Rina Lu🇷🇺 Profile picture
Mar 11 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Even Hitler’s Army Was Shocked: The Unstoppable Courage of Russian Soldiers

🧵👇

Here are quotes from German soldiers and officers about Russian soldiers.

Field Marshal Erich von Manstein, one of Hitler’s top generals:

The Russians were not afraid of death. They fought with a determination I had never seen in any other army.Image
Field Marshal Friedrich Paulus, commander of the German 6th Army, who surrendered at Stalingrad:

If I had to go to war again, I would rather have the Russians on my side than against me.Image
General Heinz Guderian, creator of Germany’s tank warfare strategy:

The Soviet soldiers were much tougher and braver than we expected. Even unarmed, they fought with incredible determination.Image
SS officer Fritz Diebert, about the Battle of Kursk:

The Russians attacked without fear, without rest. They didn’t seem to know what retreat meant. They weren’t afraid to die, and that terrified our soldiers.Image
From a German soldier’s diary, winter 1941, during the failed attack on Moscow:

They are not human, they are beasts! We are freezing to death, but they live in the snow and keep attacking!Image
General Hans Dörr:

A Soviet soldier is the perfect warrior. He adapts, he endures, and he never gives up, even when he is doomed.Image
From a German infantry soldier at Stalingrad:

We are surrounded. We have no food, almost no ammunition. The Russians keep attacking. They don’t fear hunger, cold, or death. How do you defeat men like that?Image
Even the Nazis, who thought they were the strongest army in the world, had to respect Russian soldiers. They expected an easy victory but instead found an enemy who refused to break, no matter how hard they fought. The Red Army’s courage, endurance, and strength shocked even Hitler’s best generals.Image
The Red Army captured 4.37 million enemy servicemen, including more than 2.5 million Wehrmacht soldiers and officers.

The Red Army was responsible for the destruction of approximately 7.3–8 million German soldiers, including those killed in action, who died from wounds, or were rendered unable to fight. This immense figure underscores the critical role the Soviet Union played in dismantling Nazi Germany’s military might.

Approximately 75-80% of all German military casualties occurred on the Eastern Front, making the Red Army the primary force behind the defeat of the Wehrmacht. This staggering statistic highlights the decisive role the Soviet Union played in crushing Nazi Germany.Image
Author of 'Tigers in the Mud', German 'panzer ace' and tank commander, and one of few German commanders to have fought both on western and eastern fronts, Otto Carius:

"Five Russians were more dangerous than Thirty Americans. We already noticed that in our few days in the western front."Image
German Commander Otto Carious:

"We were used to an opponent the stature of the Russians; we were amazed at the contrast (when fighting Americans). During the war, I have never saw soldiers (Americans) disperse head over heels even though virtually nothing was happening."

“For the sake of justice, it must be said that Karius highly appreciated the American army, but if you compare the soldiers of the United States and the USSR, the latter will have the advantage. The Russians could conduct multi-layered fire. They used every opportunity and tool they could muster."

"Again the pace of the war surprised me, the Russians would never have let us have so much time! The Americans took so long to close the pocket, especially given that nobody around wanted to fight anymore. A well organized German corps could have closed the pocket in a week."Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rina Lu🇷🇺

Rina Lu🇷🇺 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rinalu_

Oct 1
When NATO Broke Its Promise and Russia Knew It

On December 1, 1994, NATO made a move that would change the world map. Without setting any exact dates, the alliance released a communiqué declaring it was starting talks on expanding eastward. That meant moving into territories once under the Soviet sphere. Russia immediately saw the threat.

In Paris that same month, Russian Foreign Minister Andrei Kozyrev slammed the decision. And on December 5, President Boris Yeltsin stood at the CSCE summit in Budapest and warned the world: NATO expansion is not peace but a provocation. The Cold War is over, he said, but the West is bringing in a “cold peace.” And this time, the threat was closer to home.

1/9Image
Yeltsin proposed an alternative vision - a system of European security based on cooperation, not confrontation. But the Clinton administration brushed it off as "unrealistic." Still, Washington knew they couldn't ignore Moscow. During the 1995 Moscow summit, Yeltsin and Clinton discussed not only financial support via IMF and World Bank, but also a deal: NATO expansion would be gradual, Russia would be consulted on European security, and NATO would boost its political - not just military - dimension.

Earlier, in June 1994, Russia had agreed in principle to join the "Partnership for Peace." But NATO’s airstrikes against Bosnian Serbs in August sparked outrage in Moscow. Russia froze the talks. Only after another summit did negotiations resume. On May 30, 1995, Russia officially joined the Partnership.

2/9
Still, Russians didn’t trust the process. A September 1995 report outlined how NATO enlargement could proceed. In January 1996, Kozyrev stepped down. His replacement was no soft talker - Evgeny Primakov, former head of Russian foreign intelligence. He knew NATO expansion couldn’t be stopped. So he proposed a strategy to reduce the damage.

Here’s what Russia wanted:
🟨 No nuclear weapons in new NATO member states
🟨 Mandatory consultations with Russia on European security
🟨 A signed, binding agreement between Russia and NATO

3/9
Read 9 tweets
Sep 29
Myth that “Russia was a Mongol province!” and interesting parallels to today’s geopolitics.

Oh, here we go again, the same old tune. Yes, Rus paid tribute to the Mongols. Nobody denies that. But twisting this into “Russia didn’t exist”? That’s propaganda. Again.

Even the Mongols themselves acknowledged Rus. The khans issued yarlyks (charters) to the princes of Rus. If there was no Rus, who exactly were those yarlyks addressed to? Ghosts?

Some facts that don’t bend:
🔸 Rus kept its coinage, minted with its own symbols.
🔸 Rus worshipped the same Orthodox Christ.
🔸 The Rurik dynasty continued without interruption.
🔸 The people kept their identity and yes, their DNA code (R1a, to be precise).

Let’s dive into how this connects to Poland, the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, NATO, and the Vatican🧵👇
So the Mongols acknowledged Rus by issuing yarlyks to its princes. Europe of the time marked Rus as a country on its maps. Both worlds recognized Rus - yet in 2025, trolls deny it. Who do you trust: the Mongols and medieval Europe, or today’s propaganda bots?

1. Map: Hereford Mappa Mundi (c. 1300, England).
2. Map: Ebstorfer Weltkarte (c. 1234, Saxony).
3. Map: Psalter World Map (c. 1265, England, likely London or Westminster).

Think of India in the 19th century: ruled directly by the British, economy drained, industries ruined, millions starved. Yet it was still India on every map, its identity intact.

Rus had it easier: it paid tribute but kept its princes, faith, culture, and coins. If India wasn’t erased under full colonial rule, why pretend Rus vanished under the Mongols?

But look at today’s “Western reconstructions”: suddenly the entire map is just the Mongol Empire, with no Rus at all. That’s political revisionism.Image
Image
Image
Papal Crusades Against Rus: Another Proof of Its Existence

It’s enough to crack open the papal bulls and the chronicles of the knightly orders. The Vatican wasn’t calling crusades against “scattered tribes” or Mongols - they named Ruthenia, Rus, Russians. In 1240–1242, Pope Innocent IV greenlit a crusade against the “Russian schismatics.” The Teutonic Order marched on Pskov and Novgorod. The chronicles spell it out: Rus was the target of Catholic expansion.

If even the enemies themselves recognized Rus as a political entity, that’s the clearest proof of its reality. They weren’t fighting phantoms - they were fighting Russians, trying to break Rus under Rome’s authority.

And the Mongols? They were nowhere in this picture. They sat it out. It wasn’t their state, and it wasn’t their fight.

Chronicon Livoniae, XIII century

dmgh.de/mgh_ss_23/inde…Image
Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
Sep 25
Why Ukraine Doesn’t Qualify as the Successor of ‘Kievan Rus’.

Since 2014, Ukraine has been busy inventing a national identity from scratch. History? Doesn’t matter. Facts? Optional. Logic? Throw it out the window. The result? A confused mess of revisionism where everyone and everything is magically “Ukrainian.” But let’s unpack this fairytale.

Myth #1: Ukraine is the true successor of Kievan Rus

Let’s start with the obvious. In the time of Rus, there were no “Ukrainians.” Not even the concept. Zero. Zilch. The people were called Rus, that’s what the Greeks called them too: Ῥῶς (Ros), and later Ῥωσία (Rosia). There was no magical country called “Ukraine” in the 10th century.

Even the term “Kievan Rus” didn’t exist at the time. Historians in 19th-century Russia (not Ukraine) invented that label just to describe a specific period when Kiev was a center of power. Back then, it was just Rus - no prefixes, no qualifiers.

For the record:
🔸The first capital of Rus was Staraya Ladoga (modern Russia),
🔸Then Novgorod,
🔸Then Kiev, but only for part of the 10th to early 12th centuries.

After that, Rus split into various centers - Vladimir, Suzdal, then eventually Moscow. So Kiev was the capital for a while, sure. But using that to claim the whole legacy? That’s like Rome claiming it owns modern Germany because they used to camp there.Image
Myth #2: Ruthenia = Ukraine?

Nice try. “Ruthenia” is just Latin for Rus. Polish and Hungarian sources used the word “Rutheni” to describe eastern Slavs living under their rule, not some special Ukrainian tribe. And now modern Ukrainians try to parade it around as “proof” they’re a unique people?

Here is the break down:

🔸Rus (Old Russian) = original name
🔸Rosia (Greek) = Byzantine records
🔸Ruthenia (Latin) = Western European term

All different names for the same people, the same civilization. No Ukrainians. Not until the 20th century. Sorry.
So who was the heir of Rus?

Well, let’s see. After the Mongols razed Kiev in 1240 and left it a smoldering ruin, the Rurik dynasty packed their bags and moved to Vladimir, and later Moscow. The city was nearly abandoned, sparsely populated, with just a few monks and broken churches. The action moved north.

Meanwhile, the Lithuanians took advantage of the vacuum and rolled into Kiev in 1362. Slavs still lived there, spoke the Old Russian language, and practiced Orthodox Christianity, but the city was now under Lithuanian control. Later, in 1385, it was absorbed into the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, and stayed there until the mid-17th century.

The capital of Rus' moved to Moscow, and everyone knew it. Like when the capital of the US moved to Washington, or like Poland changed its capitals, or like the Roman Empire changed its capitals. Does it mean it becomes a new country? No, it doesn't.

🔸In 1493, Ivan III officially took the title “Gosudar vseya Rusi” (“Sovereign of All Rus”).
🔸His state documents, seals, and treaties all carried this title.
🔸The Holy Roman Emperor Frederick III addressed him as “Imperator Russiae” (Emperor of Rus).
🔸Italian ambassador Ambrogio Contarini wrote about Ivan ruling the great realm of “Rossa.”

What was Kiev doing at this time?
Being a dusty outpost of Lithuania. Not exactly the “beating heart of a great nation.”
Read 8 tweets
Sep 20
Classic British diplomacy: polite smiles on the surface, but in reality deceitful, manipulative, and driving others into war. It was the case in 1939, and it’s the same today. Finland, on Britain’s cue, did everything possible to provoke conflict with the USSR in order to weaken it.

This declassified doc shows Britain’s foreign policy at its finest: play the “good guy” while betraying every principle and fueling war.
🔸To Moscow, they smiled and said they agreed with Soviet guarantees for Finland.
🔸To Helsinki, they whispered: “Reject it, stir up trouble, block the deal.”
🔸Then they lied back to Moscow: “We’re fine with it, it’s Finland resisting.”

Our Helsinki resident reports that during the course of the Anglo-Soviet negotiations, the Finnish government continuously urged Britain not to agree to guarantees for Finland from the USSR. Britain responded to these requests with consent. However, in recent days Britain informed the Finns that the negotiations were developing in such a way that Britain would apparently satisfy the USSR’s demands regarding Finland. At the same time, Britain advised the Finns to raise a fuss and refuse the guarantee. By doing this, Britain could take advantage in negotiations with the USSR and be able to say that Britain itself does not object, but Finland does.

/1Image
Image
Politically, it was Finland that derailed the peace talks and initiated the confrontation. It acted in the interests of Britain and France, hoping to turn the USSR’s northern border into a hotspot of war.

“England and France are currently trying to use Finland as a pretext to stir up public opinion against the USSR”.

/2Image
Image
At the same time, Molotov and Stalin were doing everything possible to prevent a conflict, and the Finnish delegation itself confirmed this. Here are excerpts from the memoirs of Tanner, who was Finland’s Minister of Foreign Affairs at the time.

/3
Read 4 tweets
Sep 19
Unveiling the forgotten history: German soldiers' brutal eradication of Slavs - raped, looted, and burned their way through Soviet villages.

A thread on the untold atrocities of WWII.

Stop ignoring how the Wehrmacht acted against the Slavs. Increasingly, we hear claims like "maybe Hitler wasn't a bad guy." Perhaps this is because all you've heard is the story of the six million.

But here’s the real story🧵👇

During WWII, Nazi Germany carried out a full-blown “war of annihilation” in the USSR killing, torturing, raping, and looting millions of civilians. Most people in the West barely know about it. Nazi leaders had branded Slavs “sub-humans” and even issued orders saying soldiers weren’t accountable for violence against civilians. As one German corporal casually wrote in 1942, “The Russians are animals. We can do whatever we want to them.”

Content Warning: This discussion covers graphic accounts of wartime violence and is intended for educational purposes only.

1/10Image
Image
Rape as a Weapon

From the onset of Operation Barbarossa, Nazi forces targeted local women with brutal assaults. By 1943, alarmed SS commanders discovered that half their troops in the East were engaged in "undesirable" acts with "alien" women. Instead of imposing penalties, the Barbarossa Decree (May 13, 1941) ensured soldiers faced no repercussions for crimes against civilians. Consequently, mass rapes, gang assaults, and forced brothels were woven into the Wehrmacht's terror tactics. Astonishingly, much of the Western world still turns a blind eye to these atrocities.

Content Warning: This discussion covers graphic accounts of wartime violence and is intended for educational purposes only.

2/10Image
Firsthand Atrocities

The Nazis wielded rape like a weapon of war. Soldiers' own letters laid bare their horrific boasts: dragging women onto trucks, assaulting them, then tossing them aside. In one camp, officers brutalized "suspected spies" with rifle butts and bayonets, raped them, and collected torn-off buttons as grotesque "trophies," even hurling grenades to savor their screams. Picture eight German officers gathered around, laughing at their cruelty.

These were crimes sanctioned, ignored, and hidden.

Content Warning: This discussion covers graphic accounts of wartime violence and is intended for educational purposes only.

3/10Image
Read 10 tweets
Sep 19
The Yalta Conference (Feb 1945) brought together Stalin, Roosevelt, and Churchill in Crimea to shape the postwar world and plan the Allies’ final push against Germany and Japan. Surprisingly, Poland ended up being the main topic of debate.

/1 Image
At that time, the Polish government-in-exile, formed after the government fled and was interned in Romania had relocated to London, hence the term “the London government.”

Churchill tried to push his own interests. He argued grandly that handing authority to Poland’s government-in-exile was a matter of honor. Stalin cut him off: “For Russia, this is a matter not only of honor, but of security. Throughout history, Poland has served as a corridor through which enemies have attacked Russia.”

/2
Another interesting exchange came during debates over Poland’s eastern border, the so-called Curzon Line. That line had been proposed back in 1919 by Lord Curzon, France’s Georges Clemenceau, and American delegates at the Paris Peace Conference. As Stalin reminded the others:

“First of all, the Curzon Line was not invented by Russians. Its authors were Curzon, Clemenceau, and the Americans at the Paris Conference of 1919. Russians weren’t even present at that conference… So what, do you want us to be less Russian than Curzon and Clemenceau?”

Mic drop.

/3
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(