legal documents from the case United States v. Da Ying Sze showing Sze had any personal interactions with Canada at all—such as traveling there, residing there, or conducting any activities in the country. Image
15/ Sze wasn't just depositing into TD, either. He owned more than a dozen U.S.-owned bank accounts, tok.

And again, his activities, as outlined in legal proceedings, primarily took place in the U.S.—specifically in New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania between 2016 and 2021. Image
16/ I don't think anyone will contest that TD's money laundering safeguards were insufficient.

"A picture tells a thousand words," as the saying goes, and this picture of David depositing more cash than the teller wicket can handle says more than required. Image
17/ However, blaming an entire country (in this case, Canada) for the reckless and irresponsible behavior of some reckless, irresponsible and greedy U.S. bank tellers in New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania is as foolish as blaming Donald Trump for a KFC grease fire in Winnipeg. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alex Zoltan

Alex Zoltan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AmazingZoltan

Mar 7
Canada clearly has a fentanyl problem.

Ađź§µ.

Important questions arise over this problem: What do we do to fix it? And how much of North America's fentanyl problem is Canada's fault?

Trump's tariffs reignited the fentanyl conversation, so let's take a clear-eyed look at it: Image
1/ In Canada, the number is 21. That's the average deaths per day of fentanyl overdoses. In the United States, the number rises to over 200. This isn’t a small problem, it's a big problem. And if we’re going to tackle the problem, we need to look at it honestly and unemotionally. Image
2/ This is an emotional issue, after all. People are dying. And politicians, as they will, are politicizing the deaths. Canadians have a right to be angry. Americans have a right to be angry. But are “Canadians killing Americans”? Absolutely not. Image
Read 27 tweets
Feb 16
The @JCCFCanada challenge to prorogation hearing in the federal court taught me a lot more about Section 3 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms—and I think that Section is relevant when it comes to the possibility of Mark Carney potentially becoming the Prime Minister of Canada.Image
Section 3 says: "Every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in an election of members of the House of Commons or of a legislative assembly and to be qualified for membership therein."
By legal definition alone, there is no requirement for the Prime Minister to be an MP, but by convention—not to mention for practical and political reasons—any PM is expected to win a seat very promptly.

Even better, of course, they should already be a Member of Parliament! Image
Read 6 tweets
Feb 13
UPDATE: Someone has allegedly "pulled the fire alarm" during our lunch break at the Supreme Court/Federal Court of Appeals building where Trudeau's prorogation of Parliament is being legally challenged.
We're back from the fire alarm incident.
The JCCF lawyer replies to the Trudeau government lawyer's claim that the judge and he discussed Trudeau potentially acting in "bad faith," arguing that "in bad faith" is equivalent to acting against the principles of good government and outside the scope of his executive power.
Read 16 tweets
Feb 13
HAPPENING NOW: After a short delay and a bit of a last minute change of location, court is in session for the challenge to the Trudeau government's prorogation of Parliament.
I ran into @NorthrnPrspectv along the way, who is sitting next to me in the Court of Appeals.
The government lawyers are asking for a one day extension, until Feb. 18, 2025, to write submission replies to the interveners. Chief Justice Crampton doesn't look thrilled.
Read 48 tweets
Feb 13
"A đź§µ I Wrote on the Legal Challenge to Prorogation on an Airplane to Ottawa"

1/ Justin Trudeau’s Jan. 6, 2025 “resignation speech” at Rideau Cottage went the way of Sophie Grégoire-Trudeau—it took off and blew away, like flaming flying pinecones in the wind. Image
2/ Remarkably, even as the PM’s notes scattered into the snow, he stayed on message: announcing his intention to resign and to prorogue Parliament ahead of a Liberal leadership race. Image
3/ During the Prime Minister’s press conference, he relied on two reasons for the decision: first to “reset” Parliament based on his opinion that it has been “paralyzed for months”; and second, to permit the Liberal Party “time to select a new party leader." Image
Read 16 tweets
Feb 4
The Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF)'s lawyer, Sujit Choudhry, is taking the Emergencies Act to task now. He shares some really fascinating information and historical parallels between the FLQ October Crisis and the Emergencies Act. I'll have to learn more about that!
"This was not Canada's January 6," Choudhry says, noting that "The Section 58 explanation did not address the requirements of Section 3A of the Emergencies Act," referring to the CSIS Act requirement, which was not met.
"It was incumbent that the Cabinet acted lawfully," Choudhry explains. "This is not hindsight reasoning." You might remember Sujit Choudhry from the POEC. He's great! Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(