Aaron Reichlin-Melnick Profile picture
Mar 30, 2025 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
NEW: @ACLU obtained ICE's "Alien Enemies Act Validation Guide," confirming all it takes to be sent to rot in prison in El Salvador is 1) having a tattoo an ICE officer says is a "gang tattoo" and 2) displaying "logos," "symbols," or clothes an ICE officer says are gang signs. Image
Image
Image
In order for ICE to declare someone an "Alien Enemy," ICE must first determine they are a Venezuelan over age 14, and then second find 8 points on a scoring guide they made up.

It's 4 points for having alleged gang tattoos and 4 points for displaying gang "logos" or "symbols." Image
This checklist is shocking. A person can be declared an "Alien Enemy" based ONLY on communications with someone ICE says is a member, and nothing more.

6 points for texting a "known member of TDA" + 3 points for Venmoing or CashApping a "known member" = 9 points = TDA member. Image
One thing on this checklist even violates the AEA proclamation itself -- which applies ONLY to "members" of the gang.

By assigning 10 points to this category, a person who admits to being an "associate" (not the same as a member!) is automatically deemed a member anyway. Image
By far the most terrifying part of this checklist is the "Association" and "Symbolism" section.

Many experts say TdA does NOT use tattoos or gang signs like some other groups. And some of the tattoos ICE claims are "TDA tattoos" are things many innocent people have, like roses. Image
Imagine a guy's roommate is someone ICE says is a TDA member.

- 2 points for "residing" with him
- 2 points for "closely associating" with him
- 2 points for being in a "group photo"
- 2 points for "social media posts" with him.

= 8 points = sent to prison in El Salvador. Image
With this checklist, ICE can declare any Venezuelan an "Alien Enemy" without ANY concrete evidence -- based solely on an ICE officer's interpretation of tattoos and hand signs, or the bad luck of having a roommate ICE thinks is TDA.

This is why due process matters!
One final thing to flag: a person doesn't even need to hit 8 points to be declared a TDA member! The form itself says once a person hits 6 or higher points, a supervisor can sign off and declare the person a TDA member.

So JUST texting someone ICE says is TDA could be enough. Image
The full document is available here: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Adding some more context here: The huge problem with a lot of these is the subjectivity. The document listed above includes an ICE list of what some Tren de Aragua "identifiers" may be.

So wearing a Michael Jordan jersey can get you halfway to being deemed a TDA member! Image
Adding more here on the TdA "gang tattoos" concept.

It turns out that ICE's own internal guidance on what a "TdA tattoo" looks like actually stole random pictures of tattoos off the internet which had nothing to do with Tren de Aragua in the first place.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aaron Reichlin-Melnick

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ReichlinMelnick

Apr 29
Today the Supreme Court hears a case that will decide the fate of over 350,000 people currently living legally in the United States — and impact thousands more who are still in limbo.

So what is Temporary Protected Status and what is the case about? NEW 🧵 on the issue.
Temporary Protected Status was created to deal with the fact that sometimes, due to an outbreak of war, political crisis, or natural disaster, deportation becomes inhumane.

Without a law to address this, presidents responded on an ad hoc basis using inherent executive authority.
Before TPS, Presidents used a thing called "extended voluntary departure" to address these crisis. For example:

- Ford gave EVD to Lebanese in 1976 due to civil war
- Carter gave EVD to Ugandans in 1978 due to civil war
- Reagan gave EVD to Poles in 1981 due to Soviet crackdowns Image
Image
Image
Read 15 tweets
Apr 15
The accused assailant is a British immigrant who became a U.S. citizen in 2022, meaning he got his green card in 2017 or earlier.

The idea that Biden or his policies had anything to do with this is purely inflammatory political messaging divorced from any facts.
From FY 2021 through FY 2024, roughly 3.5 million people became U.S. citizens through naturalization. The idea that Biden is somehow personally responsible if any of them later went on to commit crimes is beyond stupid; it's willfully ignorant and deliberately inflammatory.
Neither @nypost or @DHSgov has EVER blamed Trump for any crimes committed by an immigrant who entered the country or got status under Trump. Not once.

It's because they KNOW it's not a good faith argument.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 11
Wait, sorry, so now the Trump admin is attempting to strip green cards from people just because of who their families are?! And people are cheering this on?
Our government just threw someone in jail because their grandfather was a spokesperson for the Iranian government half a century ago.

We are now openly punishing people for the sins of their ancestors and for no other reasons. We have lost the goddamn plot. Just outrageous.
I don’t think that a child, let alone a grandchild, should be punished for something their parent did and that they had nothing to do with.

That’s a core principle of our society, and something we should not toss aside casually without thinking through the ramifications.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 10
People with DACA came here as children. Every one of them has been here for a minimum 19 years. They grew up here. They went to school here. Many speak English with no accent. They are working legally, paying taxes, doing everything right.

And Trump's ICE is still jailing them.
Because that's not something a President can do. Only Congress can provide a path to permanent legal status for most DACA recipients. And Congress has sat on its ass for years, even though huge majorities of the American public supports the DREAM Act.
In 2018, the Supreme Court said DACA might be legal if it only protected against deportation, not provided work permits. The 5th Circuit, the most conservative in the country, upheld that version and limited their ruling only to Texas (the plaintiff).
Read 21 tweets
Apr 9
SEVEN whole law professors?!?!

Here I was thinking that what mattered was every single judge who has ruled on the issue, 125+ years of accepted understanding of the 14th, and centuries of common law on the contours of jus soli. But if you have SEVEN law professors, man, WOW.
Less sarcastically, this article has a GLARING flaw: dual citizenship. Many children of U.S. citizens acquire foreign citizenship at birth under jus sanguinis and so would not have an "exclusive" allegiance to the US under this theory. That can't be right.
Image
If "exclusive allegiance" is required, then how could that cover Wong Kim Ark himself, who was a dual national?

Hamburger's answer is that U.S. law at the time did not recognize dual nationality. That's a bizarre answer that raises more questions than it answers. Image
Read 8 tweets
Apr 6
The overwhelming majority of Americans (polls show over 80%) oppose the deportation of people like this woman. In every previous administration, including Trump's first, this woman would not have been a priority for enforcement.

What are we doing here? This is wrong.
You can't get a fiancé visa from inside the country, and thanks to failed laws Congress passed 30 years ago, getting a green card through her husband could be either near-impossible or could take 3-5 years minimum. It's not as simple as most people think.
In 1996, Congress said that people wanting to get a green card through a US citizen spouse, who had originally entered illegally, had to leave the US and get a visa, which triggers a 10-year ban on reentry.

Waivers exist, but that process can take years.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(