🚨THREAD: Paul Hyon Kim, 36, has been arrested for torching a row of Teslas with Molotov cocktails and spray-painting "RESIST" across the entrance of the Tesla service center in Las Vegas.
The legacy media radicalized this Democrat.
Here are his social media posts.👇
1/ On his IG, Kim links to his website (paulhyonkimdotcom) alongside a "Donations to Palestine" link.
His website identifies him as a cinematographer who relocated from the Pacific Northwest to Las Vegas.
On Vimeo, he lists his pronouns as he/him.
2/ His recent IG story labels @hasanthehun a "sellout" for gifting items to AOC and Bernie Sanders during a recent interview.
The post criticizes Hasan for not interviewing Jill Stein and for not challenging AOC and Bernie on "their support for Zionism and Iron Dome funding."
3/ One recent IG post highlights women in response to "the day Roe v. Wade was overturned."
4/ Kim's FB page is filled with left-wing and legacy media political narratives.
He follows a few hundred accounts, almost entirely left-wing politicians and media outlets, including:
Anti-Capitalist League, Axios, ACLU, SPLC, The Atlantic, Barack Obama, Bernie Sanders, Robert Reich, Media Matters, Daily Beast, Cenk Uygur, Jill Stein, Elizabeth Warren, Occupy Democrats, the NYT, PBS, and NPR.
5/ Kim was likely a Bernie Sanders supporter in 2016.
6/ He celebrated Trump's impeachment in 2019, posting "Hell yeah."
7/ His political posting intensified in 2020, centered around COVID-19 with ridiculous legacy media takes like:
"Lockdown is a privilege... Social Distancing is a privilege..."
8/ Throughout 2020, Kim posted extensively about BLM, white supremacy, defunding the police, and other progressive media narratives, like:
"Amidst the George Floyd protests... Police are more like attack dogs on a leash... [Asians] aligned ourselves with white supremacist ideals in the oppression of black people... We owe them a debt in blood."
9/ He shared a list of bail funds during the BLM/Antifa riots, encouraging donations:
"A list of organizations you can donate your money to help the cause."
He shared a Slate article titled:
"The Fight for Civil Rights is Never Nonviolent."
10/ Kim praised efforts to defund police, posting about Minneapolis council plans to disband their police, commenting, "Protesting works. It has always worked," and showing support for BLM protestors' blocking highways.
11/ He shared a meme titled "Recognize Racism," classifying subtle racism as:
"Calling Police on POC"
"White silence"
"Denial of White Privilege"
"Anti-Immigration Policies"
And labeling the phrases below as racist:
"I don't see color"
"MAGA"
"All lives matter"
"You're so articulate"
12/ He posted legacy media articles dehumanizing half the country, like this Newsweek article titled:
"Narcissists and psychopaths are more likely to refuse to wear masks"
And this Vice article titled:
"Anti-Maskers Might be Sociopaths, Says Study"
13/ He apparently doxxed Derek Chauvin's home address, and shortly after the January 6th riot, shared:
"A list of the identity of the traitors at the attempted coup."
14/ What drives someone with mainstream left-leaning beliefs to violence against Tesla?
Paul Hyon Kim likely once admired @elonmusk and @Tesla—after all, who has done more for climate change, electric vehicles, and renewable energy?
But when Musk backed Trump in 2024, the legacy media narrative Kim trusted transformed Musk overnight into a "fascist," "authoritarian," and "Nazi."
Relentless media propaganda branding Trump and Musk as evil has predictably radicalized some Democrats, pushing individuals like Kim to firebomb Tesla dealerships and vandalize electric vehicles.
Legacy media’s persistent demonization of Musk, Trump, and their supporters as Nazis, narcissists, psychopaths, and sociopaths fuels escalating division and political violence.
They want more assassination attempts, chaos, and hate.
Fortunately, Democrats like Paul Hyon Kim represent an ever-shrinking minority who still trust the legacy media's narrative.
But these Americans are increasingly conditioned to view their fellow citizens not just as political opponents, but as existential threats.
When MAGA gets labeled Nazis, neighbors become enemies, and society cracks.
Democrats lost the popular vote, the electoral college, and now some are losing their grip on reality.
Legacy media is pushing them into domestic terrorism, with people like Kim torching fellow Democrats’ Teslas while screaming about "ending the use of fossil fuels."
If you want to support my work:
BTC:bc1qu5ytcc54zexn633lylat0uah78qzeyyd2ecruy
SOL:AFnrtuaSbSaWV14a75MnyavrUDq4zLccawo5try4s81h
ETH:0x0c8D70e38246a96951b7aa9961bD20FaA878e10E
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨THREAD: @BretWeinstein tells @TuckerCarlson it's likely President Trump that is standing in the way of @RobertKennedyJr removing the COVID mRNA vaccine recommendations for children.
They highlight the case of Maddie de Garay, a 12-year-old girl who suffered severe injuries during Pfizer’s clinical trial.
@TuckerCarlson: "Where are we on the mRNA shots?"
@BretWeinstein: "I fear this question because everybody tells me there's no way forward by reaching President Trump. He can't hear it, and maybe I'll have to learn that myself."
"We are still recommending them for tiny children who don't stand to benefit at all... All mRNA shots induce a built-in vulnerability... The body will naturally attack the cells that are producing whatever protein you load into the mRNA platform..."
"The reason that the COVID shots produce such a wide range of pathologies is that they flow all around the body. There's no targeting mechanism in them. They invade tissues haphazardly, and then those tissues get targeted by the immune system, as of course they would, including the brain, including the heart."
"There's no justification scientifically, but injecting them into children for whom there was never a justification, because children didn't die from COVID, and they were injured by the shot. So why would you take a healthy child and give them something with a risk of a severe pathology when the disease it protects them from isn't a serious threat in the first place?"
"It's well beyond criminal negligence at this point. This is depraved indifference. This is the injection of these products into innocent people who are incapable of being informed and incapable of consenting in spite of the fact that you know that some substantial fraction of them will be profoundly injured. It is depraved indifference."
2/ @TuckerCarlson: "What's the process to stop recommending mRNA shots to children?"
@BretWeinstein: "I believe it could be done effectively, instantaneously, if the President were on board. The President has a certain amount of pride in Operation Warp Speed... That has caused him to dig his heels in."
"That is unnecessary. The President is in no way responsible for the appalling content of these shots. He's not a biologist. He listened to people who knew the material far better than he did, and they lied to him. That's entirely separate from the question of whether or not Operation Warp Speed was an accomplishment, whether he succeeded in bringing a shot to the public in record time, which he did."
"So, to my way of thinking, he can be proud of Operation Warp Speed, and he can be livid at the people who lied to him about the shot, and he can be horrified by all the damage that that shot has done, and I hope that he will see that. I'm wondering if maybe what might open his eyes to this is the plight of the vaccine-injured, which to me is one of the starkest horrors I've ever witnessed."
3/ @TuckerCarlson: "There are no Cabinet Secretaries that could act independently?"
@BretWeinstein: "You're surely talking about @RobertKennedyJr, who I believe absolutely would if he had the power. It must be a White House decision because Bobby knows the horror of these shots as well as or better than anyone."
"I think he must feel that he can't get there, or maybe he's working there overtime. But every month that we wait, more children are being injected with these things."
🚨THREAD: Russia's invasion of Ukraine was *PROVOKED* by NATO expansion and a U.S.-backed 2014 coup, according to three decades of leading U.S. military and foreign policy experts:
•Ambassador George Kennan
•Ambassador Jack Matlock
•Senator Joe Biden
•Senator Bill Bradley
•Senator Sam Nunn
•Senator Gary Hart
•Senator Gordon Humphrey
•Secretary of State Henry Kissinger
•Defense Secretary Robert McNamara
•Defense Secretary William Perry
•Defense Secretary Robert Gates
•CIA Director William Burns
•CIA Director Stansfield Turner
•Professor Edward Herman
•Professor Noam Chomsky
•Professor John Mearsheimer
•Prime Minister Paul Keating
•Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser
In this thread, I’ll dive into their warnings, showing how this reckless policy enriched the U.S. military-industrial complex, reignited the Cold War, and pushed the world closer to nuclear catastrophe than ever before.
Video: @ComicDaveSmith @joerogan
1⃣ 1997 Open Letter: NATO Expansion a "Policy Error of Historic Proportions"
In June 1997, 50 U.S. foreign policy experts—including former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara and ex-CIA Director Stansfield Turner—sent President Clinton an open letter, labeling NATO’s eastward expansion a “policy error of historic proportions.”
They predicted it would provoke Russia, fuel nationalism, and undermine nuclear disarmament efforts like START II, urging cooperation over confrontation.
2⃣ Senator Biden Predicts Hostile Russian Reaction (1997)
That same month, Senator Joe Biden warned that NATO expansion into the Baltic states would provoke a "vigorous and hostile" reaction from Russia.
All three Baltic states—Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania—became NATO members in 2004.
🧵THREAD: I dug up archived USAID-funded Internews Annual Reports.
Here’s how this nonprofit played a crucial role in regime change across Eastern Europe in service of NATO expansion—then turned its tactics inward, calling for censorship in the West.
A deep dive👇
1/ Internews, heavily funded by USAID ($470M), spent decades building media networks, training journalists, and promoting “free speech” in former Soviet states.
But their mission wasn’t neutral. It was about shaping narratives to support NATO expansion.
Let’s start in 2001. ⬇️
2/ The 2001 Internews Annual Report states:
"Internews is one of the more successful agents of change in the former Soviet Union." - The Washington Post
They worked to establish independent media in Russia, Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia, and beyond—fueling the decline of Moscow’s influence.