Dear friends, Germany's Energiewende - the grand plan to go green - is NOT going well⚡️
How bad is it? Can the new government fix it?
Let’s dive into one of the most ambitious (and chaotic) energy transitions in the world. 🧵👇
First, a brief background.
The term Energiewende dates back to the 1980s concept launched by Öko-institute.
The goal?
Phase out oil & nuclear while still growing the economy. Clean energy without more consumption. 🚫⚛️🛢️📈
A bold vision. But what happened?
Fast-forward to today, Energiewende = build renewables, ditch nuclear.
Why? Mostly fallout from Chernobyl and Cold War nuclear fears.
So Germany chose a unique path: no nukes, go green, but... also still use some fossil fuels.
Combine this with a new brand and spirit of environmentalism, and you get Energiewende.
In 1998, German Social Democrats (SPD) under Gerhard Schröder win the election.
By 2000, a deal is made with the Greens: Germany will quit nuclear.
In 2002, it's law. The first reactors close soon after.
The nuclear phase-out is on. 🔌❌⚛️
10 days before the election on 8th september 2005, Schröder approves the construction of Nord Stream 1.
On October 10th, Merkel and the CDU stand victorious.
On november 9th, Schröder accepts the role as president of the Shareholder's committee of Nord Stream AG. Later he will also become the president of Russian oil company Rosneft.
In 2010, Merkel and the CDU delays the phase out - new target, early 2030s instead.
Consensus achieved, nukes will remain online (at least for now)
Then, Fukushima happens.
Election panic. Green sentiment surges in state elections of Baden-Württemberg.
Merkel U-turns hard. The original phase-out plan is back.
Fast forward to 2023:
Germany pulls the plug on its last 3 reactors (after a 3 month extension. ☢️💀
The nuclear era is officially over.
But with nukes gone... how's that whole "clean energy transition" going?
Spoiler: not great.
At its peak, German nuclear plans pumped out over 170 TWh/year.
That's gone now.
Gas use? Up from 54 TWh (2002) to 77 TWh (2024). But at least down from a peak of 95 TWh in 2020.
Gas power plant capacity is booming.
From 20.3 GW to 36.7 GW in 2024. 🔥
(Electricity production from gas is a bit difficult to track, as there is significant "behind the meter generation" in industry. There are also many historical sources, as you can see in the chart on nuclear energy production.)
Electricity consumption is now the lowest since before the Berlin Wall fell. 📉
Let that sink in.
This isn’t just about clean energy - it’s about using less energy overall.
2024 had the lowest fossil-free power production since 2017. Yikes.
Germany is now a net importer of electricity - for the first time since 2002.
2023: 9.2 TWh imports
2024: 24.4 TWh imports
From energy exporter to importer in 6 years.
Since 2017, Germany's total electricity production has dropped by 152 TWh.
That's more than Sweden’s entire consumption.
From 659.3 TWh ➡️ 497.3 TWh (2024)
Let that number sink in 🔌🇩🇪
At the same time, consumption dropped by 78.2 TWh - equal to Finland’s entire power use.
From 599.9 ➡️ 521.7 TWh (2024)
The drop from the 2007 peak (624.3 TWh) is even steeper - That's a decrease of 102.6 TWh 📉
2024 = lowest electricity use since at least 1990.
Exports:
2017 ➡️ +52.5 TWh
2024 ➡️ -24.4 TWh
That’s a swing of 76.9 TWh.
Energiewende was supposed to lead Europe. Instead, Germany is importing more power than ever. ⚡🧲
(Yes, I'm aware the chart says differently, but the source data doesn't match. Please check out for yourself below)
A report from 2023 illustrates the mind blowing potential cost savings of keeping Germany's last reactors running! 🤯
🤑€37 billion in savings for European consumers
🔥60 TWh less fossil gas consumed
🌍35 million tonnes CO2 saved linkedin.com/posts/afry-man…
In Germany alone the effects would be substantial:
- a reduction of 8-23% in power prices
- consumer savings of €13.4 billion
- reduced CO2 emissions of 15 million tCO2 per year. With one single decision.
In February 2025, Germany's power prices jumped to record levels - exceeding energy crisis levels.
At the same time, the share of renewables hit the lowest level since 2022 on low solar and wind. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
This is a very real issue, that will require massive resolve from the new German government to fix.
But what's even worse? Several EU countries are still phasing out nuclear prematurely. Belgium is closing 3 reactors this year, and Spain will do in 2027.
We can't continue with "more of the same, but faster".
We also have to be better, and build smarter.
Addendum:
In 2024, Germans paid the highest electricity prices in the EU.
According to price comparison site Verivox, Germany has some of the highest electricity prices in the world. In 2023, they held the top spot for most expensive electricity globally (last image).
Starting 2024, grid fees rose sharply by 25% after the government failed to finance a €5.5 billion package on grid expansion.
This means an average consumer (4000 kWh consumption) will pay an extra €103 per year. verivox.de/presse/analyse…
Denna debattartikel har fått stor uppmärksamhet, särskilt från oppositionen som lägger fram den som något slags "facit".
Det är synd, för artikeln förvirrar mer än den förklarar.
Här kommer en tråd om energipolitisk historia
🧵👇
Med risk för att låta asdryg - som Energipolitiskt Överintresserad Person (EÖP, vi får kanske jobba på namnet lite😆) är det alltid kul att prata energipolitisk historia.
Här ett urval från bokhyllan.
Utöver flera av dessa skulle jag rekommendera Mats Bladhs "Vägskäl i svensk energihistoria : den ena omställningen efter den andra".
En rad missuppfattningar och direkta felaktigheter har fått fäste både bland oppositionens politiker och bland flera journalister och ledarskribenter.
Nivån i energidebatten MÅSTE vara bättre än så här, så jag gör ett försök.
Dags för en MEGAtråd om energi - specifikt om el.
Man kan sammanfatta Sveriges olika mål på energiområdet (och klimat) som att vi ska bli världens första fossilfria, industrialiserade välfärdsnation.
Det är tre ganska viktiga ord - som var för sig inte är särskilt svåra att uppnå men som tillsammans är svåra att uppnå.
Våra myndigheter Svk och STEM (och många andra aktörer) har tagit fram en rad olika scenarier för hur det här kan gå till - där elektrifiering är nyckeln till att stärka vår konkurrenskraft, vår försörjningstrygghet och för att fasa ut fossila bränslen för klimatomställningen.
Ska detta läsas som ett bevis på okunskap eller ett skamlöst försök till historierevisionism?
Låt oss gå igenom påståendena i denna fullständigt bisarra ledartext signerat @LibyTroein.
👇🧵 dn.se/ledare/martin-…
Till att börja med - S har sedan 2014 fullständigt kapitulerat energipolitiken till Mp.
S energiministrar (Baylan, Ygeman och Farmanbar) fick ägna sig åt nödlösningar för att rädda konsekvenserna - t.ex. "lex Ygeman" där mångmiljardbelopp räddade Stockholm och Skåne.
Eftersom DN var den enda tidning som alls lyckades täcka detta haveri till energipolitik är det mycket märkligt att S förs fram som "räddarna".
Många frågor och upprörda röster om dagens presskonferens.
Mest spännande är kanske att nästan lika många verkar upprörda över att Poseidon får grönt ljus som det är upprörda röster över att 13 vindkraftparker stoppas.
🧵👇
Låt oss prata lite havsbaserad vindkraft! 🌬️⚡️🌊