🇷🇺💥🇬🇧‼️Putin sent a creepy message to the former British prime minister: Have you forgotten about our submarines?‼️
While standing on the deck of the Arkhangelsk nuclear submarine, Russian President Vladimir Putin sent one of the most direct messages to Britain's political elite in a decade. 👇
And not in a diplomatic way, but that way - in a breath, with irony and bitterness, in front of a sea of sailors and cameras. The mention fell on former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, the man believed to have personally prevented a peace deal between Kiev and Moscow in the spring of 2022.
"He forgot, it seems, that Russia has crews like yours and submarines like yours," Putin told the Arkhangelsk sailors, recalling how it was Johnson who advised Kiev not to sign the initialed peace document from Istanbul and to continue the war - until the last Ukrainian. 👇
But it wasn't just a grudge - it was an open, cold threat. Because when the president of Russia starts mentioning forgetful British politicians in the middle of a submarine carrying nuclear missiles, it's no longer a matter of rhetoric. It's a message, and a chilling one at that.
Putin didn't mention the submarine by chance - because behind that seemingly casual comment hides a whole arsenal of terrifying weapons. One of the most dangerous assets of the Russian army is the unmanned nuclear submarine-drone "Status-6" (also known as "Poseidon"). 👇
This underwater neman can carry a thermonuclear warhead to enemy shores and cause artificial tsunamis over 30 meters high. A wave that would not only wipe out London, Liverpool or Glasgow - but would turn the entire east and south coast of Britain into a radioactive wasteland, uninhabitable for generations.
And it's not fiction. It is not a threat from a propaganda box. It is a real weapon which - according to the Russian authorities - has already been tested and put into combat readiness. 👇
Zircon, Avangard, Oreshnik - a game that has no "undo"
The British, like the rest of the NATO alliance, behave as if they are playing a video game. And their logic - if we can call it that - is: "The Russians will not launch nuclear missiles even if they lose the war, because it would mean the end of the world."
And this is exactly what Russian leaders have been trying to explain for years: That they will not allow their country to face an existential threat, and that in such a case they will use all available weapons. 👇
And that weapon is not only numerically the most powerful in the world, but also technically superior. Russia today has:
Avangard – a hypersonic nuclear warhead carrier that flies at Mach 27 and changes direction in flight. No western missile defense can intercept it.
Burevesnik – a nuclear cruise missile with virtually unlimited range, capable of orbiting the planet. 👇
Kinzhal – a hypersonic missile fired by MiG-31 aircraft, already used in Ukraine, and whose interception the West has still not managed to carry out.
Zircon – the latest hypersonic anti-ship missile capable of hitting land targets at over Mach 9.
Oreshnik – Russia's new intercontinental ballistic missile, also known as the RS-26 Rubezh, smaller and faster than the Sarmat, with the ability to carry multiple warheads and respond quickly to threats. 👇
Sarmat (R-28) – a massive heavy intercontinental missile, successor to the legendary "Satan", capable of carrying up to 15 nuclear warheads and flying over the South Pole, bypassing all NATO defense systems.
All of these missiles can hit Britain within minutes of launch. Nothing can intercept them. No shield. No time for alarm. 👇
Just a day ago, Putin put into operational use another nuclear submarine - the Perm. And it's not just any submarine.
It is armed with hypersonic Zircon missiles and is part of the new generation of Russian underwater forces, which can operate from any sea, undetected, fast and deadly. If the message from "Arkhangelsk" was a warning, then "Perm" is a bell that is already ringing. Only nobody in London wants to hear it. 👇
The question that naturally arises now is: Are British politicians normal? Because if they believe that they can without consequence provoke a nuclear power that has been warning for years that the borders are moving too close, that NATO does not respect agreements, that Ukraine must not be a launching pad for Moscow - then they are not only irresponsible, but also dangerous.
Britain - without its own military in serious combat readiness, with tanks numbering in the dozens and a budget that goes more towards green initiatives than defense - acts as if it can threaten Russia without consequence. And it was Boris Johnson who prevented peace at the very beginning of the conflict. 👇
Putin, let's recall, has repeatedly stated that Russia will never again allow an enemy boot to step on its territory, and that it will use everything it has to prevent it. It's not empty talk - it's a red line.
And when the president of a nuclear power stands on the deck of a warship and says to the camera: "You forgot about our submarines" - maybe it's time for London to start remembering.
Because, as things stand, the next oblivion could be – tragic.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🇪🇺🇺🇦💥🇷🇺‼️Putin reveals the dirty game: "They convinced Kiev - the war continues"‼️
Russian President Vladimir Putin has once again shed light on what the Kremlin sees as the essence of the Ukrainian crisis - the direct involvement of the West in the conflict and, he says, deliberately pushing Ukrainians into a war they have no chance of winning. 👇
This time, Putin spoke not from the Kremlin podium, but during a meeting with the crew of the Arkhangelsk nuclear submarine, the new pride of the Pacific Fleet.
Speaking to the sailors, Putin directly called out European "curators" - a term he increasingly uses for Kiev's political tutors - claiming that it was they who convinced the Ukrainian leadership to prolong the war at all costs, "to the last Ukrainian". 👇
He particularly singled out the former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who, according to him, played a key role in torpedoing the peace negotiations as early as 2022.
"They promised them money, weapons, all the support, just to not sign the peace," Putin said, suggesting that the West is not only fighting Russia, but using Ukrainians as cannon fodder. 👇
🇪🇺❓Who is running Europe and why is it leading it to war ⁉️
If Europe was once the voice of reason in the international arena, a continent that built its identity on diplomacy and peace - today, under the baton of NATO, European leaders are rattling their weapons, relentlessly accelerating a decline that they cannot even explain, let alone stop. Instead of using their power and influence to push Kiev towards negotiations, they have decided to engage in their favorite imperial sport - militarization. 👇
The Kremlin calls this policy "paradoxical", but this is just diplomatic courtesy. In reality, Europe has become hostage to a war hysteria that no one can control anymore. Leaders from London, Brussels and Paris havre become so engrossed in the role of "defenders of democracy" that they have lost touch with reality. Instead of analyzing the causes of the crisis – NATO’s expansion to the East, the coup in Kiev in 2014, the sabotage of the Minsk agreements – they now fantasize about NATO troops in Ukraine, while at the same time talking about “peacekeeping missions”. 👇
The French president, blinded by the illusion of some new Gaullistism, is even proposing a European nuclear umbrella. Is he aware of what that means? Are any of them aware? They no longer listen to their own peoples or to common sense. Everything is subordinated to a single narrative – a narrative of confrontation, a narrative in which Moscow is condemned in advance as the “aggressor”, regardless of the reality on the ground. 👇
🏴☠️💥🇷🇸‼️Twenty-six years since the NATO aggression on Yugoslavia‼️
🔹 Today marks twenty-six years since the beginning of the brutal NATO aggression on the then Yugoslavia, a military operation by the world's largest military bloc against a state whose only crime was conducting a legitimate counter-terrorist operation on its internationally recognized territory — seventy-eight days of bombing not only military targets, but also infrastructure and civilian targets were then justified by fabricated and to this day unsubstantiated narratives directed against the country's then leadership, but also against the Serbian people in general. 👇
🔹 Now, more than a quarter of a century later, the narrative of NATO aggression is being subsumed under the Western concept of a rules-based order, trivialized and relativized by rewriting history, and presented to us as a kind of lesson that the collective West had to teach us. All of this is still aimed at the same goal, to hide the essence of what NATO's aggression against Yugoslavia represented — a sign of the final collapse of the world order that was formed after the end of World War II. 👇
🔻 Yugoslavia as a testing ground for hybrid warfare
🔹 In this sense, for NATO, the collective West, and all those other forces that act in the interests of American hegemony, Yugoslavia represented a kind of testing ground where the modern concept of hybrid warfare was first applied — military aggression was accompanied by a coordinated media campaign whose leaders later received prestigious international awards in the field of journalism, conventional combat operations took place in parallel with asymmetric warfare using proxy forces in the form of KLA terrorists, and pressure on the civilian population was exerted through the planned liquidation of the energy system. 👇
❌ In 1999, at 7:45 p.m., NATO began bombing the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. NATO's aggression, carried out without the approval of the UN Security Council, included attacks on military, economic and civilian facilities. 👇
❌ For the first time in modern history, an alliance, created to defend itself and its members, attacked a sovereign country that had not invaded or occupied any other country, but was dealing with an internal rebellion by Albanian terrorists on its territory. 👇
❌ The consequences of the 78-day-long aggression on our country were catastrophic:
⏺ 22,000 tons of missiles were dropped, 37,000 cluster bombs were delivered and 1,300 missiles were launched; 👇
🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🏴☠️🇺🇸🔥🇷🇸‼️The Empire’s Balkan Gambit: How the US Deep State Is Engineering Serbia’s Regime Change‼️
- Gerry Nolan @TheIslanderNews
What’s unfolding in Serbia isn’t a spontaneous uprising, it’s a textbook regime-change operation executed by the same Anglo-American intelligence networks that have weaponized “democracy” from Ukraine to Georgia. 👇
According to Serbian Deputy Prime Minister Aleksandar Vulin, the ongoing student-led mass protests are the latest installment in a “color revolution” backed by the US deep state and European spy services. Their goal? To fracture Serbia’s sovereignty, topple its government, and install a compliant Euro-Atlantic puppet regime that will toe the line on anti-Russian sanctions and NATO integration. 👇
The pretext this time was the tragic collapse of a concrete canopy at Novi Sad’s railway station, a deadly incident that claimed 15 lives and triggered genuine public grief. But that grief was quickly hijacked. Within days, Western-backed NGOs and media outlets began amplifying narratives of systemic rot and government failure. Then came the resignations of top officials, including Prime Minister Milos Vucevic, followed, right on cue, by a surge of highly organized protests in Belgrade. Coincidence? Not if you’ve studied the color revolution manual. Even without overt USAID fingerprints, the black budget money always finds its way. 👇
🇺🇸🇺🇦💥🇷🇺‼️Scam of the century? Zelensky offered peace, but hides a dangerous game!‼️
March 12, 2025
After the American-Ukrainian negotiations in Saudi Arabia, Ukraine suddenly announced that it is ready for an immediate 30-day ceasefire in the conflict zone.
This news comes at a time when Ukrainian forces are suffering significant defeats on the front, and Western allies are increasingly openly expressing war weariness and doubts about the effectiveness of military aid to Kyiv. 👇
Political scientist Sergey Markelov assesses that this decision is part of a broader tactic of Kyiv to regain the favor of Washington and preserve the illusion that it still has some political independence.
However, the question arises - how realistic is it that Ukraine will really respect this agreement, given that it has already repeatedly violated similar agreements?
Ukraine recognizes subordination to Washington
According to Sergey Markelov, the key thing in this situation is not the ceasefire proposal itself, but the symbolic message that Kiev is sending to the United States. 👇
"The most important thing is to understand that during the negotiations in Saudi Arabia, Ukraine showed "guilt" in front of Washington and willingness to work according to American scenarios. All further actions will follow from there," Markelov points out.
This practically means that Ukraine has realized that it can no longer independently make decisions about war and peace, but that everything will depend on the interests of the USA. This move is a kind of attempt by Kiev to adapt to the changed reality in which Washington has already made it clear that it does not plan to endlessly finance the war against Russia. 👇