Aaron Bandler Profile picture
Apr 2 9 tweets 4 min read Read on X
My latest in @JewishJournal: 🧵

An event featuring two former Israel Defense Force (IDF) lone soldiers was cut short due to security concerns posed by anti-Israel protesters at CSU San Marcos (CSUSM) in North San Diego County on March 25. Image
The event was hosted by the university’s Students Supporting Israel (SSI) chapter and was part of SSI’s “Triggered, the Tour: From Combat to Campus” featuring IDF soldiers speaking at 25 campuses across the United States and Canada. The two soldiers who spoke at CSUSM had both served in the ongoing Israel-Hamas war, according to a post on the SSI chapter’s Instagram page. Hillel San Diego Executive Director Karen Parry wrote in a March 27 letter to community members that “Hillel staff supported student organizers and worked with the University to confirm that safety measures were in place.  We had received information prior to the event that several external non-student organizations as well as on-campus student organizations were leading a protest to seek canceling the event.”
According to Parry, the event itself began without incident, as “police created a blockade to prevent protesters from physically disrupting.” As the event went on, anti-Israel protesters could be heard “screaming and attempting to get a police reaction outside,” which Parry said was “disruptive” and intimidated attendees. Miriam Gershenson, an Israeli-American writer, wrote in the San Diego Jewish World on March 26 that she and her husband attended the event and that one of the organizers said “that they deal with this on a weekly basis.” At one point, an organizer commented on the “hundreds of protestors” surrounding the building. “I’m not sure if this was an exaggeration or a fact. We didn’t really see the protestors,” Gershenson said. She added there was a police presence which she presumed kept people away from getting too close to the building and when they were evacuated from the back to avoid the protestors. “So, we never had a clear visual of the amount of protestors.”
About 15 minutes before the event was scheduled to conclude, the university “abruptly called for the event to end and directed the 32 attendees to evacuate, citing an inability to maintain the security perimeter,” wrote Parry. “Police escorted students through a back exit of the space to cars that drove people to safety.” Gershenson also noted that the evacuation involved “having us in groups of four leave from the back door and to be driven to the parking lot where our cars were parked.”
Parry wrote that “while we appreciate the critical support provided by the San Diego Sheriff’s Department, CSUSM Police Department, and the administration in maintaining safety, we are deeply concerned and disappointed that Jewish students didn’t have freedom of expression for the entirety of their event … Together with our partners at Leichtag Foundation and in coordination with our partners at the Jewish Federation, we immediately met with senior administrators to discuss proactive next steps. We are grateful for CSUSM’s commitment to this work.”
Parry urged the administration to issue a statement “about this incident that reiterates their commitment to protecting the safety of Jewish students while upholding their right to gather peacefully in keeping with university policies and committing to take action to ensure this does not happen in the future” as well as to investigate what happened and follow through with “their commitment to establish an antisemitism task force that reflects the expertise and appropriate representation of our Jewish community and participate in Hillel’s Campus Climate Initiative as planned.”
Eliana Levinson, a third-year Jewish student at the university studying Child and Adolescent Development, told The Journal, “Overall the event was a great learning experience for all sides.” The event, she said, was great until it wasn’t. “We had the amazing opportunity to meet with two American lone IDF soldiers to learn their experience about what is going on.” But suddenly, she said, they hear the sounds of anti-Israel, pro-Hamas protestors. “It was scary, I was gripping onto my mom’s hand. I understand free speech, but free speech is not trying to enter a building where a peaceful event is going on.” She contended that the event “should’ve been more secure, we shouldn’t have had to be evacuated out a back door. We are having a meeting with administrators after spring break and I think that will be good for us to have an in person discussion about the safety of Jews on campus because I feel like we are not safe. Something needs to change.”
The university said in a statement to The Journal, “California State University San Marcos cares deeply about our students and is disheartened that those who participated in the Students Supporting Israel event experienced disruption and distress. We want to acknowledge the impact that last week’s events had on attendees and recognize the importance of ensuring that all students feel safe and supported when engaging in campus activities. We are also committed to upholding everyone’s rights to lawful free expression on our campus, even when deeply held, opposing viewpoints are present. Striking this balance is not always easy, but it is essential for a public institution. CSUSM staff and law enforcement partners worked extremely hard to ensure that Students Supporting Israel (SSI) could hold their event safely and exercise their and their invited speakers’ right to free speech and free expression.

“We will be reviewing the incident and are committed to learning from it and taking necessary actions to strengthen our campus community. As a learning institution, we always want to improve and strive to foster a respectful and inclusive campus environment. We are also committed to work with our campus and our community as we move forward.”
Link to the full story here: jewishjournal.com/news/380373/ev…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aaron Bandler

Aaron Bandler Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bandlersbanter

Apr 3
This week's Campus Watch in @JewishJournal: 🧵

UCLA Indefinitely Bans SJP
UCLA has issued a preliminary ban for the campus Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) chapter and a preliminary four-year suspension for the Graduate Students for Justice in Palestine (GSJP) chapter on March 28.

Back in February, Chancellor Julio Frenk announced that the two student groups were suspended after “individuals affiliated with the student groups harassed Mr. Sures and members of his family outside his home” and that “individuals vandalized the Sures home by applying red-colored handprints to the outer walls of the home and hung banners on the property’s hedges.” The Los Angeles Times reported that the student groups can appeal the decision, which has not yet been finalized. Additionally, the Times noted that the sanctions “do not prevent them from protesting on campus. As a public institution, limited parts of UCLA’s grounds are open to anybody to demonstrate at most times of day. But the moves prevent the organizations from registering for campus event space, applying for student activities funds and otherwise representing themselves as UCLA organizations.”

The university said in a statement, “UCLA is committed to fostering an environment where all students can live and learn freely and peacefully … We will continue to uphold our policies to ensure UCLA remains a safe and respectful learning environment for all members of our Bruin community.”Image
Katrina Armstrong Resigns as Columbia President
Katrina Armstrong resigned from her position as president of Columbia University on March 28.

The university announced that Armstrong will be leading the Irving Medical Center at the university; Claire Shipman, the co-chair of the university’s Board of Trustees, will be taking over as the interim president. Armstrong’s resignation comes after reports from The Free Press and Washington Free Beacon came out stating that Armstrong told faculty members privately that the agreement with the Trump administration’s demands to address campus antisemitism wouldn’t change much on campus; per the reports, Armstrong told faculty that there would be no ban on masking or change in admissions procedures despite both being demands from the administration. Provost Angela Olinto also reportedly told faculty that the school’s Middle East, South Asian and African Studies department would not be under an “academic receivership” for five years despite that also being a demand from the administration. The agreement was part of an effort to begin talks for the administration to restore $400 million in funding to Columbia.

“Dr. Armstrong accepted the role of interim president at a time of great uncertainty for the University and worked tirelessly to promote the interests of our community,” Board of Trustees Chair David Greenwald said in a statement. “Katrina has always given her heart and soul to Columbia. We appreciate her service and look forward to her continued contributions to the University.”
New Columbia President Reportedly Referred to Congressional Hearings on Campus Antisemitism “Nonsense”
Claire Shipman, the new interim of Columbia University, reportedly referred to the congressional hearings on campus antisemitism as being “nonsense.”

According to Fox News and The New York Post, Shipman wrote in a Dec. 2023 text message to then-University President Minouche Shafik that a New York Times article stating at the time that the school handled anti-Israel protests better than other Ivy League universities “heavily inoculates us for a while from the capital [sic] hill nonsense and threat.” The purported text was discovered in a 325-page House Committee on Education and the Workforce report in October. She also reportedly wrote in a text to Shafik at the time that “we should think about unsuspending the groups before semester starts to take the wind out of that,” referring to anti-Israel groups that the committee report claimed violated university policy with the protests. A university spokesperson told Fox News, “We are focused on doing what is right and honoring our commitments to create a Columbia community where students are safe and able to flourish.”
Read 5 tweets
Apr 2
My latest in @JewishJournal: 🧵

Michael Kaminsky, a third-year student at DePaul University, a private Catholic school in Chicago, spoke to me on March 1 about when he and another Jewish student were assaulted in November while tabling for Israel. Kaminsky, a @StandWithUs Emerson Fellow, was an attending the 2025 StandWithUs International Conference at the Hilton Los Angeles Airport and spoke to me there.Image
“On Nov. 6, 2024, myself and another student, who’s also an IDF [Israel Defense Force] reservist, were tabling for Israel,” he said. “We do this every single week on Wednesdays right around 1-3 pm on our campus trying to engage people in conversation about Israel, about misconceptions that people might have about the Jewish people or about Israel. And two people wearing ski masks physically attacked us. One person came from the front and was talking to us simply to distract us, while another person came from behind and started the assault. They battered us, and then eventually got up [and] ran away. We were left with pretty harsh injuries.”

Kaminsky, a tall, thin but solidly built 22-year old whose left arm was in a black sling at the time of the interview, said he suffered a wrist injury from the assault. He was recovering from an operation the previous week that required stitches. The other assaulted student, who has been publicly identified as Max Long, suffered a “pretty bad concussion and some other head injuries,” according to Kaminsky. “To this day, no one’s been arrested.”
Kaminsky claimed that there was a public safety officer — a person of color — who watched the attack unfold from “a few feet away” and didn’t do anything until the assailants left. “I ask myself, if I was a person of color, would this guy resemble more with me because he could see himself in my shoes?” Kaminsky said. “He knew that I was Jewish because we were there every single week, he knew that we were Zionist, and is it because of that he decided not to act? That’s a question that remains unanswered.”
Read 9 tweets
Mar 25
My latest on @Wikipedia in @JewishJournal: 🧵

Wikipedia editors decided to blacklist The Heritage Foundation’s website after a report came out that the conservative think tank is working on a plan to unmask various editors that the think tank believes are promulgating antisemitic content on Wikipedia.Image
The Forward reported in January that it had obtained documents purportedly outlining Heritage’s plan to “identify and target” the editors, which included the use of “facial recognition software and a database of hacked usernames and passwords in order to identify contributors to the online encyclopedia… The Heritage Foundation sent the pitch deck outlining the Wikipedia initiative to Jewish foundations and other prospective supporters of Project Esther, its roadmap for fighting antisemitism and anti-Zionism. ” A spokesperson for Heritage told The Forward that they couldn’t comment on the matter. Mike Howell, executive director of the think tank’s investigative arm, was in The New Yorker on March 4 that Heritage’s “investigation” of Wikipedia will be provided to “the appropriate policymakers to help inform a strategic response.”
In response to The Forward article, Wikipedia editors launched a discussion known as Request for Comment (RfC) on Jan. 8 how editors should treat the think tank’s reliability going forward. In RfCs, editors put in their “!votes” explaining their stated position on the best way to handle an issue in regards to site policy; a closer (an uninvolved Wikipedian in good standing) is often needed to render a verdict on the discussion based on the numbers and strength of the arguments presented. In this RfC, the closer, administrator “Dr vulpes,” concluded on Feb. 8 that there was consensus in favor of blacklisting the think tank; one editor explained to me that this means any links to Heritage’s website on Wikipedia will “be automatically flagged by an edit filter that will treat it like spam” and thus will be blocked from site the altogether.

“Although blacklisting is more often used to deal with spam or disruptive links it was noted that there is a possible risk to editors and the community by allowing such links to stay on the site,” Dr vulpes wrote. “As reported such links could be used to track users and editors which raised the option of blacklisting the Heritage Foundation. Several participants argued that blacklisting is the only sure way to block the direct use of heritage.org links in citations, which would prevent anyone from inadvertently clicking them. Many editors pointed out that blacklisting is not just a reliability decision but a security measure that is similar in nature to blacklisting malicious domains that track or harm our users.”

Dr vulpes also noted that myriad editors in the discussion had cited instances in which Heritage “has promoted false claims about election fraud and published unsupported scenarios about election interference. Academic sources like ‘Climate Change Counter Movement’ note Heritage Foundation’s pattern of misinterpreting evidence and promoting climate skepticism. The research cited by [another editor] shows Heritage has published disinformation about various policy matters including FDA regulations.”

The closer also noted that editors had pointed out in the discussion that blocking links to Heritage’s website would not necessarily prevent its views from discussed on Wikipedia, as any of the think tank’s views mentioned by third-party sources could be cited in articles.

“In conclusion, this discussion revolved around balancing Wikipedia’s need for reliable sources against protecting editors from a group whose published work is regarded as misleading and which appears willing to exploit links on Wikipedia to target those members of our community,” Dr vulpes added. “The pattern of misinformation, threat to our community, and the apparent ineffectiveness of lesser sanctions lead to a rough consensus that the Heritage Foundation should be blacklisted.”Image
Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
Mar 21
My cover story in this week's @JewishJournal: 🧵

An obscure Discord chat room, “Tech For Palestine,” infiltrated Wikipedia, the world’s largest information database, to spread anti-Israel propaganda. To fully understand the depth to which the TFP coordination occurred, The Journal will be publishing a 244-page dossier of screenshots from the channel taken by a source who infiltrated it, as the channel was open to the public until the beginning of September 2024.Image
On Dec. 9, Wikipedia’s Arbitration Committee (ArbCom), the site’s version of a Supreme Court, sanctioned three editors over their purported involvement in a Wikipedia channel on the “Tech for Palestine” (TFP) Discord server.

The relevant policy at hand is canvassing, meaning that any kind of offsite coordination of editing Wikipedia articles is prohibited, which is what was reportedly occurring in the Discord channel. Telling people what to edit falls under canvassing. The existence of the TFP channel has previously been reported by @J_Insider @GSDeutch, the @WikipediaFlood blog and a @PirateWires piece by @AshleyRindsberg that went viral.Image
Image
“Ïvana” was indefinitely site-banned and topic-banned from Israel-Palestine related articles, “for making edits in the Palestine-Israel topic area after off-wiki canvassing requests, and encouraging other users to game the extended confirmed restriction and engage in disruptive editing,” ArbCom announced. The “extended confirmed restriction” is a reference to how Israel-Palestine-related articles fall under extended-confirmed protection (ECP), meaning topics where only those who have been editors at least 30 days and have made at least 500 edits can make changes. Ïvana had been billed as the TFP channel’s “resident Wikipedia expert.”

“Samisawtak” was also indefinitely topic-banned from Israel-Palestine-related articles “for making edits in the PIA [Palestine-Israel articles] topic area after off-wiki canvassing requests, and violating the extended confirmed restriction in the Palestine–Israel topic area,” per ArbCom. Both Ïvana’s and Samisawtak’s sanctions can be appealed in 12 months. Samisawtak is believed to also be Samer, one of the Discord channel’s ringleaders.

“Tashmetu” had their ECP privileges revoked after ArbCom concluded that the editor had gamed the restriction; “CoolAndUniqueUsername” also had their ECP privileges revoked for the same reason, though it does not appear that CoolAndUniqueUsername was involved in the TFP channel itself.  ArbCom had made their decisions based on privately submitted evidence, according to the announcement.Image
Image
Read 21 tweets
Mar 20
My latest on @Wikipedia in @JewishJournal: 🧵

Wikipedia editors decided to place a one-year moratorium barring anyone from editing or discussing the controversial sentence in the lead of the Zionism Wikipedia page: “Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible.”Image
Middle East historian @ARomirowsky, who heads Scholars for Peace in the Middle East and the Association for Study in the Middle East and North Africa, has previously told me that this sentence in the Wikipedia page is “false” because “there are [an] abundance of diplomatic correspondents of looking to find ways for coexistence and the fact of the matter is that all those Arabs who stayed in the land and became the Arab Israelis … they became naturalized citizens because of that earlier desire for coexistence between the population of the land.” My previous reporting highlighted how the sentence resulted from anti-Israel editors primarily citing anti-Zionist historians and appearing to take a passage from one of renowned Israeli historian Benny Morris’ books out of context.
@ARomirowsky The moratorium was implemented on Feb. 21; a recent report from the @ADL cited the moratorium as an example of Wikipedia’s anti-Israel bias.
Read 12 tweets
Mar 19
This week's Campus Watch in @JewishJournal: 🧵

DOJ: Brown University Prof Deported After Attending Hezbollah Leader’s Funeral
The Department of Justice claimed that a recently deported assistant professor at Brown University’s medical school had attended Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah’s funeral and photos and videos on her phone that were sympathetic toward top Hezbollah leaders.

According to Politico, which obtained a court filing, Rasha Alawieh, 34, admitted to attending Nasrallah’s funeral and that she admired him from a religious standpoint, not a political one. Alawieh also purportedly had a picture of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei her phone; she told immigration officers that too was because of his religious teachings, not politics. A federal judge demanded that she stay until a hearing on March 17, but she was already deported to Lebanon; the government claimed that they were not aware of the order, reported CBS News. The hearing was postponed after Alawieh’s attorneys withdrew from the case and she now has a new legal team.Image
“Free Palestine” Graffiti on UMich Provost’s Home
University of Michigan Provost Laurie McCauley’s house was vandalized with graffiti stating “Free Palestine” over the weekend.

The Detroit Free Press reported that “Divest” and “No Honor in Genocide” were also spray-painted on McCauley’s house and that an object was thrown into a window. No one was injured. Police believe the vandalism likely occurred sometime between 9 pm March 15 and 8 am March 16. Police are investigating the incident and the university is assisting in the investigation.
Columbia Expels, Suspends Students Involved in Occupation of Hamilton Hall
Columbia University announced on March 13 that myriad students have been suspended and expelled from campus after occupying Hamilton Hall in April 2024.

The sanctions, according to the university’s announcement, includes “multi-year suspensions, temporary degree revocations, and expulsions.” The university did not specify how many students were sanctioned; The College Fix noted that some reports state that 22 students were sanctioned. “Columbia is committed to enforcing the University’s Rules and Policies and improving our disciplinary processes,” the announcement concluded.

As previously reported in Campus Watch, anti-Israel protesters broke windows, barricaded the doors with tables and unfurled signs saying “intifada” and “Gaza Calls, Columbia Falls” in response to the university suspending students in the encampment who refused to obey dispersal orders. A facilities worker claimed the protesters held him hostage inside the building.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(