Rina Lu🇷🇺 Profile picture
Mar 11, 2025 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Even Hitler’s Army Was Shocked: The Unstoppable Courage of Russian Soldiers

🧵👇

Here are quotes from German soldiers and officers about Russian soldiers.

Field Marshal Erich von Manstein, one of Hitler’s top generals:

The Russians were not afraid of death. They fought with a determination I had never seen in any other army.Image
Field Marshal Friedrich Paulus, commander of the German 6th Army, who surrendered at Stalingrad:

If I had to go to war again, I would rather have the Russians on my side than against me.Image
General Heinz Guderian, creator of Germany’s tank warfare strategy:

The Soviet soldiers were much tougher and braver than we expected. Even unarmed, they fought with incredible determination.Image
SS officer Fritz Diebert, about the Battle of Kursk:

The Russians attacked without fear, without rest. They didn’t seem to know what retreat meant. They weren’t afraid to die, and that terrified our soldiers.Image
From a German soldier’s diary, winter 1941, during the failed attack on Moscow:

They are not human, they are beasts! We are freezing to death, but they live in the snow and keep attacking!Image
General Hans Dörr:

A Soviet soldier is the perfect warrior. He adapts, he endures, and he never gives up, even when he is doomed.Image
From a German infantry soldier at Stalingrad:

We are surrounded. We have no food, almost no ammunition. The Russians keep attacking. They don’t fear hunger, cold, or death. How do you defeat men like that?Image
Even the Nazis, who thought they were the strongest army in the world, had to respect Russian soldiers. They expected an easy victory but instead found an enemy who refused to break, no matter how hard they fought. The Red Army’s courage, endurance, and strength shocked even Hitler’s best generals.Image
The Red Army captured 4.37 million enemy servicemen, including more than 2.5 million Wehrmacht soldiers and officers.

The Red Army was responsible for the destruction of approximately 7.3–8 million German soldiers, including those killed in action, who died from wounds, or were rendered unable to fight. This immense figure underscores the critical role the Soviet Union played in dismantling Nazi Germany’s military might.

Approximately 75-80% of all German military casualties occurred on the Eastern Front, making the Red Army the primary force behind the defeat of the Wehrmacht. This staggering statistic highlights the decisive role the Soviet Union played in crushing Nazi Germany.Image
Author of 'Tigers in the Mud', German 'panzer ace' and tank commander, and one of few German commanders to have fought both on western and eastern fronts, Otto Carius:

"Five Russians were more dangerous than Thirty Americans. We already noticed that in our few days in the western front."Image
German Commander Otto Carious:

"We were used to an opponent the stature of the Russians; we were amazed at the contrast (when fighting Americans). During the war, I have never saw soldiers (Americans) disperse head over heels even though virtually nothing was happening."

“For the sake of justice, it must be said that Karius highly appreciated the American army, but if you compare the soldiers of the United States and the USSR, the latter will have the advantage. The Russians could conduct multi-layered fire. They used every opportunity and tool they could muster."

"Again the pace of the war surprised me, the Russians would never have let us have so much time! The Americans took so long to close the pocket, especially given that nobody around wanted to fight anymore. A well organized German corps could have closed the pocket in a week."Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rina Lu🇷🇺

Rina Lu🇷🇺 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rinalu_

May 27
10 facts about Nicholas II that will make you question everything you were taught:

1. Under Nicholas II, the ruble was considered one of the strongest currencies in the world. Russia operated on the gold standard, and the Russian Empire held one of the largest gold reserves on Earth. A significant part of that reserve later passed to the USSR and remains connected to the reserves of Gokhran and the Central Bank to this day.Image
Image
2. By 1913, Russia had one of the fastest growing economies in the world. The Empire earned almost as much from butter exports as from gold. In just 15 years, butter exports increased from 2,600 to 82,000 tons. Russia was rapidly becoming one of the world's largest agricultural and industrial exporters.Image
3. During the 20 years of Nicholas II's reign, the population of Russia grew by around ~ 50 million people. The growth came from high birth rates, strong family structures, low urban demographic decline, and the rapid settlement of new territories. Image
Read 10 tweets
May 19
Stalin never said the USSR would lose WWII without Lend-Lease. American records of the Tehran Conference distorted the translation, archived it as official history, and now AI trains on the lie.

The discussion concerns Stalin's toast at the Tehran dinner on November 30, 1943. According to the mainstream American version, including even the official U.S. State Department archive, Stalin supposedly admitted that Lend-Lease was absolutely decisive and said:

"Without the use of those machines, through Lend-Lease, we would lose this war."Image
Image
Sounds dramatic but there is just one problem. At that dinner, only two people spoke Russian fluently: Stalin himself and his official interpreter Valentin Berezhkov. This is officially documented. Which means the only person at the table who actually translated Stalin's words into English was Berezhkov.

And according to Berezhkov, Stalin said something different:

"I want to tell you what, from the Soviet point of view, President Roosevelt and the United States have done to win the war. The most important things in this war are machines. The United States has proved that it can turn out from 8,000 to 10,000 airplanes per month. England turns out 3,000 per month, mostly heavy bombers. Thus, the United States is a country of machines. These machines received through Lend-Lease HELP US WIN THE WAR. For this, I want to raise my toast."

Not "we would lose without them."

Almost identical wording, only tiny adjustments but completely different meaning.Image
Interestingly, right before Stalin's famous toast, British Field Marshal Alan Brooke reportedly had the audacity to claim that the British were suffering and sacrificing the most in the war, and doing the most fighting.

An awkward silence followed. Stalin darkened, stood up, looked around the room, and then delivered the now famous toast about American industrial production and machines helping winning the war.

An interesting detail many people conveniently ignore: Roosevelt himself later raised a toast specifically to Soviet weapons.

"I highly value the power of the Red Army. Soviet troops are using not only American and British equipment, but also excellent Soviet military technology. While we are celebrating the birthday of the British Prime Minister here, the Red Army continues to push back the Nazi hordes. A toast to the successes of Soviet arms!"

Funny how that part never goes viral.Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
May 15
The Kremlin wasn’t always the red-brick giant we know today. First, it was just a wooden fortress on the hill, guarding Moscow between the rivers. After the wooden walls, the Moscow Kremlin was rebuilt in white limestone (sometimes called “white stone”), which gave Moscow its old name “Belokamennsya”- “the White-Stone city.” That’s why in medieval chronicles Moscow was often called Moscow the White-Stone.

Already back then, there was a “Red Square.” But it wasn’t about the color. In Old Russian, krasna didn’t mean “red, it meant “beautiful.” Only later did the word shift to its modern sense. So the famous square is actually the Beautiful Square.Image
The version that survived, the one we walk past now, was the work of Italians. Invited by Ivan III in the late 1400s, they brought with them Renaissance know-how and even the memory of Milan’s Castello Sforzesco. Look at the walls and towers that’s Italian engineering fused with Russian grit.

Ivan III didn’t just hire Italians to design pretty facades, but also to bring in their engineering. And they gave Moscow something almost no other fortress in Europe had back then: a water supply system.Image
Inside the Vodovzvodnaya Tower literally “Water-Lifting Tower” (1488) a mechanism pumped water straight to the Moscow River up into reservoirs within the fortress. From there, pipes carried it into palace kitchens, courtyards… and even for firefighting. In a city where fires were constant and devastating, the Kremlin had its own built-in fire defense system.

Think about it: fifteenth-century Moscow had a water supply system hidden inside its walls. While most of Europe’s cities still hauled buckets, the Kremlin had plumbing running through a fortress tower.Image
Read 4 tweets
May 7
Night Witches”: Heroines of the Sky in the WW2

During World War II, there was a badass group of Soviet women pilots called the “Night Witches.” They flew old, slow wooden planes at night and dropped bombs on enemy positions. Most of them were young girls, students with no combat experience when the war started. But they became legends.

These women pulled off 8–9 missions a night, manually loading bombs that weighed up to 300 kg each. Over one shift, a single pilot could carry over a ton of explosives. And they did it all under heavy enemy fire: searchlights, anti-aircraft guns, etc.Image
Their planes, called Po-2 (originally U-2), were developed in 1927. You might know them by their nickname, “Kukuruznik”- they got it because after the war they were used in farming to dust crops.

By 1941, these planes were completely outdated and were originally used just for training. But someone realized they could actually work for light bombing runs at night, and here’s why.

The U-2 was so slow, about 120 km/h, that it could be shot down with a regular rifle. Flying one of these things in daylight over enemy territory would’ve been a death sentence. The planes had zero protection: no armor, no real weapons but they were they could glide almost silently.Image
The pilots would cut their engines just before reaching the target, letting the plane drift silently over enemy positions. The only sound was the soft “whoosh” of the wind over the wings, like a broomstick flying through the air.

That’s actually how they got their nickname:

“Night Witches” or Nachthexen (German) from terrified German soldiers who said they sounded like broomsticks in the dark.

The psychological effect was massive:
🔸Germans were afraid to sleep at night.
🔸Anti-aircraft crews were constantly on edge, trying to spot a ghost in the sky.
🔸And imagine the humiliation: being attacked night after night by young women in outdated planes that didn’t even make a sound.

One German officer reportedly said:

“We simply couldn’t catch them. They came from nowhere and disappeared into the night.”

These women completed a mind-blowing 23,672 combat missions on those rickety planes.Image
Read 7 tweets
May 3
The phrase "Potemkin villages" appears in every Western textbook as proof that Russia fakes everything. Historians know it's a complete fabrication invented by jealous European diplomats in 1787. And yet, it's still taught as fact.

Want to know what actually happened in those "fake" villages? They're now called Odessa, Dnipro, and Kherson, founded by Catherine the Great.Image
I know, I know. You might be thinking, here we go again, more propaganda. How much of this can there possibly be? Quite a lot, actually. The amount of propaganda about Russia in history textbooks and mainstream media is truly astonishing. At this point, I’m not even sure whether it’s possible to learn real Russian history from those sources, no matter how hard you try.

But enough of that. Let’s get straight to the so-called Potemkin villages.Image
“Potemkin villages” was a political mockery invented by diplomats hostile to Russia and cemented in European propaganda to such an extent that the expression became a generic term. Like a bitter old hag choking on envy, they start inventing nonsense and slinging mud, trying to devalue Russia’s achievements.

And do you know where those supposed villages were located? You will laugh. Exactly where Odessa, Donetsk, and Kharkov stand today.

2/Image
Read 7 tweets
Apr 8
The ceasefire was supposed to end the risk. Instead, it exposed something much bigger. What if the real story isn’t peace, but what almost happened at Kharg Island?

1/12 Image
Why this island keeps coming up?

There is one location that keeps repeatedly appearing in discussions about escalation: Kharg Island in the Persian Gulf.

A large share of Iran’s oil exports flows through this point, with some estimates reaching as high as 80–90 percent. That alone explains why Washington has reportedly examined scenarios involving a limited military operation there, potentially combining naval and ground elements. At first glance, the idea looks rational and even efficient, because it targets a clear economic bottleneck.

But the problem is that strategies that look clean in theory rarely behave the same way once they are placed into real conditions, where geography, logistics, and political reactions begin to interact.
Some reports mention troop movements into the region, including airborne units and naval deployments. However, this is not about a full-scale invasion of Iran, which would be unrealistic. The discussion is centered on limited, targeted operations against specific points.

2/12Image
The reason so much oil is concentrated at Kharg is not political, but physical.

The seabed around the island is deep enough to allow large oil tankers to dock directly, while much of Iran’s coastline is too shallow for that kind of infrastructure. In other words, this is not simply a matter of preference but of geography shaping economic flows.

At the same time, Kharg is not Iran’s only export route, even if it is by far the most important one. During the Iran–Iraq war in the 1980s, repeated strikes on the island forced Tehran to rethink its vulnerability, which eventually led to the construction of a pipeline running to the port of Jask, further southeast, beyond the Strait of Hormuz.

This detail matters more than it may seem. Jask sits outside the main chokepoint of the region, which means that if Kharg were disrupted, Iran could still redirect part of its exports there. The capacity is significantly lower, so exports would drop sharply, but they would not collapse completely. The system would be damaged, not disabled.

3/12Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(