1/7 This morning I wrote to the individual who has the honour (he may consider it misfortune!) to be my MP, begging him not to support the proposed cuts to disability benefits. Here's what I said [with a few typos removed! No room to put in Alt text - DM me if needed]. 🧵
2/7 I began by recalling when I chaired the last Labour Govt's Disability Employment Advisory Committee when another 'Pathways to Work' was around, explaining why it & many other such progs don't work as expected, & why it's vital to see it from the employer's perspective.
3/7 I agree the situation is unsustainable, that being the soaring rise in sickness & disability due to an NHS on its knees, failure to manage & learn from the pandemic & ongoing devastating health impacts. If you want to reduce the benefits bill, maybe invest in clean air!
4/7 PIP does need reform., e.g. to recognise the devastating functional limitations typical of Long Covid, ME/CFS, etc. Then there's the fact many sick/ disabled people already live in dire poverty. The UN has often condemned the UK's abysmal record on disabled people's rights.
5/7 I ended with the implications of denying choice, dignity & assistance to live while providing it to die. How cuts would not only be terrible for sick/ disabled people but for democracy, if Labour joins other parties in attacking us. I urged him- & urge all-to think carefully
6/7 I added a PS suggesting that to understand more about the multi-faceted onslaught against disabled people he consult the Disability News Service @johnpringdns : disabilitynewsservice.com
7/7 I don't know how it will go today but I am not hopeful the UK Govt will listen. Meanwhile the Tories sit back & watch them take the fall for policies they support & Reform rubs its hands in glee. What I do know is that the fight - for humane policy, for democracy - isn't over
@threadreaderapp unroll please
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let me be even blunter than @danny__kruger. The private sector is driven by profit. To involve them in delivering assisted dying means making it profitable. Will they be set 'kill targets'? Will they be paid bonuses for exceeding them?
When you introduce a profit motive & if there's more profit to be made from killing people than keeping them alive, if you turn the process into a safeguard-free zone with no meaningful oversight, guess what happens.
Maybe investing our tax-payers money on a new privatised death service is what Starmer & co mean by prioritising 'growth' over everything else. Let the bodies of the otherwise unprofitable pile high, if that's what it takes? Didn't Boris Johnson say something similar?
Here's my 1st take on @leicesterliz's statement today on proposals for disability benefits, following weeks of govt scaremongering & demonising sick & disabled people, placing their mental health under intolerable strain at the prospect of losing support they need to survive 🧵
You don't fix a broken system by making it worse. You won't stop soaring disability benefit cost unless you act to stop soaring disability & ill health due to an NHS on its knees, the ongoing consequences of a pandemic let rip, & the scale of health-destroying poverty.
You don’t get very sick & disabled people into work by gaslighting the reality they'll never work & employers will never employ them, & making their lives even harder. Many devastating forms of disability are hidden. It doesn't mean they aren't very very real.
This is a long 🧵 on Assisted Dying. It’s a topic that I, like many others, have wrestled with. For me it hinges on the nature of coercion & what that in turn means for genuine freedom of choice. It begins with this poster which I find deeply troubling but also illuminating.
My wish is that no one I love should ever choose to end their life because they feel they’re a burden. My wish is also that those responsible for this messaging, who say they aim to end suffering, understood how much suffering this may cause to people already in great distress.
My wish is for everyone to understand the coercive power of such posters, whether or not intended. Coercion includes acts of manipulation & persuasion that don't involve force. It can be subtle, gradual, hinting, indirect, perceived when not intended & imperceptible when it is.
With huge thanks to @KatyMcconkey for the tip-off I have dug up this original post. It's almost like they knew Covid is airborne and thought it was important everyone else knew it too! I dug a bit deeper... 🧵
...I found images from the whole "Stop Covid-19 Hanging Around" advert campaign story board! Would you like to see them? Ok 👇. Now guess where I found them...
They were used to illustrate what looks like an internal Government Communication Service blog on the importance of social media messaging to outpace the spread of Covid-19. Here's the link in case you'd like to learn more about this important topic: gcs.civilservice.gov.uk/blog/campaign-…
You know the rise in Covid must be bad when @BBCNews feels the need to say it isn't. Yet another great case study of minimisation & manipulation. Here's a thread on how they do it. Sorry it's long. Even so it's just a quick recap on a few key tactics 🧵bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
Are we in a Summer Covid wave? "It's difficult to tell..We no longer collect national data..as far less testing takes place now. That means many cases of Covid are not being recorded." Hang on to this. One thing they do is include contradictory statements without joining the dots
This means that should anyone (e.g. me) accurately accuse them of making unevidenced statements, presented as if unequivocal fact, they can also accurately say that 'the article clearly stated that evidence was lacking'. So that's just fine then. Or not.
Final impact statements @covidinquirysco health & social care module today & tomorrow. None on the impact on CV people. It seems not only is our continued existence - our continued clinical vulnerability to continuing Covid - to be denied, we're to be written out of history😡🧵
You'd think the Inquiry would prioritise the people most vulnerable to severe illness & death from Covid, at greatest risk when protections were removed & most likely to need health & soc care; people still leading restricted precarious lives & more likely to die. You'd be wrong
They have been sitting for over 6 weeks on my approx 50 page 20k word written statement on lived experience of CV people & analysis, that I was invited to prepare by Counsel when the module was already well under way, with the possibility of being called to give oral evidence