Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Dr Peter Beaver 🇵🇸 Profile picture
@PeterJBeaver
Mar 21 • 1 tweets • 1 min read • Read on X
PubMed database with 450,000 scientific studies of SARS-CoV-2, including 18,400 on Long-COVID & 19,500 case reports.

The details are quite horrifying, in a very matter-of-fact and scientific way.

Why is there almost zero public health response???

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/coron…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Dr Peter Beaver 🇵🇸

Dr Peter Beaver 🇵🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PeterJBeaver

Dr Peter Beaver 🇵🇸 Profile picture
Dec 24, 2023
1. A friend shared frustration and incredulity that Cardiologists investigating her father’s heart issue during a hospital stay were unmasked. During a SARS2 surge. Cardiologists. Don’t they know SARS2 causes vascular damage?

It occurred to me, this is about culture.

THREAD(11)
2. Culture is irrational. We follow culture even when it contradicts science. Medical professionals are no different. An interesting medical objection to Semmelweis’ infection control work almost 200 years ago was “a gentleman’s hands are clean.” What could that mean?
3. The resistance to Semmelweis was cultural. How so? Medical culture is complex. But fundamentally it’s about helping through diagnosis & medication/surgery. That work is active – it’s about doing, it’s about actively pursuing a goal.
Read 11 tweets
Dr Peter Beaver 🇵🇸 Profile picture
Apr 18, 2023
Question. Why have many epidemiologists shamed themselves & their profession by minimising SARS2 harms and pushing misinformation?

They’ve contributed to death, ill-health, and the permanent horror of ‘‘living’ with the virus.’

I have theory …
The professional identity of the epidemiologists should have driven them to fight heroically. They did the opposite.

I make no claims about how many and what proportion of epidemiologists. It just seems like too many.
Maybe an answer can be found in the conditions of their work.

Before the pandemic epidemiologists enjoyed high status, income, career security, and a routine of teaching, publishing and conferences.

A disciplined, challenging, but satisfying and rewarding lifestyle.
Read 7 tweets
Dr Peter Beaver 🇵🇸 Profile picture
Apr 16, 2023
I keep wondering what pandemic lesson can be drawn from Vaughan’s 1996 ethnographic account of the loss of the Space Shuttle Challenger?
Vaughan reconstructed the native viewpoint: How did NASA engineers & managers make sense of complex technology not performing as expected?
The Challenger burnt up due to heat erosion on the rocket booster O rings. A known fault. Most explanations suggest managers were too concerned with the schedule and organisational reputation. They pushed for launch to save face, save costs, and save time redesigning the booster.
But if managers cared only for reputation, costs, schedule, why launch the Challenger and risk the entire programme?
They did not see themselves doing wrong. They followed a comprehensive risk management process, measurement, analysis, documents.
Challenger was “acceptable risk."
Read 4 tweets
Dr Peter Beaver 🇵🇸 Profile picture
Oct 16, 2022
This is the first study of SARS-2 reinfection.

The risk of at least one sequela at 180 days increased from 135% after one infection, to 211% after two, to 300% after three.

SARS-2 hits you harder each time.

erictopol.substack.com/p/a-reinfectio…
The study is a preprint. Eric Topol: "I have not previously seen any substantive differences from their preprints compared with the final publications."

The median time between infections was: 79 days (1st & 2nd) and 65 days (2nd & 3rd).

researchsquare.com/article/rs-174…
Compared to those with one infection, the risk of all-cause mortality for those who were reinfected (i.e. two or more infections) increased by 214%.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(