This operation is a dangerous marriage of public and private power—a global system of security agencies, tech firms, activist groups, nonprofits, media orgs and government bureaucracies taking what they describe as a "whole-of-society" approach to censoring disfavored speech.
All of this is completely unprecedented.
It's an entirely new, sprawling system of speech and thought control—far more powerful and far-reaching than anything we've seen the past, built with and for the new technology of the digital age.
And most of it operates in the shadows.
The censorship enterprise is enabled by a vast ecosystem of "non-governmental organizations" (NGOs). These groups represent a fifth column in American politics—a shadow state that serves the interests of the ruling elite, with no accountability to the society it wields power in.
I went into detail about who these groups are, what they do, and how they coordinate with elites in government and elsewhere in my thread earlier this month. We'll get into it much more in tomorrow's hearing too.
But let me briefly tell you why this is of such urgent importance.
In the 21st century, the internet is the new public square. This is where people get the information they need to understand the world. It's where they read, write, argue, and learn. It's where they shape the ideas that will define the future. It's where politics happens.
That's why this fight matters. The fight for freedom of speech online is the fight for a free people's right to access, analyze, share and discuss information on their own terms, and to draw their own conclusions.
In that sense, it's the fight for self-government itself.
The assault on free speech across the West isn't happening in a vacuum. It's inextricably connected to the war on our shared history, heritage, and identity.
In other parts of the West—where the crisis is much further along—politicians admit this openly:
You heard the Australian Premier above: They need censorship to carry out their entire social agenda.
In America, too, this is part of a much deeper war on *who we are.* It's a tool to silence the critics of the disastrous social transformation that the Left wants to carry out.
And—as we'll discuss tomorrow—it's all funded by your tax dollars.
The sprawling labyrinth of leftist NGOs, nonprofits, foundations and activist groups that drive this agenda don't just work hand-in-glove with their friends in the federal bureaucracy; they're paid by them, too.
At our hearing, we'll be exposing all of this with three of the world's leading experts on the vast censorship enterprise—all of whom have been warriors for free speech: @MZHemingway, @JonathanTurley and @bhweingarten.
Tomorrow. 2 PM. You won't want to miss this one. — End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This was written in the early months of the Biden presidency. But it lays out, in detail, exactly what they would go on to do—and how they justified it.
By adopting the framework of "domestic terrorism" (DT), they could effectively treat their critics as enemies of the state.
For years, the State Department ran a global censorship operation—not just in America, but across the West.
Now, it's pushing free speech instead.
Here's why this matters. 🧵
The "disinformation" and "hate speech" industry is one of the top threats to Western freedom today.
"From its very beginnings," @SecRubio writes, this industry "has existed to protect the American establishment from the voices of forgotten Americans."
As Attorney General of Missouri, I sued the Biden admin for working with Big Tech to censor conservatives. We took them all the way to the Supreme Court.
That case—Missouri v. Biden—led to the release of thousands of pages of documents detailing a vast censorship enterprise.
This is one I'm especially excited about. Sarah Rogers is a free speech champion—and we've worked together on some of the big anti-censorship fights of the past few years.
Another sign that this State Department is serious about dismantling the censorship-industrial complex.
Today, Sarah had her confirmation hearing for Undersecretary of Public Diplomacy at the State Department.
Under Biden, that position effectively served as a U.S. "censorship czar."
Sarah is going to help this administration transform it into a "free speech czar" role instead.
This is a big issue for me—going back to my days as Missouri AG. We filed the Missouri v. Biden lawsuit that exposed how the last administration was wielding agencies like the State Department to build a vast global censorship enterprise:
Klaus Schwab, kingpin of the World Economic Forum and face of the woke globalist movement is RESIGNING.
We didn't eat the bugs. We don't live in the pod. We won. He lost.
Here's the story of Schwab's reign of terror. 🧵
Founded in 1971, the WEF was originally a small club of faceless suits. By 2025, it had become an international powerhouse, representing the global special interests eroding American sovereignty and liberty.
How powerful? President Zelenskyy wore a suit.
Schwab’s big economic idea: "You’ll own nothing and be happy," sounds like a Bond villain's Marxist dystopian sales pitch...because it is.
🚨 President Trump has fired a lot of Administrative State bureaucrats. Praise the Lord.
The liberal media cries foul, but what if I told you President Trump was playing by the rules Joe Biden created.
In his quest for power, Joe Biden unwittingly helped MAGA. Here’s how. 🧵
In 2020, President Trump nominated Roger Severino to serve on and reform the Administrative Conference of the United States, a technocratic, deep state agency that manages many of the inner workings of the administrative state.
In 2021, Biden gave Severino an ultimatum, resign or be fired.
Severino sued, using this chance to remove bad precedent limiting the President's ability to fire bureaucrats. Biden took the bait.
(For more on that area of precedent, see my prior thread)
For too long, our leaders have been selling our country off for parts.
Today, President Trump put America First. Here's why. 🧵
Since the end of the Cold War, U.S. trade policy has been an unmitigated disaster.
We've shipped millions of good jobs overseas, hollowed out our industrial capacity, and sacrificed our sovereignty on the altar of the "global economy"—while other nations reap the benefits.
Independence was the founding principle of our republic. It was the principle that drove our ancestors to revolution.
But a nation that can't make things is not independent.
We were once the manufacturing powerhouse of the world. Now we can't even make the stuff we invented.