🇷🇺🇺🇦🧵Something’s off about Bucha, Ukraine, April 2022. The official story blames Russia, yet the timeline wavers, bodies shift, and questions linger. Staged scenes? Blocked debates? Unseen satellite shots?
Dive into the weirdness and decide for yourself. 👇
1) Peace Before the Storm?
Russian troops occupied Bucha from early March. Some suggest life went on, with claims of interactions like sharing food. Why the sudden shift to mass murders just before leaving?
2) Satellite Trickery
Skepticism about Maxar satellite images showing bodies from mid-March is understandable. Photos can theoretically be edited with Photoshop, and since Maxar satellites only work on assignment, who gave the order and why exactly then?
3) Maxar’s Pentagon Pals
Maxar, the satellite imagery provider, is a major U.S. Defense Department contractor, supplying 90% of its geospatial intel. Could their ties bias what they chose to snap over Bucha?
4) Ukrainian Shelling
Ukrainian forces shelled Bucha’s southern edge with artillery and tanks, even after the Russians left. Who caused the real damage here?
5) Peace Talks Sabotaged
The Bucha incident surfaced right after Russia-Ukraine peace talks in Turkey, with Russian withdrawal from Kyiv areas as a goodwill gesture. Was it staged to derail negotiations?
6) The Silent Mayor
Bucha’s mayor, Anatoliy Fedoruk, made a video on March 31, 2022, after the Russian withdrawal. He speaks optimistically about liberation and mentions no bodies on the streets. This is often cited as suspicious since the atrocities only surfaced widely on April 1-2.
7) Azov on the Hunt
There are videos of Ukrainian units, possibly including Azov, moving through Bucha after the Russian withdrawal. In one, a soldier says something like: “Can we shoot those without blue armbands?” and the answer is confirmative.
8) Staged Corpses
A video circulates showing Ukrainian soldiers seemingly moving bodies, which some interpret as evidence of staging. The question is: why would they do that?
9) Evidence Delayed
Images of bodies only appeared on April 3, four days after Russian troops left Bucha, when Ukrainian forces and media arrived. Why the gap if the killings happened earlier?
10) Satellite Timing Unraveled
The New York Times claims Maxar images from March 19 show bodies, but some analyses question the timing, suggesting a later date like April 1, after Russians were gone. When were these really taken?
11) Too Neatly Arranged
All photographed bodies lay on or along the street, neatly ordered. In a real massacre, people flee, you’d expect bodies in houses, gardens, or alleys. This looks too structured, as if placed for the camera.
12) Body Positions Shifted
Photos show bodies moved: one with a bag near the head on the road, later shifted to the sidewalk; another spot had three bodies, then only two. Why the changes?
13) Props Missing
A red bank card near a body’s elbow in one photo vanishes in others, later appearing with more cards farther away. Were these staged props?
14) Fresh Corpses
The bodies showed no rigor mortis, pallor, or coagulated blood, suggesting they died after the Russians left, not during their occupation.
15) White Armbands
The bodies wore white armbands, a Russian sign for civilians. Were these people Ukraine saw as collaborators and executed?
16) Maxar’s Missing Frames
On April 6, Maxar refused to sell images from March 19-23, only offering shots from March 31, after the Russians left. Why hide the earlier ones?
17) Ursula’s Performance
Ursula von der Leyen visited Bucha on April 8, 2022, over a week after the Russian withdrawal and days after the mass killing reports. Her shocked reaction was widely publicized, but if the bodies were no longer openly on the streets, why such a dramatic theatrical response?
18) Who Were the Dead?
Ukraine released no detailed victim list. Hundreds dead, but who were they? Transparency would bolster their case. Its absence suggests the identity or origin of the dead hides something.
Flechettes, tiny metal darts, turned up in Bucha, tied to Russian shells. But why would they bombard a town they controlled? What’s the catch? archive.is/HTpN9
End of thread as for now, I may add additional interesting posts though.
Just a reminder for X, I asked Grok if it is safe to post this.
One of the most revealing images is this. That mortar grenade came from the south (Irpin, Azov) and hit the very street full of bodies with Russian green food bags and white stripes. The green fence is telling you what happend there.
- Michael Kobs
Beaten Witness?
French journalist Adrien Bocquet claimed Ukrainians staged Bucha, unloading bodies for the cameras. Weeks later, he was nearly beaten to death in France. Why silence him?
"Hey all, my thread 'Bucha Unmasked' broke! Deleted a comment under 12, and X glitched, cutting it off there. Had to rebuild from 13 on. Sorry for any confusion with bookmarks, reposts, or lost reads, blame X’s shaky thread magic!"
🇺🇦🧵Why Ukraine's "Bucha Massacre" Story Isn't Adding Up
🧵 NATO: Defense Pact or Global Enforcer?
The 1999 Yugoslavia Lie.
1/9 Think NATO’s just a cozy defense club? Think again. In 1999, they bombed Yugoslavia for 78 days, no attack on NATO soil, no UN approval, just raw aggression. They sold it as “saving lives,” but was it really about power, expansion, and rewriting the rules? Here’s the story 👇
2/9 - How It Started: The Official Story
On March 24, 1999, NATO launched Operation Allied Force, a 78-day bombing campaign against Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro). The excuse? Stopping a humanitarian crisis, ethnic cleansing, and potential genocide by Serbian forces against Kosovar Albanians in Kosovo.
After failed talks at Rambouillet, where Slobodan Milošević rejected NATO troops on his soil, events like the Račak Massacre (45 Albanians killed) were hyped as proof of escalating violence. NATO called it a “humanitarian war,” with U.S. officials like Madeleine Albright claiming genocide was underway, and William Cohen hinting at 100,000 dead Albanian men.
🧵 Thread: Mark Rutte as NATO head? A disgrace to integrity.
1) The Rise of a Scandal-Plagued Leader
Mark Rutte, Dutch PM, is now NATO’s next leader. A man buried buried in scandals, caught lying repeatedly, yet always clinging to power. How does someone with this track record land one of the world’s most critical roles?
Let’s take a look
2) The Devastating Benefits Scandal
Start with the Benefits Scandal (Toeslagenaffaire). In 2021, Rutte’s government fell after over 20,000 parents were falsely accused of childcare fraud. A merciless tax system he oversaw mislabeled them as cheats, demanding repayments they couldn’t afford – often tens of thousands of euros. Families went bankrupt, homes were lost, and the trauma didn’t stop there. In the worst cases, children were forcibly removed from parents because the financial ruin was deemed “neglect.” Imagine: a mother or father, already crushed by debt they didn’t owe, watching their kids taken away by the state – all because of a bureaucratic nightmare Rutte’s administration let fester. He offered a half-hearted apology, then sailed back into power after elections.
1) Zelensky didn’t win with political skills. A TV series and a cunning oligarch catapulted him to power. Wild, huh? Thread below spills the insane details!
2) Ever wonder how a comedian became Ukraine’s president? It wasn’t talent in politics! It was a genius TV plot.
Here’s how it unfolded… 👇
3) Imagine a world where a TV star steps out of a fictional role and into the real life presidency of a nation. This isn’t a far fetched fantasy, it’s the astonishing story of how Volodymyr Zelensky became the President of Ukraine, thanks to a brilliantly unconventional strategy that required no traditional political skills. Instead, it was a wildly clever blend of entertainment and politics, orchestrated by a savvy oligarch and fueled by a hit television series.
🇸🇾🧵 HTS Hell: Syria’s Brutal Truth Unleashed
Forgot the day HTS stormed Syria and the pathetic West cheered, flooding streets with flags, celebrating the fall of Assad’s so called 'dictatorship'?
Let’s shove it in their faces with a (running) thread exposing every last atrocity
🇸🇾🧵Do we not recall how the West took the vilest terrorist scum on earth, slapped a “moderate rebels” label on them, and rolled out the red carpet - suits and all - for these monsters to shake hands with their slimy politicians?
🇸🇾🧵 Jolani terrorists chase a man down while smiling before gunning him down .
“You aren’t dead yet?” They say before putting more bullets in him.
- Syrian girl
🇵🇸🇮🇱🧵 To those who still believe October 7th was unexpected or unrelated to Netanyahu’s agenda, here's a thread.
1) I urge you to reconsider.
History teaches us that political leaders often exploit crises to advance their goals.
Let’s examine the facts, ask uncomfortable questions, and connect the dots that mainstream narratives ignore.
2) The Border Security Paradox
Israel’s Gaza border is one of the most militarized in the world: surveillance drones, thermal cameras, underground sensors, and a $1 billion “smart wall.” Yet, on October 7th, this system collapsed entirely.
For 4-8 hours, there was no IDF response as Hamas breached the border at 15 points.
- Question:
How does a state with one of the world’s most advanced intelligence agencies (Mossad) and a military touted as “invincible” fail to detect or intercept a large-scale attack?
- Context:
In 2021, the IDF intercepted Hamas drones and tunnels in real time. Why was there zero operational readiness this time?
🇷🇺🇺🇦🧵 Der Krieg in der Ukraine: Ein historischer Kontext und Analyse.
Der Thread taucht in historischen Kontext, wichtige Ereignisse, Perspektiven zum Krieg in der Ukraine, von dem sowjetischen Erbe und den Dynamiken des Kalten Krieges bis zum Putsch 2014, gescheiterten Friedensbemühungen, Sprachpolitiken und Vorwürfen ausländischer Einmischung.
Ein kurzer Überblick:
- Zweiter Weltkrieg: Sowjetopfer und Einfluss auf aktuelle geopolitische Beziehungen.
- Kalter Krieg: NATO-Erweiterung und gebrochene Versprechen.
- 2014: Frühe Anzeichen des Krieges, Putsch und westliche Einmischung.
- Anti-Terror: Bürgerkrieg in der Ostukraine.
- Minsk: Gescheiterte Friedensabkommen.
- 2022: Sabotierter Friedensvertrag.
- NordStream: Mögliche US-Beteiligung an der Sabotage.
- Profiteure: Geopolitische Konsequenzen und wirtschaftliche Vorteile.
- Sprachpolitik: Versuche und Erfolge beim Verbot der russischen Sprache.
- Verantwortung: Vielschichtige Perspektiven zu Ursachen und Schuld.
Lesen Sie weiter für eine eingehende Analyse der komplexen Situation in der Ukraine, wo historischer Kontext, geopolitische Spannungen und lokale Dynamiken zusammenkommen, um eine umfassende Perspektive auf den Krieg zu bieten.