All taxes are bad. But they're not all EQUALLY bad.
If we HAVE to have taxes, what is the less-bad option?
(1 of 17)
I define a tax as 'less bad' if it's more efficient (less admin, etc), causes less intrusion into peoples private lives, causes less distortions (changes people's behaviour less), and distorts people's behaviour only in ways which tend to aid the economy, not hurt it.
(2 of 17)
Here's how I rank the major options, and why (least-bad at the top):
Notice how the vast majority of tax revenue in Australia comes from the bottom 3... the three worst options (in my opinion.)
Let me go through them, keeping in mind that NO taxes are 'good', I'm just comparing their relative destructiveness.
(4 of 17)
1. Money exit tax. Every dollar leaving an Australian account to a foreign one gets taxed. I believe quite a low percentage would do, let's assume 2-3% on every outflow of money (not just 'net' or 'on balance'). This therefore applies to profits of multinationals...
(5 of 17)
...who will flock to Australia for our tax-friendly environment, paying only 2-3% as they repatriate profits to parent entities internationally.
Pros: privacy, compliance is done by banks, keeps money in Australia.
Cons: avoidance via crypto.
(6 of 17)
2. Import tariffs. Tariffs are bad, but they're less bad than others.
If they 'work' by bringing manufacturing on shore, tax revenue drops. The upside is that if that's happening then there's more domestic jobs, industry, and national security.
(7 of 17)
Pros: encourages on-shore economic activity, improves national security.
Cons: the 'protection' makes local industry less globally competitive, harming exports. It's ultimately paid domestically, contrary to popular belief.
(8 of 17)
3. GST. Due to 'input tax credits' GST doesn't accumulate like a transaction tax, but theres a lot of paperwork and lost time to report on and remit.
Plus a consumption tax is still a drag on the economy. You may be taxing consumers rather than producers...
(9 of 17)
... but you're still making it harder for producers to find buyers.
Pros: Administrated by businesses not individuals, less privacy issues compared to income tax, applies equally.
Cons: time consuming to administer, it's a real drag especially on smaller businesses.
(10 of 17)
4. Transaction tax. It ends up being a domestic tariff. Its 'only .25% but that's on every transaction. By the time a 100% 'made in Australia' product reaches consumers it could easily have 10%, 25%, or even more, added because of all these micro taxes accumulating.
(11 of 17)
In the same way that a tariff discourages importing, a transaction tax will discourage doing business domestically.
Pros: administrated by banks, good for privacy.
Cons: it's a tariff against domestic industry, rewarding imports, makes Australia uncompetitive.
(12 of 17)
5. Property Taxes (Rates, property tax, stamp duty.) All bad. Stamp duty adds fraction to property transactions leading to a misallocation of valuable resources.
(13 of 17)
Property tax means you never own your property and is a punitive tax against retirees who live for decades in an area which ends up with high property taxes they can't afford on their income. Rates are fine if they're genuinely 'fee for service, but they're not.
(14 of 17)
6. Income tax. The worst tax in existence. It gives the state 'ownership' of every person, it is partial slavery. No privacy or rights against the government. Huge waste of time for every person in the country, huge administrative overhead for every employer...
(15 of 17)
...discourages people from being more productive as the tax brackets climb (wage earners can hit high tax brackets as they work overtime), easy for some industries to avoid or minimise.
It's a human rights minefield, inefficient, and creates perverse incentives.
(16 of 17)
These are just my opinions though.
What do you think (besides NO TAX which I obviously agree with)?
There's a lot of misinformation out there, let's clear it up and give you the answers so you can tell others.
A Thread: 🧵🧵🧵 (1 of 13)
(2 of 13)
Australia has a Preferential System, meaning you get 1 vote but it travels from one candidate to another according to your preferences.
You number the boxes from 1 (most preferred) till the end (least preferred) and if your #1 gets knocked out, your vote travels to your #2. If they also get knocked out, it goes to your #3 etc.
The ONLY THING YOU NEED TO REMEMBER IS TO PUT ALL THE 'GOOD' or 'OK' MINOR PARTIES FIRST, above any of the major parties, yes even above the major party you like better than the other one.
The temptation is to put your preferred minor party (such as Libertarian) at #1 then put your preferred major party (such as Liberal) at #2. This is a waste of the Preferential System as we'll see further down. This mistake is the reason Tasmania did not elect me or the PHON or UAP candidates as Senators last election. Not a lack of votes between us, but a lack of Preferences.
(3 of 13)
MYTH: "There are too many freedom-friendly minor parties splitting the vote!!! They need to combine!!!"
The Preferential System is a GOOD thing because it avoids the problem of 'splitting the vote' like what they have in the USA or the UK.
For example:
Candidate A gets 55% of the vote
Candidate B gets 45%
Candidate A wins. Simple.
BUT if there's a candidate C who ALSO appeals to the same demographics as Candidate A we get:
A: 35%
B: 45%
C: 20%
Now B wins even though a majority of voters would have PREFERRED A.
This is the problem with so many 'similar' parties, Libertarians, PHON, Family First, People First, UAP, TOP, etc... "They're splitting the vote!" I hear you say.
Not if voters use their preferences correctly, because they can Vote #1 for C, and #2 for A, meaning that if C is eliminated they'll still get A, which is preferred to B.
Immediately prosecute with jury trials every officer caught on camera committing acts of unprovoked violence against Victorians, especially during lockdowns. Internal investigations or magistrate only trials are not good enough to restore public trust.
Continued.
(2 of 6)
Immediately rehire and back-pay every officer that refused to be jabbed, issue a written apology, and formally reprimand every senior member that failed to object to the jab mandates on their members.
Continued.
(3 of 6)
Immediately change the uniforms back to Blue. The switch to Black was a choice based on the psychology of colour... and it worked as intended, helping members to be psychologically ok with putting the 'force' into Police Force. This must end.
My submission, in full, to this sham Covid-19 Inquiry. They excluded unilateral actions by the states, then they gave ONE WEEK for public submissions... it's a slap in the face, but our best response is to FLOOD them with responses and make it clear we'll be watching them.
Part 1/5 of the long promised Perth Mainstream Medical and Media Convention!
I had the honour of being the MC, and we opened with a very funny set from Corey White, followed by an impassioned opening talk from John Shipton, father of Julian Assange.
The remaining 4 parts will be uploaded in due course!
Part 2/5
Ed Dowd brings the data that demands answers... if it's not the 'elephant in the room' that's caused this uptick in deaths and disabilities among working age people... what did?
And why are the authorities so disinterested in explaining THESE deaths when they shut down the world to 'save one live' just 2 years ago?
@DowdEdward
Part 3/5
Dr Naomi Wolf has led a team of researchers diving deep into the 'Pfizer Papers', the documents that Pfizer wanted hidden for decades but were finally forced to release.
What is revealed within their pages is damning, arguably the biggest and most deadly medical cover up in history, and @naomirwolf breaks it down for us live over zoom.