Hours after the Paul Weiss news broke, an associate at Skadden Arps sent a firm-wide email: "Please consider this email my two week notice, revocable if the firm comes up with a satisfactory response to the current moment...We do not have time. It is now or it is never, and if it is never, I will not continue to work here."
The associate, Rachel Cohen, recently organized an open letter that called on Big Law to respond to Trump's executive orders designed to sanction three prominent firms. The letter was signed by more than 300 Big Law associates.
Within hours after sending the firm-wide notice, Cohen says she lost access to her firm email account.
"If being on this career path demands I accept that my industry—because this is certainly not unique to Skadden—will allow an authoritarian government to ignore the courts, I refuse to take it any further," she wrote on LinkedIn.
“It is my understanding that DOGE contacted [the Justice Management Division] this afternoon and instructed them to terminate the contract,” Sirce Owen, the acting director of the Executive Office of Immigration Review, wrote on April 3.
NEW: Fourth Circuit shoots down the Trump administration’s efforts to appeal order requiring it to facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
“We shall not micromanage the efforts of a fine district judge attempting to implement the Supreme Court’s recent decision.”
“It is difficult in some cases to get to the very heart of the matter. But in this case, it is not hard at all. The government is asserting a right to stash away residents of this country in foreign prisons without the semblance of due process..”
“[The government] claims in essence that because it has rid itself of custody that there is nothing that can be done. This should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far removed from courthouses still hold dear..”
NEW: At a hearing in Greenbelt, Maryland, Judge Paula Xinis told the government that she will require "daily updates" on their efforts to facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
The hearing followed last night's ruling from SCOTUS, which held that the Trump administration must facilitate Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador.
Drew Ensign, who has represented the gov in the JGG matter before Judge Boasberg, represented DOJ during the hearing.
Judge Xinis asked Ensign to answer three questions that she previously directed the government to answer in a written filing.
Judge Xinis started with the first question: Why did the government not comply with my order and give me a declaration of someone with personal knowledge about Mr. Abrego Garcia's current location and status?
Ensign: We've said what we can say.... I do not have that info
NEW: Last fall, Ed Martin—Trump’s nominee for U.S. attorney in Washington, DC—presented an award to Jan. 6 defendant Tim Hale, who prosecutors described as a “Nazi sympathizer.”
Here’s a video of that moment, in which Martin calls Hale an “extraordinary man” and “extraordinary leader” of “those who have survived January 6.”
Who is the man that Ed Martin referred to as an “extraordinary leader”?
In court filings, federal prosecutors described Timothy Hale as a “white supremacist.”
Hale allegedly said “Hitler should have finished the job” and referred to black people as “shit skinned minorities.”
More on Timothy Hale-Cusanelli, the man Ed Martin described as an “extraordinary leader” just a few months ago:
After J6, Hale-Cusanelli’s roommate recorded a conversation between the two about the attack on the Capitol.
“I really fucking wish there’d be a civil war,” Hale-Cusanelli said at one point.
“Yeah, but then a whole bunch of fucking people would die,” the roommate replied.
“Yeah. Well, you know, as Jefferson said, the price—the tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants,” Hale-Cusanelli responded.
Here’s another exchange that might have been disagreeable to DOJ leadership, who have accused Reuveni of failing to “zealously advocate” on behalf of the United States:
THREAD: Law firm statements issued in response to Trump’s executive orders targeting lawyers.
(This thread will be updated as more statements are released. Want to flag something I missed? DM me, email me at anna.bower@lawfaremedia.org, or message on Signal at annabower.24)🧵⬇️
Keker, Van Nest, & Peters:
“We encourage law firm leaders to sign on to an amicus effort in support of Perkins Coie's challenge to the Administration's executive order targeting the firm, and to resist the Administration's erosion of the rule of law."
Kwall Barack Nadeau PLLC: “Make no mistake, the goal of the Trump Administration is not only to punish specific lawyers or firms, but to chill the legal profession itself, until there is no one left willing to stand up in court and say, 'This is wrong.'”