The Intellectualist Profile picture
Mar 22 9 tweets 14 min read Read on X
🌍Spanish: How The Language of A Once Tiny Kingdom Became Global

🧵1/9: The roots of Spanish stretch back to the spoken Latin of the Romans on the Iberian Peninsula, a language that has undergone extensive transformation to become the rich and complex Spanish we recognize today.

This evolution was not in isolation; the Arabic influences during the Almoravid rule introduced a wealth of vocabulary and grammatical nuance to the language.

These influences were integral in shaping modern Spanish, which now boasts the status of being the fourth most widely spoken language in the world. The emergence of Spanish as a national language is a relatively recent phenomenon, mirroring the historical trend where diverse dialects unify into a single standard language.

This standardization reflects the broader pattern of emerging modern nation-states during the early modern period, where language played a critical role in constructing national identity.

The Linguistic Evolution of the Iberian Peninsula

Long before modern borders were drawn, the Iberian Peninsula was a melting pot of languages. Each community spoke a distinct language, contributing to a colorful linguistic patchwork. When the Romans came, they brought Latin with them, which slowly began to weave its way into the local dialects, becoming the common thread among the various communities.

However, not all languages blended with Latin. The Basque language, spoken in the mountainous region between Spain and France, stands out as a unique member of this linguistic family. It is unrelated to the Romance languages that sprouted from Latin and remains a living example of the Peninsula’s ancient linguistic diversity.

After the fall of Rome, Latin’s unifying influence faded, and the Peninsula fragmented into a series of kingdoms, each with a language that was a mix of Latin and local speech.

Over time, these languages began to consolidate—a process where, slowly but steadily, one language extends its influence over others. This can happen for many reasons, like the power of the kingdom that speaks it, the prestige of its literature, or its use in trade and governance.

In the case of the Iberian Peninsula, the language of the Kingdom of Castile, known as Castilian, gained the upper hand. As Castile expanded its territory and power, so did its language. Castilian spread through the Peninsula, in schools, in laws, and in everyday conversation, gradually becoming the dominant language.

This is the language we now recognize as Spanish, a testament to the historical process of language consolidation where one regional tongue becomes the voice of a nation.

The Almoravid Influence on Castilian Spanish

When North African invaders, known as the Moors, swept into the Iberian Peninsula, they brought with them not only their armies but also a rich and complex culture.

These conquerors, reaching as far as present-day France, were halted at the Battle of Tours, an event that could have significantly reshaped European history had they succeeded. This pivotal moment marked the northernmost expansion of the Moors, with the Iberian Peninsula remaining their stronghold.

The era of Moorish rule, particularly under the Almoravids, gave rise to Al-Andalus, a time and place where cultures converged, and the arts and sciences thrived. It was here, amidst this vibrant intellectual milieu, that Castilian Spanish absorbed a wealth of Arabic vocabulary.

The Arabic language, renowned for its contributions to science, mathematics, and philosophy, left an indelible mark on Spanish, as seen in the many Spanish words prefixed with ‘al,’ a direct lift from Arabic articles. Al-Andalus stands out in history as a beacon of learning and tolerance, and its linguistic legacy is still audible in the Spanish we speak today. Words like “alcohol,” “algebra,” and “almohada” (pillow) are but a few examples of this enduring Arabic influence.

theintellectualist.com/spanish-how-th…Image
The Almoravid Influence on Castilian Spanish

2/9: When North African invaders, known as the Moors, swept into the Iberian Peninsula, they brought with them not only their armies but also a rich and complex culture.

These conquerors, reaching as far as present-day France, were halted at the Battle of Tours, an event that could have significantly reshaped European history had they succeeded. This pivotal moment marked the northernmost expansion of the Moors, with the Iberian Peninsula remaining their stronghold.

The era of Moorish rule, particularly under the Almoravids, gave rise to Al-Andalus, a time and place where cultures converged, and the arts and sciences thrived. It was here, amidst this vibrant intellectual milieu, that Castilian Spanish absorbed a wealth of Arabic vocabulary.

The Arabic language, renowned for its contributions to science, mathematics, and philosophy, left an indelible mark on Spanish, as seen in the many Spanish words prefixed with ‘al,’ a direct lift from Arabic articles. Al-Andalus stands out in history as a beacon of learning and tolerance, and its linguistic legacy is still audible in the Spanish we speak today. Words like “alcohol,” “algebra,” and “almohada” (pillow) are but a few examples of this enduring Arabic influence.

This blending of languages under the Almoravids illustrates the depth of cultural interplay that occurred and highlights the role of conquests not only in changing borders but also in enriching languages.

The Gradual Reconquista and the Development of Spain’s Modern Languages

The Reconquista, a centuries-long period of intermittent battles, was not just a military campaign but also a crucible for the languages of the Iberian Peninsula. As Christian kingdoms in the north began to reclaim territory from the Moorish south, they found themselves not only fighting against a common enemy but also vying for dominance amongst themselves. Each kingdom—be it Castile, Aragon, or Leon—had its own version of the Romance languages that had emerged after the fall of Rome.

It was during this period that Castilian began to take on a role larger than just the language of a single kingdom.

Under King Sancho III of Castile, a concerted effort was made to standardize this dialect, laying the groundwork for its future as the national language. This standardization included the adoption of certain grammatical and orthographic rules, making Castilian more consistent and widely intelligible across the various regions of the kingdom.

As the Reconquista progressed, so did the expansion of Castilian.

It was a gradual process, with each victory against the Moors also serving as a catalyst for the spread of Castilian culture and language.

By the time the Catholic Monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella completed the Reconquista in 1492, Castilian had already taken root as the primary language of governance and commerce throughout the reconsolidated territories.

The final seal of linguistic unity came with the political unification of Spain.

As the new Spanish state began to emerge, Castilian was increasingly seen as the language of the Spanish identity, a sentiment that was formalized when it became the official language of the entire kingdom. This official status secured Castilian’s position as the national language, a status it has maintained into modern times.

Today’s linguistic landscape in Spain is still marked by the diversity that characterized the early days of the Reconquista, with languages like Catalan, Galician, and Basque holding official status in their respective regions. However, the story of Castilian’s rise reflects the historical power dynamics that have shaped national languages worldwide.

theintellectualist.com/spanish-how-th…Image
The Impact of Spanish Imperialism and Colonialism

3/9: Spanish imperialism and colonialism left an indelible imprint on the Western Hemisphere. With the arrival of Spanish conquistadors and settlers, a campaign to implant Spanish culture, religion, and language began, often at the expense of the local indigenous populations.

This deliberate cultural replacement was systemic, aimed at extending Spain’s influence and control over vast new territories.

The colonial administration erected a rigid caste system that sorted individuals based on race and nobility. This stratification entrenched social and racial divisions, prioritizing Spanish-born individuals and devaluing the indigenous and African populations.

The use of African slaves, forcibly brought to the New World, created a labor force dedicated to the extraction of resources, all to enrich the Spanish crown.

It was during this era, the ‘Siglo de Oro’ or the Golden Age, that Spain reached the zenith of its power, wielding influence that stretched from the hills of California to the southernmost reaches of Argentina’s Tierra del Fuego.

The transplantation of Spanish language and culture across such a wide array of cultures and environments led to the emergence of numerous Spanish dialects, each adapting to local conditions while carrying the linguistic legacy of Castilian Spanish.

The consequences of the obliteration of indigenous cultures, the establishment of the encomienda system—a form of labor coercion—and the perpetuation of Spain’s racial hierarchy, have echoed through the centuries.

These actions have shaped the cultural and social fabric of the Americas, leaving a complex legacy that continues to influence the region’s identity and linguistic diversity. The languages spoken across the Americas today are a testament to this turbulent history.

While Spanish has become a dominant language, it is a Spanish that has evolved, diverged, and assimilated aspects of countless indigenous and local expressions, creating a rich and varied linguistic landscape that tells the story of a tumultuous past.

Regional Phrases in Spain’s Diverse Languages

The linguistic landscape of Spain is remarkably diverse, with several regional languages coexisting with the nationwide Castilian Spanish.

This diversity becomes evident when translating a phrase such as “How are you doing today? I hope to meet you for dinner before 8:00 PM if possible. If not, can you meet another day?” into the different official languages of Spain.

1. In Castilian Spanish, you might hear, “¿Cómo estás hoy? Espero encontrarte a cenar antes de las 8:00 PM si es posible. Si no, ¿puedes otro día?“

2. Move into Catalonia, and the Catalan version would be, “Com estàs avui? Espero trobar-te per sopar abans de les 8:00 PM si és possible. Si no, pots un altre dia?“

3. In Galicia, the Galician language renders it as “Como estás hoxe? Espero atoparte para cear antes das 8:00 PM se é posible. Se non, podes outro día?“

4. And in the Basque Country, where the Basque language is unrelated to the others, it would be, “Nola zaude gaur? Espero zaitut afaltzeko 8:00 PM aurretik ahal bada. Bestela, beste egun batean elkartu gaitezke?“

Each of these translations reflects the unique grammar, syntax, and vocabulary of the respective languages, demonstrating the rich linguistic heritages that have been maintained across the regions of Spain.

The differences in expression, even in this simple plan-making phrase, highlight the depth and breadth of Spain’s linguistic identities.
theintellectualist.com/spanish-how-th…Image
Mutual Intelligibility Among Spain’s Regional Languages

4/9: In Spain, the network of regional languages demonstrates varying degrees of mutual intelligibility. Castilian Spanish, serving as the national standard, shares substantial intelligibility with languages like Galician due to their shared Romance origins and historical intermingling.

Galician, the language of the northwest, is closely related to Castilian Spanish, allowing for a fluid understanding and communication between speakers. Their shared linguistic features, such as grammar and vocabulary, are a testament to their common lineage. Catalan, the primary language of Catalonia in the northeast, is less mutually intelligible with Castilian Spanish.

However, the similarities in structure due to their Romance roots allow for a basic understanding, particularly in written form. Catalan itself has been a significant cultural force, influencing neighboring Romance languages and fostering a rich tradition of literature and the arts.

The Basque language, or Euskara, presents a unique case. As a language isolate, it shares no commonality with Romance languages, resulting in little to no mutual intelligibility with Castilian Spanish. Its distinct structure and lexicon highlight the diverse linguistic heritage of the Iberian Peninsula.

A mutual intelligibility chart for Spain’s languages would display high comprehensibility between Spanish and Galician, moderate between Spanish and Catalan, and virtually none between Spanish and Basque.

This reflects the cultural and linguistic landscape of Spain, where educational and linguistic policies encourage multilingualism and unity amid linguistic diversity. theintellectualist.com/spanish-how-th…Image
National Language as a Catalyst in the Rise of Modern Nation-States

5/9: The concept of a national language has been pivotal in the historical trajectory of modern nation-states, particularly in the context of Spain and Britain.

In these countries, the establishment of a standardized national language became a cornerstone for economic expansion and imperial ambitions. It facilitated a shared sense of identity and purpose, which was instrumental in uniting diverse populations under a single national banner.

In Spain, the consolidation of Castilian Spanish as the official language during and after the Reconquista helped unify the various kingdoms of the Iberian Peninsula.

This linguistic unity was crucial in fostering administrative cohesion and facilitating communication, thereby streamlining the process of governance and integration of different regions. It also played a key role in the cultural and economic activities that underpinned Spain’s Golden Age and its imperial endeavors across the Atlantic.

Similarly, in Britain, the standardization of English, particularly after the publication of the King James Bible and the works of William Shakespeare, greatly contributed to the development of a British identity.

As the British Empire expanded, English became the lingua franca of administration and commerce, spreading across continents and reinforcing Britain’s global influence.

In contrast, the linguistic fragmentation of regions that would later become Germany and Italy posed challenges to early national consolidation.

These areas were collections of principalities and city-states, each with its own dialects and cultural practices. The lack of a unifying language initially impeded the formation of a cohesive national identity and delayed the centralization of economic and political power.

Germany and Italy’s eventual unification in the 19th century was, in part, facilitated by the eventual adoption of a standardized national language, which was essential in rallying the populace towards a common nationalistic goal. The national languages, German and Italian, became symbols of unity and were instrumental in the construction of the respective national identities.

The narrative of national languages contributing to the rise of modern nation-states underscores the profound influence that language has on national identity and unity. It demonstrates how linguistic standardization can serve as a catalyst for nation-building and international influence.

theintellectualist.com/spanish-how-th…Image
Linguistic Comprehension Across Medieval Kingdoms

6/9: During the Middle Ages, the Iberian Peninsula was a patchwork of kingdoms, each with its own dialects and languages. A resident of Madrid, situated within the Kingdom of Castile, would have been familiar with the Castilian language, which was developing into what we recognize as modern Spanish. If this Madrilenian ventured into neighboring kingdoms, such as Aragon or Leon, they would likely encounter variations of Romance languages or dialects.

Due to the shared Latin heritage and similar grammatical structures, there would have been a degree of mutual intelligibility, especially with the languages like Aragonese or Leonese that had also evolved from Latin.

However, the level of understanding would vary. The closer the languages were to Castilian, the easier it would be to comprehend them. For instance, the transition from understanding Leonese to Aragonese might have been smoother due to their similarities with Castilian.

On the other hand, a language like Basque, which has no Romance roots, would present significant challenges to a Castilian speaker. It is also worth noting that during this time, the concept of a standardized language was not as rigid as it is today. Languages existed on a continuum, with dialects often blending into each other across geographic areas. This fluid linguistic landscape meant that people were generally more adept at understanding a range of dialects and languages.

In cities, trade and political interactions would necessitate a certain level of linguistic flexibility. Therefore, a resident of Madrid would have likely possessed the ability to communicate with speakers from neighboring regions, utilizing the shared Romance roots as a foundation for understanding.

Recommendations for Further Exploration

For enthusiasts eager to explore the depths of the Spanish language and its history, numerous resources stand ready to illuminate the journey.

The Real Academia Española (RAE) stands as an authoritative figure in the Spanish-speaking world, offering comprehensive guides and databases on the language’s evolution, rules, and usage. Their resources are invaluable for anyone looking to gain a scholarly understanding of Spanish. Online language learning platforms, such as Duolingo, provide interactive opportunities to learn Spanish and its regional variations.

They can be especially helpful for grasping the differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, and grammar that characterize the diverse dialects across Spain and the Spanish-speaking world. For a more casual yet informative approach, linguistic blogs and websites are excellent for daily insights and interesting facts about the Spanish language.

They often cover a broad spectrum of topics, from etymology to regional expressions, and can offer perspectives on the living language as it evolves today.

Additionally, podcasts and YouTube channels dedicated to Spanish linguistics can make learning about the language’s history and its regional distinctions both engaging and accessible.

These platforms often feature interviews with linguists, language teachers, and native speakers who provide diverse and comprehensive perspectives on the language.

Lastly, visiting Spain and immersing oneself in the culture provides a firsthand experience of the language in its natural setting. Engaging with locals, listening to regional music, reading local literature, and participating in cultural events can offer profound insights into the intricacies of Spanish and its regional counterparts.

For those interested in the academic side, university courses and textbooks provide structured and detailed studies of Spanish linguistics. These resources are particularly suitable for individuals seeking a deeper, more formal education in the language

theintellectualist.com/spanish-how-th…Image
7/9: If you’ve ever wanted to support independent media, now is the time.

The Intellectualist aims to build an initial base of 1,000 subscribers, and we still have a long way to go. Your support would make all the difference in allowing us to continue.
buymeacoffee.com/theintellectua…
🌎8/9: The roots of Spanish stretch back to the spoken Latin of the Romans on the Iberian Peninsula, a language that has undergone extensive transformation to become the rich and complex Spanish we recognize today.
theintellectualist.com/spanish-how-th…
9/9: If you’re not following us, please do. We would appreciate it. Thank you. 🧵 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Intellectualist

The Intellectualist Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @highbrow_nobrow

Mar 23
The Disappeared: Trump’s Mass Deportation Machine and the Shadow Prison in El Salvador

A Knock at the Door, Then Nothing

🧵1/10: Imagine waking up one morning to discover that your brother is gone.

Not missing—disappeared.

No phone call. No charges. No lawyer.

And days later, a message appears—he’s been deported to a country he’s never been to, locked in a concrete hell designed for gang leaders and killers.

That’s not a story from Argentina’s Dirty War or Stalin’s gulags.

It happened in the United States—in 2025.

And it’s still happening, as you read this.

This is the story of The Disappeared—238 Venezuelan men secretly deported by the Trump administration to El Salvador’s most notorious prison, CECOT—a facility condemned by the United Nations, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch for crimes against human dignity.
theintellectualist.com/the-disappeare…Image
Not Criminals—Targets of Vulnerability

2/10: They weren’t taken because they were criminals.

They were taken because they were vulnerable—asylum seekers, migrants, dissidents—fleeing persecution, hoping for protection under American law.

Instead, they were swept up under a statute from 1798—the Alien Enemies Act, a wartime relic once used by John Adams to jail immigrants.

The Trump administration revived it and reinterpreted it to enable a deportation machine without trial, judge, or oversight.

This wasn’t a crackdown on MS-13.

Most had no criminal records.

Some were flagged only for tattoos—like Jefferson José Laya Freites, deported because of a lion on his forearm. It was assumed to be gang-related. It was actually a tribute to his Christian faith.

Or Arturo Suárez Trejo, a Venezuelan singer living in Houston, legally awaiting an asylum hearing. One morning, ICE agents came to his door.

“He’s being transferred to finish processing,” they told his daughter.

He never came home.

His family later identified him in a prison photo—head shaved, shackled, kneeling in the white uniform of El Salvador’s mega-prison.
theintellectualist.com/the-disappeare…Image
Black Saturday: The Collapse of Judicial Authority

3/10: This was the reality on March 15, 2025—Black Saturday—the day the Trump administration defied a federal court order and deported a large number of these men to CECOT.

A judge had ruled the deportations unconstitutional and ordered the flights turned around. The planes were in the air. The White House ignored the ruling. They kept going.

It was the day the United States crossed a line no constitutional democracy should ever cross.

CECOT: A Modern Gulag

Because CECOT is not a prison.

It is a modern gulag.

No windows.

No sunlight.

No visitors.

No phone calls.

Prisoners are held in stress positions, denied food, beaten with batons, and stripped of all identity.

They sleep on concrete in crowded cells—100 men to a room.

Their heads are shaved. Their movements are choreographed by armed guards.

The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture condemned CECOT as a site of systematic abuse.

El Salvador’s president, Nayib Bukele, presents it as a symbol of authoritarian control.

But it is also a dumping ground—for prisoners deported by foreign governments looking to disappear them without scrutiny.

And that’s where the United States sent people who had done nothing wrong.

Not back to Venezuela.

But to a third country—with no legal jurisdiction, no treaty obligation, and no accountability.

Photojournalist Philip Holsinger captured their arrival: shackled men, trembling, forced to kneel.

An ICE agent was present at the plane. The transfer was coordinated by American officials.

Detainees were offloaded rapidly—processed like inventory, not people.

One man clutched a broken rosary. The crucifix had snapped off.

He held it anyway.

This wasn’t deportation.

This was disappearance.

The Legal Definition—and the Human Cost

And the difference matters.
Deportation is a legal process.
Disappearance is a crime against humanity.

The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance—signed by the United States in 2000—defines it as:

“The arrest, detention, or abduction of persons by agents of the state… followed by a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or by concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person.”

That is what happened here.

Families were told nothing.
Some were lied to.
Legal representation was severed.
Communication ceased.

We do know the names of the 238 men.
CBS News published the full list.

Among them:

Andrys Caraballo, a makeup artist last seen in ICE custody.

David Larez, a father of three, awaiting asylum processing.

Luis Molina, a diabetic who needed daily insulin.

Anyelo José Sarabia González, 19, deported for a rose tattoo.

Jerce Reyes Barrios, 36, a former Venezuelan soccer player flagged for a rosary and a soccer ball.

We don’t know where most are now—or if they’re still alive.

But we know this violated a federal court order.

This was not a miscommunication.

It was a deliberate act of executive defiance.

Stephen Miller and senior DHS officials orchestrated the flights in secret. Internal documents reviewed by CBS and Axios confirm the operation was timed to outrun judicial oversight.

But at 6:51 p.m. ET, Judge James Boasberg issued a legal injunction.

He ordered that the planes be turned around.
He told DOJ lawyers: “You need to ensure compliance immediately.”

They didn’t comply.
The planes kept flying.

Thus came Black Saturday: the first time in modern U.S. history that a president defied a federal court order—and faced no consequence.
theintellectualist.com/the-disappeare…Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 22
Trump’s USAID Cuts Leave Starving Babies Without Food as American Aid System Collapses

A Life-Saving Mission Crumbles

🧵1/6: In a detailed report by CBS News correspondent Graham Kates, titled “American manufacturer of food for malnourished babies lays off staff amid USAID funding upheaval,” published March 20, 2025, an American-made humanitarian crisis is unfolding with devastating global consequences.

At the heart of it is Edesia Nutrition, a Rhode Island-based nonprofit that produces Plumpy’Nut—a shelf-stable, peanut-based paste used to treat severe acute malnutrition in children.

The company has been a crucial partner in U.S. foreign aid for 16 years, supplying ready-to-use therapeutic food to famine-stricken regions.

But after a sweeping overhaul of USAID led by the Trump administration eliminated more than 80% of the agency’s foreign assistance contracts, Edesia—though technically spared—was still forced to lay off 10% of its workforce due to non-payment of invoices for already fulfilled orders.
theintellectualist.com/trump-usaid-cu…Image
Layoffs Amid Plenty: When Compassion Meets a Wall of Bureaucracy

2/6: CEO Navyn Salem called the layoffs “the hardest thing I’ve ever had to do.”

Although her USAID contract remains active on paper, multiple invoices have been rejected in recent weeks, causing shipments to halt and her warehouse to overflow with unsent product.

One invoice was rejected because the goods had not yet shipped; another was denied despite being tied to a batch that had shipped.

Meanwhile, American peanut farmers and suppliers—integral parts of Edesia’s domestic supply chain—have gone unpaid, creating ripple effects that undercut both U.S. agriculture and global health aid.

A Fictional Baby, A Real Crisis

To understand what’s truly at stake, consider one fictional but fully representative case: a baby girl named Nyalok, living in a remote region of South Sudan, one of the countries currently experiencing extreme famine.

Born prematurely and weighing less than five pounds, Nyalok showed signs of acute malnutrition—sunken eyes, distended belly, and barely the energy to cry.

Her mother, Abuk, walked hours to a rural health clinic where Plumpy’Nut had saved another child’s life two years earlier.

This time, the staff had nothing to offer. “A shipment was supposed to come,” one nurse told her, “but it never arrived.” The food had been produced in the United States—but it never left the port, because USAID hadn’t paid for it.

To be absolutely clear: Nyalok is a fictional case, based on conditions widely reported by humanitarian organizations like UNICEF and Doctors Without Borders.

She is not real, but her story is representative of thousands of real children whose survival now hangs in the balance. Babies just like her will now go without food. Some will die.

And not because the world lacks resources—but because the U.S. government, under Donald Trump’s leadership, has broken the system that used to deliver help.

theintellectualist.com/trump-usaid-cu…Image
Official Excuses, Systemic Collapse

3/6: According to a State Department spokesperson, a review ordered by Secretary of State Marco Rubio revealed “serious flaws” in USAID’s payment infrastructure, with 27 outdated and incompatible financial systems contributing to chaos.

The administration now claims it’s attempting to “streamline” the process—but aid groups like Edesia say the damage is already being done.

As Salem noted, “You have American farmers, American commodities brokers, American manufacturers, American shippers, and the NGOs, the American organizations… if one of those goes down, the whole system stops.”

That system is stopping.

Authoritarian Patterns, American Consequences

The Trump administration’s actions—whether by design or neglect—mirror patterns seen in authoritarian regimes.

In Hungary, Viktor Orbán dismantled civil society under the pretense of efficiency and nationalism. In Russia, Vladimir Putin centralized humanitarian sectors under state control. In both cases, civil society weakened and lives were lost.

Now in the U.S., Trump’s policies are hollowing out America’s most effective tool of global influence: compassion backed by competence.
theintellectualist.com/trump-usaid-cu…Image
Read 6 tweets
Mar 22
In Social Media Post, Trump Demands Submission From Maine’s Governor

“We need a full-throated apology from the Governor herself, and a statement that she will never make such an unlawful challenge to the Federal Government again.” — President Donald J. Trump

A Defiant Response from Governor Mills

🧵1/8: At the recent White House Governors’ Conference, Maine Governor Janet Mills responded to President Donald Trump’s criticism of state policies concerning transgender athletes with a succinct remark:

“I’ll see you in court.”

Standing among her peers, Governor Mills invoked the rule of law, signaling readiness to resolve disputes through judicial means.
theintellectualist.com/trump-demands-…Image
Trump’s Demand for Submission

2/8: President Trump’s reaction was swift and pointed. He publicly demanded that Governor Mills issue a personal, “full-throated” apology and pledge never to challenge the federal government in such a manner again.

Despite Maine’s prior clarification on the matter, the President dismissed it as insufficient, emphasizing that Governor Mills herself must make the concession. This response transcended typical political discourse, resembling a demand for personal submission.
A Familiar Pattern with Women in Power

Observers note that this incident aligns with a recurring pattern in President Trump’s interactions, particularly with female leaders who openly challenge him.

Historically, figures such as Hillary Clinton, Gretchen Whitmer, and E. Jean Carroll have faced similar responses characterized by demands for public contrition or personal attacks. This consistent behavior raises questions about the President’s approach to dissent and governance.

theintellectualist.com/trump-demands-…Image
Psychological Red Flags: Malignant Narcissism

3/8: Mental health professionals have previously expressed concerns regarding traits exhibited by President Trump that align with malignant narcissism, a concept introduced by psychoanalyst Erich Fromm and later expanded by Dr. Otto Kernberg.

This construct, while not officially listed in the DSM-5, encompasses a combination of narcissistic grandiosity, antisocial behavior, paranoia, and sadism.

Dr. Bandy Lee, a forensic psychiatrist and former Yale faculty member, has cautioned that such traits in leaders can pose significant risks to democratic institutions.

Behavioral Breakdown: Grandiosity, Paranoia, and Punishment

In this context, the President’s demand for a personal apology reflects grandiosity—the belief that ordinary political disagreement is a personal affront.

The claim that Mills’ comment was an “unlawful challenge” indicates paranoia, transforming routine federal-state interactions into threats.

His distortion of legal language to criminalize dissent suggests antisocial manipulation, and the public nature of the demand, especially directed at a female governor, carries sadistic undertones, aiming to humiliate rather than reconcile.

theintellectualist.com/trump-demands-…Image
Read 8 tweets
Mar 18
The Poisoning of the American Mind: How Fox News Conditioned A Nation for Tyranny

🧵1/9: There is no single moment when democracy dies.

No grand funeral.

No sirens wailing in the streets.

It vanishes step by step—one norm broken, one institution hollowed out, one truth buried beneath a pile of lies.

And when the final threshold is crossed, most people don’t even realize it.

They wake up, drink their coffee, scroll their news feed, and assume the world is as it was yesterday.

But it isn’t.

The rules have changed. Power is no longer constrained by law.

What was once unthinkable is now just another headline.

Another day in America.

Black Saturday: The Day the Rule of Law Collapsed

March 15, 2025—Black Saturday—the day checks and balances failed.

A sitting president, in open defiance of the judiciary, brazenly violated a federal court order, authorizing the deportation of over 200 alleged Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador despite Judge James E. Boasberg’s directive to halt and return the flights.

With that single act, he shattered the foundations of constitutional government, proving that the rule of law no longer applied to those in power.

Future historians will mark it as a day of infamy—spoken in the same breath as December 7, September 11, and January 6.

It was the moment a court order became a mere suggestion rather than a constitutional19: There is no single moment when democracy dies.

No grand funeral.

No sirens wailing in the streets.

It vanishes step by step—one norm broken, one institution hollowed out, one truth buried beneath a pile of lies. l.

No tanks rolled through the streets. No new constitution was signed.

But make no mistake—this was the day democracy in America ceased to function.

A federal court issued a direct order to the President of the United States. The White House ignored it.

And nothing happened.

No enforcement. No accountability. No constitutional crisis that led to immediate consequences.

This is how democracy falls—not with a bang, but with silence.

Not through a dramatic coup, but through quiet acquiescence.

Black Saturday was the moment it became clear: the law only matters if those in power choose to obey it.

A System Already Hollowed Out

This was not the first time a leader defied the rule of law.

But this time was different.

This time, there was no backlash, no intervention, no meaningful resistance.

The political system had already been eroded to the point where consequences no longer applied.

Congress would not act—Trump’s party had become a rubber-stamp legislature, too afraid or too complicit to challenge him.

The Supreme Court—stacked with justices who believe in an all-powerful executive—would not intervene.

The Justice Department—purged of officials with even a shred of independence—would do nothing.

And the press?

The press would cover it, debate it, analyze it—then move on.

Because the machine that had poisoned the American mind for decades had already done its work.
theintellectualist.com/?p=73800Image
Fox News: America’s Chief Poisoner

2/9: Fox News, one of the chief architects of America’s democratic decay, had conditioned the public to expect lawlessness from their leader.

To justify it.

To celebrate it.

This is the legacy of Rupert Murdoch’s empire.

Not just misinformation.

Not just propaganda.

But the systematic destruction of the American public’s ability to see reality, to process truth, to respond to corruption with outrage.

Fox News did not act alone.

It built the foundation for the others who would follow—OAN, Newsmax, the radicalization of Facebook’s algorithm, and the transformation of Twitter into X.

But Fox was the original poisoner. The one that made the others possible.

The one that trained millions to distrust any information that did not conform to their worldview.

The one that taught its audience that the courts, the press, and the opposition were not just wrong, but illegitimate.

That any act taken in the name of power was justified, as long as their side was the one doing it.
theintellectualist.com/?p=73800Image
How the American Public Was Conditioned for Tyranny

3/9: How does a nation reach a point where a president can openly reject the Constitution and half the country shrugs?

How does it happen that the leader of a democratic republic can ignore the law, and millions cheer?

The answer lies in something more powerful than policy, more insidious than corruption.

It lies in the manipulation of the human mind.

Fox News and its imitators have mastered the art of psychological warfare, leveraging cognitive biases, repetition, and emotional manipulation to rewire how millions of Americans see the world.

The Power of Repetition

Repetition is the most basic weapon in their arsenal.

Say something often enough, and it becomes truth in the minds of those who hear it.

The “big lie” strategy is not just about deception—it is about creating a new reality.

Fox drilled the same false messages into its audience, night after night.

By relentlessly pushing these falsehoods, Fox eroded trust in every institution that could check authoritarian power.

Judges, journalists, and even democracy itself were cast as corrupt and illegitimate.

Once that foundation was set, Fox no longer had to prove its claims—its audience had been conditioned to reject any facts that challenged the narrative.
theintellectualist.com/?p=73800Image
Read 12 tweets
Mar 16
Black Saturday: The Day the United States Ceased to Be a Constitutional Democracy

The Moment Democracy Ceased to Function

🧵1/10: Saturday, March 15, 2025, may have seemed unremarkable to most Americans. But in time, history will remember it as Black Saturday—the moment the United States ceased to function as a constitutional democracy.

For the first time in modern American history, a sitting president openly defied a direct federal court order—and nothing happened. No intervention. No enforcement. No consequences.

A legal ruling was issued, and the White House simply ignored it.

The White House’s Decision: Power Over Law

Inside the White House, the decision was not about law—it was about power.

A federal judge ruled against the administration. The debate inside Trump’s team was not whether the ruling was legal, but whether they could get away with ignoring it. They decided they could. And they were right.

This was not a clash between equal branches of government. It was the moment the judiciary was exposed as powerless. The courts do not have an army. They rely on compliance.

But a court that cannot enforce its rulings is not a court—it is a suggestion box.

And a presidency that can ignore the courts without consequence is no longer constrained by law—it is an untouchable executive.

Trump did not declare the end of judicial authority in a speech.

He demonstrated it in practice.

This is how democratic systems collapse—not with a single act, but with the normalization of defiance, the expectation that a ruling can simply be brushed aside.
theintellectualist.com/black-saturday…Image
How the System Failed to Stop Him

2/10: This moment did not happen in isolation. It happened because every prior attempt to hold Trump accountable has failed.

The system tried—and at every turn, it proved incapable of stopping him.

Impeachment failed—twice.

Criminal cases stalled.

The Supreme Court refused to rule on his disqualification.

Congress never moved to check his power.

At each step, Trump tested the system—and the system flinched.

He learned that laws are only as strong as the institutions willing to enforce them.

And so, when faced with a court ruling, he did what he had been conditioned to do—he ignored it. And nothing happened.

The Supreme Court’s Role in Making the Presidency Untouchable

The judiciary was already weakened by years of erosion, but in 2024, the Supreme Court itself ensured that when this moment arrived, there would be no legal recourse left.

In a landmark ruling, the Court expanded presidential immunity to such an extent that the office of the presidency is now functionally above the law.

A president can commit crimes while in office and face no immediate accountability.

And now, with Black Saturday, Trump has proven that he can ignore court rulings entirely without consequence.

This is not the separation of powers.

It is the absorption of power into a single branch. The courts were supposed to be the last line of defense. Instead, they have been reduced to issuing rulings the executive can freely ignore.

theintellectualist.com/black-saturday…Image
The Role of Fox News in Conditioning the Public

3/10: Fox News did not issue the order, but it made this moment possible.

In the aftermath of Trump’s defiance, Fox put the judge’s face on screen, not as part of neutral reporting, but as a deliberate act of intimidation.

They did not need to explicitly declare that judicial rulings no longer mattered—they had already spent years training millions to believe it.

Through relentless framing, they had conditioned their audience to see the courts as corrupt, as partisan, as obstacles to be overcome rather than institutions to be respected.

Trump did not invent this strategy; he simply acted on it, carrying their rhetoric to its logical conclusion.

Why Americans Do Not See the Collapse Happening

This is why the phrase “you cannot see the forest for the trees” is so powerful in this moment.

The trees are the individual events.

Trump ignoring a court ruling.

The Supreme Court making the presidency immune from criminal accountability.

Congress failing to act repeatedly.

The media normalizing the breakdown of democracy.

The forest is the overarching reality.

The U.S. government is no longer constrained by constitutional limits.

The judiciary has been rendered powerless through precedent and selective enforcement.

The executive branch now decides which laws apply to itself.

Most people living through history don’t realize they are inside a moment of collapse because each event, taken alone, does not seem like the end of democracy.

The shock of one ruling being ignored does not feel catastrophic.

The Supreme Court deciding a president is immune from prosecution feels like just another legal controversy. Congressional inaction feels like business as usual.

The media’s treatment of this moment as just another chapter in the ongoing Trump saga makes it easy to assume the system will self-correct.

But when viewed together, it becomes undeniable that the system has already failed.
theintellectualist.com/black-saturday…Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 15
The Collapse of U.S. Global Leadership Has Arrived

The Moment Before the Fall

1/13: 🧵There is a moment before the fall, a moment when history slows, when those who can still see the truth begin screaming into the void.

A moment when an empire stands at the edge of the abyss, staring down into the darkness, but does nothing to stop the fall. That moment is now.

Trump’s Subtle Endorsement of Russia’s Land Grab

On March 14, 2025, on Fox News, Sean Hannity turned to Trump’s National Security Advisor, Michael Waltz, and said, “I would imagine parts—maybe the Donbas region in particular—or areas that are heavily populated by people from Russia, that would go to Putin in any negotiated settlement. Am I wrong?”

It didn’t sound like a question. It sounded like a suggestion, a justification disguised as inquiry.

The language was carefully crafted, eerily aligned with Kremlin talking points, reinforcing the idea that Russian-speaking territories in Ukraine are naturally Russian and that the realignment of borders is not an act of war but an inevitability.

Waltz did not push back. He did not correct the record. Instead, he said, “You’re not wrong in any of that.”

But this time, history does not have to repeat.

theintellectualist.com/trump-ukraine-…Image
The Abandonment of Ukraine

2/13: With those words, the Trump administration signaled something far more dangerous than a shift in policy.

It suggested that Ukraine’s fate would no longer be determined by the battlefield, by the resolve of its people, or by the alliances it had built with democratic nations.

Instead, it would be dictated by a White House willing to trade land for political favor, negotiated in Washington rather than Kyiv.

The message was clear. Trump was not simply re-evaluating America’s support for Ukraine—he was dismantling it.

This was not the language of deterrence. It was not even the language of realpolitik.

It was surrender dressed up as pragmatism, an admission that America would no longer be an obstacle to Putin’s ambitions.

The betrayal was not subtle. It was not hidden. It was happening in plain sight.
theintellectualist.com/trump-ukraine-…Image
Xi Jinping Watches and Waits

3/13: Xi Jinping was watching. The Chinese Communist Party sees Taiwan not as a separate nation, but as an unfinished chapter in history.

For China, the unification of Taiwan is not just a strategic objective—it is the final, unresolved scar from the “Century of Humiliation.”

The phrase refers to the brutal period between the Opium Wars of the 1830s and the Japanese occupation of the 1930s and 40s, when foreign powers carved China apart, controlled its trade, seized its ports, and dictated its laws.

Hong Kong fell to the British. Shanghai was divided into foreign concessions.

The country was humiliated—once the world’s dominant power, now reduced to a fractured, exploited state. This humiliation only ended with the Communist Revolution in 1949, when Mao Zedong declared a new era of Chinese strength.

But to Beijing, that victory remains incomplete.

The defeated Nationalist government fled to Taiwan, declared itself the rightful ruler of China, and has remained a defiant, independent democracy ever since.

To the Communist Party, Taiwan is more than a piece of land. It is a wound that must be healed, a final proof that China will never again be at the mercy of foreign interference.
theintellectualist.com/trump-ukraine-…Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(