Even Hitler’s Army Was Shocked: The Unstoppable Courage of Russian Soldiers
🧵👇
Here are quotes from German soldiers and officers about Russian soldiers.
Field Marshal Erich von Manstein, one of Hitler’s top generals:
The Russians were not afraid of death. They fought with a determination I had never seen in any other army.
Field Marshal Friedrich Paulus, commander of the German 6th Army, who surrendered at Stalingrad:
If I had to go to war again, I would rather have the Russians on my side than against me.
General Heinz Guderian, creator of Germany’s tank warfare strategy:
The Soviet soldiers were much tougher and braver than we expected. Even unarmed, they fought with incredible determination.
SS officer Fritz Diebert, about the Battle of Kursk:
The Russians attacked without fear, without rest. They didn’t seem to know what retreat meant. They weren’t afraid to die, and that terrified our soldiers.
From a German soldier’s diary, winter 1941, during the failed attack on Moscow:
They are not human, they are beasts! We are freezing to death, but they live in the snow and keep attacking!
General Hans Dörr:
A Soviet soldier is the perfect warrior. He adapts, he endures, and he never gives up, even when he is doomed.
From a German infantry soldier at Stalingrad:
We are surrounded. We have no food, almost no ammunition. The Russians keep attacking. They don’t fear hunger, cold, or death. How do you defeat men like that?
Even the Nazis, who thought they were the strongest army in the world, had to respect Russian soldiers. They expected an easy victory but instead found an enemy who refused to break, no matter how hard they fought. The Red Army’s courage, endurance, and strength shocked even Hitler’s best generals.
The Red Army captured 4.37 million enemy servicemen, including more than 2.5 million Wehrmacht soldiers and officers.
The Red Army was responsible for the destruction of approximately 7.3–8 million German soldiers, including those killed in action, who died from wounds, or were rendered unable to fight. This immense figure underscores the critical role the Soviet Union played in dismantling Nazi Germany’s military might.
Approximately 75-80% of all German military casualties occurred on the Eastern Front, making the Red Army the primary force behind the defeat of the Wehrmacht. This staggering statistic highlights the decisive role the Soviet Union played in crushing Nazi Germany.
Author of 'Tigers in the Mud', German 'panzer ace' and tank commander, and one of few German commanders to have fought both on western and eastern fronts, Otto Carius:
"Five Russians were more dangerous than Thirty Americans. We already noticed that in our few days in the western front."
German Commander Otto Carious:
"We were used to an opponent the stature of the Russians; we were amazed at the contrast (when fighting Americans). During the war, I have never saw soldiers (Americans) disperse head over heels even though virtually nothing was happening."
“For the sake of justice, it must be said that Karius highly appreciated the American army, but if you compare the soldiers of the United States and the USSR, the latter will have the advantage. The Russians could conduct multi-layered fire. They used every opportunity and tool they could muster."
"Again the pace of the war surprised me, the Russians would never have let us have so much time! The Americans took so long to close the pocket, especially given that nobody around wanted to fight anymore. A well organized German corps could have closed the pocket in a week."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let’s take a look today at the city of Chita. Usually the chorus goes: ‘Well, Moscow may be fine, but just step outside of Moscow and you’ll see…’ So let’s take that step. Chita is a small city, located very far from Moscow. It’s an old city, with its history going back to the 15th century, and it began to truly develop during the construction of the Trans-Siberian Railway.
After the Treaty of Nerchinsk (1689) between Russia and China, the status of Transbaikalia was secured for Russia, and the Buryats gradually became part of it. In the 18th century, the Buryats entered Russian allegiance, retaining considerable autonomy and their own lands. In return, they received protection from the Manchus and Mongols, as well as access to trade.
Distance to the Mongolian border (Kyakhta) - 716 km.
Distance to the Chinese border (Zabaykalsk) - 490 km.
Distance to Moscow - 6,310 km.
Yesterday we discussed the Second World War in Europe, where the Red Army destroyed 75–80% of the Wehrmacht. Today, let’s turn to what happened in China.
Japan launched its war against China in 1937, which is why many historians mark that year as the true beginning of World War II in Asia. A lesser-known fact is that in 1939 Japan also clashed with the USSR at Khalkhin Gol, where Soviet forces under General Zhukov delivered a decisive defeat. On September 15, 1939, the Soviet–Japanese Ceasefire Agreement was signed in Moscow.
After that, Japan no longer attempted to attack the USSR, but instead intensified its brutal campaign in China and Korea, killing civilians, sending people to concentration camps, and pursuing outright territorial conquest.
In the Second World War, between 15 and 29 million Chinese died, including 3 to 4 million soldiers (some estimates are even higher).
China fought back against Japan and played a major role in wearing down the enemy, though this contribution is rarely acknowledged in the West.
Many people assume the Americans did most of the fighting in the Pacific, but that was primarily a naval war near Japan. In China, it was a vast land war, especially in Manchuria in the northeast, with massive battles that tied down much of the Japanese Army, a fact still largely absent from Western narratives.
On the occasion of the parade in China marking victory over fascism, Trump hurried to remind everyone about the “massive amount of support and blood that the US gave to China in order to secure FREEDOM from a very unfriendly foreign invader. Many Americans died in China’s quest for victory and Glory.” So let’s unpack that.
It is true that the US provided help but, as Chinese historians put it, it was “extremely limited and highly calculating.”
In reality, around 65,000 American soldiers were present in China during WWII. By contrast, the Red Army fielded about 1.5 million troops in the final campaign.
The U.S. sent about $1.6 billion in Lend-Lease aid, plus the Flying Tigers and some military advisors. But this support came with its own agenda. The Chinese historian even describe pre-1949 relations between the two countries as resembling those of “colonizer and colonized.”
The Soviets, by contrast, stepped in earlier with hundreds of planes, tanks, artillery, ammunition, fuel, and even military experts on the ground, sometimes hauling supplies through blizzards to get them there. Meanwhile, Chinese troops fought on relentlessly, launching major offensives and guerrilla operations like the Battle of 100 Regiments, steadily wearing down Japan’s forces on the mainland.
Finnish President Stubb calls on Europe to unite against the “common threat.” Oh, how boring and repetitive. Where have we heard that before? Ah yes, when Finland joined Hitler in his campaign against the USSR, dreaming of new territories.
Remember Finland's rallying cry to join forces with Hitler: "Join us in a holy war against our nation's enemies. Together with Germany's powerful military, as brothers-in-arms, we embark on a crusade to secure Finland's future."
And guess what? Churchill was right there, holding Mannerheim’s hand. Didn’t know that?
Then let’s unpack👇🧵
1/5
Western textbooks love to paint Churchill as the bulldog of Europe: stubborn, fierce, never yielding. But when it came to Finland and its Marshal, Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim, Churchill’s role was something else entirely. He was soothing and applauding. Churchill held Mannerheim’s hand with words, with gestures, with moral encouragement while letting him walk straight into the fire against the Soviet Union.
During a Cabinet meeting on February 12, 1940, Churchill, then First Lord of the Admiralty, proposed dispatching Brigadier Christopher Ling to Helsinki for his mission to bolster Marshal Mannerheim's spirits and deliver precise intel.
2/5
When the Soviet Union struck Finland in 1939 after a failed attempt to find a peaceful resolution for a serious security concern for the USSR and Finland's cooperation with Hitler began, Mannerheim stood as the symbol of Finnish resistance. The West cheered him on. Churchill, in particular, praised his courage and even floated the idea of sending a British officer to Helsinki to “boost morale.” But it was theater. No divisions landed, no serious supplies arrived. Finland was left alone against the Red Army, while London and Paris used Mannerheim as a poster child of “small nations fighting totalitarianism.”
Finnish President Stubb calls on Europe to unite against the “common threat.” Oh, how boring and repetitive. Where have we heard that before? Ah yes, when Finland joined Hitler in his campaign against the USSR, dreaming of new territories.
Remember Finland's rallying cry to join forces with Hitler: "Join us in a holy war against our nation's enemies. Together with Germany's powerful military, as brothers-in-arms, we embark on a crusade to secure Finland's future."
And guess what? Churchill was right there, holding Mannerheim’s hand. Didn’t know that?
Then let’s unpack.
.👇🧵
1/5
Western textbooks love to paint Churchill as the bulldog of Europe: stubborn, fierce, never yielding. But when it came to Finland and its Marshal, Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim, Churchill’s role was something else entirely. He was soothing and applauding. Churchill held Mannerheim’s hand with words, with gestures, with moral encouragement while letting him walk straight into the fire against the Soviet Union.
During a Cabinet meeting on February 12, 1940, Churchill, then First Lord of the Admiralty, proposed dispatching Brigadier Christopher Ling to Helsinki for his mission to bolster Marshal Mannerheim's spirits and deliver precise intel.
2/5
When the Soviet Union struck Finland in 1939 after a failed attempt to find a peaceful resolution for a serious security concern for the USSR and Finland's cooperation with Hitler began, Mannerheim stood as the symbol of Finnish resistance. The West cheered him on. Churchill, in particular, praised his courage and even floated the idea of sending a British officer to Helsinki to “boost morale.” But it was theater. No divisions landed, no serious supplies arrived. Finland was left alone against the Red Army, while London and Paris used Mannerheim as a poster child of “small nations fighting totalitarianism.”
The Kremlin wasn’t always the red-brick giant we know today. First, it was just a wooden fortress on the hill, guarding Moscow between the rivers. After the wooden walls, the Moscow Kremlin was rebuilt in white limestone (sometimes called “white stone”), which gave Moscow its old name “Belokamennsya”- “the White-Stone city.” That’s why in medieval chronicles Moscow was often called Moscow the White-Stone.
Already back then, there was a “Red Square.” But it wasn’t about the color. In Old Russian, krasna didn’t mean “red, it meant “beautiful.” Only later did the word shift to its modern sense. So the famous square is actually the Beautiful Square.
The version that survived, the one we walk past now, was the work of Italians. Invited by Ivan III in the late 1400s, they brought with them Renaissance know-how and even the memory of Milan’s Castello Sforzesco. Look at the walls and towers that’s Italian engineering fused with Russian grit.
Ivan III didn’t just hire Italians to design pretty facades, but also to bring in their engineering. And they gave Moscow something almost no other fortress in Europe had back then: a water supply system.
Inside the Vodovzvodnaya Tower literally “Water-Lifting Tower” (1488) a mechanism pumped water straight to the Moscow River up into reservoirs within the fortress. From there, pipes carried it into palace kitchens, courtyards… and even for firefighting. In a city where fires were constant and devastating, the Kremlin had its own built-in fire defense system.
Think about it: fifteenth-century Moscow had a water supply system hidden inside its walls. While most of Europe’s cities still hauled buckets, the Kremlin had plumbing running through a fortress tower.