🚨 President Trump just fired the two unaccountable Democrat Commissioners of the Federal Trade Commission. This bold action challenges the core thesis of the Administrative State (that technocrats should be politically insulated) and challenges the incredibly errant 1935 Supreme Court case Humphrey's Executor, which helped create the Deep State 🧵 x.com/afergusonftc/s…
Throwing it back to your high school civics class: our nation was founded upon the idea that We the People get to pick our federal government: locally we elect members of Congress, states elect Senators, and nationally, we elect the President. All of the other people who work in our government are selected directly or indirectly by these elected officials. /2
Article II of the Constitution vests the power to execute the laws in its one officer, the President. For nearly the first century of the republic, the President could hire, fire, or appoint anyone who worked in Article II because the President has the sacred duty to "take care" that the laws of the US be “faithfully executed”
As the 19th Century Progressive Era took over, ivory tower elites like Woodrow Wilson and James Landis stripped the people of their power, destroyed our Separation of Powers, and concentrated power in the hands of technocratic so-called "experts," insulated from the will of the People by creating "Independent Agencies."
Why you ask? They said our Constitution was "inadequate" to address "modern problems," so they tried to rip it up. /4 x.com/VivekGRamaswam…
Who were these agencies independent of? The President and the electoral process. These agencies had "removal protections" hindering the ability of the President to remove those officials not aligned with his execution of the laws. /5
Who were these agencies independent of? The President and the electoral process. These agencies had "removal protections" hindering the ability of the President to remove those officials not aligned with his execution of the laws. /5
After a landslide election, in 1933, President Roosevelt fired FTC Commissioner William Humphrey for hindering him from discharging his duties as President and acting pursuant to his electoral mandate. (Sound familiar)? /6
In one of its worst reasoned and anti-constitutional cases, the Supreme Court held that the President had to comply with the "removal protections" limiting his ability to remove an appointee to an independent agency. Humphreys died before the Supreme Court gave its ruling, but the executor of his will sought the back pay, Humphrey's Executor. /7
Humphrey's Executor is bad law. It undermines the President's centralized authority he is granted under Article II and creates very power, unaccountable federal agencies. That is the key to this entire fight against the Administrative State, the accountability of the federal government to the electoral will of the People. /8
In recent years, the Supreme Court has weakened the power of the flawed Humphrey's case in its Seila Law v. CFPB and Collins v. Yellens cases, giving power back to the People's elected representatives and eliminating unaccountability in some agencies. The modern FTC has also expanded in size and scope, possibly making Humphrey’s Executor no longer good law. /9 x.com/EliNachmany/st…
Today, President Trump brought us back to where this whole thing started, the Federal Trade Commission, by removing two FTC Commissioners who stand opposed to his agenda, his electoral mandate, and will be unaccountable to our constitutionally empowered officials. /10
This case will end up in the Supreme Court and will be one of the most important Separation of Powers cases in the last century, if not the most important. As Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on the Constitution, I will be looking into this further. I look forward to fighting alongside President Trump to dismantle the unaccountable administrative state and I urge the Supreme Court to take quick, decisive action. /END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Left spent the past decade building a vast censorship enterprise.
A shadowy network of NGOs, tech groups and governments working to censor the Left's enemies—not just in America, but across the West.
Over the next four years, the GOP must expose + dismantle this system. 🧵
The censorship-industrial complex wasn't built overnight. It's been festering for years.
But the Biden administration mobilized an unholy alliance of government power, taxpayer dollars, NGOs and Big Tech companies to build it into a global censorship powerhouse.
Seemingly every agency was a partner in building this system: FBI, CIA, NSA, DHS, State Department, Department of Education, the National Science Foundation, USAID—even FEMA.
Through grants and partnerships, these agencies funneled countless tax dollars to censorship groups.
Americans certainly expected better than the Biden Administration's unprecedented attempt to throw their political opponents in jail (Banana republic stuff) and made that known on November 5th.
We oppose utopian ideology in all its forms, because we recognize that we live in a fallen world. Humans are flawed and imperfect creatures. We can't build Heaven on Earth—and it's highly dangerous to try.
(Remember the Tower of Babel?)
That means we approach the world as it is—not as we wish it could be.
We live in a world of scarcity and limits. A foreign policy that protects and advances American interests must understand that.
We have to make tough choices about when and where we use our resources.
🚨Don’t look now Jack Smith and the Biden Harris DOJ are cranking back up their Lawfare machine against @realDonaldTrump.
It’s Election Interference.
Jack Smith is like a rabid dog after his bone. It’s time he’s leashed.🧵
After the United States Supreme Court threw out Jack Smith’s first indictment and a federal court found his appointment to be unconstitutional, Jack Smith filed a new indictment against President Trump for alleged efforts to interfere in the 2020 presidential election—the great irony of these actions is that Smith is now decidedly interfering in the 2024 presidential election.
Jack Smith has weaponized the DOJ and has used it to make purely political attacks against President Trump.
I am demanding AG Garland and the DOJ hand over all internal communications with Jack Smith regarding his latest indictment of Trump.
I request answers to the following questions by October 11.
1. Please describe any communications DOJ officials had with Special Counsel Jack Smith after the Supreme Court of the United States vacated the appellate decision and remanded the presidential immunity case, Trump v. United States.
As Joe Biden heads to the border today for nothing more than a glorified photo op - it’s worth laying out the case of exactly how Biden created the crisis at the border.
A thread 🧵
On Biden’s first day in office, January 20, 2021, Biden terminated the national emergency at the southwestern border. He halted construction of the border wall.
Same day: Biden reversed a Trump Era executive order. The executive order put restrictions on immigration from countries associated with terrorism.
Same day: Biden pauses deportations for 100 days.
Same day: Biden reverses yet another Trump policy. This policy told law enforcement to enforce the immigration laws of the United States.
February 2021:
Biden stops applying Title 42 expulsions to children at the border.
CDC exempts unaccompanied alien children from Title 42 expulsion requirements.
🚨THREAD: The Biden campaign is hiring Rob Flaherty to combat “misinformation.” Flaherty was a key player in the Biden WH's "censorship enterprise." Here’s what we found out in MO v. Biden, and why this should concern everyone. politico.com/news/2023/09/2…
Flaherty is a defendant in Missouri v. Biden, the lawsuit that I filed that uncovered evidence that the Biden White House colluded with social media companies to censor speech. Flaherty served as the White House director of digital strategy.
In April 2021, Flaherty and other HHS officials had a “Twitter Vaccine Misinfo Briefing” with Twitter to talk about deplatforming those who spread misinformation.