The TDA ruling by SCOTUS was a *total loss* for the admin—and not just on process. And it was a Marbury-esque move by the Chief Justice. 🧵
The whole purpose of invoking the Alien Enemies Act was to do expedited removals without having to go through the INA administrative hearings.
9 justices said the AEA still requires some process. 4 said it requires process under the APA. 5 said it requires process under habeas corpus.
But guess what? Habeas corpus means going into federal court for every individual and all the process due—which is a lot more than the administrative process under the INA.
So the Court just said: You’re welcome to try to use the AEA (which may or may not be lawful)…but we’ve taken away your reason for wanting to use it in the first place. Thanks for playing!
In the meantime, the admin gets to claim a victory and the Court escapes unscathed. A win for the institution and the aliens who were already being detained under the INA are in no worse shape than before.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Overheard in Georgetown outside a Michelin star restaurant : “I’m a member of the new administration and the fact you don’t offer takeout food seems like proof that you’re biased against us!” [I’m not joking…this really just happened]
“Not even a salad? There are restaurants on Park Ave that offer take out. I’m from New York!”
“It’s just so DC. I don’t want to be ugly, but it’s so DC—unnecessary and inconvenient.”
A 🧵 on the future of Harvard's Federalist Society. Elections tomorrow will be run using "natural law," which they say "may mean, in some circumstances, reference to 'the law written in the hearts of men, which iniquity itself effaces not.'"
Yes, this is for a student group's election code, and as you might suspect, it reads like an immature law student. There's "notice and comment" on their election code as well as "administrative opinions" on who may vote.
Importantly, these students hate progressives, sure, but they are resentful of conservatives at least as much. The footnotes are littered with a lot of Thomas Aquinas and Adrain Vermeule as you might imagine.
What it felt like to live next door when we didn’t know how many planes were coming, whether they’d rigged the bridges to blow, if they were trying to get everyone outside for another attack. hotair.com/allahpundit/20…
Everyone is using the term “Republican Party” interchangeably to refer to two totally different political parties.
1) Goldwater-2012: project American strength abroad, abortion/guns, limited govt 2) Populist now: isolationism, anti-woke, grow govt safety net
When Trump defeated the GOP(1) in 2016 primary, it was like a new marriage. Folks assumed there was a decent chance of divorce. The Vance pick is like when the couple has a baby and you realize they’re actually serious about this.
Every other VP option (Rubio, Burgam, Haley, Stefanik) came up through GOP(1) institutions. Vance was the only guy to be a pure creation of—and owe his political success to—GOP(2).
But this is the problem: if Dems become convinced they’re going to lose either way—with either Biden or Harris, Dems are way better off losing with Biden. Here’s why:
If Biden loses, people will blame
Biden and his team. If the elites of the party/pundit class pressure Biden to step aside and Harris loses, the 1/3 of the party that still wants Biden as the nominee, will blame them and hold to the counterfactual that Biden would have won.
So it doesn’t matter that 60+% want to replace Biden. It will rip apart the party MORE if Harris loses, which isn’t a certainty but it’s at best a coin flip. So if you’re a Dem operative…
The next constitution crisis. AKA another problem w Joe Biden as the Dem nominee....a 🧵
The 12th Amendment says that the presidency goes to the person who wins the majority of electoral college votes *out of the whole number available.*
In 2020, the Supreme Court upheld state laws that bind electoral college members to vote for the candidate that wins the popular vote in the state. Over half of states have such a law and half of those have penalties for non compliance.
If Joe Biden were to win the November election but become incapacitated in December, the electors in those states would still be legally obligated to vote for him. Other electors, though, would be free to vote for Harris (or someone else).