Rina Lu🇷🇺 Profile picture
Mar 11 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Even Hitler’s Army Was Shocked: The Unstoppable Courage of Russian Soldiers

🧵👇

Here are quotes from German soldiers and officers about Russian soldiers.

Field Marshal Erich von Manstein, one of Hitler’s top generals:

The Russians were not afraid of death. They fought with a determination I had never seen in any other army.Image
Field Marshal Friedrich Paulus, commander of the German 6th Army, who surrendered at Stalingrad:

If I had to go to war again, I would rather have the Russians on my side than against me.Image
General Heinz Guderian, creator of Germany’s tank warfare strategy:

The Soviet soldiers were much tougher and braver than we expected. Even unarmed, they fought with incredible determination.Image
SS officer Fritz Diebert, about the Battle of Kursk:

The Russians attacked without fear, without rest. They didn’t seem to know what retreat meant. They weren’t afraid to die, and that terrified our soldiers.Image
From a German soldier’s diary, winter 1941, during the failed attack on Moscow:

They are not human, they are beasts! We are freezing to death, but they live in the snow and keep attacking!Image
General Hans Dörr:

A Soviet soldier is the perfect warrior. He adapts, he endures, and he never gives up, even when he is doomed.Image
From a German infantry soldier at Stalingrad:

We are surrounded. We have no food, almost no ammunition. The Russians keep attacking. They don’t fear hunger, cold, or death. How do you defeat men like that?Image
Even the Nazis, who thought they were the strongest army in the world, had to respect Russian soldiers. They expected an easy victory but instead found an enemy who refused to break, no matter how hard they fought. The Red Army’s courage, endurance, and strength shocked even Hitler’s best generals.Image
The Red Army captured 4.37 million enemy servicemen, including more than 2.5 million Wehrmacht soldiers and officers.

The Red Army was responsible for the destruction of approximately 7.3–8 million German soldiers, including those killed in action, who died from wounds, or were rendered unable to fight. This immense figure underscores the critical role the Soviet Union played in dismantling Nazi Germany’s military might.

Approximately 75-80% of all German military casualties occurred on the Eastern Front, making the Red Army the primary force behind the defeat of the Wehrmacht. This staggering statistic highlights the decisive role the Soviet Union played in crushing Nazi Germany.Image
Author of 'Tigers in the Mud', German 'panzer ace' and tank commander, and one of few German commanders to have fought both on western and eastern fronts, Otto Carius:

"Five Russians were more dangerous than Thirty Americans. We already noticed that in our few days in the western front."Image
German Commander Otto Carious:

"We were used to an opponent the stature of the Russians; we were amazed at the contrast (when fighting Americans). During the war, I have never saw soldiers (Americans) disperse head over heels even though virtually nothing was happening."

“For the sake of justice, it must be said that Karius highly appreciated the American army, but if you compare the soldiers of the United States and the USSR, the latter will have the advantage. The Russians could conduct multi-layered fire. They used every opportunity and tool they could muster."

"Again the pace of the war surprised me, the Russians would never have let us have so much time! The Americans took so long to close the pocket, especially given that nobody around wanted to fight anymore. A well organized German corps could have closed the pocket in a week."Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rina Lu🇷🇺

Rina Lu🇷🇺 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rinalu_

Jun 15
The Crimean War: The First Western Plan to Break Russia and How Persia Was Used in Britain’s Geopolitical Game

The Crimean War (1853–1856) is often portrayed in Western textbooks as a limited conflict over Christian holy sites or a simple case of Russian imperial overreach. In reality, it was the first major hybrid war waged by the collective West against Russia aimed not at Crimea alone, but at surrounding, weakening, and fragmenting the Russian Empire through both military and ideological means.

🧵👇Image
Part 1: Why the West Wanted to Cripple and Break Russia in the 1850s

After the defeat of Napoleon in 1812–1814, Russia emerged as a dominant power in Europe:

🔸 Russia controlled Poland, Finland, and the Caucasus
🔸 It was pushing into the Balkans and gaining influence over the weakening Ottoman Empire
🔸 It was seen as the protector of Orthodox Christians across Eastern Europe and the Middle East
🔸 It possessed a massive land army, strategic fleets, and vast manpower resources

This alarmed both Britain and France, especially due to:

🔸 Britain’s fear for its colonial route to India
🔸 France’s ambition to regain prestige after the Napoleonic wars
🔸 Shared concerns about Russia’s growing access to the Black Sea, the Mediterranean, and possibly the Bosporus and Dardanelles
Confirmed evidence of geopolitical intent:

🔸 British Prime Minister Lord Palmerston wrote explicit memoranda on containing Russia and stirring unrest along its borders
🔸 British agents were sent into Persia and Afghanistan throughout the 1830s–1850s to build influence and provoke anti-Russian sentiment
🔸 British missionaries and intelligence operatives were active in the Caucasus and Caspian regions, targeting Shiite elites to turn them against Orthodox Russia
🔸 France, under Napoleon III, pursued what it saw as a neo-Crusade, forming an alliance with Britain and the Ottomans under the banner of Christian rights while in fact aiming to check Russian power in the East
Read 10 tweets
Jun 13
Zhirinovsky’s quotes:

In 2024, there will be no elections. There will be no country called Ukraine. You’re not taking into account what’s happening in the Middle East. Events are unfolding there so rapidly that everyone will forget Ukraine even existed.

(2019) Image
It’s heading toward World War III. And Iran is not Vietnam, not North Korea, and not Kosovo. The worst events will happen right there. We will be forced to let refugees through to you. Europe will let them in, the Turks will open the borders at our request, and they’ll all end up with you. That will be the end of your country. We are forced to do this, because you ignore international law, you’ve forgotten what Russia is, and frankly, you’ve violated everything you possibly could.

(2019)
Israel will strike those facilities where it believes there are nuclear enrichment centers, and possibly even sites for producing nuclear warheads. And after that strike, Iran will definitely retaliate.

(2019)
Read 8 tweets
Jun 12
Why “Russian” Is an Adjective:

On the Civilizational Identity of Rus’ and the Late Birth of Nations in Europe

🧵👇

In Russian, the word “russkiy” (as in “I am Russian”) is grammatically an adjective, unlike Italian, Englishman, and similar national identifiers in other languages, which are nouns. At first glance, this may seem like a grammatical coincidence. But upon closer inspection, it reveals something deeper: a reflection of Russia’s unique historical trajectory. While medieval Europe remained fragmented, tribal, and regionally divided for centuries, Rus’ had already developed a centralized cultural and political core strong enough to generate a unified identity.Image
Adjective = Belonging, Not Blood

In most European languages, names for national or ethnic groups are nouns:

🔸Frenchman, Spaniard, German, Italian, Pole.

These nouns reflect tribal or ethnic origins. One “is” a member of a people, a bloodline, and the modern nation eventually arises from that ethnos.

In contrast, in Russian:

🔸“russkiy chelovek” - Russian person
🔸“russkaya vera” - Russian faith
🔸“russkiy yazyk” - Russian language

Here, “russkiy” is an adjective. It describes not one’s lineage, but one’s belonging to Rus’, to a state, to a religious and cultural tradition.

This marks a fundamental difference: In Europe, the nation grew out of the tribe. In Rus’, identity grew out of the state.
Europe: The Late Birth of Nations

Until the modern period, there were no true nations in Europe. People identified themselves by:

🔸region (Bavarian, Milanese, Breton);
🔸feudal allegiance;
🔸religion (Catholic or Protestant);
🔸estate or class.

In France, even into the 18th century, many peasants did not speak French and did not think of themselves as “French.”

In Spain, the situation was even more fractured: Castilians, Catalans, Galicians, Basques each with their own language, identity, and elite.
Germany was a mosaic of hundreds of duchies, bishoprics, and free cities.

What we now call “national identity” as a unifying political, linguistic, and cultural concept only began to form in the 19th century, spurred by the Reformation, the Napoleonic wars, industrialization, and ultimately, the demands of modern warfare.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 11
Why Proposals for Peace Talks at the Vatican Are the Height of Arrogance - and What Lies Behind the Ban on the Russian Orthodox Church in Ukraine
🧵👇

Why is the idea of holding peace talks in the Vatican not just naive but downright hostile? Because the Vatican has never been a neutral player, especially when it comes to the East. And to really understand why, you need to know who’s pulling the strings.

The Jesuit Order, officially the Society of Jesus, isn’t just another religious group. It’s the Vatican’s ideological hit squad, founded in the 1500s to crush anything that didn’t bow to the Pope. In other words: spiritual special forces.

Their motto is universalism, and their weapon of choice is infiltration. They don’t kick down the front door, they walk in through the school system, elite networks, and slick language games. One of their favorite sayings? “Give me the child for the first seven years, and I’ll give you the man.” That’s why they built hundreds of universities around the world, including Georgetown University, now basically a training ground for globalists, diplomats, and intelligence agents.

Georgetown’s School of Foreign Service has churned out everyone from Bill Clinton and King Abdullah of Jordan to CIA directors, EU policymakers, and IMF officials. The Jesuits’ mix of education, missionary work, and ideological grooming is the blueprint for today’s soft power game: think tanks, foreign-backed NGOs, and glossy training programs that slowly reshape people’s beliefs from the inside.Image
The Jesuits’ First Target: Rus’

Historically, the Jesuits were the Vatican’s shock troops but Rome’s crusading ambitions started way before them. Back in the 11th century, the Vatican wasn’t just fighting Muslims in the Holy Land; it was also launching attacks on fellow Christians in the East. The Fourth Crusade ended with the brutal sack of Constantinople in 1204, and in the 13th century, Catholic military orders like the Teutonic and Livonian knights were waging so-called “holy wars” against Orthodox Rus’. The famous Battle on the Ice in 1242 where Alexander Nevsky crushed the Catholic knights on a frozen lake was one of those moments where Rome tried (and failed) to bring the East to heel.

Fast forward to the 16th century, and the Jesuits enter the scene. They were the next phase in the Vatican’s campaign, less about swords, more about strategy. But just as ruthless. In 1572, they were involved in the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre – a coordinated bloodbath that wiped out tens of thousands of Protestants in France. Once the Vatican had brought Western Europe to its knees, it turned its sights back East. Rus’ wasn’t seen as a different tradition, it was labeled a 'schism.' A threat. The war was no longer just fought on battlefields. It moved into classrooms, churches, and diplomatic backrooms.
Ivan the Terrible and the Smear Campaign Against Rus’

In the mid-1500s, while Russia was locked in brutal conflict with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth over the western lands of Rus’, the Vatican decided to make a move. Pope Pius IV reached out to Tsar Ivan IV with an offer: let’s be allies but only if you submit to the Pope and unite with Rome.

Ivan, who wasn’t just a fierce ruler but also a highly educated theologian, shut it down immediately. His response wasn’t just political, it was spiritual:

“Any pope who does not live according to Christ’s teaching and apostolic tradition is a wolf, not a shepherd.”

That answer infuriated the Vatican. From that moment on, the war turned ideological. Ivan became a target for Western propaganda, and it’s no coincidence that this is when Europeans started calling him “the Terrible.” That nickname? It never existed in Russia at the time. It was pure spin.

This is how the Jesuit machine works: if you can’t conquer a ruler, you smear him, isolate him, and try to rot his state from the inside.
Read 17 tweets
Jun 10
Why “Peace Talks” at the Vatican Are a Joke and Dangerous

Some people think the Vatican is the right place to talk about peace in Ukraine. But this idea isn’t just naive - it’s dangerous. Why? Because the Vatican is not a neutral side. It never was. Especially when it comes to Russia.

To understand this, you need to know who’s really behind these “peace” offers.Image
Who Are the Jesuits?

The Jesuits, also called the Society of Jesus, are not just regular priests. They were created in the 1500s by the Catholic Church to destroy other types of Christianity that didn’t follow the Pope. You can think of them as the Vatican’s special forces: smart, strategic, and loyal only to Rome.

In Russia, they tried many times to break the Orthodox Church. One of their main tools was the idea of “Eastern Catholicism”, churches that look Orthodox on the outside, but follow the Pope on the inside.
Vatican in the USSR? Yes, Secretly

In the 1920s, while the Soviet Union was destroying the Orthodox Church, the Vatican saw its chance. Jesuit agents secretly entered the USSR to create an underground Catholic network. The goal? To quietly replace the broken Orthodox structure with a version loyal to the Vatican.

One of them, Jesuit Michel d’Herbigny, even made secret bishops not to help anyone, but to prepare a Catholic takeover behind the government’s back.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 10
Lenin’s Letter to Ganetsky: Proof of a Revolution for Germany’s Benefit

In the summer of 1917, as the Russian Empire bled on the Eastern Front and the Provisional Government teetered in Petrograd, Lenin wrote a letter to his trusted comrade and financial handler Ganetsky (also known as Fürstenberg).

Among the many things Lenin outlined was this demand:

“Withdraw troops from Armenia and Galicia immediately.”
- Lenin to Ganetsky, 1917

It’s a critical phrase and a loaded one. Because both Armenia and Galicia were key military zones in Russia’s war effort against the Central Powers. Demanding a withdrawal was not a tactical maneuver, it was a strategic surrender, one that aligned perfectly with Germany’s wartime objectives.Image
Who Was Ganetsky?

Ganetsky real name Henrik Fürstenberg was:

🔸A Polish socialist, Bolshevik, and Lenin’s close associate
🔸A money handler who operated businesses in Switzerland and Sweden
🔸The conduit through which German money flowed to Lenin and the Bolsheviks

Using shell companies like “Franz Summa”, Ganetsky moved large sums of money from German banks, disguised as trade funds, into Russia. These funds supported Bolshevik newspapers, strikes, sabotage, and propaganda.

Even the Russian Provisional Government confirmed in 1917:

Over 2 million German marks were funneled into Bolshevik hands.Image
Imperial Germany had three goals in Eastern Europe:

1. Collapse the Eastern Front
2. Destabilize Russia from within
3. Secure a separate peace with massive territorial gains

Lenin’s letter to Ganetsky reads like a checklist of how to deliver all three.

Withdraw troops.
Renounce imperial ambitions.
Call for peace talks with Germany.
Undermine the war effort.
Shift public trust from the Provisional Government to the Bolsheviks.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(