1/8 THREAD- THE SCROLL OF ʿALĪ IBN ABĪ ṬĀLIB: THE STUDY RESULTS
I have now completed my study of the Muslim narratives (derived exclusively from Sunni sources) regarding the Scroll of ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib. Across thirty-five hadiths forming five distinct clusters, they convey that ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib inherited two things from the Prophet: the Qur’an and a scroll containing the Prophet’s knowledge. On one occasion, shortly after the Battle of the Camel, ʿAlī delivered a sermon to dissuade his followers from plundering or enslaving the defeated army of ʿĀʾisha (as I have discussed in earlier posts).
2/8 In that sermon, he stressed that killing fellow Muslims is impermissible, particularly when they have already been granted protection in a conflict. Subsequently, various individuals approached ʿAlī with further inquiries about this knowledge, and on each occasion, he recited different passages from his Scroll, suggesting it had a comprehensive archetype.
3/8 Importantly ʿAlī is said to have carried this scroll, likely in the form of sheets, attached to his sword Dhū al-Faqār, which he likewise inherited from the Prophet. Some sources conflate this scroll with a parchment that the Prophet is said to have affixed to the sword before gifting it to ʿAlī, but that parchment, according to al-Shāfiʿī’s Musnad, was rather an instructional text on the sword’s proper use and not the same as ʿAlī’s scroll:
4/8 “Al-Shafi’i informed us... “Found on the hilt of the sword of the Messenger of Allah was a written message: “Indeed, the worst enemy of Allah, the Exalted, is the one who kills someone who did not kill him (retribution), the one who strikes someone who did not strike him, and the one who gives allegiance to someone other than his rightful allies (who betray their allies). Such a person has disbelieved in what Allah, the Exalted, has revealed to Muhammad.” (Imam Shafi’s Musnad)
5/8 It is striking that in this golden chain (narrated through the family of the Prophet), al-Shāfiʿī recorded the ethics of war, and if these ethics were applied in today's conflicts, many Muslims who have deliberately killed unarmed civilians would be considered among the worst enemies of God and classified as disbelievers.
It is also important to note that there is a striking resemblance between the Scroll and the articles of the so-called "Constitution of Medina" (CM).
6/8 This similarity may suggest that the Scroll to which ʿAlī referred was the CM. However, some narrative clusters contain information absent from the CM, raising the possibility that ʿAlī’s scroll included the CM among other teachings. He probably recorded and preserved these teachings himself, as part of his practice of retaining whatever he learned directly from the Prophet. I have reconstructed the segments of the Scroll and attached them here.
7/8 Shiʿi sources provide more detailed information about the contents of the Scroll, describing it as consisting of twenty-four chapters, mostly addressing legal matters. The study by M. S. Bahmanpour, "The Book of Imam ʿAlī" , offers an excellent analysis of the relevant narratives and their content.
8/8 Employing the isnād-cum-matn analysis, my research dates the Scroll back to ʿAlī himself. Thus, ʿAlī may have compiled the earliest known legal text in Islamic history, preserving within it the Prophet's original legal teachings. Crucially, the Constitution of Medina seems to have been preserved in this Scroll, as ʿAlī used its stipulations to resolve disputes during the Battle of the Camel. Therefore, this scroll holds great significance for the study of early Islamic history and the formation of Shiʿi identity, as it demonstrates that, from an early period, Shiʿis believed ʿAlī possessed special knowledge inherited directly from the Prophet.
I will now send this draft to colleagues for review and feedback, and thus my findings at this stage are provisional. I plan to share the full paper following the conference in July 2025. Please do let me know about your thoughts!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/6 Thread: Why is it important to use “biographical evaluation” (ʿilm al-rijāl) in modern #Hadith studies?
One of the key sources in traditional Hadith studies is “biographical evaluation” (ʿilm al-rijāl). In essence, it involves assessing the individuals who transmit Hadith. Since Hadith formation itself relies on oral transmission, this discipline compiles scholarly opinions about transmitters, noting qualities such as trustworthiness, decency or dishonesty. It may also document their places of activity, political affiliations, theological or legal positions and scholarly leanings.
2/6 Methodologically, it is problematic to use these evaluations as the sole basis for historical inquiries, for instance, to judge a Hadith purely by the reported trustworthiness of its narrators, because there have been many instances of intense scholarly disagreements, rivalries and jealousy. "Cancel culture” is not a modern invention; those considered to hold “wrong” views were always ostracised or harshly judged.
3/6 Nevertheless, biographical evaluation is valuable for more than simply trusting or dismissing transmitters. It can help detect motives and identify potential culprits for interpolations (or forgeries), rather than being used in the traditional manner of grading transmitters and ruling on Hadith authenticity. Practicioners of isnād-cum-matn analysis use it to determine whether transmitters were contemporaries, operated in nearby locations, and could plausibly have handed down the Hadith to one another. It also reveals whether they might have been motivated to interfere with a Hadith.
1/4 Thread: Reading list on the systematic study of Hadith (isnād-cum-matn analysis):
I have occasionally been asked for a reading list on Hadith studies, particularly to help in understanding isnād-cum-matn analysis. Below are some key works and my general observations. Many other significant texts exist, but I have aimed to be concise.
To begin with, it is important to note that various applications of isnād-cum-matn analysis exist. The following list includes the “original” implementation, designed (by Motzki and Schoeler) for an unbiased and systematic study of Hadith. Their approach is in contrast to the methodologies advocated by Schact, Juynboll, and others.
2/4 Additionally, there is an alternative strand of isnād-cum-matn analysis based on a deep-rooted (or extreme) scepticism, operating as a hyper-intensified version of the Schatian and Juynbollian premises. According to this second approach, hadiths can never be considered to have originated from the Prophet. This creates great confusion; I wish there had been a distinction.
In addition, some colleagues implement only Juynboll’s isnād criticism and erroneously refer to it as the isnād-cum-matn analysis, which creates some confusion. It is important to distinguish between these methodologies to avoid existing confusion. In isnād-cum-matn analysis, there must be a synoptic analysis of the textual variants of Hadith.
3/4 For an overview of the field, it is advisable to begin with Brown’s significant book. Subsequently, the iconic works of Donner and Robinson provide excellent insights into the critical study of the history of Islam, ongoing debates, and key sources. This should be followed by the contributions of Motzki, Schoeler, and Görke.
To fully grasp the application of the method, it is essential to examine the incorporation of form and redaction criticism as employed in biblical studies. Consequently, I have included several key sources related to these methods. As Motzki and Schoeler have documented, Hadith is not merely transmitted orally; its written transmission is also significant, which stresses the implementation of redaction criticism.
1/5
Thread: How to Solve an “Isnād Puzzle” Using the Isnād-Cum-Matn Analysis?
The study of Hadith is one of the most difficult fields in Islamic studies. In addition to the significant bias that Hadith scholars must deal with due to deeply rooted scepticism towards Hadith, researchers also face problems related to the chain of transmission. I am unsure which of these deters more researchers from studying Hadith in academia 😃. Here is an excellent example:
2/5
I have divided 35 (initially, I found 32 but added 3 more) Hadith variants on the Scroll (al-Ṣaḥīfa) of ʿAlī b. Abī Ṭālib into five clusters based on the five apparent Common Links (CL). The first one is the Qatāda Cluster: As you see in the diagram, Qatāda claims to have received the report from ʿAlī via four different lines: Variant 1 directly from ʿAlī; Variant 2 and 3 through Abū Ḥassān al-Aʿraj; Variant 4 through Mālik b. al-Ashtar and Abū Ḥaṣṣan al-Aʿraj. Variants 5, 6 and 7 through Qays b. Saʿd b. ʿUbāda al-Khazrajī and Mālik b. al-Ashtar.
3/5 Here are the problems:
-ʿAlī died in the year 40/661.
-Qatāda was born in the year 60/679-80 and died in 117/735. So he cannot hear it from ʿAlī
-Abū Ḥassān al-Aʿraj died in the year 130/747-48, so he must have had a very long life to be able to receive it from ʿAlī and pass it on to Qatāda.
-Abū Ḥassān al-Aʿraj joined al-Khawarij (who hated ʿAlī), so did he narrate a report about the merit of ʿAlī? (maybe?)
-Only Qatāda narrates from Abū Ḥassān al-Aʿraj, about whom there is scarce information in the sources.
1/11
Thread: Has Madina always been revered as the ‘Holy City’ in Islam?
In my forthcoming article, “Debating the Origins: The Sanctity of Madina in hadith Narratives” (Journal of Islamic Studies), I examine the origins of Madina’s sanctification by analysing 27 hadith variants that indicate the Prophet himself sanctified the city during his lifetime. In the article, before applying the isnad-cum-matn analysis to these hadiths, I engage with Harry Munt’s The Holy City of Madina, which offers an alternative perspective. Presented below is a brief critique of Munt’s work, as excerpted from my forthcoming article.
While I have offered some critiques, I must acknowledge that the book remains one of the finest contributions to the subject.
2/11
In The Holy City of Madina, Harry Munt examines how Madina’s sanctity emerged and solidified over the first three centuries of Islam. He argues this was neither immediate nor uniform, but developed gradually. Munt contends that early Muslim caliphs and scholars bolstered Madina’s sacred status to legitimise their authority, linking it to the Prophet Muhammad. By aligning themselves with the Prophet, they fortified their religious and political standing. Central to Munt’s thesis is the idea that Madina’s sanctification was shaped by later needs and narratives, rather than stemming solely from its historical ties to the Prophet.
3/11
He identifies “two main problems” with standard Muslim accounts of Madina’s sanctity. First, Munt notes that the Qur’an highlights Mecca’s status while Madina is rarely mentioned at the same level, challenging claims of an early, continuous recognition of Madina’s primacy.
He cites traditions like “prayer in the Prophet’s Mosque is worth one thousand prayers anywhere else,” suggesting these might conflict with Mecca’s prestige explicitly stated in the Qur’an. Yet, I argue that such phrasing in the Arabic language is often figurative, indicating abundance rather than literal superiority.
Thread: Abraham to Muhammad, The Stoning Penalty in the Ancient Near East: It's important to acknowledge mistakes. In my book The Integrity of the Qur’an, I stated that there is no stoning penalty in the Qur’an. But actually, there is—just not for adultery.
In the Qur'an 19:46, Azar (likely the adoptive father of Abraham) says:
"Abraham, do you reject my gods? I will stone you if you do not stop this. Depart from me a long while!"
This threat arises when Azar senses Abraham’s opposition to idolatry is deeply rooted.
So the Qur’an does mention stoning; but as a punishment for blasphemy, not adultery and to deter Abraham, "the friend of God" from monotheism. In the Ancient Near East, stoning was used for blasphemy and social crimes as an extreme form of punishment.
The Scroll of Ali ibn Abi Talib- Thread: Hadith holds great untapped potential for studying Islamic history. While working on my articles about Madina, I came across a fascinating narrative attributed to ‘Ali b. Abi Talib. I first thought it was rare, but then I found more
This hadith refers to the Qur’an and the "al-Ṣaḥīfa" (Scroll) of ‘Ali, which preserves knowledge he learned from the Prophet. When I was asked to prepare a paper for a conference at Oxford in July 2025, I decided to investigate these reports further.
To my surprise, I found 32 variants of this report in major Sunni collections. In one version, ‘Ali says, ‘Whoever claims that we have anything to recite apart from the Book of God (Qur'an) and this scroll... has lied.’ (Ibn Abī Shayba, Muṣannaf, no. 5423b.)