Jeff Clark Profile picture
Mar 18 13 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Tomorrow, watch for a post from me about the latest revelations from Senators Grassley and Johnson about the corrupt FBI investigation under Biden/Garland/Wray called Operation Arctic Frost.
+1 A thread 🧵:

This past Friday, March 14, 2025, Senators Grassley and Johnson released new whistleblower information.

That bombshell set of revelations was particularly important to me because it told the world I had been targeted by the FBI’s Operation Arctic Frost.

I am grateful to the Senators and the whistleblowers for their doggedness on this and getting this information out to the American people, who need it.

Read it all here (and note that there are hyperlinks you can click on to the FBI emails and other documents on this webpage, so you can look at the original source material for yourself).

grassley.senate.gov/news/news-rele…
+2 Arctic Frost is the FBI investigation designed to try to send alternate (Republican) presidential electors from the 2020 election along with President Trump (and anyone else the prior FBI wanted to smear) to prison for long periods of time.

It was a political weaponization of heretofore-unknown proportions and perfidy.

And the Operation was opened by FBI Assistant Special Agent in Charge in the Washington Field Office, Tim Thibault.Image
+3 Thibault opened Arctic Frost in violation of an important FBI rule — namely the rule that prohibits the self-opening of new cases.

The Senators found that Thibault used FBI Agent Michelle Ball as cover to open what was really his own investigation. So, in reality, she was Thibault’s cat’s paw to make it seem as if FBI procedures were properly followed, when they weren’t.
+4 Arctic Frost eventually became Jack Smith’s DC prosecution of Trump.

This means that the DC case against Trump was tainted from the very start. And thus the Jack Smith prosecution could never have survived, if discovery into Thibault’s misconduct had ever been properly disclosed.

The lawyers on Jack Smith’s team had to have known this. Yet they persisted in prosecuting Trump anyway. One can only conclude that they intended to conceal this vital information from the public through trial or that securing a guilty verdict was never their real objective — just kicking up bales of media dust designed to subtract 2024 votes from Trump, and perhaps that was their realistic objective.
+5 I am particularly interested in Operation Arctic Frost because it turns out that I was added as a target to that Operation sometime in the time window of May 21-24, 2022.

The DOJ Inspector General’s Office had started an investigation against me in January 2021 after improper leaks to the New York Times of tiny bits of highly spun information.

But in the timeframe May 21-24, 2022, the important point for this thread is that the OIG investigation against me was merged into Arctic Frost, meaning the FBI became my antagonist at that point.Image
+6 The merged investigation means that the taint originated by rabid FBI partisan Tim Thibault (who was dead set to destroy Trump (consult other Grassley work unmasking Thibault) and who also was such a tool of the two-tiered system of justice that he ran cover for Hunter Biden) *applied equally to me.*

So no federal prosecution against me ever could have succeeded either. And if Fani Willis is eventually shown to have been cooperating with the FBI (which there is already strong evidence of, including her repeated refusals to turn over documents about such federal-state collusion sought by Judicial Watch), then the Georgia state prosecutions of President Trump and myself also would eventually have been exposed as completely bankrupt, leading to their collapse.
+7 Next, note that on July 1, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court held that President Trump was immune from federal prosecution — and in particular, absolutely immune — for consulting with me and others at the Justice Department in 2020 and early 2021 about his options to investigate the 2020 election.

The President was just exercising his core Article II Take Care Clause powers and obligations.
+8 The President’s consultations with me are — and absolutely have been protected by my actions to the hilt — cloaked by a slew of legal privileges.

Others, who did not have the same level of integrity, fidelity to the Constitution, or intestinal fortitude — or some combination of those traits — by contrast violated the privileges and kicked off the lawless process of the January 6 Committee, which was not just unconstitutional, but a contrived and scripted Hollywood political farce.
+9 Once the immunity decision was released, Jack Smith had no choice but to remove his ham-handed references to me from his indictment of President Trump, where Smith had smeared me as an unindicted co-conspirator.

Thus, when Jack Smith rolled out his superseding indictment in August 2024 against our President, I was now no longer in sight or under federal jeopardy.Image
+10 Now for the application of logic based on my removal from the superseding indictment by Jack Smith coupled with the new March 14, 2025 whistleblower revelations announced by Senators Grassley and Johnson:

Because the OIG investigation had been merged into Arctic Frost, once that unified investigation ran smack dab into the brick wall of the immunity decision, as implicitly admitted by Jack Smith’s removal of references to me from the Trump indictment, in addition to being safe because the whole investigation was tainted by Thibault’s and Ball’s misconduct at the FBI, I was doubly rendered safe because there thus could be no ongoing OIG investigation of me as of August 2024.

That investigation and the FBI Arctic Frost investigation are now both dead against me. The died the day the superseding indictment dropped me out. R.I.P.
+11 But I never would have known about the OIG investigation being merged into Arctic Frost without the courage of the unknown FBI whistleblowers who came forward to the Senators. So I endured 7 needless months of individuals on the Left still attacking me as under OIG investigation.
+12 Nor would I have known about the merged investigations without Senators Grassley and Johnson, who are honest, decent, and forthright American legislators.

I am thankful both to the whistleblowers and to this duo of Senators for exposing the dirty deeds of these bad actors at the FBI.

And I know the whistleblowers, for their part, want nothing more than for the Bureau to be cleaned up and refocused on fighting real crime, not trying to penalize the political views of half the country, let alone to penalize the legal advice of leading lawyers for that half the country.

Praise to the Lord for turning over these dark stones and exposing the slugs underneath to the light.

I am so gladdened not to see the daily lionization of Jack Smith and Tim Thibault coming from the MSM anymore.

The MSM was so enamored with Smith at one point they were literally praising him for eating at Subway. The “journalists” who feted Smith to feed these fake and evil stories to weaponize the justice system should now be the ones to crawl under the rocks.

Good riddance.

**END**Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff Clark

Jeff Clark Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JeffClarkUS

Oct 6, 2024
1--#KamalaBusRape Case

Here are the documents I have from this case.

As a reminder for those who have not been following this, there is a man who comes to the country as an illegal alien. He is convicted of a domestic violence crime. He gets out of jail and settles in San Francisco, a sanctuary city. Somehow, he gets a job as a bus driver carting around drunk and rowdy people at night from one night club to another. He and his cousin conspire to let the illegal alien bus driver rape a married woman in her twenties. The rape is brutal. He's arrested and Kamala, when District Attorney, agrees to let him off for a ridiculously lenient 3-year prison term.

Given the 4-image limit, it will take a thread to attach all of the pages.

I want you to focus on the police officer's report of what occurred. And on the victim's impact statement given in open court.

And then ask yourself if such a prosecutor has disqualified herself from the presidency. My answer is a resounding "yes," she is disqualified.

Lastly, note that this case was not personally prosecuted by Kamala but by an assistant DA that she would have needed to sign off on -- one Adrian Ivancevich.Image
Image
Image
Image
2--#KamalaBusRapeCase

Tranche 2. Image
Image
Image
Image
3--#KamalaBusRapeCase

Tranche 3. Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Oct 2, 2024
As I digest this document, I will post reactions.

But let me start with the first thing that jumps out at me: The document is signed as pictured below. There is no mention that Jack Smith and his subordinates are at the U.S. Department of Justice.

As if you needed any better indication that they regard themselves as an extra-constitutional Fourth Branch of government. They are no longer listing their institutional affiliation.

(Though they list their address as that building that many DOJ alums call "Main Justice" at 9th and Pennsylvania Aves., or more formally the Robert F. Kennedy Justice Building. Presumably, the name of the building is not used (and I can tell you that is standard on DOJ court filings coming out of Main Justice) because in either variant of the building's name DOJ would have to use the word "Justice.")

Now stop to think why Jack Smith might have done this: It raises the question of whether use of any Justice Department organ to go after a former President of the United States is constitutional and could comport with the Supreme Court's July 1, 2024 immunity decision in Trump v. United States.Image
+1 The redactions are ridiculous. None of them are designed to shield either privileged information or inadmissible evidence from public view, but instead just to ostensibly conceal identities.

But the identities pop out at you, if you’ve been following the constant news story drum beat against Trump in the MSM and you’ve read the J6 Report.

So what that means is essentially that virtually nothing is redacted. The process is a joke. The redactions are an easily penetrated smokescreen that has nothing to do with protecting witnesses.

In this connection, let me make a prediction: Norm Eisen, Brookings, Just Security, , the Brennan Center, and/or the NYT and Washington Post will issue a redactions guide before too long.

It will be in the form of a Key — P1 is such and such person, P2 is __, P3 is either __ or __, etc.

You watch. If I’m wrong, I’ll re-ripen this point and admit it. But I don’t think I will be.Lawfare.com
+2 There is a fatal admission on Page 9 of Jack Smith’s filing.

The background to understand the importance of the admission is that Smith is saying (like the J6 Cmte before him) that Trump’s criminal state of mind is established by the fact that many Trump advisors told him that he had lost the 2020 election.

That theory has always been ridiculous because advisors are just that — they advise — the President decides. Their advice is not imputable/attributable to the President’s state of mind.

But there is a little parenthetical on Page 9 that these advisors “were telling the truth that he [Trump] **did not want to hear**—that he had lost ….”

This inherently confesses that Trump disagreed with his advisors telling him he’d lost. That right there negates “the criminal mind” or what lawyers call scienter.

And without the requisite scienter or intent, Trump cannot legally be convicted of a crime.

Trump’s only “crime” is believing that he won the 2020 election, something many Americans both sophisticated and ordinary agree with.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 7, 2023
1/4 This is Barr covering his posterior, since the informant info goes back to 2017, as John Solomon reported. He wants to lay the inaction on the Biden Administration whereas in reality, the inaction straddles both the Barr DOJ and this DOJ, with Wray as a constant across both.
2/4 Now, the way Barr would answer your question is that he had assigned looking at Hunter Biden corruption allegations to the Delaware US Attorney, so sending Joe Biden corruption allegations to the same US Attorney seemed like a natural fit.
3/4 But what you & the American people need to ask is a logically prior question: Why would Barr ever want to send any Biden family investigations to Delaware? That's the Biden family's HOME POWER BASE. They have been instrumental in the rise of many people who hold office there.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 2, 2023
1/x This will be a long 🧵on the topic of whether H.R. 3746's permitting reform is worth something or is basically worthless. H.R. 3746 raises the debt limit.
From here on out, I call it "the Bill."

This will no doubt be my longest thread so strap in. I'll begin with main pts.
2/x The "reforms" in H.R. 3746 (“the Bill”) will do little to solve the serious problems created by the 1970 National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) and its regulations.

NEPA is a law that requires all infrastructure projects to be analyzed for their environmental effects.
3/x Worse even than Nixon's price controls, his signing the NEPA statute was one of his worst decisions.

NEPA is the go-to statute for leftist environmental groups to block infrastructure projects. You wonder why in China infrastructure sprouts up overnight but it takes 2 yrs
Read 45 tweets
May 30, 2023
1/x OK, I've listened so as not to be only abstract. (This will be a long thread as I'm going to take the most salient things on point by point.)

First, there will be snark or acrimony here. I'd like to think of both @JennaEllisEsq and @josh_hammer as friends in conservatism.
2/x Second, I think reasonable conservatives can differ in the race between Trump and DeSantis.

Third, I think DeSantis does have his merits.

Fourth, I'm not going to descend into the intercamp mud wars.

Fifth, the Jenna-Josh podcast exchange was better than I'd expected.
3/x Still, I think the points they made are thin and in particular, I don't think Jenna carried the burden to explain her switcheroo.

There were many generalities & much public-relations speak. Those things always strike me as so much diaphanous mist.

Now, on to the merits ...
Read 35 tweets
Apr 11, 2023
1/4 Rep Raskin tells us several things about “woke” here, all of which I think is balderdash:

see around 19:50-21:00 mark.

Specifically, he says:

1) conservatives don’t know what the term means;
2) the Left doesn’t really know what it means either;
2/4 cont’d:
3) we on the Left have stopped using the term anyway, so conservatives are too late; &
4) I, Rep Raskin, have a def’n for “woke” which is “stay vigilant” because we Dems are under attack.
3/4 No, “woke” is cultural Marxism, an attack on our traditions, religious life & culture.

The Left runs from “woke” as a label now because they prefer their radical beliefs to rest inside the equivalent of an amorphous smoke screen where they can hide.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(