Start with any triangle and draw equilateral triangles on each side. Then connect the centroids of the added triangles. The resulting triangle will be equilateral.
🧵 1/n
The added triangles don't have to face outward. They could also face inward, though this makes a messier image.
2/n
Napolean's theorem starts with an arbitrary triangle and adds equilateral triangles on the sides.
So a natural question is what happens if you start with a quadrilateral and draw squares on each side. If you connect the centers of the squares, do you get a square?
3/n
No, but Van Aubel’s theorem says that if you connect the centers of squares on opposite faces of the quadrilateral (dashed lines below), the two line segments are the same length and perpendicular to each other.
4/n
There is another variation on Napolean's theorem discovered recently. It takes a little more than 280 characters to state, so I'll link to the statement. You can get an idea of the theorem from the illustration.
The error in approximating the perimeter of an ellipse increases with the eccentricity of the ellipse for every practical approximation as far as I know.
🧵 1/n
I say practical because here's a useless approximation that is exact in the limit as eccentricity goes to infinity:
perimeter ≈ 4 * semi-major axis
You wouldn't want to use this approximation on, say, the orbit of a planet.
2/n
Here's my favorite approximation for the perimeter of an ellipse with semi-major axis a and semi-minor axis b:
A polyhedron is called harmonic if the number of vertices is the harmonic mean of the number of edges and faces.
🧵 1/n
The notion of a harmonic polyhedron goes back to Philolaus (c. 470 – c. 385 BC). Philolaus was a Pythagorean, as depicted in the medieval woodcut below.
2/n
You could call the definition of harmonic polyhedron above vertex-harmonic, and call a polyhedron face-harmonic if the number of faces is the harmonic mean of the number of vertices and faces.
3/n
What is the significance of the number 10^10^10^34?
🧵 1/n
The number 10^10^10^34 is known as Skewes' number. When Skewes defined this number in 1933 it was the largest "useful" number that had been defined. What was it useful for?
2/n
It has to do with the prime number theorem.
The function π(x) is the number of primes less than or equal to x. The prime number theorem says that π(x) is asymptotically equal to li(x).