Even Hitler’s Army Was Shocked: The Unstoppable Courage of Russian Soldiers
🧵👇
Here are quotes from German soldiers and officers about Russian soldiers.
Field Marshal Erich von Manstein, one of Hitler’s top generals:
The Russians were not afraid of death. They fought with a determination I had never seen in any other army.
Field Marshal Friedrich Paulus, commander of the German 6th Army, who surrendered at Stalingrad:
If I had to go to war again, I would rather have the Russians on my side than against me.
General Heinz Guderian, creator of Germany’s tank warfare strategy:
The Soviet soldiers were much tougher and braver than we expected. Even unarmed, they fought with incredible determination.
SS officer Fritz Diebert, about the Battle of Kursk:
The Russians attacked without fear, without rest. They didn’t seem to know what retreat meant. They weren’t afraid to die, and that terrified our soldiers.
From a German soldier’s diary, winter 1941, during the failed attack on Moscow:
They are not human, they are beasts! We are freezing to death, but they live in the snow and keep attacking!
General Hans Dörr:
A Soviet soldier is the perfect warrior. He adapts, he endures, and he never gives up, even when he is doomed.
From a German infantry soldier at Stalingrad:
We are surrounded. We have no food, almost no ammunition. The Russians keep attacking. They don’t fear hunger, cold, or death. How do you defeat men like that?
Even the Nazis, who thought they were the strongest army in the world, had to respect Russian soldiers. They expected an easy victory but instead found an enemy who refused to break, no matter how hard they fought. The Red Army’s courage, endurance, and strength shocked even Hitler’s best generals.
The Red Army captured 4.37 million enemy servicemen, including more than 2.5 million Wehrmacht soldiers and officers.
The Red Army was responsible for the destruction of approximately 7.3–8 million German soldiers, including those killed in action, who died from wounds, or were rendered unable to fight. This immense figure underscores the critical role the Soviet Union played in dismantling Nazi Germany’s military might.
Approximately 75-80% of all German military casualties occurred on the Eastern Front, making the Red Army the primary force behind the defeat of the Wehrmacht. This staggering statistic highlights the decisive role the Soviet Union played in crushing Nazi Germany.
Author of 'Tigers in the Mud', German 'panzer ace' and tank commander, and one of few German commanders to have fought both on western and eastern fronts, Otto Carius:
"Five Russians were more dangerous than Thirty Americans. We already noticed that in our few days in the western front."
German Commander Otto Carious:
"We were used to an opponent the stature of the Russians; we were amazed at the contrast (when fighting Americans). During the war, I have never saw soldiers (Americans) disperse head over heels even though virtually nothing was happening."
“For the sake of justice, it must be said that Karius highly appreciated the American army, but if you compare the soldiers of the United States and the USSR, the latter will have the advantage. The Russians could conduct multi-layered fire. They used every opportunity and tool they could muster."
"Again the pace of the war surprised me, the Russians would never have let us have so much time! The Americans took so long to close the pocket, especially given that nobody around wanted to fight anymore. A well organized German corps could have closed the pocket in a week."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You've been told the Russian Revolution was a spontaneous uprising of the oppressed masses.
But what if I told you it was meticulously planned, funded with millions of German marks, and executed according to a memorandum written two years before it happened?
Meet Alexander Parvus. 🧵👇
/1
Born Israel Lazarevich Gelfand in the Russian Empire, Parvus moved through Europe building connections in socialist circles. He participated in the 1905 revolution, escaped exile to Siberia, and settled in Constantinople where he advised the Young Turks and amassed substantial wealth.
/2
In Munich Trotsky fell under Parvus’s intellectual influence. He spent much of his time in Parvus’s apartment, absorbed his worldview, and later admitted that no one shaped his thinking more deeply.
The core idea is that revolution must not stop after its first success. It must continue to expand.
What if Hitler’s war machine was financed not by Berlin but by Wall Street? I bet you've never heard of the Dawes Plan (1924) and the Young Plan (1929). Let's unpack why it's important and why you never heard about it in school 🧵👇
A consortium of American investment banks, backed by the U.S. State Department, orchestrated Germany’s postwar “recovery.” The Dawes Plan (1924) was about control: It plugged Germany directly into the Anglo-American financial system, turning its economy into a satellite of Wall Street and the City of London.
Here’s how it worked:
🔸 Control through debt
The reparations crisis after World War I made Germany dependent on foreign credit. The Dawes Plan, drafted by American banker Charles G. Dawes and approved by U.S. diplomats, handed effective control of the German economy to an international board dominated by Wall Street financiers.
Every mark Germany paid as “reparations” came from American loans, meaning the Allies were repaid with their own money, filtered through German debt.
At the heart of this web were the Warburgs, a transatlantic banking dynasty linking New York, Hamburg, and London.
Paul Warburg, co-founder of the U.S. Federal Reserve, had already laid the foundation for America’s central banking power. His brother Max Warburg, head of M.M. Warburg & Co. in Hamburg (Germany) and a director of the Reichsbank, advised both Dawes and Hjalmar Schacht (later Hitler’s finance chief).
Through this dual network (Wall Street on one side, the Reichsbank on the other) the Warburgs acted as a bridge for American capital into German industry. The Dawes and later Young Plan (1929) weren’t “aid packages” but mechanisms through which German economic sovereignty was absorbed into the Anglo-American banking orbit.
Do you know that Hitler’s early backers were the Americans?🧵
1/7
In November 1922, U.S. Army Captain Truman Smith, then Assistant Military Attaché in Berlin, traveled to Munich and became the first American officer to meet the rising agitator Adolf Hitler. Smith filed a glowing report to Washington, describing Hitler as a “marvelous demagogue” with immense sway over crowds. He was impressed by Hitler’s oratory and predicted that he could become a major political figure.
2/7
In November 1922, U.S. Army Captain Truman Smith, then Assistant Military Attaché in Berlin, traveled to Munich and became the first American officer to meet the rising agitator Adolf Hitler. Smith filed a glowing report to Washington, describing Hitler as a “marvelous demagogue” with immense sway over crowds. He was impressed by Hitler’s oratory and predicted that he could become a major political figure.
3/7
“Crimea belongs to the Crimean Tatars”?
That’s a favorite Western talking point, but the Tatars weren’t even native to Crimea. They were brought there by the Mongols after their conquest of the region in the 1200s, when Mongol and Turkic groups settled on the peninsula and later formed the Crimean Khanate. 🧵
#1
By that time, Crimea had already been Greek, Roman, Byzantine, and part of the Rus world for centuries. Long before the Tatars or the Ottoman Empire, from around the 7th century BC to the early Middle Ages, Crimea and the northern Black Sea steppe were home to ancient peoples connected to the early Slavs and the Sarmatians. Ancient writers mentioned the Taurians, Scythians, and Sarmatians, who lived both in Crimea and across the steppe north of it, and later, Slavic tribes moved south along the Dnieper and Don, reaching these same lands.
#2
When Sarmatians Met the Slavs
The Sarmatians were nomadic horsemen, and their way of life left a real mark on the cultures that came after them. You can see traces of their warrior symbols, horse rituals, and jewelry styles showing up in early Slavic artifacts from the same regions.
The Sarmatians were closely related to the Scythians, both steppe peoples with similar languages, customs, and a shared warrior culture. The Sarmatians gradually replaced the older Scythians on the Pontic steppe, but in the eyes of the Greeks and later the Byzantines, they were almost the same, fierce riders from the Black Sea plains.
This ancient image of the “Scythians” lived on for centuries. Even when the early Rus appeared in chronicles, the Greeks and Byzantines often called them “Scythians” or “Tavroscythians,” keeping the old classical name for the peoples coming from the lands of Rus and the Black Sea region.
Modern DNA studies confirm deep genetic continuity between the ancient steppe populations and the Eastern Slavs, showing that the people of this region shared common roots and gradually merged over time. By the 6th to 8th centuries, Sarmatian and Slavic elements were blending across the steppe.
So no, the Sarmatians did not disappear. Many of them became part of the world that shaped the Eastern Slavs, preserving their culture and their bloodlines.