🧵(1) BREAKING: CHRISTIAN NURSE TAKES LEGAL ACTION AFTER BEING INVESTIGATED BY NHS FOR CALLING 6FT TRANSGENDER PAEDOPHILE 'Mr'
The convicted paedophile, ‘Mr X’, is in a high security male prison after multiple convictions for luring boys into sex acts while pretending to be a teenage girl on social media.
After refusing to refer to Mr X as a ‘she’ while on duty, Jennifer Melle was racially abused and physically threatened.
Instead of supporting her, however, Epsom and St Helier University Hospital Trust has abandoned Jennifer and treated her like the criminal.
The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) has also said Jennifer is ‘a potential risk’ for not using Mr X’s preferred ‘gender identity.’
The story is the latest in a series of cases where NHS policy supports trans ideology over biological reality. It also follows the publication of the Sullivan report this week which revealed that the police are allowing criminals to ‘self-identify’ their gender on official records.
In this case, policy has led, in the name of inclusivity, to the NHS siding with a paedophile convicted of serious offences, while pretending to be the opposite sex, over members of staff with Christian and gender-critical beliefs.
Supported by the Christian Legal Centre, the case Jennifer has now launched against the Trust on the grounds of harassment, discrimination and human rights’ breaches, is believed to be unprecedented.
In response to her claims, NHS lawyers have said that Christian beliefs Mis holds, that we are born male and female, are ‘not worthy of respect in a democratic society.’
(2) On the night of May 22, 2024, Jennifer began her shift at the hospital, where a Pride Progress Flag—symbolising support for transgender rights and gender identity affirmation—flew from the rooftop.
Miss Melle, who came to the UK from Uganda as a child, and has worked her way up to become a senior nurse, had been told along with her colleagues that Mr X had been brought in for treatment from a Category C men’s prison and was a sex offender.
He entered the hospital chained to two guards and was clearly masculine in appearance, standing over six feet tall and of large build.
At 10pm, a junior colleague approached Miss Melle in a distressed state saying that Mr X wanted to self-discharge. He was shouting and upsetting other elderly and vulnerable patients on the ward.
The doctor had been called for guidance on the discharge but had not yet responded. As the senior nurse on the ward, Jennifer followed her colleague to take charge of the situation and to provide support.
Looking at the patient’s medical records, she saw that the patient was recorded as male, not female or transgender. On the name board next to the bed, it simply gave the feminine name.
With her colleague finally getting through to the doctor on the phone, Jennifer requested to speak to him. She said to the doctor that: ‘Mr X would like to self-discharge.’
Overhearing the call, enraged Mr X screamed: “Do not call me Mr! I am a woman!”
Still on the phone to the doctor, Jennifer called back to Mr X that she was speaking to the doctor and was working out what medication could be given before he was discharged.
Finishing the call, she approached the patient’s room...
(3) Stepping inside, Jennifer found Mr X pacing up and down in chains.
Jennifer politely said: ‘I am sorry I cannot refer to you as her or she, as it’s against my faith and Christian values but I can call you by your name.’
She then began to relay what the doctor had said, but then the abuse and vitriol escalated.
‘Imagine if I called you n*****’, Mr X yelled. ‘How about I call you n*****? Yes, black n*****!’
Jennifer said if he carried on, she would have to call security.
Mr X then lunged threateningly towards Jennifer and pursued her out of the room until he was eventually held back by the guards.
He then shouted: ‘I want your name and NHS number and am going to report you to the police for homophobia and to Patient Advice and Liaison Service’ (PALS).
One of the guards approached Jennifer and said: ‘Why can’t you just call him what he wants?’
Jennifer reiterated what she had already said about her Christian beliefs, and the guard said no more.
Returning, Jennifer said, using Mr X’s feminine name: ‘I got you your pain relief.’
After having the painkillers, Mr X calmed down and was quiet until the morning.
(4) Afraid and upset, but keeping it inside, Jennifer handed over to colleagues on the next shift but felt unable to speak to anyone about what had happened.
Shortly after arriving home, Jennifer received a call from a colleague who had taken over her shift. They said that Mr X had been shouting for her and repeating the threat that he was going to make a complaint to PALS.
Sleepless nights followed.
The next time Jennifer was on night shift, she was pulled aside by a ward manager and asked to make a statement about what had happened.
After Jennifer relayed that she was still feeling impacted by the racial and potential physical attacks, she was told that despite that she still had to respect “equality and diversity” according to the Nursing and Midwifery Council code of conduct.
Jennifer said she had no issues with people’s sexuality but also asked where the respect was for her Christian beliefs and said that she ‘could not deny biological reality’.
As a Christian, Jennifer believes that the Bible is unambiguous about human sex, as it is written in Genesis 1:27, that:
‘So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them, male and female he created them.’
Over the next few days Jennifer said she felt pressured to provide management with a statement.
She was then told that she must attend a meeting with HR and that if she refused to comply, she would be sent home until an investigation was completed.
She was then redeployed to another unit, which she found this to be hurtful and demeaning.
(5) An investigation report subsequently concluded that: ‘the Code of Conduct outlines that in order to treat people as individuals and to uphold their dignity nurses should avoid making assumptions and should recognise Diversity and individual choice.’
The report cited the NMC Code of Conduct which states that nurses should ‘not express your personal beliefs (including political, religious or moral beliefs) in an inappropriate way. Therefore, although [Jennifer] felt unable to identity Patient X using the preferred pronouns due to her religion, as outlined in the NMC Code of Conduct, it could be perceived that [Jennifer’s] actions could…be seen as a potential breach of the code.’
She was accused of ‘not respecting the patient’s preferred identity’ and told her actions and behaviour had ‘fallen short of the Trust’s value of Respect’.
Summoned to a disciplinary hearing in October 2024, Jennifer was given a final written warning and has been referred to the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC).
Since the incident, she has been moved to another ward and effectively demoted. Her name was wiped off the internal system, making it difficult to apply for extra shifts at the hospital.
Her capacity to earn much needed extra money was therefore removed and she and her family have suffered as a result.
Under severe pressure within the system, and with her career and livelihood under investigation and at serious risk, Jennifer faced no alternative but to file a legal claim on the grounds of harassment and direct discrimination.
She says that the NHS has unlawfully interfered with her rights under Article 9 ECHR to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, especially with her right to manifest her religion by seeking to compel her to use preferred pronouns.
Jennifer’s case follows other high profile legal cases involving nurses in Darlington and Scotland taking legal action against the NHS over being forced to undress in female changing rooms in front of men ‘identifying’ as women.
(6) Jennifer, whose story is on the front page of the Mail on Sunday today, says she has never had any issues with any transgender patients previously, said: “I am devastated by how I have been treated and believe I am being institutionally abused, harassed, bullied and racially discriminated against.
“Ever since I have expressed my Christian beliefs under extreme pressure, I have been a marked woman.
“I do not feel supported by my colleagues, or the NHS, following the racial abuse and threat of physical violence I received from the patient. I remained professional throughout and always treat each and every individual with dignity and respect.
“My conduct throughout this incident and during my career has been fully compliant with the code.
“I have been put at risk, but I am being treated like a criminal. Sadly, if you put your head above the parapet and speak truthfully on these issues in the NHS the risk is that you will be knocked down, punished severely and demoted.
“The message to me during the investigation is that I should put up with extreme racism and deny biological reality and my deeply held Christian beliefs, for the sake of ‘inclusivity’ and respecting lies.
“It feels like I am dreaming, but I am trusting in Jesus to look after me. I have to take a stand on this issue and am concerned about how many other NHS workers are suffering in silence during similar experiences.”
(7) Andrea Williams, Chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre which is supporting Jennifer, said: “The NHS appears to remain captured by transgender ideology to the point it is prepared to back a convicted paedophile, who was clearly very disturbed and shouting racist comments, over the Christian nurse.
“Jennifer Melle was genuinely doing her best while not wanting to deny her Christian faith and biological reality.
“We thought we had seen it all when it comes to controversial legal cases on these issues, but what Jennifer Melle is experiencing at the hands of this ideology is off the scale and on a whole new disturbing level.
“Jennifer loves Jesus and is a talented nurse who should be supported and protected, not investigated and silenced.
“The Trust cannot force compelled speech on their staff and an urgent U-turn and apology is needed.
“We would ask @wesstreeting , as health secretary, to investigate what is happening here. He is already involved in the Darlington nurses’ case, and has previously said he is ‘horrified’ by how they are being treated. It’s time for government intervention on this matter.
“It’s time for the government to stop equality and diversity policies being weaponised in the NHS to punish innocent nurses just doing their job.
“We will stand with Jennifer for as long as it takes for her to receive justice and with any other nurses who are discriminated against due to this dangerous ideology.”
(8) If you are concerned by Jennifer's story, please share it and consider supporting Jennifer and her legal team here:
We and Jennifer value all support and prayer as we pursue justice in this matter 🙏mailchi.mp/christianlegal…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(1) BREAKING: The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) and its General Secretary and Chief Executive, Professor Nicola Ranger, are under growing scrutiny for refusing to intervene in the case of Jennifer Melle, a senior Christian nurse suspended after declining to use biologically inaccurate pronouns for a convicted male paedophile patient.
Despite the UK Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in For Women Scotland, which reaffirmed the legal recognition of biological sex, the RCN has stalled on implementing the judgment, citing the need to “await EHRC statutory guidance”, a process already plagued by delay and resistance within government and public institutions.
Jennifer has been suspended on full pay by Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals since April for an alleged “data breach” after speaking to the media about being disciplined for indirectly referring to a male transgender paedophile as “Mr.”
She was disciplined and referred to the Nursing and Midwifery Council as a ‘potential risk’ for not using the preferred gender identity of the paedophile.
She has said previously that in ‘her hour of need’ the RCN abandoned her and suggested that she do ‘a reflection’ to ensure the situation didn’t happen again.
Jennifer said: “I was racially abused in my workplace, and instead of protecting me, the Trust punished me. My Christian faith teaches me that sex is immutable. I should not be forced to deny that truth to keep my job.
“The Supreme Court has spoken clearly: biological sex matters in law. Yet the RCN, an organisation that claims to champion equality, chooses delay over action. Nurses like me are left vulnerable while ideology trumps reality. This is not inclusion; it is discrimination.”
(2) The story is breaking in today's Daily Express where Darlington nurse and President of the Darlington Nursing Union, Bethany Hutchison, said: “Jennifer’s case is not an isolated incident. Across the NHS, women are being told to ‘broaden their mindset’ and accept policies that erase biological reality.
“The Supreme Court has spoken, yet institutions drag their feet. Why is it that the NHS has repeatedly implemented unlawful Stonewall policies, but cannot follow a legal ruling from the highest court in the land? We will not stop fighting for dignity and truth in healthcare.”
Ms Hutchison wrote to Prof Ranger on July 18 asking the RCN boss to use her influence to ensure “nursing does not become a profession where suitability to work is determined by one's acquiescence to particular acceptable’ beliefs”.
Prof Ranger has described equity and inclusion as a “moral imperative”, stating: “Our health and care systems can only thrive when they reflect, respect and actively engage the diversity of the people they serve - and the people who work within them.”
In her reply Ms Hutchison was told: “We await the EHRC statutory code of practice for services, public functions, and associations and the code may provide guidance on how this relates to the provision of health and care services.”
Prof Ranger confirmed the RCN had received inquiries from members following the Supreme Court decision, suggesting Ms Melle’s case is just one example of a wider national picture where institutions are dragging their feet.
(3) Under Nicola Ranger’s leadership, the RCN has embedded LGBTQI+ inclusion as a core principle in its policies and campaigns, including:
- #PrideInNursing Campaign: Celebrating LGBTQ+ diversity through events and resources.
- Advocacy Against Hate Crime: Congress resolutions for better training to support LGBTQ+ victims.
- EDI Conferences and Webinars: Promoting allyship and inclusive care across the profession.
Ranger has described equity and inclusion as a “moral imperative,” stating:
“Our health and care systems can only thrive when they reflect, respect and actively engage the diversity of the people they serve — and the people who work within them.”
Where is her video committing to support nurses like Jennifer Melle and the Darlington nurses and committing to fight for them?
1/ 🚨 Today at Newcastle Employment Tribunal, Rose Henderson gave evidence in the high-profile case brought by eight female nurses against County Durham & Darlington NHS Trust. The hearing has exposed serious safeguarding failures. See some of the explosive evidence that came out in this thread 🧵
2/ The nurses allege the Trust forced them to share intimate changing spaces with an “evidently sexually functional biological male,” violating their dignity and creating a hostile environment. They claim harassment, discrimination & victimisation under the Equality Act.
3/ The Trust’s policy allowed access to female changing rooms based on self-declared gender identity, without consultation or risk assessment. This breached Regulation 24 of Workplace Health & Safety law, which requires separate facilities for men & women.
1/ BREAKING: Church of England says its own teaching on marriage is a ‘safeguarding risk’ as it continues to blacklist chaplain for sermon
Rev. Dr Bernard Randall, who is being supported by the Christian Legal Centre, was labelled a 'risk to children' after a sermon saying pupils didn’t have to accept LGBT ideology, and he remains blacklisted by the @churchofengland .
Despite no action from Prevent, who he was reported to as an potential 'extremist', or other secular bodies, he says he's been left “bewildered and broken” by his continued blacklisting.
The CofE has now started a new safeguarding process against Dr Randall, despite him being vindicated and no evidence provided that he has done anything wrong...
See more breaking in the Mail on Sunday, on our website and on this🧵
2/ Bernard's 2019 sermon followed a visit to Trent College by Educate and Celebrate, a group promoting the idea of “smashing heteronormativity”, even to nursery-aged children.
For preaching Church of England doctrine in a Church of England school, in a Church of England chapel, in response he was:
❌Dismissed from his role
❌Referred to counter-terrorism
❌Denied a licence to preach
❌Labelled a safeguarding risk
Every official body — Prevent, the Teaching Regulation Agency, the DBS, and the local safeguarding officer — found no case to answer.
Yet the CofE continues to treat him as a risk based on what he might say in future sermons....
3/ One of Educate and Celebrate's patrons was recently jailed for child sex offences.
But guess who the CofE want to continue labelling a safeguarding risk to children?
🧵THREAD: Christian preacher vindicated after arrest, prosecution and ‘non-crime hate incident’ threat for questioning Quran
1/ Watch the unbelievable moment police arrest Christian preacher John Steele in Rotherham town centre and say they will record it as a ‘non-crime hate incident’, for asking a question about the Quran and domestic violence.
The story reveals embedded two-tier policing in Rotherham, where over many years South Yorkshire Police have failed to act on the systematic r**e of young girls by predominantly Islamic men, but on this occasion swiftly arrested a Christian preacher for asking a question about the Quran.
2/ John Steele, 60, was arrested after a 30-second conversation with a Muslim woman at a public awareness stall.
He asked how Quran 4:34, which mentions wife-beating, aligns with the stall’s message on domestic abuse. He compared it to what Jesus and St Paul say in Ephesians 5:25
Despite his calm tone and peaceful approach, Steele was surrounded by officers, who threatened him with a “non-crime hate incident,” and arrested under Section 50 of the Police Reform Act.
He was fingerprinted, DNA-swabbed, and held in custody...
3/ The Crown Prosecution Service has now dropped the case, saying prosecution was “not needed in the public interest.”
But the incident has raised serious concerns about free speech, Christian freedom, and two-tier policing in the UK.
(1) BREAKING: In a win for Christian freedom, a West London church has compelled a local authority to reverse a controversial Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) that had effectively criminalised its Christian outreach ministry.
Supported by lawyers at the Christian Legal Centre, the Kingsborough Centre in Uxbridge, pursued a Judicial Review of the London Borough of Hillingdon’s (LBH) decision to create the first ever street preaching and evangelising censorship zone in the UK.
The Pentecostal church, known for founding London’s first food bank in 2009, discovered during a prayer meeting that most of its outreach activities had been banned without warning.
The Church, which is situated within the censorship zone, has undertaken ministry in the community since its inception, and for example, held and organised peace gatherings in the area that is now a PSPO zone following the 7/7 terror attack in London in 2005.
Contributing significantly to the community, the Church has also set up three branches of the ‘Coat of Many Colours’ nursery, plus an affordable childcare service which now serves multiple areas within Hillingdon and Hounslow.
Reading the proposals, however, the church believed they had been ‘criminalised for loving our neighbour’ without proper consultation and had no choice but to pursue legal action.
The few responses there were to the public consultation described the legislation as “extremely worrying”, “an attack on freedom of speech”, and ushering in a “police sate”.
In August 2023, the council went ahead with its plans, nonetheless, with its website stating that: ‘police and specific officers authorised by the council can enforce PSPO conditions and may issue fixed penalty notices of £100 for non-compliance.’
It added that: ‘Non-payment of an FPN may lead to court prosecution with a maximum fine of £1,000 and/or criminal conviction.’
This made it a criminal offence to preach with amplification, distribute Christian leaflets and display Bible verses on posters in Uxbridge town centre.
But now after permission was given for a Judicial Review of the 'unlawful' legislation, the council has been forced into a U-turn with £20,000 legal costs...
See more in this🧵, on our website, and breaking in the @dailytelegraph👇
(2) Tracts and leaflets, like the one pictured, sharing the Christian faith would have been banned and criminalised under the proposed legislation.
The day after the legislation was published, a group of Christians reported that police officers approached them in the town centre as they undertook their regular outreach activities, which included street preaching.
Four posters containing biblical teaching were displayed and they were distributing leaflets to passers-by.
The police warned them that they were in breach of the PSPO and would be fined if they continued their activity.
The police even told the group to turn the signs around so that the biblical messages could not be read. Signs displayed in the zone, for example, include “Jesus Christ is Lord of Lords and King of Kings”, from the Book of Revelation.
Also facing censorship were leaflets entitled ‘How can I know God?’ and ‘What is Christianity: An Introduction to the Story of Jesus.’
(3) Notably, England footballer Bukayo Saka and his family used to attend the Kingsborough Centre before relocating to Hertfordshire to be near Arsenal's training ground.
(1) If you want to see why the NHS is in no position to handle the chaos that would be unleashed on its services by the assisted suicide bill, look no further than this🧵on the tragic case of 19-year-old Sudiksha Thirumalesh…
(2) Sudiksha’s case was reminiscent of Charlie Gard, Alfie Evans and Archie Battersbee, in that an NHS Hospital, had asked the Court of Protection to authorise removal of life-saving medical treatment from Sudiksha, effectively condemning her to death.
Unlike in most such cases, however, Sudiksha was conscious, able to speak, and had instructed her own lawyers to argue that she should be kept alive and be allowed to go to Canada for experimental treatment, which could give her a chance of survival.
She was suffering from a rare genetic mitochondrial disease which caused chronic muscle weakness, loss of hearing, and damage to her kidneys, making her dependent on regular dialysis and other intensive care.
It did not, however, affect the functioning of her brain as her handwritten notes, written in hospital, reveal...
(3) The Hospital argued that while Sudiksha’s prognosis was uncertain and she could have survived for some months, her condition was deteriorating, and she was therefore “actively dying”.
The NHS Trust had asked the Court of Protection to approve a “palliative care plan” for Sudiksha which would mean she is no longer be given dialysis and would die from kidney failure within a few days.
Supported by her family, Sudiksha told her doctors that she disagreed with their prognosis, wanted to explore treatment options, and that she wanted to ‘die trying to live.’
In response in March 2023, at the request of the NHS without giving any reasons, the Court made a “Transparency Order” which, opposite to its title, imposed draconian restrictions on reporting any information which might lead to identification of Sudiksha, members of her family, or the Hospital.
This trapped the family and severely limited their ability to speak to the media or raise funds for treatment in Canada.
With no warning, the NHS took the parents to court to get legal approval for their plan...
The vice on the family was tightening, forcing them down a road of death rather than life...