Even Hitler’s Army Was Shocked: The Unstoppable Courage of Russian Soldiers
🧵👇
Here are quotes from German soldiers and officers about Russian soldiers.
Field Marshal Erich von Manstein, one of Hitler’s top generals:
The Russians were not afraid of death. They fought with a determination I had never seen in any other army.
Field Marshal Friedrich Paulus, commander of the German 6th Army, who surrendered at Stalingrad:
If I had to go to war again, I would rather have the Russians on my side than against me.
General Heinz Guderian, creator of Germany’s tank warfare strategy:
The Soviet soldiers were much tougher and braver than we expected. Even unarmed, they fought with incredible determination.
SS officer Fritz Diebert, about the Battle of Kursk:
The Russians attacked without fear, without rest. They didn’t seem to know what retreat meant. They weren’t afraid to die, and that terrified our soldiers.
From a German soldier’s diary, winter 1941, during the failed attack on Moscow:
They are not human, they are beasts! We are freezing to death, but they live in the snow and keep attacking!
General Hans Dörr:
A Soviet soldier is the perfect warrior. He adapts, he endures, and he never gives up, even when he is doomed.
From a German infantry soldier at Stalingrad:
We are surrounded. We have no food, almost no ammunition. The Russians keep attacking. They don’t fear hunger, cold, or death. How do you defeat men like that?
Even the Nazis, who thought they were the strongest army in the world, had to respect Russian soldiers. They expected an easy victory but instead found an enemy who refused to break, no matter how hard they fought. The Red Army’s courage, endurance, and strength shocked even Hitler’s best generals.
The Red Army captured 4.37 million enemy servicemen, including more than 2.5 million Wehrmacht soldiers and officers.
The Red Army was responsible for the destruction of approximately 7.3–8 million German soldiers, including those killed in action, who died from wounds, or were rendered unable to fight. This immense figure underscores the critical role the Soviet Union played in dismantling Nazi Germany’s military might.
Approximately 75-80% of all German military casualties occurred on the Eastern Front, making the Red Army the primary force behind the defeat of the Wehrmacht. This staggering statistic highlights the decisive role the Soviet Union played in crushing Nazi Germany.
Author of 'Tigers in the Mud', German 'panzer ace' and tank commander, and one of few German commanders to have fought both on western and eastern fronts, Otto Carius:
"Five Russians were more dangerous than Thirty Americans. We already noticed that in our few days in the western front."
German Commander Otto Carious:
"We were used to an opponent the stature of the Russians; we were amazed at the contrast (when fighting Americans). During the war, I have never saw soldiers (Americans) disperse head over heels even though virtually nothing was happening."
“For the sake of justice, it must be said that Karius highly appreciated the American army, but if you compare the soldiers of the United States and the USSR, the latter will have the advantage. The Russians could conduct multi-layered fire. They used every opportunity and tool they could muster."
"Again the pace of the war surprised me, the Russians would never have let us have so much time! The Americans took so long to close the pocket, especially given that nobody around wanted to fight anymore. A well organized German corps could have closed the pocket in a week."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The ceasefire was supposed to end the risk. Instead, it exposed something much bigger. What if the real story isn’t peace, but what almost happened at Kharg Island?
1/12
Why this island keeps coming up?
There is one location that keeps repeatedly appearing in discussions about escalation: Kharg Island in the Persian Gulf.
A large share of Iran’s oil exports flows through this point, with some estimates reaching as high as 80–90 percent. That alone explains why Washington has reportedly examined scenarios involving a limited military operation there, potentially combining naval and ground elements. At first glance, the idea looks rational and even efficient, because it targets a clear economic bottleneck.
But the problem is that strategies that look clean in theory rarely behave the same way once they are placed into real conditions, where geography, logistics, and political reactions begin to interact.
Some reports mention troop movements into the region, including airborne units and naval deployments. However, this is not about a full-scale invasion of Iran, which would be unrealistic. The discussion is centered on limited, targeted operations against specific points.
2/12
The reason so much oil is concentrated at Kharg is not political, but physical.
The seabed around the island is deep enough to allow large oil tankers to dock directly, while much of Iran’s coastline is too shallow for that kind of infrastructure. In other words, this is not simply a matter of preference but of geography shaping economic flows.
At the same time, Kharg is not Iran’s only export route, even if it is by far the most important one. During the Iran–Iraq war in the 1980s, repeated strikes on the island forced Tehran to rethink its vulnerability, which eventually led to the construction of a pipeline running to the port of Jask, further southeast, beyond the Strait of Hormuz.
This detail matters more than it may seem. Jask sits outside the main chokepoint of the region, which means that if Kharg were disrupted, Iran could still redirect part of its exports there. The capacity is significantly lower, so exports would drop sharply, but they would not collapse completely. The system would be damaged, not disabled.
The Soviet Union made a film in 1983 about Zionism, the Rothschilds and the Israeli lobby in the US. It was buried for decades. I just added English subtitles and corrected the dubbed version. Watch what they didn't want you to see. Links below.
“But Stalin created Israel and he was a crypto Jew.” Or: “Stalin was an antisemite.”
You’ve heard these claims. I know you have. The favorite villain of the twentieth century is never allowed to rest. The propaganda just keeps going. And propaganda doesn’t need logic. It only needs repetition.
So let’s look at what actually happened.
Let’s start with antisemitism, because real thinking usually disappears the moment the conversation treats it as something completely separate and more important than every other kind of ethnic hostility, as if it were the only form that is truly unacceptable. Once that happens, the discussion stops being about principles and starts turning into an ideology of ethnic supremacy.
2/
The reason for this special status is the Holocaust. But Jews were not the only victims of Nazi racial policy. The Nazis also targeted Roma, disabled people, and large parts of the Slavic population. Plans like Generalplan Ost and the Hunger Plan openly called for deporting, starving, or eliminating huge numbers of Slavs in Eastern Europe. In total, more than twice as many Slavs in the Soviet Union and Poland were killed during the war. Yet when this period is discussed today, the focus falls entirely on the Jewish tragedy, while the suffering of many other groups receives no attention, which, let's be honest, confuses all others who now start singing praises of Hitler due to the current geopolitical situation. But please, don't be fooled. That guy killed a huge number of white Christians, too.
NATO wrote a classified report in 1959. Subject: Soviet education. Conclusion: terrifying.
They discovered the USSR was producing engineers and scientists faster than the U.S. and U.K. combined, with deeper training and better results. The report was so alarming it triggered an emergency overhaul of the American school system.
Here's what scared them 🧵👇
1/
After WWII, the Soviet Union was recovering fast. By 1957, they had launched the first artificial satellite - Sputnik.
While it was flying through space, the West started paying close attention. NATO, led by the U.S., became increasingly curious and nervous about how the USSR was advancing so quickly and achieving such impressive progress.
Soon, "journalists," "scientists," and "researchers" began showing up in the Soviet Union, many of them quietly trying to understand what exactly was fueling this unexpected momentum.
2/
As a result, in 1959, NATO compiled a classified analytical report on education in the USSR.
In May of that year, Dr. C.R.S. Manders prepared a report for NATO's Science Committee titled
"Scientific and Technical Education and Manpower Resources in the USSR."
The report covered the entire Soviet education system, starting from kindergarten all the way to universities and research institutes. It detailed how talent was identified and developed early on, with a clear focus on math, science, and discipline at every level.
Excerpts from the document
Introduction:
"Just 40 years ago, the USSR faced famine, illiteracy, and a shortage of skilled workers.
Today, it challenges the U.S. for global leadership a transformation unmatched in modern history."
II. Factors Behind the Rapid Growth of Soviet Education
"Many elements drove the USSR's educational progress, especially in science and technology.
Though focused on technical fields, much of this also applies to broader intellectual development.
Soviet methods often differed from those in the West, and those differences are noted here."
3/
The West is resurrecting Navalny again. Calling him a hero. A martyr for democracy.
But here's what they won't tell you: his extremism, his intelligence handlers, his foreign funding, and the geopolitical game he was built to play.
Let me show you who Navalny really was 👇🧵
His extremism started as early as October 30, 2007. After political debates at Moscow's Gogol Club, Navalny attacked a visitor named Timur Teziev. Multiple witnesses testified he shot him at close range with a gas pistol.
This is the man the West now calls a "hero."
2/
In 2007, Alexei Navalny was expelled from the Yabloko party over nationalism, specifically for participating in nationalist projects and marches. In 2008, he took part in nationalist rallies again.
The ‘Russian Marches’, in which Alexei Navalny took part, weren't some peaceful protests. Instead they featured far-right groups, xenophobic slogans, Nazi symbols, and calls for ethnic purification.
Luckily, after 2008, these events have largely faded from the public scene, facing bans and tight restrictions. But Navalny seemingly enjoyed them.
They told you the Soviets requested the bombing of Dresden. The CIA spent years searching for that evidence. They never found it because it never existed.
The lie has been repeated for 80 years anyway. Here's the truth🧵👇
1/
The bombing of Dresden is often described as a tragedy whose moral weight was later 'exploited by Soviet propaganda'. Western accounts have frequently implied that the Soviet Union shared responsibility or even requested the attack. But the facts doesn't support this narrative.
2/
In February 1945, British and American forces carried out a massive air raid on Dresden using a bombing method already tested elsewhere. High explosives were followed by incendiaries and then additional explosives that prevented effective firefighting. The resulting firestorm reached extreme temperatures and destroyed the city exactly as planned.