Dear friends, Germany's Energiewende - the grand plan to go green - is NOT going well⚡️
How bad is it? Can the new government fix it?
Let’s dive into one of the most ambitious (and chaotic) energy transitions in the world. 🧵👇
First, a brief background.
The term Energiewende dates back to the 1980s concept launched by Öko-institute.
The goal?
Phase out oil & nuclear while still growing the economy. Clean energy without more consumption. 🚫⚛️🛢️📈
A bold vision. But what happened?
Fast-forward to today, Energiewende = build renewables, ditch nuclear.
Why? Mostly fallout from Chernobyl and Cold War nuclear fears.
So Germany chose a unique path: no nukes, go green, but... also still use some fossil fuels.
Combine this with a new brand and spirit of environmentalism, and you get Energiewende.
In 1998, German Social Democrats (SPD) under Gerhard Schröder win the election.
By 2000, a deal is made with the Greens: Germany will quit nuclear.
In 2002, it's law. The first reactors close soon after.
The nuclear phase-out is on. 🔌❌⚛️
10 days before the election on 8th september 2005, Schröder approves the construction of Nord Stream 1.
On October 10th, Merkel and the CDU stand victorious.
On november 9th, Schröder accepts the role as president of the Shareholder's committee of Nord Stream AG. Later he will also become the president of Russian oil company Rosneft.
In 2010, Merkel and the CDU delays the phase out - new target, early 2030s instead.
Consensus achieved, nukes will remain online (at least for now)
Then, Fukushima happens.
Election panic. Green sentiment surges in state elections of Baden-Württemberg.
Merkel U-turns hard. The original phase-out plan is back.
Fast forward to 2023:
Germany pulls the plug on its last 3 reactors (after a 3 month extension. ☢️💀
The nuclear era is officially over.
But with nukes gone... how's that whole "clean energy transition" going?
Spoiler: not great.
At its peak, German nuclear plans pumped out over 170 TWh/year.
That's gone now.
Gas use? Up from 54 TWh (2002) to 77 TWh (2024). But at least down from a peak of 95 TWh in 2020.
Gas power plant capacity is booming.
From 20.3 GW to 36.7 GW in 2024. 🔥
(Electricity production from gas is a bit difficult to track, as there is significant "behind the meter generation" in industry. There are also many historical sources, as you can see in the chart on nuclear energy production.)
Electricity consumption is now the lowest since before the Berlin Wall fell. 📉
Let that sink in.
This isn’t just about clean energy - it’s about using less energy overall.
2024 had the lowest fossil-free power production since 2017. Yikes.
Germany is now a net importer of electricity - for the first time since 2002.
2023: 9.2 TWh imports
2024: 24.4 TWh imports
From energy exporter to importer in 6 years.
Since 2017, Germany's total electricity production has dropped by 152 TWh.
That's more than Sweden’s entire consumption.
From 659.3 TWh ➡️ 497.3 TWh (2024)
Let that number sink in 🔌🇩🇪
At the same time, consumption dropped by 78.2 TWh - equal to Finland’s entire power use.
From 599.9 ➡️ 521.7 TWh (2024)
The drop from the 2007 peak (624.3 TWh) is even steeper - That's a decrease of 102.6 TWh 📉
2024 = lowest electricity use since at least 1990.
Exports:
2017 ➡️ +52.5 TWh
2024 ➡️ -24.4 TWh
That’s a swing of 76.9 TWh.
Energiewende was supposed to lead Europe. Instead, Germany is importing more power than ever. ⚡🧲
(Yes, I'm aware the chart says differently, but the source data doesn't match. Please check out for yourself below)
A report from 2023 illustrates the mind blowing potential cost savings of keeping Germany's last reactors running! 🤯
🤑€37 billion in savings for European consumers
🔥60 TWh less fossil gas consumed
🌍35 million tonnes CO2 saved linkedin.com/posts/afry-man…
In Germany alone the effects would be substantial:
- a reduction of 8-23% in power prices
- consumer savings of €13.4 billion
- reduced CO2 emissions of 15 million tCO2 per year. With one single decision.
In February 2025, Germany's power prices jumped to record levels - exceeding energy crisis levels.
At the same time, the share of renewables hit the lowest level since 2022 on low solar and wind. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
This is a very real issue, that will require massive resolve from the new German government to fix.
But what's even worse? Several EU countries are still phasing out nuclear prematurely. Belgium is closing 3 reactors this year, and Spain will do in 2027.
We can't continue with "more of the same, but faster".
We also have to be better, and build smarter.
Addendum:
In 2024, Germans paid the highest electricity prices in the EU.
According to price comparison site Verivox, Germany has some of the highest electricity prices in the world. In 2023, they held the top spot for most expensive electricity globally (last image).
Starting 2024, grid fees rose sharply by 25% after the government failed to finance a €5.5 billion package on grid expansion.
This means an average consumer (4000 kWh consumption) will pay an extra €103 per year. verivox.de/presse/analyse…
Under slutet av september hade de återigen kraftiga pendlingar i spänning (25, 26, 27 och 28 september).
Deras TSO har nu skickat en "nödbegäran" till CNMC (deras motsvarighet till Ei) där de vill få OK på att införa vissa akuta åtgärder.
Kort tråd, källor på slutet 👇
Enligt TSOn kan de kraftiga spänningsvariationerna, även om de ligger inom toleransintervall, leda till att produktion eller konsumtion kan kopplas bort vilket kan leda till en ny blackout.
Detta efter att under flera månader ha prokrastinerat om systemets problem. Nu måste åtgärderna implementeras på 5 dagar.
I en rapport beskriver TSOn orsakerna och vilka åtgärder som behöver vidtas. Där kan man läsa att:
"Systemets utveckling de senaste åren har lett till en ny dynamik, till följd av flera faktorer:
👉Avsevärd tillväxt i anläggningar som är ansluta via kraftelektronik (aka sol- och vindkraft) med hög koncentration av dessa anläggningar i vissa områden. Dessa anläggningar kan justera deras effekt på ett par sekunder, i praktiken i "steg".
👉Genom att dessa anläggningar deltar allt mer aktivt i olika balansmarknader ökar sannolikheten för stora variationer i produktion.
👉Dessa anläggningar justerar inte spänning kontinuerligt. Det har observerats att en stor andel av dessa anslutna producenter med kontinuerlig spänningskontroll inte har tillräckligt snabb responstid givet de stora dynamiska variationer som man har uppmätt under de senaste dagarna.
I TV4 Nyhetsmorgon försöker @amandalind_ med lite historierevisionism genom att påstå att MP inte drev fram stängningar av kärnkraft.
Det är en helt bisarr lögn som är mycket enkel att motbevisa.
Här kommer en liten redogörelse
👇
1️⃣ MP gick till val 2014 med lfötet att flera reaktorer skulle stängas.
2️⃣ Det var då, sedan åtminstone 2002, en uttalad strategi från MP att detta skulle åstadkommas genom att höja kostnaderna för kärnkraft och subventionera alternativen. Det framgår tydligt av en rad källor.
3️⃣ Efter valet nådde MP och S en överenskommelse med det tydligt uttalade målet att flera reaktorer skulle stängas.
4️⃣ Effektskatten och avfallsavgiften höjdes samtidigt som stora stöd betalades ut till förnybart. Skatten utgjorde efter höjningen 20-30% av produktionskostnaden.
Ovanligt höga elpriser idag - men vad beror det på?
Bra inslag hos @sverigesradio, men missar flera viktiga aspekter.
En kort tråd som botemedel för eventuella miljöpartister och centerpartister ni råkar stöta på.
Eller för all del en nyansering av att "kraftsystemet är stabilt" som det talats mycket om på senare tid.
🧵👇
Först en överblick:
💸Över 2 kr i SE3 och SE4 mellan kl 19 och 20 är verkligen högt för slutet av augusti. Liknande situation igår och i förrgår mellan 19 och 21.
⚛️3 reaktorer (hälften av samtliga) ur drift
🌬️vindkraften levererar i princip noll i hela landet
🔥Öresundsverket tillfälligt ur drift pga oplanerat underhåll.
⚡️Under flera timmar i morse importerade vi motsvarande en halv reaktor.
Men bakom den här överblicken gömmer sig betydligt mer.
Att kärnkraft har underhållsperioder, både planerade och oplanerade, är inget nytt.
Det som däremot är lite nytt (nåja, sedan ~5 år tillbaka) är den dramatiska påverkan på kraftsystemet och följdverkningar på kostnader.
MUST READ 🧐
German heavy industry emphasises the need for more competitive energy prices in strongly worded letter to Chancellor Merz:
"If the energy transition is an open-heart operation on our economy, as is sometimes said, then this operation has so far been a complete failure. We must admit: The patient is in danger of dying on the operating table.
PV and wind have been legally privileged and subsidized for 35 years. However, their contribution to security of supply is no greater today, than three decades ago.
In return, they generate grid costs in the hundreds of billions.
The dual phase-out of nuclear power and coal has made Germany dependent on unreliable PV and wind power and expensive gas imports. We are paying the price with the highest electricity prices in Europe. Our electricity supply has never been so expensive and insecure."
My own translation of the last three paragraphs.
"Wenn die Energiewende eine Operation am offenen Herzen unserer Volkswirtschaft ist,
wie manchmal gesagt wird, dann ist diese Operation bislang gründlich misslungen. Wir
müssen feststellen: Der Patient droht, auf dem OP-Tisch zu sterben.
Seit 35 Jahren werden PV und Wind gesetzlich privilegiert und gefördert. Sie leisten jedoch
bis heute keinen größeren Beitrag zur Versorgungssicherheit als vor drei Jahrzehnten.
Dafür verursachen sie Netzkosten im dreistelligen Milliardenbereich.
Der Doppelausstieg aus Kernenergie und Kohle hat Deutschland abhängig gemacht von unzuverlässigem PV- und Windstrom und teuren Gasimporten. Die Zeche zahlen wir mit den europaweit höchsten Strompreisen. Noch nie war unsere Stromversorgung so teuer
und unsicher."
The entire text translated (and yes, the all caps words are from the letter) 👇
"It's 5 past 12 - so we need industrial jobs NOW!
Dear Chancellor,
we are in the midst of the worst economic crisis since the Second World War. Last year alone, at least 100,000 industrial jobs were eliminated without replacement. The political promises of the last federal government for a "green economic miracle" are nothing but smoke and mirrors. The reality is that never before have so many good jobs been threatened as today.
In Germany alone, well over a million people work in energy-intensive industries. Most of them work in the IGBCE and IG Metall sectors. We therefore need an Industrial and Economic Agenda 2030 NOW!
We need innovations and investments for decent jobs and for livable regions. We don't want lordly subsidies, but reasonable framework conditions so that decent work and added value have a future in Germany again.
While the complaints about paralyzing bureaucracy and delayed digitalization are valid, it is also true that German energy policy, in particular, has developed into one of the most dangerous risks to our location and economy.
If the energy transition is an open-heart operation on our economy, as is sometimes said, then this operation has so far failed miserably. We must admit that the patient is in danger of dying on the operating table.
For 35 years, PV and wind have been legally privileged and subsidized. However, to this day, they have made no greater contribution to security of supply than they did three decades ago. In return, they incur grid costs in the hundreds of billions.
The dual phase-out of nuclear power and coal has made Germany dependent on unreliable PV and wind power and expensive gas imports. We are paying the price with the highest electricity prices in Europe. Our electricity supply has never been so expensive and insecure.
We demand:
➢ Electricity prices must become internationally competitive again for the economy and especially for industry. We need an industrial electricity price of 5 cents/kWh. And this industrial electricity price must not be further inflated by political CO2 costs or burdened with excessive requirements.
➢ Permanent, complete exemption from transmission charges for electricity-intensive production, continuation of the relief under Section 19.2 of the Electricity New Energy Ordinance (StromNEV), and free connection to the electricity infrastructure with the required capacity.
➢ No further burdens on industry's own electricity supply. Industrial electricity grids and CHP self-generated electricity are important economic assets and location factors that must be strengthened in international competition.
➢ Instead of further advance payments from Germany and Europe in climate protection, we expect a clear link to be established: all relevant countries worldwide must commit to the same efforts.
➢ Protection of industry from the special burdens of the EU ETS through an effective CBAM that includes exports, excludes circumvention, and expands the product range in line with the actual competitive situation.
➢ Upgrading and modernizing foreign trade protection through a fundamental revision of the EU's existing anti-dumping and anti-subsidy instruments, particularly with regard to China.
➢ Fundamental revision of the German hydrogen strategy with the aim of pragmatic and realistic requirements for technology and targets. In the realistic event that European and international "green lead markets" cannot be implemented in the near future, competitive alternatives to H2 must be made possible.
➢ Immediate adoption of an investment-friendly legislative package to enable CCU/S, including government risk protection and infrastructure investments without technical or industry-specific selection.
Några kommentarer som SVTs dokumentär "Slaget om kärnkraften"
1️⃣ Jag minns när Kåberger hittade på om påtvingade aborter på missbildade foster efter Fukushima. Detta är totalt påhittat. Inga sådana hälsoeffekter från strålning har kunnat påvisas.