Even Hitler’s Army Was Shocked: The Unstoppable Courage of Russian Soldiers
🧵👇
Here are quotes from German soldiers and officers about Russian soldiers.
Field Marshal Erich von Manstein, one of Hitler’s top generals:
The Russians were not afraid of death. They fought with a determination I had never seen in any other army.
Field Marshal Friedrich Paulus, commander of the German 6th Army, who surrendered at Stalingrad:
If I had to go to war again, I would rather have the Russians on my side than against me.
General Heinz Guderian, creator of Germany’s tank warfare strategy:
The Soviet soldiers were much tougher and braver than we expected. Even unarmed, they fought with incredible determination.
SS officer Fritz Diebert, about the Battle of Kursk:
The Russians attacked without fear, without rest. They didn’t seem to know what retreat meant. They weren’t afraid to die, and that terrified our soldiers.
From a German soldier’s diary, winter 1941, during the failed attack on Moscow:
They are not human, they are beasts! We are freezing to death, but they live in the snow and keep attacking!
General Hans Dörr:
A Soviet soldier is the perfect warrior. He adapts, he endures, and he never gives up, even when he is doomed.
From a German infantry soldier at Stalingrad:
We are surrounded. We have no food, almost no ammunition. The Russians keep attacking. They don’t fear hunger, cold, or death. How do you defeat men like that?
Even the Nazis, who thought they were the strongest army in the world, had to respect Russian soldiers. They expected an easy victory but instead found an enemy who refused to break, no matter how hard they fought. The Red Army’s courage, endurance, and strength shocked even Hitler’s best generals.
The Red Army captured 4.37 million enemy servicemen, including more than 2.5 million Wehrmacht soldiers and officers.
The Red Army was responsible for the destruction of approximately 7.3–8 million German soldiers, including those killed in action, who died from wounds, or were rendered unable to fight. This immense figure underscores the critical role the Soviet Union played in dismantling Nazi Germany’s military might.
Approximately 75-80% of all German military casualties occurred on the Eastern Front, making the Red Army the primary force behind the defeat of the Wehrmacht. This staggering statistic highlights the decisive role the Soviet Union played in crushing Nazi Germany.
Author of 'Tigers in the Mud', German 'panzer ace' and tank commander, and one of few German commanders to have fought both on western and eastern fronts, Otto Carius:
"Five Russians were more dangerous than Thirty Americans. We already noticed that in our few days in the western front."
German Commander Otto Carious:
"We were used to an opponent the stature of the Russians; we were amazed at the contrast (when fighting Americans). During the war, I have never saw soldiers (Americans) disperse head over heels even though virtually nothing was happening."
“For the sake of justice, it must be said that Karius highly appreciated the American army, but if you compare the soldiers of the United States and the USSR, the latter will have the advantage. The Russians could conduct multi-layered fire. They used every opportunity and tool they could muster."
"Again the pace of the war surprised me, the Russians would never have let us have so much time! The Americans took so long to close the pocket, especially given that nobody around wanted to fight anymore. A well organized German corps could have closed the pocket in a week."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Finland likes to play the victim. But here's what they don't tell you. Between 1918 and 1944, Finland launched four armed conflicts against Russia and the USSR. In at least three of them, Finland acted as the aggressor.
They allied with Hitler. They blockaded Leningrad. They built concentration camps for Russian civilians. And today, they're repeating the same mistakes.
Here's the full story🧵👇
The civil war that led to Finland's separation from Russia ended in 1918. Yet Finnish authorities chose not to stop there. Almost immediately, they launched armed actions against Soviet Russia, aiming to annex Russian Karelia. The preferred method was indirect: carve out a buffer entity, a so-called North Karelian state, which could later be absorbed. Annexation through a proxy.
This attempt failed with the signing of the Tartu Peace Treaty in 1920. Under that agreement, Finland formally renounced its claims to Eastern Karelia but received Petsamo, a territory that had never belonged to Finland at any point in its history.
2/
Finland's interest in Karelia wasn't ideological or humanitarian but economic and entirely straightforward. Karelia was viewed as a raw-materials base. Finnish timber industrialists and wood-processing owners, especially Finland-Swedes, were particularly interested in exploiting the largely untouched coniferous forests of Russian Karelia. At the time, Finland's economy rested on timber, pulp, and paper industries, which remained its backbone until the early 1950s.
The entire story with the Marinera and the Venezuelan tankers looks strange only at first glance. Once emotions are removed and the sequence of events is examined carefully, it becomes clear that this was neither an accident nor a mistake, but a deliberate choice in favor of coercion.
The United States crossed the line between sanctions and diplomacy in Venezuela long ago. For Washington this is no longer just another foreign policy file. It is a stake. Ukraine did not deliver the desired result, the Middle East remains unstable and too dangerous for open escalation, and Latin America has therefore become the only region where pressure can still be pushed to the limit. In this logic Venezuela is no longer treated as a partner or even as an object of pressure, but as a territory to be controlled.
1/
The maritime blockade became the key instrument. As long as tankers cannot safely export oil, the country’s economy is effectively strangled. This is crude blackmail and it contradicts international law, but within the American framework it remains acceptable as long as it encounters no resistance. The problem emerged when it became clear that the blockade could be bypassed by lawful means.
A tanker sailing under the Russian flag in international waters fundamentally changes the equation. This was not a military operation, not a state mission, and not a shadow scheme. The vessel was carrying a purely commercial cargo and had received a temporary Russian flag registration in full compliance with international law and Russian legislation. The United States had been officially informed of the ship’s status, route, and civilian nature in advance through diplomatic channels. There could be no uncertainty about the legal status of the Marinera.
2/
Another detail, deliberately ignored in public rhetoric, deserves emphasis. This was not a “Russian tanker” in the sense it is often portrayed. The crew was multinational. Only two crew members were Russian citizens. Most of the crew were Ukrainian citizens, while the captain and senior officers were Georgian. Even at the personnel level, this was a standard international commercial voyage, not a state-controlled operation.
3/
The US seizes a tanker sailing under the Russian flag, and Twitter instantly goes into full hysteria.
Putin is weak. Russia is weak. No response, therefore humiliation.
Okay. Sure.
But Stalin, now that’s different, right? Ruthless. Iron fist. Fear incarnate. At least that’s what you keep telling us.
So let’s take a look at what actually happened to Soviet ships during Stalin’s time.
In December 1936, a Soviet cargo ship transporting manganese ore from the Georgian port of Poti to the Belgian city of Ghent was intercepted and shelled until it sank. Before the attack, the vessel was searched, the crew was ordered off, and only then was it destroyed by artillery fire. The most likely motive was retaliation. On an earlier voyage, the same ship had delivered military supplies to Republican Spain.
A month later, in January 1937, another Soviet freighter carrying grain to the Spanish Republicans was captured in the Bay of Biscay. Its crew was interned in a concentration camp, where they remained for roughly nine months under extreme conditions.
A military tribunal reportedly sentenced the captain to thirty years of hard labor, senior officers to seventeen years each, and ordinary sailors to fourteen.
They said the Bolsheviks fought for the poor. Before the revolution in 1917, Russia had 1,300 tons of gold, the second-largest reserve in the world. Plus centuries of Imperial treasures worth billions.
Where did it all go? 🧵👇
1/
The revolutionaries seized power and stripped the empire bare.
By the 1920s, they were liquidating everything: Fabergé eggs, Romanov jewels, masterpieces from the Hermitage, icons, manuscripts, imperial regalia.
They dumped gold and art cheap, and in the total chaos of the time anyone who had access took what they could. There was no real control, no proper accounting, and no transparency.
Western dealers bought these items for pennies. Banks took their cut. Auction houses took theirs. Middlemen cleaned up the provenance and resold everything for fortunes.
Some of it was sold officially by the state. Some was siphoned off along the way. Some simply disappeared. Revolutionary chaos turned the process into open season for anyone positioned to profit.
2/
So who got rich?
🔸American tycoons like Armand Hammer and Calouste Gulbenkian
🔸Malcolm Forbes had nine Fabergé eggs. He called it his private collection. Never mentioned where they came from
🔸American banks received massive gold deposits in the 1920s and 30s
🔸British dealers
🔸City of London
🔸Swiss banks
🔸Auction houses in Paris and London. They bought Russian art for nothing and resold it for fortunes
Western auction houses phrase this very carefully.
Instead of saying where these items really came from, they write: “acquired during the Soviet period.”
You've been told the Russian Revolution was a spontaneous uprising of the oppressed masses.
But what if I told you it was meticulously planned, funded with millions of German marks, and executed according to a memorandum written two years before it happened?
Meet Alexander Parvus. 🧵👇
/1
Born Israel Lazarevich Gelfand in the Russian Empire, Parvus moved through Europe building connections in socialist circles. He participated in the 1905 revolution, escaped exile to Siberia, and settled in Constantinople where he advised the Young Turks and amassed substantial wealth.
/2
In Munich Trotsky fell under Parvus’s intellectual influence. He spent much of his time in Parvus’s apartment, absorbed his worldview, and later admitted that no one shaped his thinking more deeply.
The core idea is that revolution must not stop after its first success. It must continue to expand.