Some men spend their entire lives trying to turn others away from God.
But in their final moments… what do they say?
Are they proud of the life they lived?
Are they ready to die?
Let’s look at the last words of some of history’s most well-known atheists & enemies of God…
1. Voltaire (1694–1778)
A brilliant writer and satirist, but a rabid critic of Christianity. He once said, “In twenty years Christianity will be no more.”
On his deathbed, his doctor urged him to renounce Satan. Voltaire reportedly replied:
“Now is not the time for making new enemies.”
But moments later, writhing in agony, he screamed:
“I am abandoned by God and man! I shall go to hell!”
2. Thomas Paine (1737–1809)
Author of The Age of Reason, Paine rejected Christianity and the divinity of Jesus. He mocked organized religion and saw Scripture as myth.
His final words, as reported by witnesses, were:
“I would give worlds, if I had them, that The Age of Reason had never been published. O Lord, help me! Christ, help me!… For God’s sake, send even a child to stay with me, for it is hell to be alone.”
3. Sir Francis Newport (1620–1708)
Head of an English atheist club. He spent his life mocking God and ridiculing Scripture.
On his deathbed, he cried out:
“You need not tell me there is no God, for I know there is one, and that I am in His presence! You need not tell me there is no hell—I know there is, I am already in its jaws!”
4. David Hume (1711–1776)
A famous Scottish philosopher and skeptic. He denied miracles, attacked religion, and promoted naturalistic explanations for everything.
Though many secular biographers try to paint a calm death, witnesses like James Boswell reported that Hume was often uneasy and trembling. His nurse reportedly said:
“He was more terrified than I ever saw any man.”
5. Anton LaVey (1930–1997)
Founder of the Church of Satan and author of The Satanic Bible. He dedicated his life to glorifying self and rejecting God.
LaVey’s reported last words were:
“Oh my, oh my, what have I done? There is something very wrong… there is something very wrong…”
6. Joseph Stalin (1878–1953)
Dictator of the Soviet Union. He brutally suppressed religion, closed churches, and executed priests. A staunch atheist who replaced God with the state.
His daughter, Svetlana, was at his side when he died. She said:
“At the last moment he suddenly opened his eyes and looked at something over everyone’s head. It was a terrible look, insane or angry… Then he raised his left hand as though he were pointing to something… or threatening us… It was as if he were summoning death with a gesture. The gesture was full of menace… and then the spirit wrenched itself free of the body.”
7. Aldous Huxley (1894–1963)
Author of Brave New World and an advocate of psychedelic drugs and Eastern mysticism. Raised in a secular household and often critical of organized religion.
His final hours were filled with LSD and silence, but his wife later admitted:
“He had no peace, no hope—he was grasping, searching—but it wasn’t there.”
These men lived denying God—and they died in fear, doubt, and darkness.
This thread isn’t to mock them. It’s a sober warning:
How you live your life matters.
Don’t be like these men.
Live a life of truth, humility, and service to your Creator—and die in peace.
Jesus said, “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”
If you think this message is important please share this thread with others and let’s focus on what truly matters
𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝟏: If the property of rationality exists, then God must exist.
𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝟐: The property of rationality exists.
𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧: Therefore, God exists.
𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝟏: 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
This argument came out of a conversation I had with an atheist who claimed the universe is necessarily rational. This to me seemed nonsensical… doesn’t rationality require a mind? Can something truly be rational if it wasn’t brought about by something that understands and exercises reason?
The more I thought about it, the more I realized this could form the basis of a new argument for the existence of God. It’s not just a variation on a familiar theme. It’s not a streamlined version of a classical argument or a sharpened take on an older form. It’s something deeper—something more foundational. It doesn’t begin with what we see. It begins with what must be true for rationality to exist at all.
This argument doesn’t infer God from design, order, or probability. It asserts that if rationality exists in any form, then God necessarily exists. Not because the world appears rational, but because rationality as a metaphysical property cannot arise without a rational foundation.
Some people might think this is the design argument, but that’s incorrect. The design argument is inductive—it’s an inference to the best explanation. It says the world looks designed, and that the best explanation for that appearance is a designer. This argument is not inductive and not based on appearance. It’s based on what rationality is, and what kind of cause is required for it to exist at all.
Nor is this argument about the laws of logic, intelligibility, or epistemology like many presentations of the transcendental argument (TAG).
And it’s not about whether our beliefs are reliable, like C.S. Lewis’s argument from reason.
It’s about the existence of rationality itself as a metaphysical property we find in minds and whose effects or reflections we see manifested in arguments, stories, laws, etc.
I believe this argument is new. At the very least, I’ve never seen it stated this way before.
Before we move into the syllogism and its parts, let’s define God for the purposes of this argument with precision:
God, as used in this argument, refers to a transcendent, necessary, and rational mind—the metaphysical foundation of all rationality. This being is personal (possessing will and intellect), perfectly consistent with logical truth, and cannot fail to exist (necessary).
In classical theology, this is the Logos—the divine reason behind all being. This is not a god of the gaps or an arbitrary preference, but the only kind of being capable of grounding the reality of rationality itself.
I’ll be presenting the Rational Argument for God in five parts:
A Note to the Reader:
Before we dive in, a quick note. I’ve shown this argument to both theists and atheists—at least eight different people so far—and no one has said they’ve seen it before. That includes people who are well-read in philosophy and apologetics. I’ve looked for similar arguments, and I haven’t found anything that frames the case this way either. Because of that, I’ve taken special care to make the reasoning below as clear and precise as possible.
But that also means this is not a short post. The argument takes time to build. It unfolds step by step. If you’re interested in exploring a new and hopefully rigorous proof for the existence of God, be prepared to spend about 40 minutes here reading this. It’s a slow burn—but I think it’s worth it.
Now… Let’s begin.
𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝟐: 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐎𝐧𝐞
Premise One: If the property of rationality exists, then God must exist.
This premise carries the main weight of the argument, and so it requires careful justification. In what follows, I will define rationality and related concepts, distinguish between different types of rationality, show that rationality always depends on a mind, and finally demonstrate that this leads necessarily to the existence of God.